" FAO all members "

All I will say is the TRUTH is out there.

Tan stripped our club of its identity,divided our fans,made us a laughing stock and our debt under Tan rose to an incredible £170 million and guess what we are back in the Championship,with less fans than before Tan came.

I could write a book, just on the Tan Circus

Sad Facts,the Truth hurts

If you are an eternal pessimist then yes you could sum up Tan’s ownership like that. Of course I could say in response that he “listened” to the fan base and returned our colours/bluebird, he took us to the Premiership were our fan numbers definitely increased (despite the rebrand and relegation) and he has kept the club afloat with his own personal cash.

It is a matter of balance and as others have said I would prefer the devil we know. After all Tan wouldn’t rebrand us again, but possibly a new owner could?

Rather than holding petty grudges over matters which have been resolved, fans and I mean all fans should show some passion towards getting our team promoted again rather just moaning over the past.

The real post of the year.

What about a TAN OUT smiley?

We've got a Slade Out we're just missing a Tan Out

Unless you have an alternative then I don't get it.

We are in blue, with the bluebird and it seems being made self sufficient. Isn't this what we want?
What more do you want from an owner going forward?

Yes we've got our blue back but we should never have lost it in the first place, under Tan our club is a laughing stock.

Your right we shouldn't have but I don't see the point in looking backwards, what does that gain us?

If a new owner came in half way through last season and said ill return the blue, charge no interest on the current debt while reducing the debt and making much needed cut backs to the squad to enable us to be self sufficient I think everyone would be over the moon.

I don't go along with this laughing stock, no one is laughing, they were probably but much worse teams struggling.

What about a TAN OUT smiley?

We've got a Slade Out we're just missing a Tan Out

Unless you have an alternative then I don't get it.

We are in blue, with the bluebird and it seems being made self sufficient. Isn't this what we want?
What more do you want from an owner going forward?

Yes we've got our blue back but we should never have lost it in the first place, under Tan our club is a laughing stock.

Your right we shouldn't have but I don't see the point in looking backwards, what does that gain us?

If a new owner came in half way through last season and said ill return the blue, charge no interest on the current debt while reducing the debt and making much needed cut backs to the squad to enable us to be self sufficient I think everyone would be over the moon.

I don't go along with this laughing stock, no one is laughing, they were probably but much worse teams struggling.

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Cheers lads

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Answer the question Annis.

But it still shocks me how people want an owner who has changed our badge and identity, who employed a painter to work as a chief executive at our club and who thought Marshall should be scoring goals - The Tan lovers need to wake up and smell the roses

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Answer the question Annis.

The question?


I dont see any positives in Tan staying.

But it still shocks me how people want an owner who has changed our badge and identity, who employed a painter to work as a chief executive at our club and who thought Marshall should be scoring goals - The Tan lovers need to wake up and smell the roses

Almost word for word what Annis wrote in another post. Christ sake mate get your own view. The goalkeeper thing is complete bullshit.

Also I bet even a painter and decorator wouldn't have bought Cornelius for 8.5 million.

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Answer the question Annis.

The question?


I dont see any positives in Tan staying.

The question is what do you actually want from Tan?

I'll add who is there to take over from him and how do you see that working out?

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Answer the question Annis.

The question?


I dont see any positives in Tan staying.

The question is what do you actually want from Tan?

I'll add who is there to take over from him and how do you see that working out?

I want him to leave and to at least cut our debt down to bare minimum even if he does not do what he promised 4 years ago to make us debt free.

I will answer who knows? but there is always someone around the corner,but the way Tan has run our club, that is now back firing on him as the debt is outrageous and we have looked like a joke club.

But I mean this,if he sorts out the mess he has created,City will sell.

33,000 Stadium,years of over 20,000 season ticket holders and 260,000 names on our fan base etc etc

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Answer the question Annis.

The question?


I dont see any positives in Tan staying.

The question is what do you actually want from Tan?

I'll add who is there to take over from him and how do you see that working out?

I want him to leave and to at least cut our debt down to bare minimum even if he does not do what he promised 4 years ago to make us debt free.

I will answer who knows? but there is always someone around the corner,but the way Tan has run our club, that is now back firing on him as the debt is outrageous and we have looked like a joke club.

But I mean this,if he sorts out the mess he has created,City will sell.

33,000 Stadium,years of over 20,000 season ticket holders and 260,000 names on our fan base etc etc

Debt free was linked to the rebrand. That's been reversed. I don't see why Tan would now make us debt free unless to sell us.

:?:

Mason, started this thread in a joking manner,everyone is taking life to serious,lighten up

Ha ha Agree Annis

Maybe so but it still brings up a good debate, going forward what do people actually want from Tan. He had done plenty wrong but since the rebrand was reversed I can only see positives. His choice of manager isn't my choice but then plenty of owners and chairman pick unpopular managers.

Luke as you know, you and I love good debates and of course Neil, So well done Mason

Answer the question Annis.

The question?


I dont see any positives in Tan staying.

The question is what do you actually want from Tan?

I'll add who is there to take over from him and how do you see that working out?

I want him to leave and to at least cut our debt down to bare minimum even if he does not do what he promised 4 years ago to make us debt free.

I will answer who knows? but there is always someone around the corner,but the way Tan has run our club, that is now back firing on him as the debt is outrageous and we have looked like a joke club.

But I mean this,if he sorts out the mess he has created,City will sell.

33,000 Stadium,years of over 20,000 season ticket holders and 260,000 names on our fan base etc etc

Debt free was linked to the rebrand. That's been reversed. I don't see why Tan would now make us debt free unless to sell us.

Debt Free, was said 4 years ago and was said before it and during it.

Neil, I give up on you

But it still shocks me how people want an owner who has changed our badge and identity, who employed a painter to work as a chief executive at our club and who thought Marshall should be scoring goals - The Tan lovers need to wake up and smell the roses

Almost word for word what Annis wrote in another post. Christ sake mate get your own view. The goalkeeper thing is complete bullshit.

Also I bet even a painter and decorator wouldn't have bought Cornelius for 8.5 million.

Get your facts right mate, Tan actually came out and said - Marshall should score a few goals a season. Clueless owner - and to employ a decorator because he was his son's mate complete madness. Think you and only a few other cannot see what Tan has done to our club and the sooner he leaves the better for all of us - except the few tan lovers

But it still shocks me how people want an owner who has changed our badge and identity, who employed a painter to work as a chief executive at our club and who thought Marshall should be scoring goals - The Tan lovers need to wake up and smell the roses

Almost word for word what Annis wrote in another post. Christ sake mate get your own view. The goalkeeper thing is complete bullshit.

Also I bet even a painter and decorator wouldn't have bought Cornelius for 8.5 million.

Get your facts right mate, Tan actually came out and said - Marshall should score a few goals a season. Clueless owner - and to employ a decorator because he was his son's mate complete madness. Think you and only a few other cannot see what Tan has done to our club and the sooner he leaves the better for all of us - except the few tan lovers

Mason, Neil, Tan said it in the Directors box and many heard him.

Neil, for gods sake, your sticking up for Tan no matter what

Neil, Im not on my own, thousands want Tan out

This started off as a joke but it looks like Neil has taken it a bit seriously

This started off as a joke but it looks like Neil has taken it a bit seriously

Mason, when it comes to Tans Circus Neil will fight to the end

Fair Play he gives a good debate though

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

Steve
There is balance, read the thread,we are both giving as good as we get

This started off as a joke but it looks like Neil has taken it a bit seriously

Mason, when it comes to Tans Circus Neil will fight to the end

Fair Play he gives a good debate though

Ha ha yes I've certainly got a good debate going Annis

This started off as a joke but it looks like Neil has taken it a bit seriously

Mason, when it comes to Tans Circus Neil will fight to the end

Fair Play he gives a good debate though

Ha ha yes I've certainly got a good debate going Annis

You have Mason

Now we only need Neil to admit,Tan when it comes to football is a complete clown

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

Steve
There is balance, read the thread,we are both giving as good as we get

Actually meant by certain individuals and not this thread in gerneral

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

Steve
There is balance, read the thread,we are both giving as good as we get

Actually meant by certain individuals and not this thread in gerneral

Steve, I make No apologies, I will only be happy once Tan has gone

BUT I WILL SUPPORT MY TEAM NO MATTER WHAT


I support Cardiff City,not the Regime

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

Steve
There is balance, read the thread,we are both giving as good as we get

Actually meant by certain individuals and not this thread in gerneral

Steve, I make No apologies, I will only be happy once Tan has gone

BUT I WILL SUPPORT MY TEAM NO MATTER WHAT

And so do i - owners/players come and go but with the figures involved these days not sure who will take us over and without a wealthy backer the only way is down
Anyway my point is like me you will be there no matter what so why not try and encourage some positivity in those who are not so committed - people like that reading all the negativity are hardly likely to be encouraged to come and support us


I support Cardiff City,not the Regime

And its the same the other way whereby some will continually kick Tan no matter what he does
Some balance would be nice

Steve
There is balance, read the thread,we are both giving as good as we get

Actually meant by certain individuals and not this thread in gerneral

Steve, I make No apologies, I will only be happy once Tan has gone

BUT I WILL SUPPORT MY TEAM NO MATTER WHAT

And so do i - owners/players come and go but with the figures involved these days not sure who will take us over and without a wealthy backer the only way is down
Anyway my point is like me you will be there no matter what so why not try and encourage some positivity in those who are not so committed - people like that reading all the negativity are hardly likely to be encouraged to come and support us


I support Cardiff City,not the Regime

That did not quite work but the point is there

The Tan lovers need to wake up - clueless owner with no football knowledge...