Mike hall has got a book coming out

Carl, so basically what you are now saying is that you are upset by the methods used by PMG, Peter Ridsdale and Michael Isaacs to oust Sam Hammam(which I agree were hardly the most honourable of methods)and nothing really to do with PMG making money ( which was pointed out to you when you first raised the subject ages ago you had misunderstood financially).
I am still puzzled why you refuse to be critical of Michael Isaac.What link does he have to this message board?

As far as I am aware MI has no link to this message board, I don't know why you are alluding that he may have or that I have any thoughts about him.

I don't really know him, met him briefly on two or three occasions.

correct me if i am wrong but pmg have got the rent from the retail park which is worth 4m at least a year!! that was part of the deal, along with premier seating income? that part of deal as been finished and city have the income now from premier seats but not retail park, someone somewhere within pmg have probably and still are making a mint out of city still!

Don't be so daft Allan, people want us to believe that pmg made nothing out of the stadium or retail park

how much did pmg pay the council for the land then carl which then went toward the cost of building the stadium. how much did it cost pmg to develop the land and build all the buildings on the retail park.
without pmg there would have been no stadium full stop.
always amazes me how you campaigned for sam to get his money back plus interest after wasting millions of pounds of money yet the one guy who has used his money to benefit the club shouldent make a penny in your eyes
sam dident have the money or a business plan to take the club forward you need to get over it

You said earlier in the thread that Mike Hall made nothing,

Pmg including Mike Hall made money, that's my point.

It is not about them making money, I have nothing against anyone making money when they put money in, it is how they get their hands on the deal and who was shafted along the way which makes my blood boil.

I don't understand can someone explain who's been shafted ?, I don't know the boardroom people, but all I know is, tan and Sam have been 2 owners who have come close to destroying the club in their own way, so I don't understand what's. Wrong with mike hall, Borely, and this Issac guy, and tbh I have never really heard of thrm

FAO Steve Davies


Give us a ring

Carl, so basically what you are now saying is that you are upset by the methods used by PMG, Peter Ridsdale and Michael Isaacs to oust Sam Hammam(which I agree were hardly the most honourable of methods)and nothing really to do with PMG making money ( which was pointed out to you when you first raised the subject ages ago you had misunderstood financially).
I am still puzzled why you refuse to be critical of Michael Isaac.What link does he have to this message board?

As far as I am aware MI has no link to this message board, I don't know why you are alluding that he may have or that I have any thoughts about him.

I don't really know him, met him briefly on two or three occasions.

Carl

The reason for my query is that you have had a real go against PMG on two occasions now , both shortly after meeting up with Sam who , as I have said , probably has good reason to feel aggrieved about the part PMG played in the coup to remove him from the club. On the first occasion , it was clearly shown that the basis of your/Sam`s claims about PMG making unfair £millions out of CCFC had little or no foundation in fact , yet the accusation is repeated again now and people like Steve Davies etc have had to point this out again in this thread.

Fair enough for you to support Sam in this but you fail to criticise any other party who also took part in Sam`s removal , including an individual - Michael Isaac - who , when the club was on the bones of its a*se , charged it ridiculously high rates of interest on a loan (nobody else , including Sam , PMG ,Steve Borley etc did). Using your terminology , do you not think that this was the action of a "parasite" against CCFC?

It seems strange to me that you are quick to criticise someone (on the basis of known facts seemingly unfairly) while failing to criticise another individual who is on public record as having made an interest "killing" to the detriment of the club.

Keith

Keith,

The thread is discussing Mike Hall.

There is a clue in the header.

There have been a number of parasites who have bled Cardiff City FC but this thread is about Mike Hall and his book.

bleedin hell you,ve had some dodgy (allegedly)blokes around yr club.im starting to feel sentimental to carson yeung

Keith,

The thread is discussing Mike Hall.

There is a clue in the header.

There have been a number of parasites who have bled Cardiff City FC but this thread is about Mike Hall and his book.

Sam done very well out of Cardiff city ,he didn't loss a penny now he's been paid out by tan

Keith,

The thread is discussing Mike Hall.

There is a clue in the header.

There have been a number of parasites who have bled Cardiff City FC but this thread is about Mike Hall and his book.

Sam done very well out of Cardiff city ,he didn't loss a penny now he's been paid out by tan

True, Correct Tan has paid Langston and yet everyone said he wont pay and they will find corruption etc ? ? ?