Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:51 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:RoathMagic wrote:I told you all at the time what he was doing with regards to interest on his loans. He is very VERY clever at manipulating the fans and foresees things before they happen.
The interest he was charging was to create "non existent" money that he would then write off in exchange for more shares so he doesnt have to convert as much of his own loans to equity but instead use the money that never really existed.
When he announced he was converting the interest to equity people rejoiced on here. He just took shares for money that never even changed hands. Very clever, very manipulative and he has the majority eating out of the palm of his hands.
I also told you from the start he will never do a full debt to equity conversion as it made no sense what so ever. That has also proven true. My advice is use your brains rather than what he is telling you because a manipulator that has his audience in the palm of his hands use misdirection, and everyone falls for it time and time and time again.
so all the interest ive paid in my life is non existent money..............waw........so that must mean i earned non existent money to pay the non existent money that was interest............somebody owes me a hell of a lot of money...........
are there specialist companies like there are for to claim this non existent interest back like there are for PPI?
if not maybe you could start one up?
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:02 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:06 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:07 am
RoathMagic wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:RoathMagic wrote:I told you all at the time what he was doing with regards to interest on his loans. He is very VERY clever at manipulating the fans and foresees things before they happen.
The interest he was charging was to create "non existent" money that he would then write off in exchange for more shares so he doesnt have to convert as much of his own loans to equity but instead use the money that never really existed.
When he announced he was converting the interest to equity people rejoiced on here. He just took shares for money that never even changed hands. Very clever, very manipulative and he has the majority eating out of the palm of his hands.
I also told you from the start he will never do a full debt to equity conversion as it made no sense what so ever. That has also proven true. My advice is use your brains rather than what he is telling you because a manipulator that has his audience in the palm of his hands use misdirection, and everyone falls for it time and time and time again.
so all the interest ive paid in my life is non existent money..............waw........so that must mean i earned non existent money to pay the non existent money that was interest............somebody owes me a hell of a lot of money...........
are there specialist companies like there are for to claim this non existent interest back like there are for PPI?
if not maybe you could start one up?
Is this going to be another silly soulofthesea thread or are you going to try and be sensible? Ill live in hope this will be the latter so will reply.
Let me explain.
You paid interest to a third party who benefit solely from lending you the money.
Tan, as owner of the club, charged interest..... To himself.
Thus creating a purse of money he has not borrowed, lent nor paid back (Its non existent) - yet now uses it to buy a larger stake in the company.
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:09 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:no Roath...............after the non existent interest post...from a multi millionaire propery developer who KNOWS EVERYTHING........this has nowhere to go.....................either tell me where i get all my interest back..or beat it.......
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:10 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Pretty easy to work out...![]()
He says he will charge interest on certain monies, never has any intention of doing so, then wipes out the alleged interest.
He looks good, it looks like he is wiping debt away out of the goodness of his heart & he is still owed exactly what he put in.
Very clever.

Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:13 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Pretty easy to work out...![]()
He says he will charge interest on certain monies, never has any intention of doing so, then wipes out the alleged interest.
He looks good, it looks like he is wiping debt away out of the goodness of his heart & he is still owed exactly what he put in.
Very clever.
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:15 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:18 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
yes its mind blowing clever.......if i were you id memorise Roathes post,and run down the bank shouting eureka........this interest is non existent money idea will change the world
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:20 am
RoathMagic wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Pretty easy to work out...![]()
He says he will charge interest on certain monies, never has any intention of doing so, then wipes out the alleged interest.
He looks good, it looks like he is wiping debt away out of the goodness of his heart & he is still owed exactly what he put in.
Very clever.
apparently soulofthesea has decided this cannot happen im afraid
But all children aside, yes Barry thats exactly what he did. Very good business indeed.
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:20 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:23 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
yes its mind blowing clever.......if i were you id memorise Roathes post,and run down the bank shouting eureka........this interest is non existent money idea will change the world
You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:28 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
yes its mind blowing clever.......if i were you id memorise Roathes post,and run down the bank shouting eureka........this interest is non existent money idea will change the world
You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
of course i get it...................its his money..he chose to invest in us ,could be getting interst for it, if he lent it elsewhere.......if he lent each fan a 100k.....he would be having interest of each of us.......where is the trick ffs?
he gets NO interest...............
oh my lord. He isn't after the interest you moron. If you lend yourself money, why the heck would you bother charging yourself interest? Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:29 am
RoathMagic wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
Spot on.
I may be wrong, my memory isnt the best.... but not only did he wipe it out but didnt he convert it into shares? Essentially getting them for free?
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:29 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:33 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
Spot on.
I may be wrong, my memory isnt the best.... but not only did he wipe it out but didnt he convert it into shares? Essentially getting them for free?
if you became a money lender............the money you recieve as interest is yours........to spend on massage parlours..biscuits, an education......or buy shares in a football club...........your money,what a novel thought eh...
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:34 am
RoathMagic wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
yes its mind blowing clever.......if i were you id memorise Roathes post,and run down the bank shouting eureka........this interest is non existent money idea will change the world
You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
of course i get it...................its his money..he chose to invest in us ,could be getting interst for it, if he lent it elsewhere.......if he lent each fan a 100k.....he would be having interest of each of us.......where is the trick ffs?
he gets NO interest...............
oh my lord. He isn't after the interest you moron. If you lend yourself money, why the heck would you bother charging yourself interest?
![]()
He owns Cardiff City...... Cardiff City needed his loans...... He provided them to himself as he needed them to buy players etc which increases the value if his shares by asset purchase...... if he charged interest he would be paying himself back interest from his own money (the club doesnt generate enough)...... Instead he "wipes it out" and gets shares in the club for nothing...... Instead of equity swapping funds he has physically put in he is equity swapping funds that were never there or ever going to be paid back.
Which bit if that confuses you and we will go through it.
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:34 am
Natman Blue wrote:Isn't it strange how Roath jumps on a thread where the anti-tan bandwagon starts get a beating and completely derails it onto something else hmmmmm
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:35 am
Natman Blue wrote:Isn't it strange how Roath jumps on a thread where the anti-tan bandwagon starts get a beating and completely derails it onto something else hmmmmm
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:37 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:you do realise that these shares are not worth what he payed for them?.......hypothetical..........if the club is worth 1mill and there are 1 mil shares,they are worth a pound each...........if he turns his debt into more shares say increases it to 2mil.,a share then becomes worth 50p..........as the total value of the club does not increase just because there are more shares........im not confused by your childish efforts at all, i know how you think but its incredibly naive
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:44 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:RoathMagic wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
yes its mind blowing clever.......if i were you id memorise Roathes post,and run down the bank shouting eureka........this interest is non existent money idea will change the world
You aren't getting it. He charges interest on the loans to the club with no intention of ever reclaiming it (in my opinion) and then wipes it out in a good will gesture.
The fans think he is wiping away money for no reason and celebrate it, yet VT will still be owed exactly the same amount of money that he put in.
It has absolutely nothing to do with banks.![]()
Were you kicked out of the crayon class for eating all the crayons?
of course i get it...................its his money..he chose to invest in us ,could be getting interst for it, if he lent it elsewhere.......if he lent each fan a 100k.....he would be having interest of each of us.......where is the trick ffs?
he gets NO interest...............
oh my lord. He isn't after the interest you moron. If you lend yourself money, why the heck would you bother charging yourself interest?
![]()
He owns Cardiff City...... Cardiff City needed his loans...... He provided them to himself as he needed them to buy players etc which increases the value if his shares by asset purchase...... if he charged interest he would be paying himself back interest from his own money (the club doesnt generate enough)...... Instead he "wipes it out" and gets shares in the club for nothing...... Instead of equity swapping funds he has physically put in he is equity swapping funds that were never there or ever going to be paid back.
Which bit if that confuses you and we will go through it.
you do realise that these shares are not worth what he payed for them?.......hypothetical..........if the club is worth 1mill and there are 1 mil shares,they are worth a pound each...........if he turns his debt into more shares say increases it to 2mil.,a share then becomes worth 50p..........as the total value of the club does not increase just because there are more shares........im not confused by your childish efforts at all, i know how you think but its incredibly naive
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:45 am
RoathMagic wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:you do realise that these shares are not worth what he payed for them?.......hypothetical..........if the club is worth 1mill and there are 1 mil shares,they are worth a pound each...........if he turns his debt into more shares say increases it to 2mil.,a share then becomes worth 50p..........as the total value of the club does not increase just because there are more shares........im not confused by your childish efforts at all, i know how you think but its incredibly naive
You are incredibly confused im afraid, you are describing share dilution which didnt happen![]()
Try again. It really is simple. But at least you have moved away from banks and PPI
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:45 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:48 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:
his investment in our club is many times what the club is worth..............debt to equity makes absolutely no business sense as the club has no equity left in it.................the PPI bit was ridicule..duh.........not smart at all are you
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:53 am
RoathMagic wrote:simon.wiesenthal wrote:
his investment in our club is many times what the club is worth..............debt to equity makes absolutely no business sense as the club has no equity left in it.................the PPI bit was ridicule..duh.........not smart at all are you
What?That has absolutely nothing to do with what we have just been discussing
![]()
As for the PPI "ridicule" - if wishing to ridicule a perfectly factual post then maybe try and at least make it the least bit relatable or sensible, otherwise it tends to have the opposite effect.![]()
Now again i ask to avoid this mind numbing circular posting..... Which bit EXACTLY is confusing you?
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:55 am
RoathMagic wrote:I told you all at the time what he was doing with regards to interest on his loans. He is very VERY clever at manipulating the fans and foresees things before they happen.
The interest he was charging was to create "non existent" money that he would then write off in exchange for more shares so he doesnt have to convert as much of his own loans to equity but instead use the money that never really existed.
When he announced he was converting the interest to equity people rejoiced on here. He just took shares for money that never even changed hands. Very clever, very manipulative and he has the majority eating out of the palm of his hands.
I also told you from the start he will never do a full debt to equity conversion as it made no sense what so ever. That has also proven true. My advice is use your brains rather than what he is telling you because a manipulator that has his audience in the palm of his hands use misdirection, and everyone falls for it time and time and time again.
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:56 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:57 am
Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:00 am
RoathMagic wrote:I wasnt going to but he is adorable in his naivety
Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:04 am
Natman Blue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:I wasnt going to but he is adorable in his naivety
The thread was actually about whether Tan had said he would do it within a matter of days or not. annis made the statement that Tan had promised that he would convert debt to equity in days and I questioned him on it as to provide evidence. This was his attempt and providing that.
I still maintain that even from that evidence the debt to equity and a debt free club is still a long term strategy. Not, as has been used as another stick, days.