Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:17 pm
Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:49 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:52 pm
Pulisnewport wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
It's blatantly obvious that when Harris came on and played through the middle the game changed.
Will our Management team see this and play him from the start on Tuesday?
Makes me laugh when I see us buying all these players and it's one right under our (Managements) noses that delivers
Sun Jan 18, 2015 1:11 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Pulisnewport wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
It's blatantly obvious that when Harris came on and played through the middle the game changed.
Will our Management team see this and play him from the start on Tuesday?
Makes me laugh when I see us buying all these players and it's one right under our (Managements) noses that delivers
![]()
Ive said for weeks Kadeem,Ralls and John could help this team![]()
Kadeem changed the game yesterday![]()
Sun Jan 18, 2015 1:39 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Pulisnewport wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
It's blatantly obvious that when Harris came on and played through the middle the game changed.
Will our Management team see this and play him from the start on Tuesday?
Makes me laugh when I see us buying all these players and it's one right under our (Managements) noses that delivers
![]()
Ive said for weeks Kadeem,Ralls and John could help this team![]()
Kadeem changed the game yesterday![]()
Annis, as I said to you at half time, that penalty from Whitts showed a complete lack of confidence, which is concerning from a player who is usually so reliable, have the players already lost confidence in Slade and his methods/ tactics??
I am really not happy with persisting with Le Fondre up front, how many more games are we giving this guy ?
I thought Maloney looked very ordinary, made a number of mistakes, a couple almost cost us more goals, he is no better than what we already have, so what's the point?
The two goals made us look more respectable, but in fairness it should have been 4 or 5 to them, if Redmonds shot had gone in, I think that we would have been looking at 5/6 nil
Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:07 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Pulisnewport wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
It's blatantly obvious that when Harris came on and played through the middle the game changed.
Will our Management team see this and play him from the start on Tuesday?
Makes me laugh when I see us buying all these players and it's one right under our (Managements) noses that delivers
![]()
Ive said for weeks Kadeem,Ralls and John could help this team![]()
Kadeem changed the game yesterday![]()
Annis, as I said to you at half time, that penalty from Whitts showed a complete lack of confidence, which is concerning from a player who is usually so reliable, have the players already lost confidence in Slade and his methods/ tactics??
I am really not happy with persisting with Le Fondre up front, how many more games are we giving this guy ?
I thought Maloney looked very ordinary, made a number of mistakes, a couple almost cost us more goals, he is no better than what we already have, so what's the point?
The two goals made us look more respectable, but in fairness it should have been 4 or 5 to them, if Redmonds shot had gone in, I think that we would have been looking at 5/6 nil
Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:17 am
tenerife_blu wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Pulisnewport wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
It's blatantly obvious that when Harris came on and played through the middle the game changed.
Will our Management team see this and play him from the start on Tuesday?
Makes me laugh when I see us buying all these players and it's one right under our (Managements) noses that delivers
![]()
Ive said for weeks Kadeem,Ralls and John could help this team![]()
Kadeem changed the game yesterday![]()
Annis, as I said to you at half time, that penalty from Whitts showed a complete lack of confidence, which is concerning from a player who is usually so reliable, have the players already lost confidence in Slade and his methods/ tactics??
I am really not happy with persisting with Le Fondre up front, how many more games are we giving this guy ?
I thought Maloney looked very ordinary, made a number of mistakes, a couple almost cost us more goals, he is no better than what we already have, so what's the point?
The two goals made us look more respectable, but in fairness it should have been 4 or 5 to them, if Redmonds shot had gone in, I think that we would have been looking at 5/6 nil
When did we sign Maloney?![]()
Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:37 pm
Forever Blue wrote:tenerife_blu wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Pulisnewport wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Mel86 wrote:Nothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
Were not playing decent 442 our defence is leaky but it's hardly like were making up for it with our poor attacking play
Spot on MelNothing wrong with a bit of 442 - its who and how you're playing it
It's blatantly obvious that when Harris came on and played through the middle the game changed.
Will our Management team see this and play him from the start on Tuesday?
Makes me laugh when I see us buying all these players and it's one right under our (Managements) noses that delivers
![]()
Ive said for weeks Kadeem,Ralls and John could help this team![]()
Kadeem changed the game yesterday![]()
Annis, as I said to you at half time, that penalty from Whitts showed a complete lack of confidence, which is concerning from a player who is usually so reliable, have the players already lost confidence in Slade and his methods/ tactics??
I am really not happy with persisting with Le Fondre up front, how many more games are we giving this guy ?
I thought Maloney looked very ordinary, made a number of mistakes, a couple almost cost us more goals, he is no better than what we already have, so what's the point?
The two goals made us look more respectable, but in fairness it should have been 4 or 5 to them, if Redmonds shot had gone in, I think that we would have been looking at 5/6 nil
When did we sign Maloney?![]()
About 10 days ago Steve.