' Cardiff to give Caulker a loyalty bonus ! '

SSN REPORTING SUNDAY 15th June 2014

If he stays until July, according to SSN.That's what he waiting for then he's off. What the fcuk is that all about.
More Malky and Moody madness ?

You couldn't make it up could you??? a loyalty bonus to a player who's only been here for eleven months.

Simon Lim City's CEO acting on Tans behalf and over seen by Tan, Unbelievable.

Come on annis ,tan and lim gave Moody and malky full reign as so called football men and they fucked up and both have deservedly got the sack ,tan shouldn't of been so trusting

Simon Lim City's CEO acting on Tans behalf and over seen by Tan, Unbelievable.

But where is the sense in giving him a bonus to stay until July ?

tan may be top dog but the underlings were the ones who must have agreed this with agent! that's why tan is taking more control on how we spend money! obviously not enough control before. someone's learning from previous mistakes it :seems.

tan may be top dog but the underlings were the ones who must have agreed this with agent! that's why tan is taking more control on how we spend money! obviously not enough control before. someone's learning from previous mistakes it :seems.

Agree

But this is Tans business and I do sometimes wonder exactly how did he become a Billionaire ?

Bring no managers into it and talk about the bonus. Simples*.

I'll talk about the alleged bonus offer, which would have been included at the time of the record breaking deal. If that includes bringing up the man who was a key element to this contract being agreed (in Caulker's words ) then I shall.

Are you on about Lim now being the main man with the contract?

Lim, whilst being advised and stitched up by jj is what again I've been hearing

Bring no managers into it and talk about the bonus. Simples*.

I'll talk about the alleged bonus offer, which would have been included at the time of the record breaking deal. If that includes bringing up the man who was a key element to this contract being agreed (in Caulker's words ) then I shall.

Are you on about Lim now being the main man with the contract?

Lim, whilst being advised and stitched up by jj is what again I've been hearing

There seems to have been alot of stitching up and bad advice from the conniver.

Don't forget Jinks, he's the mole!

Caulker is a on £1m loyalty bonus every season he is a CCFC player with his £30k basic wage that puts him Roughly £50k, I am led to believe that Medel is on the same sort of deal

Caulker is a on £1m loyalty bonus every season he is a CCFC player with his £30k basic wage that puts him Roughly £50k, I am led to believe that Medel is on the same sort of deal

Shocking he shouldn't get his bonus this year if he goes

Bring no managers into it and talk about the bonus. Simples*.

I'll talk about the alleged bonus offer, which would have been included at the time of the record breaking deal. If that includes bringing up the man who was a key element to this contract being agreed (in Caulker's words ) then I shall.

oooooOOOOOOOoooh! tell em Alex if not ring the Police. You have their number on speed dial no doubt arsehole.

IF true, probably something that was agreed in the original contract he signed... You were all delighted that we could pull off such a signing, so don't complain about it now.

I don't see the problem with it. Just another stick to try and slate Malky with.

I don't understand why people are getting excited about this because in my understanding a "Loyalty" bonus in the means clubs use to pay a player a "Signing On Fee" and that fee is spread equally over the full term of his contract and paid annually. I believe it is done this way to save clubs from finding large chunks of cash immediately a player is signed by spreading the cost over the term of the contract.

This being the case then the "Release" clause which has been negotiated into his contract will be considered a "transfer request" and when he leaves any outstanding "Loyalty" payments will not need to be paid.

So in reality Cardiff City will save money by not having to pay the balance of what was his signing on fee.

IF true, probably something that was agreed in the original contract he signed... You were all delighted that we could pull off such a signing, so don't complain about it now.

I don't see the problem with it. Just another stick to try and slate Malky with.

I don't understand why people are getting excited about this because in my understanding a "Loyalty" bonus in the means clubs use to pay a player a "Signing On Fee" and that fee is spread equally over the full term of his contract and paid annually. I believe it is done this way to save clubs from finding large chunks of cash immediately a player is signed by spreading the cost over the term of the contract.

This being the case then the "Release" clause which has been negotiated into his contract will be considered a "transfer request" and when he leaves any outstanding "Loyalty" payments will not need to be paid.

So in reality Cardiff City will save money by not having to pay the balance of what was his signing on fee.

From what I was told the bonus is not part of signing on fee and literally a bonus for each completed season with CCFC regardless of division

When Caulker signed I seem to remember a lot of our fans chest beating and speaking of "blowing others out of the water" with Tan's cash.

The reality is you have to pay top dollar in your first season in PL for experienced, tried players.

I don't think many players of Caulker's standard would join a club without cash incentives. If we had survived, he'd have stayed IMHO but there you go.

Expensive business isn't it?

Madness, but all we can do now is get as much as possible for him. At least this new transfer committee should be able to stop this happening again. Hope they stand up to the agents.

To be honest, the old system was ok, when transfers could happen anytime. At least we got a decent sum for Toshack!

SSN REPORTING SUNDAY 15th June 2014

If he stays until July, according to SSN.That's what he waiting for then he's off. What the fcuk is that all about.
More Malky and Moody madness ?

M and M are both nuts.

IF true, probably something that was agreed in the original contract he signed... You were all delighted that we could pull off such a signing, so don't complain about it now.

I don't see the problem with it. Just another stick to try and slate Malky with.

Spot on Alex

lol.............so if it is viewed as a good singing...its Malkys
if the bonus is ridiculous its Lim?

for the record i thought Caulker was a great signing at the time..and what ever deal was struck back then must have been required ,no matter who agreed what..............