Sam Hamman

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Did annis ask you to post on this thread or do you just follow him around like?

Last edited by Jasonccfc on Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

That's my point. Read my post and think of what the message really is

Ahhhh I get you. Very true actually. he's fighting their corner but the blind can't see it.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Did annis ask you to post on this thread or do you just follow him around like?

Jinks, No I never, Alex has his own strong views and yes we do agree on plenty, including our identity,pride and whats right for our club

Thankfully there are only a few of you who love the red and Tan,thats because most have opened their eyes and seen sense

Jinks, I remember when you were doubting the debt was over £50 mill, what do u think now its £150 mill?

by Jinks » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:08 am

Forever Blue wrote:
Allan Whiteley publicly stated last week that it was never red or dead.

But lets be honest when they took over we were about £32 mill in debt, now over 2 years later under their leadership we about £82 mill in debt.

Jinks wrote
Do you or anyone know how this debt has escalated by 50m? Im sure it isnt just running costs was there any debts paid?

In June 2012 Jinks you said they knew what they were doing, since then 3 CEO's and an Exodus of staff, £150 mill in debt, merchandise sales down by £1.5mill,relegated.
Honestly do you think they still know what they are doing?


Re: VT's marketing strategy
by Jinks » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:31 am

I think they know what they are doing



Re: " Vincent Tan Statement "
by Jinks » Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:44 pm

That statement shows they know what they are doing

Just a thought. Sam very supportive of VT rebranding so i recall then Langstone settled.

I don't suggest for one minute he would get fans to stir up a mutiny against VT with a view to stepping back in with a consortium but just wondered what fans feelings would be? Especially if a return to blue was offered?

I would let Sam in just to get rid of Tan the tw*t.As long as he brought back the blue.Lesser of two evils.Much lesser.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Did annis ask you to post on this thread or do you just follow him around like?

Jinks, No I never, Alex has his own strong views and yes we do agree on plenty, including our identity,pride and whats right for our club

Thankfully there are only a few of you who love the red and Tan,thats because most have opened their eyes and seen sense

Talking crap again claiming i love the red Because fans dont hate tan that doesnt mean people love the red
Thousands of fans tolerated the red that doesn't mean they lik it..
You did nothing about the red or your identity and pride for ages no protests nothing. You met tan and had your chance to really speak your mind but sam told you not to mention it and you listened so much for you hating the rebrand and tan.
Rebrand aside yes i still think Tan knows what he's doing whether im right or wrong will be known when he leaves no doubt.
You seem to like making accusations on here about people but you wont like them back.
I think its best for you to ban me

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Did annis ask you to post on this thread or do you just follow him around like?

Tan over Sam all day, every day.

At least Tan has put his own money into the club and not as bank debt, at least Tan has invested to make the club better.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Did annis ask you to post on this thread or do you just follow him around like?

Jinks, No I never, Alex has his own strong views and yes we do agree on plenty, including our identity,pride and whats right for our club

Thankfully there are only a few of you who love the red and Tan,thats because most have opened their eyes and seen sense

Talking crap again claiming i love the red Because fans dont hate tan that doesnt mean people love the red
Thousands of fans tolerated the red that doesn't mean they lik it..
You did nothing about the red or your identity and pride for ages no protests nothing. You met tan and had your chance to really speak your mind but sam told you not to mention it and you listened so much for you hating the rebrand and tan.
Rebrand aside yes i still think Tan knows what he's doing whether im right or wrong will be known when he leaves no doubt.
You seem to like making accusations on here about people but you wont like them back.
I think its best for you to ban me

Read back to June 2012 I organised 3 meetings, but could not get the numbers for a protest, you were one of them who kept laughing it down Jinks.

I kept the BLUE going on here and at matches, nothing more I could do really.

Did you try to keep our BLUE identity? Did you stand up for it?

As to Sam as you keep going for me on him, Sam will always be my friend, honoured to be his friend, but I never ever arse licked him, told him my feelings every time, disagreed with him on the badge, Sam admits he made mistakes and you know all this as I have replied on it dozens of times.

You answer some questions for a change

So are you saying your against the Red? Yes or No?


Do you believe in Tan? Yes or No

Do you back Tan? Yes or No

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

Yes I have, because I honestly believe he has stalked me and Ive told him that in pm's as well.

And Yes he admits he is totally for Tan and I respect his right,just dont agree with it

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

This. Don't think Annis has covered himself in glory at all recently. Something appears to be up and I think Natman is onto something.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

Yes I have, because I honestly believe he has stalked me and Ive told him that in pm's as well.

And Yes he admits he is totally for Tan and I respect his right,just dont agree with it

Utter rubbish, you've called him out and wound him up just as much as he has. It seems whenever Natman is winning an argument or getting somewhere with his argument you resort to name calling and accusations of stalking.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

This. Don't think Annis has covered himself in glory at all recently. Something appears to be up and I think Natman is onto something.

You keep repeating your same line ,your right something is up, were Red

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

Yes I have, because I honestly believe he has stalked me and Ive told him that in pm's as well.

And Yes he admits he is totally for Tan and I respect his right,just dont agree with it

Utter rubbish, you've called him out and wound him up just as much as he has. It seems whenever Natman is winning an argument or getting somewhere with his argument you resort to name calling and accusations of stalking.

^ this.

yes annis you may feel he has "stalked" you (although i'm not sure if that counts on an MB that you've started up and invited city fans to give their opinions on) but to my knowledge he's never licked tans arse, so when you call him a tan arse licker should you be getting a warning from another mod? or is it just double standards because jinks doesnt agree with your veiws on the club?

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

This. Don't think Annis has covered himself in glory at all recently. Something appears to be up and I think Natman is onto something.

You keep repeating your same line ,your right something is up, were Red

You weren't like this in 2012/2013, not even first half of 2013/2014. We were red then, yes you stated your dislike but you were not this militant in my opinion.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this :roll:

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

should we be remembering this next time you call natman a stalker or a tan lover annis?

This. Don't think Annis has covered himself in glory at all recently. Something appears to be up and I think Natman is onto something.

You keep repeating your same line ,your right something is up, were Red

You weren't like this in 2012/2013, not even first half of 2013/2014. We were red then, yes you stated your dislike but you were not this militant in my opinion.

From May 2012 I disliked it,from June 2012 I started to try and get meetings and protests going viewtopic.php?f=2&t=84324&p=806389&hilit=meeting#p806389 (That was just the 2nd meeting with in days) and as time has gone on, your right I have begun to despise the Red even more
As I have said previously as time has gone on, I have felt more hurt by what the rebrand has done to our club.