' POLL ' So what is the priority to you then as a City Fan ?

I can't believe some have voted for PL.

Even the jaxx I know, joking aside, have sympathy for the way we've been treated!! There is no dilemma with this poll. BLUE every time. I'd rather see BLUEbirds playing in a lower league for the time being.

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

I hit the wrong button. So irritating on a pod. Should be 81 votes for blue.

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

The fans are the life blood of the club. He didn't ask me if I was prepared to accept red under the terms of his offer. If he had, I would have told him to stuff it. I bet he didn't ask you either, or the thousands of others who have supported this club for many years. To top things off , emperor Ming hasn't kept his promises either.

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Nukes you can't have it both ways. There was either no one who wanted the rebrand or people were duped into it. You are trying to use both arguments to suit your agenda.

Why not the team? People like me not bothered by shirt or premier! Its team and name that's important to me!

I voted back to the Premier League.

I see this as the only way we will regain our identity once Vincent Tan sells the club.

At present we have NO appeal to prospective buyers, an under achieving squad, huge debt, and a split fan base.

Easy one this. Tradition, History & Identity over everything else.

Fuk the premier league it was shit anyway,even if we went back up it wouldn't repair what's happened to our club,nothing ever will repair wat tan has done to us,the day he goes a lot of city fans will breath a sigh of relief

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Nukes you can't have it both ways. There was either no one who wanted the rebrand or people were duped into it. You are trying to use both arguments to suit your agenda.

No agenda Chief for me I was against it from the start. I new red or dead was a lie. But for many they saw this as the truth and were duped into these lies.

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Nukes you can't have it both ways. There was either no one who wanted the rebrand or people were duped into it. You are trying to use both arguments to suit your agenda.

No agenda Chief for me I was against it from the start. I new red or dead was a lie. But for many they saw this as the truth and were duped into these lies.

Everyone has an agenda. Yours is that you want blue back. In fairness you were solid from the start with that agenda. I say agenda as in something you want not anything nefarious which some take it to mean.

A full return to Blue and Tan long gone. In the past there might have been a compromise, but not now, he is destroying the club.

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Nukes you can't have it both ways. There was either no one who wanted the rebrand or people were duped into it. You are trying to use both arguments to suit your agenda.

No agenda Chief for me I was against it from the start. I new red or dead was a lie. But for many they saw this as the truth and were duped into these lies.

Nukes who actually said red or dead?

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Nukes you can't have it both ways. There was either no one who wanted the rebrand or people were duped into it. You are trying to use both arguments to suit your agenda.

No agenda Chief for me I was against it from the start. I new red or dead was a lie. But for many they saw this as the truth and were duped into these lies.

Nukes who actually said red or dead?

Do you know what it was a term so widely used back then I have no idea now Believe some fans leaders said it first then everyone was saying it.

Many of the fans have very short memories. I want us to play in blue as much as anybody else, but Tan's terms for investment were very clear from the start, further confirmed when he pulled out temporarily then came back to the table.
Take the emotion out of equation, a change to red was the main part of his offer, whether we like it or not.
We all know -
1. He has no regard for the club's history
2. He has no relationshio with the fanbase BUT
3. We knew the conditions under which he was investing

Thank you for your fictional biography but how the fook did you vote Chief ?

How is that fictional Nukes? It's all correct. True there was no poll of season ticket holders but there were many who wanted the investment. Our problems started with the Malaysian flags etc welcoming him. It showed how desperate we were.

Chief it was intimidation and lies that got the City Fans to reluctantly except the re brand. Red or dead was a lie. So it wasn't so much I will put a hundred mill in it was the lies from certain fans leaders with an agenda telling massive porkies. Instead of saying lets stand up for our Club and saying no and he would of backed down we was walked all over. What he was saying Chief I feel to be misleading and incorrect

Nukes you can't have it both ways. There was either no one who wanted the rebrand or people were duped into it. You are trying to use both arguments to suit your agenda.

No agenda Chief for me I was against it from the start. I new red or dead was a lie. But for many they saw this as the truth and were duped into these lies.

Nukes who actually said red or dead?

Do you know what it was a term so widely used back then I have no idea now Believe some fans leaders said it first then everyone was saying it.

Funny until we started playing shit I had barely heard red or dead.

Ridiculous poll. Too late. That horse has bolted and many, many more than are choosing Premiership now chose it when it mattered.

Neil, Uve stuck up for Tan ect from day one, whats your views nowadays???

Ridiculous poll. Too late. That horse has bolted and many, many more than are choosing Premiership now chose it when it mattered.

Neil, Uve stuck up for Tan ect from day one, whats your views nowadays???

Annis my viewpoint has never changed. I am grateful that he invested in our club to save us from liquidation. Your viewpoint has never changed in that you wanted us back to blue throughout. There are many who are bandwagon jumping because we aren't doing so well.

It's clearly all gone Pete Tong at the club but that's not all his fault as I feel the fans are also to blame. As I have said to you on many occasions we lost the club in the build up to the FA Cup Final.

It's ironic what should have been the best days for our club turned into the worst.