Mon Nov 17, 2014 6:53 pm
Mon Nov 17, 2014 8:01 pm
Mon Nov 17, 2014 8:10 pm
Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I don't profess to know a lot about airports but the one thing we have in our favour, over Bristol, is the WAG.
If the WAG wanted to it could "arrange" for the size of the runway to be increased and also "arrange" for free/cheaper runway fees for the airlines.
The result would be more flights into South Wales. Benefits to the communities in both West and South Wales and economic improvements as well.
Paul, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the runway already long enough to take 747 (Jumbo) Jets??
Last time I spoke to anyone from there, I was told that the big issue was (as you say) the relatively extortionate Landing Fees for airlines landing this side of the Channel versus the Brrrsol side
That may have changed under WAG??
Mon Nov 17, 2014 8:11 pm
barry boy wrote:the flights from cardiff to dusseldorf is not a fair comparison to Bristol services.
If Bristol had the same flights to Germany, it too would have few passengers.
Of course lots of people want to go to Spain, Prague, Portugal and ski resorts...they just happen to be going from Bristol.
They are going from Bristol now because of the excessive charges Cardiff charged for planes in past years. hopefully these reported charges re now being reduced.
Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:33 pm
wez1927 wrote:Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I don't profess to know a lot about airports but the one thing we have in our favour, over Bristol, is the WAG.
If the WAG wanted to it could "arrange" for the size of the runway to be increased and also "arrange" for free/cheaper runway fees for the airlines.
The result would be more flights into South Wales. Benefits to the communities in both West and South Wales and economic improvements as well.
Paul, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the runway already long enough to take 747 (Jumbo) Jets??
Last time I spoke to anyone from there, I was told that the big issue was (as you say) the relatively extortionate Landing Fees for airlines landing this side of the Channel versus the Brrrsol side
That may have changed under WAG??
The runway is long enough to land with passangers but can only take off with minium weight not a full load
Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:15 am
pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I don't profess to know a lot about airports but the one thing we have in our favour, over Bristol, is the WAG.
If the WAG wanted to it could "arrange" for the size of the runway to be increased and also "arrange" for free/cheaper runway fees for the airlines.
The result would be more flights into South Wales. Benefits to the communities in both West and South Wales and economic improvements as well.
Paul, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the runway already long enough to take 747 (Jumbo) Jets??
Last time I spoke to anyone from there, I was told that the big issue was (as you say) the relatively extortionate Landing Fees for airlines landing this side of the Channel versus the Brrrsol side
That may have changed under WAG??
The runway is long enough to land with passangers but can only take off with minium weight not a full load
true wez and advantage rhoose as over bristol aswell is our runway can be expanded bristols cannot hence any flight from bristol to usa carribean ect ect or further needs to refuel cannot go direct! but you can from rhoose using wide body jets
Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:54 am
Sven wrote:pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I don't profess to know a lot about airports but the one thing we have in our favour, over Bristol, is the WAG.
If the WAG wanted to it could "arrange" for the size of the runway to be increased and also "arrange" for free/cheaper runway fees for the airlines.
The result would be more flights into South Wales. Benefits to the communities in both West and South Wales and economic improvements as well.
Paul, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the runway already long enough to take 747 (Jumbo) Jets??
Last time I spoke to anyone from there, I was told that the big issue was (as you say) the relatively extortionate Landing Fees for airlines landing this side of the Channel versus the Brrrsol side
That may have changed under WAG??
The runway is long enough to land with passangers but can only take off with minium weight not a full load
true wez and advantage rhoose as over bristol aswell is our runway can be expanded bristols cannot hence any flight from bristol to usa carribean ect ect or further needs to refuel cannot go direct! but you can from rhoose using wide body jets
Thanks, Allan (and Wez)![]()
I flew to Florida from Cardiff a couple of times in the past (with Monarch the last time, I think) and always find the airport pretty good whenever I use it and it will always get my support. Wales needs its own transport hub, if it is to continue with its quest for more autonomy and attract business investment
Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:06 am
Thu Jan 08, 2015 10:48 pm
Thu Jan 08, 2015 10:56 pm
wez1927 wrote:Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I don't profess to know a lot about airports but the one thing we have in our favour, over Bristol, is the WAG.
If the WAG wanted to it could "arrange" for the size of the runway to be increased and also "arrange" for free/cheaper runway fees for the airlines.
The result would be more flights into South Wales. Benefits to the communities in both West and South Wales and economic improvements as well.
Paul, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the runway already long enough to take 747 (Jumbo) Jets??
Last time I spoke to anyone from there, I was told that the big issue was (as you say) the relatively extortionate Landing Fees for airlines landing this side of the Channel versus the Brrrsol side
That may have changed under WAG??
The runway is long enough to land with passangers but can only take off with minium weight not a full load
Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:19 pm
Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:20 pm
Military Junta wrote:When are you going to realise that I was right about it being a waste of taxpayers money from the start!!!
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/business/b ... rf-8109311
Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:40 pm
Wed Mar 04, 2015 8:16 pm
adamt958 wrote:Currently in Dubai having flown from Cardiff (via Amsterdam) with KLM. Although it is a small airport. The space in the departure lounge is non existent, it is so cramped, there is also a big Swansea City FC section in there but no Cardiff.
The new routes is great news.
But the airport needs major transport links. No one wants to drive through Barry or down five mile lane to get to the airport. It needs a duel carriageway from the A48 at Culverhouse Cross. Or from the nearest point on the M4. The train links are good. (Potentially talking about half hourly services instead of hourly over the VOG line which serves Rhoose/Cardiff International Airport).
The airport is a major eyesore tjough. But they are trying to get it back to a sustainable level, and it's a lot better now than in my last visit in 2008.
give it time it will improve Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:56 pm
Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:44 am