Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:57 pm
d20 wrote:another post just to get hits .
Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:11 pm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:38 pm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:45 pm
Ps naming rights was 9m? If part of sam settlement correct me if wrong.pembroke allan wrote:Firstly he will now have to pay over odds for players, with wages to match! can he persuade premier class players to play under him in champ? Ffs you lot moan about us paying to much wages but cream over what pearce will spend, also naming rights can be any amount, but there are restrictions as to who is paying it! Man city ran into trouble doing theirs as owners cannot put there own money in or anyone with financial interest iin owners cant either, this is to stop cheating fair plair rules.
Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:03 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Ps naming rights was 9m? If part of sam settlement correct me if wrong.pembroke allan wrote:Firstly he will now have to pay over odds for players, with wages to match! can he persuade premier class players to play under him in champ? Ffs you lot moan about us paying to much wages but cream over what pearce will spend, also naming rights can be any amount, but there are restrictions as to who is paying it! Man city ran into trouble doing theirs as owners cannot put there own money in or anyone with financial interest iin owners cant either, this is to stop cheating fair plair rules.
Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:11 pm
Sven wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Ps naming rights was 9m? If part of sam settlement correct me if wrong.pembroke allan wrote:Firstly he will now have to pay over odds for players, with wages to match! can he persuade premier class players to play under him in champ? Ffs you lot moan about us paying to much wages but cream over what pearce will spend, also naming rights can be any amount, but there are restrictions as to who is paying it! Man city ran into trouble doing theirs as owners cannot put there own money in or anyone with financial interest iin owners cant either, this is to stop cheating fair plair rules.
Correct, Allan
Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:28 pm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:41 pm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:55 pm
Forever Blue wrote:AJ1927 wrote:Truth be told I don't like the name CCS.
Always liked the idea when it was announced as Parc Dewi Sant
Tony nor do I like the name.
Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:56 pm
Cardiffmad wrote:The TAN arena
Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:22 pm
Sven wrote:d20 wrote:another post just to get hits .
And you just posted and added to the total!![]()
Cheers, fella (always assuming you are right, of course, which you aren't!)![]()
![]()
Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:39 pm
Tommy Gun wrote:Sven wrote:d20 wrote:another post just to get hits .
And you just posted and added to the total!![]()
Cheers, fella (always assuming you are right, of course, which you aren't!)![]()
![]()
![]()
what a silly c**t.
Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:39 pm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:56 pm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:21 pm
mikeyt.po3 wrote:Not liking the CCS as our home name strikes me as odd, other than the "new Ninian" I couldn't think of a more apt name. We are Cardiff City, it is our stadium![]()
Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:07 pm
jon1959 wrote:This story was all over the Forest boards and NewsNow yesterday - but I can't see a sponsorship figure anywhere.
Where does £1bn come from? That is off the scale for any stadium naming rights deal - EVER. It just sounds wrong.
The Premier League sponsorship deals (as of a year ago) were headed by Man City at just over £18m per year.
http://www.american-appraisal.co.uk/UK/ ... ture-1.htm
Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:24 pm