Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:48 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:carlccfc wrote:RFMH wrote:The agenda on this board is pretty laughable. I'm not saying don't criticise Ole, but just be honest that there is an anti-Ole (because he is Tan's man) agenda on this board.
Absolutely not, I think you are stereotyping people on this board which is very wrong.
I have doubts, like the majority do, but like those doubters we want Ole to succeed.
He has my support, simple as.
I'm not being funny Carl, but to publish an article that questions the managers ability before the season starts and then say he has your full support is hypocriticalIt's just negative, not objective or honest. You could quite easily have written a headline " After 2 years of negative football, I'm excited, to see us attack every team in this league"
Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:25 pm
Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:25 pm
Blue Boy wrote:Let's be positive,Ole is taking us up![]()
![]()
Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:53 pm
Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:56 pm
Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:06 pm
DrDre wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:I'm not being funny Carl, but to publish an article that questions the managers ability before the season starts and then say he has your full support is hypocritical
My thoughts exactly!
Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:06 pm
DrDre wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:I'm not being funny Carl, but to publish an article that questions the managers ability before the season starts and then say he has your full support is hypocritical
My thoughts exactly!
Fri Aug 08, 2014 5:43 pm
carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:37 pm
NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Honest question Carl:
Why do you copy and paste every other article thereby depriving the website that posted it of both the advertising revenue associated with each hit and the ability to ascertain how many are reading each article but when it comes to your own Wales Online article, you post the link without copying and pasting the article?
Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:39 pm
carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Honest question Carl:
Why do you copy and paste every other article thereby depriving the website that posted it of both the advertising revenue associated with each hit and the ability to ascertain how many are reading each article but when it comes to your own Wales Online article, you post the link without copying and pasting the article?
Honest answer, none of your business what I do
Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:36 pm
NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Honest question Carl:
Why do you copy and paste every other article thereby depriving the website that posted it of both the advertising revenue associated with each hit and the ability to ascertain how many are reading each article but when it comes to your own Wales Online article, you post the link without copying and pasting the article?
Honest answer, none of your business what I do
Classy.
It was a perfectly reasonable question.
Sat Aug 09, 2014 12:01 am
carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Honest question Carl:
Why do you copy and paste every other article thereby depriving the website that posted it of both the advertising revenue associated with each hit and the ability to ascertain how many are reading each article but when it comes to your own Wales Online article, you post the link without copying and pasting the article?
Honest answer, none of your business what I do
Classy.
It was a perfectly reasonable question.
NJ, I put links to all the articles or I at least credit them.
With my articles I am asked specifically by Walesonline to provide a link only.
Sat Aug 09, 2014 9:56 am
NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Honest question Carl:
Why do you copy and paste every other article thereby depriving the website that posted it of both the advertising revenue associated with each hit and the ability to ascertain how many are reading each article but when it comes to your own Wales Online article, you post the link without copying and pasting the article?
Honest answer, none of your business what I do
Classy.
It was a perfectly reasonable question.
NJ, I put links to all the articles or I at least credit them.
With my articles I am asked specifically by Walesonline to provide a link only.
What you and other mods one here do with other peoples articles is contemptible imho.
You may well provide a link occasionally, you may well credit occasionally, but what you do is deprive the website who published the article and the author of the article of the hits that the reading of it deserves.
It's utterly classless and completely unnecessary other than to make it appear that your own article gets a higher hit ratio than those written by others.
But then, none of what I just posted is anything you are unaware of.
Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:06 am
Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:08 am
Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:33 am
grimly fiendish wrote:Got to admit that even in this division Solskjaer looked tactically naïve especially in the second half give him time, maybe he''l learn.
Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:01 pm
NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:My first column of the season, read it all from the link before responding please![]()
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Many bookmakers have installed the Bluebirds as favourites for the title, I can understand why because of the depth of quality we have.
But the question is still there... do we have the right manager to succeed in this league?
City had no right to beat any team last season, we were the newcomers in town and we had to prove our wort, but in the fancied games we didn’t just fail ... we got it spectacularly wrong.
That is what is putting doubt in my mind.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... up-7583512
Honest question Carl:
Why do you copy and paste every other article thereby depriving the website that posted it of both the advertising revenue associated with each hit and the ability to ascertain how many are reading each article but when it comes to your own Wales Online article, you post the link without copying and pasting the article?
Honest answer, none of your business what I do
Classy.
It was a perfectly reasonable question.
NJ, I put links to all the articles or I at least credit them.
With my articles I am asked specifically by Walesonline to provide a link only.
What you and other mods one here do with other peoples articles is contemptible imho.
You may well provide a link occasionally, you may well credit occasionally, but what you do is deprive the website who published the article and the author of the article of the hits that the reading of it deserves.
It's utterly classless and completely unnecessary other than to make it appear that your own article gets a higher hit ratio than those written by others.
But then, none of what I just posted is anything you are unaware of.