Wed Oct 15, 2014 5:09 pm
RFMH wrote:Stan_B wrote:RFMH wrote:jhippno wrote:RFMH wrote:Tough call, but he probably should be allowed to do his job, although if be disgusted if Cardiff signed him.
Clearly guilty of rape and has shown zero contrition which is sad. But you can't expect much from a scum bag. International level should probably be avoided though, rapists don't deserve that privledge.
What a load of shite, clearly deluded and zero knowledge which is sadder. Basing knowledge on an extremely questionable conviction given a split verdict on the co accused. Based on your intelect, you shouldn't be allowed to judge others, why dont you just assume you dont know the full facts, oh thats right, you already did and judged irresoectivejhippno wrote:i think most people on this board by the precedent set in this case are rapists (including myself)
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=149209&p
Being judged by someone who admits to being a rapist.![]()
![]()
![]()
Ched Evans is a rapist, all you rape apologists change nothing about that no matter how much you try and justify it or blame the victim.
What a f*cking moron. With comments like yours I would doubt whether you have the intelligence to even tie your own shoelaces.
First watch the video which shows the supposedly pissed female when they arrive at the hotel. No way is she too drunk to consent. Then look at the tweets. If you can get your little peabrain around this you might understand that it is all about how much the tart can get in compensation. There was no rape, just a jury falling for a sob story.
Ched Evans - convicted rapist, Stan_B rape apologist. Both disgusting.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 5:25 pm
Wed Oct 15, 2014 5:28 pm
RFMH wrote:I'm not a drunk defenceless young girl so I'd imagine he wouldn't have much to say too me.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:00 pm
Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:03 pm
Denzil wrote:Cardiff dyskinesia wrote:nubbsy wrote:Don't know the details but she obviously went back to the hotel room for a reason. He didn't drag her back there did he?
You clearly don't know the details. She was incapacitated by alcohol which is the reason a guilty verdict was returned. She couldn't consent.
I would be a very annoyed if my daughter was going to hotel rooms with two strange men at that time of night.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:10 pm
RFMH wrote:I'm not a drunk defenceless young girl so I'd imagine he wouldn't have much to say too me.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 7:09 pm
Stan_B wrote:RFMH wrote:I'm not a drunk defenceless young girl so I'd imagine he wouldn't have much to say too me.
You sound like you have created your own little reality whereby if a court says your guilty them you must be. So all the hundreds of city supporters who have had to appear in court because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time in your book must be guilty if they were found guilty. Yes or no?
Have you even read a transcript of the trial. Have you looked at the facts in this case. There have been a lot of innocent people convicted in the last few years. In a lot of cases the police/CPS don't really care about innocence or guilt. They have targets to achieve and that's all anyone in court really is, a statistic.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:06 pm
Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:10 pm
Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:23 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:Welcome back Ched.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 10:27 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:Stan_B wrote:RFMH wrote:I'm not a drunk defenceless young girl so I'd imagine he wouldn't have much to say too me.
You sound like you have created your own little reality whereby if a court says your guilty them you must be. So all the hundreds of city supporters who have had to appear in court because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time in your book must be guilty if they were found guilty. Yes or no?
Have you even read a transcript of the trial. Have you looked at the facts in this case. There have been a lot of innocent people convicted in the last few years. In a lot of cases the police/CPS don't really care about innocence or guilt. They have targets to achieve and that's all anyone in court really is, a statistic.
News just in:
The Police don't try suspects. The judicial system is independent and has no targets. If you believe that they would pervert the course of justice just to victimise a pro footballer, then you need to find proof, although the personally appointed defence team could not produce enough... THREE times (the trial and 2 subsequent appeals).
Innocent until proven guilty.
Guilty when proven.
Should not wear a Wales shirt unless this is overturned imho.
Wed Oct 15, 2014 10:59 pm
Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:43 am
kenbarlow wrote:Denzil wrote:Cardiff dyskinesia wrote:nubbsy wrote:Don't know the details but she obviously went back to the hotel room for a reason. He didn't drag her back there did he?
You clearly don't know the details. She was incapacitated by alcohol which is the reason a guilty verdict was returned. She couldn't consent.
I would be a very annoyed if my daughter was going to hotel rooms with two strange men at that time of night.
you seem to be suggesting that it's the woman's fault....i hope you dont have a daughter
Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:10 pm
Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:47 pm
Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:39 pm
Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:46 pm
Depressed Blue wrote:If you are taking the law seriously by saying "He has served his time, he can work, that is the law" Then you also have to accept the conviction that he is an actual rapist. Then if you are morally okay with a rapist serving a short prison sentence, losing nothing, then even benefiting from his previous hyped up rating, then carry on.
He isn't even that good a footballer. Average at best. This isn't Cantona coming back. If he puts on a welsh shirt then I doubt I'd attend the game. The years of 'rape' songs sung at us if we did it would make it not worth while in my opinon. We have a good Welsh squad currently, don't ruin it
Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:38 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:dressing like a slag then getting drunk to the point of blackout is like going into the london tube with a gucci bag full of iPhones and leaving it open next to a bunch of romanian pickpockets and then acting surprised when they're gone when you get off at the next stop!
the lads served his time so he has a right to continue to earn a wage from the game if a club offer him a contract, simple as that.
Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:17 pm
Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:33 am
Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:52 am
Bellamys barmy army wrote:Since everyone has had their say I thought I would give my two pence
When he played for Norwich ? He scored the best goal I have ever seen live to beat us 1-0
For that reason, guilty
Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:39 am
Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:51 am
Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:31 am
cityblue wrote:I havent read all the posts on this topic but the title got me thinking, didnt Lee Hughes play pro football again after being released for killing somebody whilst drink driving and fleeing the scene?
Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:42 pm
Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:08 pm
Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:26 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Denzil wrote:As far as I'm concerned after reading about the case, and the files of the solicitor/ reporter who fought for the conviction to be overturned, he is innocent of rape.
Guilty or not guilty, he has served his time and since his job does not require him to take a CRB check, or should it be affected by him being on the sex offenders register, he should be allowed to start playing again. If anyone wants him.
Denzil, I'm with you, I followed the case as well and also he should be allowed to continue his career,just like anyone who commits a crime should be allowed a job once theyve served their time.
Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:17 pm
ronnieconradsflatcap wrote:This is a website all about the case etc
Very interesting & gives a greater insight into the case well from Ched Evans supporters.
http://www.chedevans.com/the-disputed-tweets
![]()
![]()
Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:11 pm
krabb wrote:SwampCCFC wrote:dressing like a slag then getting drunk to the point of blackout is like going into the london tube with a gucci bag full of iPhones and leaving it open next to a bunch of romanian pickpockets and then acting surprised when they're gone when you get off at the next stop!
the lads served his time so he has a right to continue to earn a wage from the game if a club offer him a contract, simple as that.
2 things .....
1. if i give my belongs away its called consent.....if taken its theft...
2. lets say a lad is a paedophile is this also the case that he has done the time ..?