Uncle Roathie right again

Ive answered that. You have appealed to my business brain so ive given you the answer.

I wouldnt EVER do debt to equity, and neither will he. Hw owns 90% of the club so tell me one reason why he will essentially buy the other 10% for £100m which of course values the business at £1 billion pro rata

Its pure nonsense and the suggestion is ludicrous, he is playing you all for fools and you are lapping it up. If the club is worth £80m then the going rate for the final 10% is around £8m. Its like embarking on buying a house to make a profit and then buying a £80,000 house for £1 million.

Ridiculous.

He will buy the other 10% for around £8m - £10m and the club will still owe him close to £100m.

Bookmark it if you like.

Im castro btw

This debt to equity scenario still makes absolutely no sense what so ever, and the more the debt rises - the less sense it makes.mFor what possible reason would he ever do it?

Partial debt to equity - sure. But coverting £100m into equity is like a money hungry penny pincher buying a big mac meal for £150 when he could just pay just £6.

His goal is to make money so why give it away?

Still dont get it. I see one line say he will never do it, and one line say he might turn partial. What Makes your figures right and Lawnmovers figures wrong? You say you have said it all along, all this prove is that you change your argument to be right

I dont understand what is confusing you.

He will never do full debt to equity because he will essentially be buying the remaining 10% stake for £150m.

I said he would do a partial debt to equity meaning the club will still be in debt to the tune of £100m

Here is another, enjoy....

I told you the float was ridiculous and I also told you debt to equity makes no sense. If he only needs to acquire 10% of the club then there is no way he will pay £80m for it, that values the company at £800m pro rata which is bonkers.

I assume there will be a partial debt to equity.

Everything loaned is covered as always.

I dont understand what is confusing you.

He will never do full debt to equity because he will essentially be buying the remaining 10% stake for £150m.

I said he would do a partial debt to equity meaning the club will still be in debt to the tune of £100m

Here is another, enjoy....

I told you the float was ridiculous and I also told you debt to equity makes no sense. If he only needs to acquire 10% of the club then there is no way he will pay £80m for it, that values the company at £800m pro rata which is bonkers.

I assume there will be a partial debt to equity.

Everything loaned is covered as always.

You and your inconsistency confuse me. First you say he will turn partial, the he wont, and then he will again? And your numbers are going up and down like a dutch whore on a saturday.. Rather listen to Lawnmower, he seem to be more on target

Im not sure if you are being an idiot or just cant read.

Where have I ever said he wont do a partial debt to equity? Ive made it pretty clear that he wont do a full debt to equity but will do a partial one.

anybodies numbers are guesswork based on what we know previously, but with regards ti what we are discussing, amounts are irrelevant.

But im glad you now see im spot on again, even though i sense you would hate to admit it