Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:38 am
dannyblue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:dannyblue wrote:
Not even man enough to back your words with actions, as Ali says on Match day "on behalf of Cardiff City thank you for all your support "
Keep calling Tan a wanker bit of luck you get banned.
I've done plenty to back up my words, thanks.I don't believe I've ever sung that song either. Bit cringey for me.
All in all, you've had a bit of a mare with this post.
All in all l think you have had a worse one, as you say all opinions welcome.
Tue Jun 24, 2014 3:58 pm
Pant-yr-awel bluebird wrote:dannyblue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:dannyblue wrote:A person gives his views on our Chairman's
business record compared to previous chairman all true it seems. Like a little weed in the classroom you got to poke your tongue out.
or just countering that post with a differing view. That is what forums are about, you know?![]()
You really are a horrible little child minded dick head to the extent, if you wear blue the rest would wear red, who the he'll would want to be like you. Our club has NO THIRD PARTY debt unlike most clubs for the first time since the 50, s and you can't see it.
where have I claimed that the club still have 3rd party debt? Can you quote me please? You're just making things up.unless the debt is wiped (as promised by a Tan) then it will have to be paid off one day. Doesn't matter whether it is 3rd party or not, it will still have to be honoured.
Maybe YOU can't see THAT.![]()
You don't give differing views you distort facts.
Of course the club has every chance of being huge as the post implies. Of course third party debt is a much worse situation than owners risk. The post indicates over time Tans plan on Cardiff is of similar substance. Paying off debtors is part of it.Why funking argue for the sake of it.
I can see the facts. My business established over my adult lifetime has shown me that there is a massive difference between owners carrying debt/losses to third parties. You speak on behalf of your agenda and not on the fact that we are lucky to have Tan. I and many support the club which for obvious reasons supports Tan at the same time so man up. Admit it.Better still stop moaning or stop going. There you have your choices.
Dannyman is a Tan poodle Annis.No point in arguing with him.Danny'you state many support Tan.Give us an aproximate percentage.Because i dont see many wearing red down the stadium.People like me and Annis would be happy watching the city in the lower league's wearing Blue.We are Cardiff city fans.Not premier league fans.People like you purport to be City fans.When in fact you are success fans with little or no respect for Cardiff City's history or culture. In my 54 year's down the City'i have known owners disliked.But i have never known an owner so hated and reviled as Tan.He will fall.All dictators do.Then i will volunteer to hand out the humble pie.
Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:20 pm
wez1927 wrote:Tan will turn us into a huge club by the time he leaves
Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:38 pm
unless the debt is wiped (as promised by a Tan) then it will have to be paid off one day. Doesn't matter whether it is 3rd party or not, it will still have to be honoured.
Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:22 pm
85harj wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:85harj wrote:Cardiff haven't turned to gold.... Blah blah..
Maybe just maybe..one step back to take two forward was the approach needed.
Not saying we got relegated on purpose or anything insane like that..but now we are down it gives us a chance to clean up a bit.
So you think all Tans businesses were a roaring success from the moment he touched them?
Or maybe just like has happened here with Cardiff a bit of work was needed and the transformation to "gold" was a slightly slower process.
Now that's a fair post. Can't disagree on anything with that.![]()
For me though, he has to go, purely for his horrific rebrand. Not everyone will agree, but those are my thoughts.
Everyone has an opinion won't knock you for yours one bit.
Your not on your own in thinking he needs to go, rebrand aside I don't think he's done that bad (some might not agree) I'd give him this season and next if we went up and see how things were going then.
We're already red. Seats will go in red now anyway so even if he were to go at the end of this season we would have a red team in red seats, so no harm if we went up to see where he takes us!?
Better the devil you know. Who knows what the new owner would do he could implement MORE rebranding for all we know as we've already began..at least it seems like Tan is done..
I think now we are red we will stay red whoever owns us as it's just easier to continue.
Your taking the piss pal.We will be blue as soon as we get rid of Tan.Any new owner does'nt want all the shit that comes with red.Tan is taking flack at home because he is being made to look a prick by so many real City supporters wearing Blue at home games.Now with alternative blue shirts set to outsell the official one'well what sort of buisnessman gets out played by the common man.Tan is an arrogant dictator who is finaly having people stand up to him.When that happens its the begining of the end.Ask hittler.
Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:48 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I know, and respect, you have issues with VT Annis and Im not going to knock that![]()
But when I think of all the Chairman we have had, in the 40 or so years Ive been going down, no-one has had the capacity to deliver to the extent that VT has. Stefan Terlezki (local counsellor) Tony Clemo (and his 10 seater plane for the squad!) The Kumar Brothers. Sam, much as I love him, I dont think had the capacity that VT has.
Like it or loathe it everything he touches turns to gold. Companies get listed on various stock markets and a lot of success is usually enjoyed by all.
Much as I would prefer us to be playing in blue I really do believe that VT will, very shortly, deliver not just premiership football but European Football as well. Now I used to love the European trips. That was also part of our heritage until the FAW/UEFA took that away.
I know I am not going to change your mind Annisand Im not saying I love VT either - but you cant knock his business skills. He certainly knows how to make money.
Not quite true. Cardiff City certainly hasn't turned to gold with his touch!
Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:01 pm
Pant-yr-awel bluebird wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:I know, and respect, you have issues with VT Annis and Im not going to knock that![]()
But when I think of all the Chairman we have had, in the 40 or so years Ive been going down, no-one has had the capacity to deliver to the extent that VT has. Stefan Terlezki (local counsellor) Tony Clemo (and his 10 seater plane for the squad!) The Kumar Brothers. Sam, much as I love him, I dont think had the capacity that VT has.
Like it or loathe it everything he touches turns to gold. Companies get listed on various stock markets and a lot of success is usually enjoyed by all.
Much as I would prefer us to be playing in blue I really do believe that VT will, very shortly, deliver not just premiership football but European Football as well. Now I used to love the European trips. That was also part of our heritage until the FAW/UEFA took that away.
I know I am not going to change your mind Annisand Im not saying I love VT either - but you cant knock his business skills. He certainly knows how to make money.
There are those in his country who have stated that he is a corrupt crook'They have said this on television.Tan has refused to answer questions about this.He has taken no legal action against those who spoke on television.(Why).
Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:19 am
Pant-yr-awel bluebird wrote:85harj wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:85harj wrote:Cardiff haven't turned to gold.... Blah blah..
Maybe just maybe..one step back to take two forward was the approach needed.
Not saying we got relegated on purpose or anything insane like that..but now we are down it gives us a chance to clean up a bit.
So you think all Tans businesses were a roaring success from the moment he touched them?
Or maybe just like has happened here with Cardiff a bit of work was needed and the transformation to "gold" was a slightly slower process.
Now that's a fair post. Can't disagree on anything with that.![]()
For me though, he has to go, purely for his horrific rebrand. Not everyone will agree, but those are my thoughts.
Everyone has an opinion won't knock you for yours one bit.
Your not on your own in thinking he needs to go, rebrand aside I don't think he's done that bad (some might not agree) I'd give him this season and next if we went up and see how things were going then.
We're already red. Seats will go in red now anyway so even if he were to go at the end of this season we would have a red team in red seats, so no harm if we went up to see where he takes us!?
Better the devil you know. Who knows what the new owner would do he could implement MORE rebranding for all we know as we've already began..at least it seems like Tan is done..
I think now we are red we will stay red whoever owns us as it's just easier to continue.
![]()
Your taking the piss pal.We will be blue as soon as we get rid of Tan.Any new owner does'nt want all the shit that comes with red.Tan is taking flack at home because he is being made to look a prick by so many real City supporters wearing Blue at home games.Now with alternative blue shirts set to outsell the official one'well what sort of buisnessman gets out played by the common man.Tan is an arrogant dictator who is finaly having people stand up to him.When that happens its the begining of the end.Ask hittler.