Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:16 pm
Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:16 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:16 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:17 pm
Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
just daily mail get things right sum times dnt mean they get things all time, stop treating like its a gospoel
i hear clause in mutchy's contract for 1.5m
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:17 pm
Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
just daily mail get things right sum times dnt mean they get things all time, stop treating like its a gospoel
i hear clause in mutchy's contract for 1.5m
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:18 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:19 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
just daily mail get things right sum times dnt mean they get things all time, stop treating like its a gospoel
i hear clause in mutchy's contract for 1.5m
UVE CHANGED YOUR NAME AGAIN
Partywithole![]()
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:19 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
just daily mail get things right sum times dnt mean they get things all time, stop treating like its a gospoel
i hear clause in mutchy's contract for 1.5m
UVE CHANGED YOUR NAME AGAIN
Partywithole![]()
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:20 pm
Forever Blue wrote:My Opinion worth at least £3-£4 mill
![]()
![]()
Daily Mail.
Sunderland agree £1.5m deal for Jordan Mutch after impressive season at Cardiff City
By SIMON JONES
Sunday 1st June 2014
Sunderland have agreed a £1.5million deal for Cardiff midfielder Jordon Mutch, 22.
Mutch was Cardiff's top goalscorer last season and was not keen to drop back down to the Championship.
The club are looking to wrap up many deals early on, with Billy Jones and Jordi Gomez already signed.
Coup: Sunderland have agreed a £1.5m fee with Cardiff City to sign star midfielder Jordan Mutch
Two men who could be on their way out at the Stadium Light are Jack Colback and Adam Johnson.
West Ham are looking to sign academy graduate Colback, while Johnson is £5m target for Hull City.
Gus Poyet though, has recently penned a new contract.
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:21 pm
Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
just daily mail get things right sum times dnt mean they get things all time, stop treating like its a gospoel
i hear clause in mutchy's contract for 1.5m
UVE CHANGED YOUR NAME AGAIN
Partywithole![]()
password locked annis boy
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:21 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:22 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Principal Prickly wrote:only daily mail been wrong before
another milky player sold for no profit, another habit
And what if they are not?
Also surely your not blaming Malky for this, Mutch is quality and Malky is gone.![]()
just daily mail get things right sum times dnt mean they get things all time, stop treating like its a gospoel
i hear clause in mutchy's contract for 1.5m
UVE CHANGED YOUR NAME AGAIN
Partywithole![]()
password locked annis boy
Not by us, pm Carl or Owain![]()
Weve missed u on here
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:25 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:28 pm
HandyLegs wrote:This is the reality of relegation. Players don't want to be here, particularly ones that are in the final year of their contract or have buy out clauses inserted on demotion.
The reported £1.5m is derisory though. If true , another Tan embarrassment to add to the long list
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:31 pm
Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Don't forget guys, Tan himself said he will be personally involved with transfers now
Carl he certainly did
Very worrying though.
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:33 pm
A block wrote:Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Don't forget guys, Tan himself said he will be personally involved with transfers now
Carl he certainly did
Very worrying though.
Don't know what's going on here but certainly don't believe Tan is that daft - he wants to make money.
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:34 pm
carlccfc wrote:Don't forget guys, Tan himself said he will be personally involved with transfers now
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:35 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:37 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:38 pm
Forever Blue wrote:A block wrote:Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Don't forget guys, Tan himself said he will be personally involved with transfers now
Carl he certainly did
Very worrying though.
Don't know what's going on here but certainly don't believe Tan is that daft - he wants to make money.
Lets be honest, no matter what now Tan will never make money out of City, he is in for £150mill and he will never get all that back.
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:40 pm
A block wrote:Forever Blue wrote:A block wrote:Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Don't forget guys, Tan himself said he will be personally involved with transfers now
Carl he certainly did
Very worrying though.
Don't know what's going on here but certainly don't believe Tan is that daft - he wants to make money.
Lets be honest, no matter what now Tan will never make money out of City, he is in for £150mill and he will never get all that back.
So what you think he's just throwing even more money away?
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:42 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:43 pm
BluebirdCoz wrote:The boy was bought for 2m if I remember correctly. This can't be true. Surely it's a typo and it's 15 rather than 1.5
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:44 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:45 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:46 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:48 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:55 pm
Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:00 pm
Wayne S wrote:Fans often over inflate the value of players they like.
Last year of contract, easily got half a million worth out of him while at the city and his fitness concerns could return at any point.
He will not fit into Ole's style of play and his ability to slot in goals from midfield suggests he was more inclined to be going forward than tracking back.
I'm not shocked by £1.5million. It may be the bottom end of his worth with his current contract but the top end would only be about £2 to £2.5million.
May be add ons or sell ons.