Sun May 11, 2014 6:32 pm
markeMark wrote:You have one person handing out a right slating, and another person issuing a public apology. Tan would not be able to publicly criticise Malky in such a manner unless he was in a position to back his comments up should Malky consider he had a claim for libel after Tan's latest outburst. If MM is squeaky clean as suggested by many on this forum, there is no reason why he shouldn't fight back as this is not exactly doing his reputation a lot of good. Tan has messed up by changing to red, but it seems as if Malky has also messed up big time, especially now being publicly accused of almost destroying the club. If Malky remains quiet after this, I think the MM supporters may have to accept that he wasn't completely innocent when he was removed from the club.
Sun May 11, 2014 6:32 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 6:33 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 6:33 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 6:41 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 7:03 pm
RFMH wrote:Imagine how many players Dave Jones would have bought for £5mil and not a single one would have been a central midfielder.
Sun May 11, 2014 7:06 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 7:13 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 7:18 pm
CantonJack wrote:Malky's fault for losing 4-0 to Hull and Sunderland and 3-0 to Palace and Swansea![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun May 11, 2014 7:19 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:CantonJack wrote:Malky's fault for losing 4-0 to Hull and Sunderland and 3-0 to Palace and Swansea![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes
Sun May 11, 2014 7:59 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:chrisdoi wrote:I really like Malky and am totally against the rebrand, but Tan does have a point. We paid 8.5 million or whatever it was (and $45,000/week) to a player that a Championship side was looking at bringing in for $500,000. The striking issues were never addressed this season. After 38 games a goal here and a goal there keeps us up, even if we concede as many as we did. Whoever the manager was going to be, it was always going to be tough without a decent goal scorer.
Of course he has a point and i agree with him but hes still a total idiot even his latest thing on converting a little debt if we get back to the prem and a supposed compromise two years on just makes me cringe when it was ALL DEBT TO EQUITY just for turning red we was promised. The mans taking the piss out of us end of
Sun May 11, 2014 8:15 pm
CantonJack wrote:Malky's fault for losing 4-0 to Hull and Sunderland and 3-0 to Palace and Swansea![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun May 11, 2014 8:16 pm
Bluebina wrote:CantonJack wrote:Malky's fault for losing 4-0 to Hull and Sunderland and 3-0 to Palace and Swansea![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes because he left us without a goal scoring Striker and a leaky defence........
Our £10millions striker was back where he started.....
Sun May 11, 2014 8:24 pm
toshacks_1_tales wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:chrisdoi wrote:I really like Malky and am totally against the rebrand, but Tan does have a point. We paid 8.5 million or whatever it was (and $45,000/week) to a player that a Championship side was looking at bringing in for $500,000. The striking issues were never addressed this season. After 38 games a goal here and a goal there keeps us up, even if we concede as many as we did. Whoever the manager was going to be, it was always going to be tough without a decent goal scorer.
Of course he has a point and i agree with him but hes still a total idiot even his latest thing on converting a little debt if we get back to the prem and a supposed compromise two years on just makes me cringe when it was ALL DEBT TO EQUITY just for turning red we was promised. The mans taking the piss out of us end of
£50 million is a tad more than a little debt. £50 million pounds is 50 MILLION POUNDS. Do you know how much £50 million pounds is? It's a lot of bloody money.
Sun May 11, 2014 8:42 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 9:06 pm
RicardoPatrese wrote:Bunch of whining xxxxx - Mackay is a good manager and he would have motivated his players and brought the best out of them. Cornelius was injured and played in total 8 games, some off bench. It was always going it be difficult but perhaps Mackay was buying for the future and we will never know if he would have settled.
Look - you never know Norwich's striker has had a shit season, Swansea's a great one both had a similar record;
One thing for 100% in all clubs when you get a crazy motherfucker chairman interfering all the f*cking time pissing off the fans trying to sue other clubs etc etc it always fucks up.
Putting this all aside - HOW THE f**k can TAN criticise Mackay for Cornelius and then employ clueless OGS.
I wonder if all will humbly apologise when Norwich under Mackay are top.
Sun May 11, 2014 10:15 pm
Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Sun May 11, 2014 11:05 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 11:38 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Mon May 12, 2014 4:18 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Malky was the football man and moody negotiated fees/wages. They were trusted with millions and they blew it.
what would be said if Tan had veteod the Acorn deal as he thought it wasnt right......you'd all be up in arms claiming he's interfering and that the manager should decide.
Beat Tan with the rebrand stick all you like but he gave the manager full control of a war chest and trusted his judgement to spend it wisely.......Malky fucked up!
Mon May 12, 2014 6:39 am
Snaag wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Malky was the football man and moody negotiated fees/wages. They were trusted with millions and they blew it.
what would be said if Tan had veteod the Acorn deal as he thought it wasnt right......you'd all be up in arms claiming he's interfering and that the manager should decide.
Beat Tan with the rebrand stick all you like but he gave the manager full control of a war chest and trusted his judgement to spend it wisely.......Malky fucked up!
Neither Malky or Moody are qualified to negotiate fees or salaries, they should never have been anywhere near the money, any sensible business would have negotiators who would negotiate the best price.
The person to blame is the person at the top.
Mon May 12, 2014 8:07 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Malky was the football man and moody negotiated fees/wages. They were trusted with millions and they blew it.
what would be said if Tan had veteod the Acorn deal as he thought it wasnt right......you'd all be up in arms claiming he's interfering and that the manager should decide.
Beat Tan with the rebrand stick all you like but he gave the manager full control of a war chest and trusted his judgement to spend it wisely.......Malky fucked up!
Mon May 12, 2014 8:11 am
Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Malky was the football man and moody negotiated fees/wages. They were trusted with millions and they blew it.
what would be said if Tan had veteod the Acorn deal as he thought it wasnt right......you'd all be up in arms claiming he's interfering and that the manager should decide.
Beat Tan with the rebrand stick all you like but he gave the manager full control of a war chest and trusted his judgement to spend it wisely.......Malky fucked up!
And what about Lim in all this Craig?
I find it difficult to believe Malky and Moody were left totally in chare of this sort of thing.
Mon May 12, 2014 11:55 am
Mon May 12, 2014 1:01 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 1:04 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Snaag wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Malky was the football man and moody negotiated fees/wages. They were trusted with millions and they blew it.
what would be said if Tan had veteod the Acorn deal as he thought it wasnt right......you'd all be up in arms claiming he's interfering and that the manager should decide.
Beat Tan with the rebrand stick all you like but he gave the manager full control of a war chest and trusted his judgement to spend it wisely.......Malky fucked up!
Neither Malky or Moody are qualified to negotiate fees or salaries, they should never have been anywhere near the money, any sensible business would have negotiators who would negotiate the best price.
The person to blame is the person at the top.
Dont be so stupid
Mon May 12, 2014 1:22 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:toshacks_1_tales wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:chrisdoi wrote:I really like Malky and am totally against the rebrand, but Tan does have a point. We paid 8.5 million or whatever it was (and $45,000/week) to a player that a Championship side was looking at bringing in for $500,000. The striking issues were never addressed this season. After 38 games a goal here and a goal there keeps us up, even if we concede as many as we did. Whoever the manager was going to be, it was always going to be tough without a decent goal scorer.
Of course he has a point and i agree with him but hes still a total idiot even his latest thing on converting a little debt if we get back to the prem and a supposed compromise two years on just makes me cringe when it was ALL DEBT TO EQUITY just for turning red we was promised. The mans taking the piss out of us end of
£50 million is a tad more than a little debt. £50 million pounds is 50 MILLION POUNDS. Do you know how much £50 million pounds is? It's a lot of bloody money.
It's also not what VT promised when he suggested the rebrand. He's a liar.
Mon May 12, 2014 1:36 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 1:41 pm
Snaag wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Snaag wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Military Junta wrote:But Jones done f**k all at Sheff Wednesday so that is just Tans opinion. He was the one who signed off the cheques so where is his apology for that then ? As per usual its never Tans fault
Thats just it adam the way tans talking its as if malky is the board to agree on fees and wages to be paid when we all know it has to be santioned by the board, i mean how can that be tans fault it never is
Malky was the football man and moody negotiated fees/wages. They were trusted with millions and they blew it.
what would be said if Tan had veteod the Acorn deal as he thought it wasnt right......you'd all be up in arms claiming he's interfering and that the manager should decide.
Beat Tan with the rebrand stick all you like but he gave the manager full control of a war chest and trusted his judgement to spend it wisely.......Malky fucked up!
Neither Malky or Moody are qualified to negotiate fees or salaries, they should never have been anywhere near the money, any sensible business would have negotiators who would negotiate the best price.
The person to blame is the person at the top.
Dont be so stupid
Sorry but if you think its the norm for the manager to negotiate fees and salaries then your the stupid one.
Do you think them down the road will be giving Monk a wad of cash and saying spend wisely, doubt that very much, I remember reading after they sacked Laudrup that Laudrup said he had talked to a number of players and given the details to Jenkins but didn't know why they never signed.
I doubt very much if Wenger, Mourinho, Rodgers or even Fergurson when he was at Man Utd negotiated signing fees, salaries etc, all clubs are businesses and they employ people to do the negotiations or the person in charge will do it (owner/chairman), people who run the club and know what can be afforded.
As someone mentioned Lim was Tan's man at the club, why didnt he control the money?
There are a lot of questions that need asking, putting the blame on Malky for spending too much money is cowardy by Tsn, he accepts no responsibility at all.
Mon May 12, 2014 9:09 pm