Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:29 pm
pembroke allan wrote:6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's second half,ministration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
Whilst was excellent result up to that free kick you never looked like scoring second half despite montero running rings around chambers most game!. Still early days
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:31 pm
waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
which is exactly the same as happened to us , they didn't have to accept but came to an agreement
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:33 pm
pembroke allan wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
which is exactly the same as happened to us , they didn't have to accept but came to an agreement
Think pennies in the pound in Swansea's case is slightly different to to what hamman excepted? And who knows actual amount was owed to Sam? And admin is not what was agreed with Sam? so cannot possibly compare like for like. Unless want a never ending debate again!
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:37 pm
pembroke allan wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
which is exactly the same as happened to us , they didn't have to accept but came to an agreement
Think pennies in the pound in Swansea's case is slightly different to to what hamman excepted? And who knows actual amount was owed to Sam? And admin is not what was agreed with Sam? so cannot possibly compare like for like. Unless want a never ending debate again!
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:38 pm
waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
which is exactly the same as happened to us , they didn't have to accept but came to an agreement
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:42 pm
Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:26 am
Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:51 am
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Normally agree with a lot of your posts but this comes across as a bitter jealousy.
Unfortunately, the jack bastards are light years ahead of our circus from top to bottom.
It's not bitter jealousy. Since administration they've done remarkably well rising to the top and good luck to them. They're largely responsible for giving us a chance to qualify for France after all. My point is that the Jacks can gloat about how much better they're doing than us all they want, but that doesn't mean they did things the correct and honourable way.
Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:34 am
Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:50 am
Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:02 pm
Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:26 pm
6 bysedd wrote:In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:38 pm
Stan_B wrote:6 bysedd wrote:In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
When we were chasing both Montero and Gomis all you lot could say was how crap they were.
You had the benefit of us not staying up as they would certainly have signed for us if we had stayed up.
Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:50 pm
Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:00 pm
llan bluebird wrote:I know he would never ever do it as he is a fan, but hiring Huw as DoF/CEO would be the best thing Tan could do. You have to admit they don't get many recruitment decisions wrong.
We need a guy who can run a business (I know his went through) and understands football at the top.
We are run as Tans play thing
Mon Nov 10, 2014 4:50 pm
Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:27 pm
Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:52 pm
MalagaCF wrote:They are still peg selling gypos and will always look up to us as their capital city.
Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:19 pm
Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:49 am
waddle wrote:So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be paid back
What a tit !
Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:53 am
Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:58 am
Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:18 am
Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:08 pm
Blueboys1927 wrote:It's pointless comparing the two clubs, we are like Del Boys yellow 3 wheeler, they are like a shiny new Bentley turbo, we are about 10 years behind them in everything, they are playing with the PL big boys and flirting with Europe, we are playing with the Brentford,s and flirting with the Johnston paint trophy
Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:18 am
JonCCFC wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:It's pointless comparing the two clubs, we are like Del Boys yellow 3 wheeler, they are like a shiny new Bentley turbo, we are about 10 years behind them in everything, they are playing with the PL big boys and flirting with Europe, we are playing with the Brentford,s and flirting with the Johnston paint trophy
10 years? Chill out. We were in the same league as them a few months ago.
Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:16 am
MalagaCF wrote:They are still peg selling gypos and will always look up to us as their capital city.