Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:06 pm
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:08 pm
davids wrote:If there's one thing we should know about Sam Hammam it's not to believe one single word that comes out of his mouth.
Still waiting for him to repay that £500,000 he shafted the club for seconds before we almost went bust.
I think the appropriate phrase is "Out of the frying pan into the fire"
Why so many people want to see the return of the man who brought the club to it's knees through incompetence and mismanagement I do not understand.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:11 pm
wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:12 pm
Einstein wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:By the way I want Tan out, but we're all hypocrites, we all cheered when we beat Man City, when we got promoted. Tan enabled that with his money, yes it's owed, but without his funds we'd not have got there. Even Annis et al with their we were always against the rebrand, they all cheer when city players paid for by Tan scored.
Bollocks.
You need to learn the difference between supporting the team and supporting the regime.
Tan came to this club not to win us over but make money. If it was not for us supporting the team over the years the likes if Tan would never have the opportunity to make more money.
I agree support the team but don't by a hypocrite, who paid for medel caulker Campbell etc
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:12 pm
wez1927 wrote:davids wrote:If there's one thing we should know about Sam Hammam it's not to believe one single word that comes out of his mouth.
Still waiting for him to repay that £500,000 he shafted the club for seconds before we almost went bust.
I think the appropriate phrase is "Out of the frying pan into the fire"
Why so many people want to see the return of the man who brought the club to it's knees through incompetence and mismanagement I do not understand.
Only some off the inner circle want him back most fans want him and tan gone
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:13 pm
wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:15 pm
eddiep wrote:wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Not saying I ant Sam back but if it were a choice between Sam or Vincent
I would go for Sam.
He started the momentum that stabilised Cardiff as a championship club.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:18 pm
davids wrote:eddiep wrote:wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Not saying I ant Sam back but if it were a choice between Sam or Vincent
I would go for Sam.
He started the momentum that stabilised Cardiff as a championship club.
And started the momentum that sees us where we are today, as well as taking us to being within minutes of going bust.
The man is untrustworthy and as selfish and self obsessed as Tan but without the money.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:24 pm
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:24 pm
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:33 pm
he's better than your mate Sam ,hope he has nothing to do with the club ,Sam the ultimate leach done very well out of Cardiff and played the fans a treat ,still got his puppet s doing his pr todayForever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Wez, Anyone is better than Dictator TanI know u wont agree as u have always supported Tan, no matter what he has done to our club
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:39 pm
wez1927 wrote:he's better than your mate Sam ,hope he has nothing to do with the club ,Sam the ultimate leach done very well out of Cardiff and played the fans a treat ,still got his puppet s doing his pr todayForever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Wez, Anyone is better than Dictator TanI know u wont agree as u have always supported Tan, no matter what he has done to our club
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:40 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:By the way I want Tan out, but we're all hypocrites, we all cheered when we beat Man City, when we got promoted. Tan enabled that with his money, yes it's owed, but without his funds we'd not have got there. Even Annis et al with their we were always against the rebrand, they all cheer when city players paid for by Tan scored.
Bollocks.
You need to learn the difference between supporting the team and supporting the regime.
Tan came to this club not to win us over but make money. If it was not for us supporting the team over the years the likes if Tan would never have the opportunity to make more money.
I agree support the team but don't by a hypocrite, who paid for medel caulker Campbell etc
Yes but look at it this way:
Unless a buyer is found Tan is going to take us down to league one with his cost cutting now. He is going in the opposite direction to splashing out the money. He will be with us for another 2 seasons until the parachute payments have dried up. n that time we will have a squad of league one players plus a league one manager. Don't be surprised if we do end up in league one.
Final chapter of the book of Tan is he would have recouped his money by taking the parachute payments and selling the club at a reasonable price because the books are balanced. We will most likely be in league one and gone back 10 years. If all this happens which is likely what will we all think of Tan then?
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:41 pm
don't love tan love Cardiff city better the devil you know in tan ,owners come and goForever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:he's better than your mate Sam ,hope he has nothing to do with the club ,Sam the ultimate leach done very well out of Cardiff and played the fans a treat ,still got his puppet s doing his pr todayForever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Wez, Anyone is better than Dictator TanI know u wont agree as u have always supported Tan, no matter what he has done to our club
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wez, like most things,WE TOTALLY DISAGREE YET AGAIN![]()
![]()
![]()
You can love Tan all you want,I despise and hate the Dictator![]()
![]()
I speak my own mind and you know that![]()
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:44 pm
Forever Blue wrote:np20 wrote:wez1927 wrote:carlccfc wrote:Bluebina wrote:He wanted us in black and yellow and changed the badge, now he's jumping on the blue shirt issue...........
He also consulted and listened, big difference and kept us Blue![]()
and nearly cost us our club
exactly,
the guys a cancer
I agree Sam made many mistakes,but that word should never ever be used.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:45 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:By the way I want Tan out, but we're all hypocrites, we all cheered when we beat Man City, when we got promoted. Tan enabled that with his money, yes it's owed, but without his funds we'd not have got there. Even Annis et al with their we were always against the rebrand, they all cheer when city players paid for by Tan scored.
Bollocks.
You need to learn the difference between supporting the team and supporting the regime.
Tan came to this club not to win us over but make money. If it was not for us supporting the team over the years the likes if Tan would never have the opportunity to make more money.
I agree support the team but don't by a hypocrite, who paid for medel caulker Campbell etc
Yes but look at it this way:
Unless a buyer is found Tan is going to take us down to league one with his cost cutting now. He is going in the opposite direction to splashing out the money. He will be with us for another 2 seasons until the parachute payments have dried up. n that time we will have a squad of league one players plus a league one manager. Don't be surprised if we do end up in league one.
Final chapter of the book of Tan is he would have recouped his money by taking the parachute payments and selling the club at a reasonable price because the books are balanced. We will most likely be in league one and gone back 10 years. If all this happens which is likely what will we all think of Tan then?
Well we won't be in debt? And the fans will get 3 wishes fulfilled tan gone, back in blue (hopefully), & in div 1
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:51 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Einstein wrote:By the way I want Tan out, but we're all hypocrites, we all cheered when we beat Man City, when we got promoted. Tan enabled that with his money, yes it's owed, but without his funds we'd not have got there. Even Annis et al with their we were always against the rebrand, they all cheer when city players paid for by Tan scored.
Bollocks.
You need to learn the difference between supporting the team and supporting the regime.
Tan came to this club not to win us over but make money. If it was not for us supporting the team over the years the likes if Tan would never have the opportunity to make more money.
I agree support the team but don't by a hypocrite, who paid for medel caulker Campbell etc
Yes but look at it this way:
Unless a buyer is found Tan is going to take us down to league one with his cost cutting now. He is going in the opposite direction to splashing out the money. He will be with us for another 2 seasons until the parachute payments have dried up. n that time we will have a squad of league one players plus a league one manager. Don't be surprised if we do end up in league one.
Final chapter of the book of Tan is he would have recouped his money by taking the parachute payments and selling the club at a reasonable price because the books are balanced. We will most likely be in league one and gone back 10 years. If all this happens which is likely what will we all think of Tan then?
Well we won't be in debt? And the fans will get 3 wishes fulfilled tan gone, back in blue (hopefully), & in div 1
Yep ad I'm prepared for it.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:53 pm
eddiep wrote:wez1927 wrote:agree with you ,only a saviour to some on here who miss the inner circle daysswansea jack wrote:why do you think he is some sort of saviour he was the cause of what is happening at present langstone and all that the mans a joke id be tamping with the prick anywhere near the place ffs annis and carl get out of his arse.
Not saying I ant Sam back but if it were a choice between Sam or Vincent
I would go for Sam.
He started the momentum that stabilised Cardiff as a championship club.
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:55 pm
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:57 pm
Daya wrote:Well blow me over with a feather !
Nukes didn't get that one right !
Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:59 pm
Daya wrote:Well blow me over with a feather !
Nukes didn't get that one right !
Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:02 pm
Daya wrote:Well blow me over with a feather !
Nukes didn't get that one right !
Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:04 pm
Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:09 pm
wez1927 wrote:Daya wrote:Well blow me over with a feather !
Nukes didn't get that one right !
David gold Steve lol
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:18 am
Daya wrote:Well blow me over with a feather !
Nukes didn't get that one right !
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:22 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Daya wrote:Well blow me over with a feather !
Nukes didn't get that one right !
But Steven but did I mention any names in my threads ? Nah others named Sam I didnt. But you can confirm I'm sure that 2 different people are trying to put consortiums together ?![]()
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:26 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:27 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:29 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:10 am
Daya wrote:Refresh my memory ... Didn't SH say he wasn't Langstone and did anyone ever prove he was ?