Malky was mr Milky after all

taken out of context as usual

How? You said you were there protesting.... I've quoted the whole post!

Apology accepted.

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

Maybe the good Mr Cheata will take note now.

out of context because
whats your fu..ing point your trying to make

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

What next,you'll be telling us Sam Hamman didn't fleece us.You used to say the truth will come out over Sam too.Were still waiting.

Apology for what?

Evidence please? None that any of us have seen a fact

Has Malky been charged? NO

Has Malky been brought before the League? NO

Will Malky continue now to manager after this? YES

MODERATORS ON THIS FORUM SPEAK THEIR OWN MINDS A FACT

you got to admit annis seems like moody and malky were at it ,if the mail is right about no money being involved in the settlement maybe the milky rummours were right

That's it though, it's all maybe's, nobody knows the truth.

Spot on, none of us know the truth, only them and until then, I stand by Malky

But you knew part of the truth by this time and you said " I stand by Malky" shame on you

Apology for what?

Evidence please? None that any of us have seen a fact

Has Malky been charged? NO

Has Malky been brought before the League? NO

Will Malky continue now to manager after this? YES

MODERATORS ON THIS FORUM SPEAK THEIR OWN MINDS A FACT

you got to admit annis seems like moody and malky were at it ,if the mail is right about no money being involved in the settlement maybe the milky rummours were right

That's it though, it's all maybe's, nobody knows the truth.

Spot on, none of us know the truth, only them and until then, I stand by Malky

But you knew part of the truth by this time and you said " I stand by Malky" shame on you

I knew that Malky had received one email or text of Moody, big deal?

Shame on you for twisting things

Apology for what?

Evidence please? None that any of us have seen a fact

Has Malky been charged? NO

Has Malky been brought before the League? NO

Will Malky continue now to manager after this? YES

MODERATORS ON THIS FORUM SPEAK THEIR OWN MINDS A FACT

you got to admit annis seems like moody and malky were at it ,if the mail is right about no money being involved in the settlement maybe the milky rummours were right

That's it though, it's all maybe's, nobody knows the truth.

Spot on, none of us know the truth, only them and until then, I stand by Malky

But you knew part of the truth by this time and you said " I stand by Malky" shame on you

About taking bungs......none of us know anything on that subject.

Apology for what?

Evidence please? None that any of us have seen a fact

Has Malky been charged? NO

Has Malky been brought before the League? NO

Will Malky continue now to manager after this? YES

MODERATORS ON THIS FORUM SPEAK THEIR OWN MINDS A FACT

you got to admit annis seems like moody and malky were at it ,if the mail is right about no money being involved in the settlement maybe the milky rummours were right

That's it though, it's all maybe's, nobody knows the truth.

Spot on, none of us know the truth, only them and until then, I stand by Malky

But you knew part of the truth by this time and you said " I stand by Malky" shame on you

About taking bungs......none of us know anything on that subject.

I said part of he truth "text messages"

Apology for what?

Evidence please? None that any of us have seen a fact

Has Malky been charged? NO

Has Malky been brought before the League? NO

Will Malky continue now to manager after this? YES

MODERATORS ON THIS FORUM SPEAK THEIR OWN MINDS A FACT

you got to admit annis seems like moody and malky were at it ,if the mail is right about no money being involved in the settlement maybe the milky rummours were right

That's it though, it's all maybe's, nobody knows the truth.

Spot on, none of us know the truth, only them and until then, I stand by Malky

But you knew part of the truth by this time and you said " I stand by Malky" shame on you

About taking bungs......none of us know anything on that subject.

I said part of he truth "text messages"

Carl and Annis have admitted to knowing that one e-mail was sent to Malky.

Have to say there's not any strong evidence yet towards M&M taking bungs at this time, so give it some time and see how the investigation goes.

As for the rest you're spot on. All the usual haters will now now start bringing up the 'debt to equity' "promise". I keep asking but no one can show me when and where this 'promise' was made.

Have to say there's not any strong evidence yet towards M&M taking bungs at this time, so give it some time and see how the investigation goes.

As for the rest you're spot on. All the usual haters will now now start bringing up the 'debt to equity' "promise". I keep asking but no one can show me when and where this 'promise' was made.

I gave you loads of links.

Have to say there's not any strong evidence yet towards M&M taking bungs at this time, so give it some time and see how the investigation goes.

As for the rest you're spot on. All the usual haters will now now start bringing up the 'debt to equity' "promise". I keep asking but no one can show me when and where this 'promise' was made.

I gave you loads of links.

and none of them mentions any promise from Tan to clear all the debt. At the time of the rebrand he mentioned that "work will also continue in earnest to improve the balance sheet by driving new revenue streams, attracting new investment and converting existing debt to equity". And that was that. No promise. No timescales. Current debt only (approx 40 million at the time).

So I'm still waiting

Have to say there's not any strong evidence yet towards M&M taking bungs at this time, so give it some time and see how the investigation goes.

As for the rest you're spot on. All the usual haters will now now start bringing up the 'debt to equity' "promise". I keep asking but no one can show me when and where this 'promise' was made.

I gave you loads of links.

and none of them mentions any promise from Tan to clear all the debt. At the time of the rebrand he mentioned that "work will also continue in earnest to improve the balance sheet by driving new revenue streams, attracting new investment and converting existing debt to equity". And that was that. No promise. No timescales. Current debt only (approx 40 million at the time).

So I'm still waiting

You are unbelieveable.....ok he didn't say he was going to do the debt to equity....anyone else agree with this guy?

I have predicted here that probebly MM earned personally on the transfer market through backhanders.
It happen more than we like to think in english football unfortunately.

Why pay 8 mill for cornelius, no one in scandinavia would ever pay more than 2mill.
Plus agent fees in amounts as high as what the club paid for Dæhli !

VT must have had some hard evidence against MM and Moody to have them bow to VT in a stunning appology like this.
The club did not pay MM a penny, as Tan was right all the time in sacking him.
Tan could have taken them to the cleaners and they knew it when the saw the evidences through the silicitors, but Tan wanted surely to save the club from more disturbance.

Maybe OGS was wanted by Cardiff after MM, as he is knowned to be a 100 0/0 loyal and 100 0/0 honest man, and the club needed that from a manager?

The moderators on this forum were all Malky lovers and abused Tan for sacking him. Perhaps an appology is in order from Annis & co, and many others as well?
But that will not happen, now they back up each other in theories of new job etc.etc.
And from being law experts for months, they now will change to financial experts with a dept to equity case.

Rebrand aside, Tan has done good things for ccfc,saving it and bringing the club to PL for first time etc.

Now comes the silly answers with abuse against me , as it did when I was predicting the thruth months ago !

Quote (GoldenCheetah): "The moderators on this forum were all Malky lovers and abused Tan for sacking him"

Not so, and you need to get your facts right before making broad statements, fella

You'll have to trawl pretty deep in the ocean to find a post from me (or a number of other 'Mods') that criticises Tan for sacking Malky. What I did say, however, was that I personally would have kept him until the summer out of respect for getting us promotion. I saw that as fair (given the limited/nee incorrect information we had at that time)

We didn't know at that time (because Tan rightly kept it to his chest for legal reasons) was exactly what had occurred and, check again, I did say at the time that Tan must have had his reasons and that we should 'hold off' until the facts were known!

Doesn't make me ITK, a Tan-lover or anything of the sort, but is does show that the 'Mods' can think for themselves regardless of the rubbish people like you spout in the hope that the other sheep will listen!

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

I cannot wait for the truth to come out. I've been saying the opposite since day 1. . You are going to look very foolish annis

Malky was mr Milky after all........And the evidence is where Oh yes its just anotherinternet football thread so it must be true, untill it comes out hes guilty then i'll believe it.

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

I cannot wait for the truth to come out. I've been saying the opposite since day 1. . You are going to look very foolish annis

I cannot see how Annis would look foolish.

I know that Annis was told back when this thread was started there was no evidence at all of any fraud or bungs being levelled against Malky.

I was told the very same as Annis and it was to do with a text or email communication that Moody sent to Malky that the apology was for.

Danny, as it has been said in another thread, do you think people like Steve Borley would have been publicly supporting Malky Mackay right before his sacking and after it had there been evidence of bungs and brown envelopes ?

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

I cannot wait for the truth to come out. I've been saying the opposite since day 1. . You are going to look very foolish annis

I cannot see how Annis would look foolish.

I know that Annis was told back when this thread was started there was no evidence at all of any fraud or bungs being levelled against Malky.

I was told the very same as Annis and it was to do with a text or email communication that Moody sent to Malky that the apology was for.

Danny, as it has been said in another thread, do you think people like Steve Borley would have been publicly supporting Malky Mackay right before his sacking and after it had there been evidence of bungs and brown envelopes ?

Yes I think he wanted to keep the peace until he got the cash sorted for his own shareholdings

I will repeat again Malky is 100% not guilty of any fraud and one day you will all see and hear the facts

Malky and Moody apologised for something nothing to do with Fraud

I cannot wait for the truth to come out. I've been saying the opposite since day 1. . You are going to look very foolish annis

Danny, I am entitled to my opinion,so far i have heard of NO evidence involving Malky in Fraud

Danny have you ?


If so please tell us?

I am sure the evidence is with the right people, hence the high court warrants

I am sure the evidence is with the right people, hence the high court warrants

But you've got No evidence yourself?

I have no physical evidence myself how could i?

Did you have any physical evidence of the emails that you claimed to know about?

No

You were told right?

Have to say there's not any strong evidence yet towards M&M taking bungs at this time, so give it some time and see how the investigation goes.

As for the rest you're spot on. All the usual haters will now now start bringing up the 'debt to equity' "promise". I keep asking but no one can show me when and where this 'promise' was made.

I gave you loads of links.

and none of them mentions any promise from Tan to clear all the debt. At the time of the rebrand he mentioned that "work will also continue in earnest to improve the balance sheet by driving new revenue streams, attracting new investment and converting existing debt to equity". And that was that. No promise. No timescales. Current debt only (approx 40 million at the time).

So I'm still waiting

You are unbelieveable.....ok he didn't say he was going to do the debt to equity....anyone else agree with this guy?

how is he unbelieveable?? hes quoted what tan said and, as much as i hate tan, he's keeping his promise (existing debt 40m at the time, i believe he's doing 50m so thats 10m OVER what he promised) and you or anyone else can't provide any quotes or evidence to suggest otherwise. yet when someone proves you wrong you just give them shit without offering anything yourself.

Have to say there's not any strong evidence yet towards M&M taking bungs at this time, so give it some time and see how the investigation goes.

As for the rest you're spot on. All the usual haters will now now start bringing up the 'debt to equity' "promise". I keep asking but no one can show me when and where this 'promise' was made.

I gave you loads of links.

and none of them mentions any promise from Tan to clear all the debt. At the time of the rebrand he mentioned that "work will also continue in earnest to improve the balance sheet by driving new revenue streams, attracting new investment and converting existing debt to equity". And that was that. No promise. No timescales. Current debt only (approx 40 million at the time).

So I'm still waiting

You are unbelieveable.....ok he didn't say he was going to do the debt to equity....anyone else agree with this guy?

Based on what he is quoting, what is there not to agree with?