Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:16 am

Mario wrote:Season 13/14
John Brayford £1,500,000
Steven Caulker £8,000,000
Simon Moore Undisclosed
Maximiliano Amondarain Free
Kevin Theopile Catherine £2,100,000
Peter Odemwingie £2,500,000
Andreas Cornelius £8,000,000
Gary Medel £11,000,000
Mats Daehli £1,000,000
Magnus Eikrem £2,000,000
Jo Inge Berget Undisclosed
Kenwyne Jones Swap
Fabio Minimal

£36,100,000


You do realise a about agent fees and bonus payment right :laughing6:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:17 am

Kenfig Blue wrote:
Mario wrote:Season 13/14
John Brayford £1,500,000
Steven Caulker £8,000,000
Simon Moore Undisclosed
Maximiliano Amondarain Free
Kevin Theopile Catherine £2,100,000
Peter Odemwingie £2,500,000
Andreas Cornelius £8,000,000
Gary Medel £11,000,000
Mats Daehli £1,000,000
Magnus Eikrem £2,000,000
Jo Inge Berget Undisclosed
Kenwyne Jones Swap
Fabio Minimal

£36,100,000


You do realise a about agent fees and bonus payment right :laughing6:


Yes. So add that to what every other club has spent then.

Mackay I highly doubt is involved the drawing up of contracts.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:18 am

Mario wrote:Season 13/14
John Brayford £1,500,000
Steven Caulker £8,000,000
Simon Moore Undisclosed
Maximiliano Amondarain Free
Kevin Theopile Catherine £2,100,000
Peter Odemwingie £2,500,000
Andreas Cornelius £8,000,000
Gary Medel £11,000,000
Mats Daehli £1,000,000
Magnus Eikrem £2,000,000
Jo Inge Berget Undisclosed
Kenwyne Jones Swap
Fabio Minimal

£36,100,000


So according to that Malky spent 33m and OGS 3m

I rest my case on whos to blame for having a shit squad.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:23 am

Net Spend last 5 Years Purchased Gross Sold Net Per Season
Cardiff City £53,695,000 £16,225,000 £37,470,000 £7,494,000
Hull City £56,525,000 £8,750,000 £47,775,000 £9,555,000
QPR £76,450,000 £16,350,000 £60,100,000 £12,020,000
Birmingham £37,675,000 £47,400,000 -£9,725,000 -£1,945,000
Wigan £55,300,000 £78,550,000 -£23,250,000 -£4,650,000
Blackburn £47,802,000 £82,850,000 -£35,048,000 -£7,009,600
Middlesbrough £41,700,000 £47,350,000 -£5,650,000 -£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:25 am

Mario wrote:I think we have a good enough squad.


Put the solvents away son. We've been fighting a losing battle since the crap Malky and Moody bought in the summer.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:25 am

Mario wrote:Net Spend last 5 Years Purchased Gross Sold Net Per Season
Cardiff City £53,695,000 £16,225,000 £37,470,000 £7,494,000
Hull City £56,525,000 £8,750,000 £47,775,000 £9,555,000
QPR £76,450,000 £16,350,000 £60,100,000 £12,020,000
Birmingham £37,675,000 £47,400,000 -£9,725,000 -£1,945,000
Wigan £55,300,000 £78,550,000 -£23,250,000 -£4,650,000
Blackburn £47,802,000 £82,850,000 -£35,048,000 -£7,009,600
Middlesbrough £41,700,000 £47,350,000 -£5,650,000 -£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.



why are u looking at 5 years? :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:27 am

Net Spend last 5 Years...Purchased Gross.........Sold..............Net...............Per Season
Cardiff City.....................£53,695,000.......£16,225,000....£37,470,000 ..........£7,494,000
Hull City.......... ............. £56,525,000........£8,750,000 .....£47,775,000..........£9,555,000
QPR..............................£76,450,000........£16,350,000....£60,100,000.........£12,020,000
Birmingham....................£37,675,000.........£47,400,000....£9,725,000...........-£1,945,000
Wigan...........................£55,300,000.........£78,550,000....£23,250,000........£4,650,000
Blackburn.......................£47,802,000.........£82,850,000.....£35,048,000.......£7,009,600
Middlesbrough..................£41,700,000........£47,350,000......£5,650,000........£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Because people bitch and moan on here about Mackays complete transfer record.

For the amount of money the club is racking in, our transfer spending hasn't been that bad.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:28 am

Mario wrote:Net Spend last 5 Years...Purchased Gross.........Sold..............Net...............Per Season
Cardiff City.....................£53,695,000.......£16,225,000....£37,470,000 ..........£7,494,000
Hull City.......... ............. £56,525,000........£8,750,000 .....£47,775,000..........£9,555,000
QPR..............................£76,450,000........£16,350,000....£60,100,000.........£12,020,000
Birmingham....................£37,675,000.........£47,400,000....£9,725,000...........-£1,945,000
Wigan...........................£55,300,000.........£78,550,000....£23,250,000........£4,650,000
Blackburn.......................£47,802,000.........£82,850,000.....£35,048,000.......£7,009,600
Middlesbrough..................£41,700,000........£47,350,000......£5,650,000........£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Because people bitch and moan on here about Mackays complete transfer record.

For the amount of money the club is racking in, our transfer spending hasn't been that bad.



so ill ask again..... why are you looking at 5 years.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:30 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:Net Spend last 5 Years...Purchased Gross.........Sold..............Net...............Per Season
Cardiff City.....................£53,695,000.......£16,225,000....£37,470,000 ..........£7,494,000
Hull City.......... ............. £56,525,000........£8,750,000 .....£47,775,000..........£9,555,000
QPR..............................£76,450,000........£16,350,000....£60,100,000.........£12,020,000
Birmingham....................£37,675,000.........£47,400,000....£9,725,000...........-£1,945,000
Wigan...........................£55,300,000.........£78,550,000....£23,250,000........£4,650,000
Blackburn.......................£47,802,000.........£82,850,000.....£35,048,000.......£7,009,600
Middlesbrough..................£41,700,000........£47,350,000......£5,650,000........£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Because people bitch and moan on here about Mackays complete transfer record.

For the amount of money the club is racking in, our transfer spending hasn't been that bad.



so ill ask again..... why are you looking at 5 years.


Init, what a freak.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:30 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:Net Spend last 5 Years...Purchased Gross.........Sold..............Net...............Per Season
Cardiff City.....................£53,695,000.......£16,225,000....£37,470,000 ..........£7,494,000
Hull City.......... ............. £56,525,000........£8,750,000 .....£47,775,000..........£9,555,000
QPR..............................£76,450,000........£16,350,000....£60,100,000.........£12,020,000
Birmingham....................£37,675,000.........£47,400,000....£9,725,000...........-£1,945,000
Wigan...........................£55,300,000.........£78,550,000....£23,250,000........£4,650,000
Blackburn.......................£47,802,000.........£82,850,000.....£35,048,000.......£7,009,600
Middlesbrough..................£41,700,000........£47,350,000......£5,650,000........£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Because people bitch and moan on here about Mackays complete transfer record.

For the amount of money the club is racking in, our transfer spending hasn't been that bad.



so ill ask again..... why are you looking at 5 years.


To show we don't spend much as a club seeing as we are racking in money from the new tv deals. When relegated teams as shown have been spending shit loads of money with smaller amounts coming into their clubs.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:31 am

Mario wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:Net Spend last 5 Years...Purchased Gross.........Sold..............Net...............Per Season
Cardiff City.....................£53,695,000.......£16,225,000....£37,470,000 ..........£7,494,000
Hull City.......... ............. £56,525,000........£8,750,000 .....£47,775,000..........£9,555,000
QPR..............................£76,450,000........£16,350,000....£60,100,000.........£12,020,000
Birmingham....................£37,675,000.........£47,400,000....£9,725,000...........-£1,945,000
Wigan...........................£55,300,000.........£78,550,000....£23,250,000........£4,650,000
Blackburn.......................£47,802,000.........£82,850,000.....£35,048,000.......£7,009,600
Middlesbrough..................£41,700,000........£47,350,000......£5,650,000........£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Because people bitch and moan on here about Mackays complete transfer record.

For the amount of money the club is racking in, our transfer spending hasn't been that bad.



so ill ask again..... why are you looking at 5 years.


To show we don't spend much as a club seeing as we are racking in money from the new tv deals. When relegated teams as shown have been spending shit loads of money with smaller amounts coming into their clubs.



or to deliberately skewer the figures, lets have a look at the last two seasons :thumbup:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:31 am

9 million to get promoted, 35 million this season. There, that was hard.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:33 am

Mario wrote:9 million to get promoted, 35 million this season. There, that was hard.



44m spent by malky then over two years, a net spend of what... 40 million?

to amass a squad not good enough for the premier league.


Still not sure why you bothered posting that rubbish! :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:33 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:Net Spend last 5 Years...Purchased Gross.........Sold..............Net...............Per Season
Cardiff City.....................£53,695,000.......£16,225,000....£37,470,000 ..........£7,494,000
Hull City.......... ............. £56,525,000........£8,750,000 .....£47,775,000..........£9,555,000
QPR..............................£76,450,000........£16,350,000....£60,100,000.........£12,020,000
Birmingham....................£37,675,000.........£47,400,000....£9,725,000...........-£1,945,000
Wigan...........................£55,300,000.........£78,550,000....£23,250,000........£4,650,000
Blackburn.......................£47,802,000.........£82,850,000.....£35,048,000.......£7,009,600
Middlesbrough..................£41,700,000........£47,350,000......£5,650,000........£1,130,000

I don't think our spending is that outrageous, not seeing as we have sell on value with them.

Because people bitch and moan on here about Mackays complete transfer record.

For the amount of money the club is racking in, our transfer spending hasn't been that bad.



so ill ask again..... why are you looking at 5 years.

Be course Cardiff did some really god business in the past. Including that might hide the complete cock up in the summer :thumbup:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:34 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:9 million to get promoted, 35 million this season. There, that was hard.



44m spent by malky then over two years, a net spend of what... 40 million?

to amass a squad not good enough for the premier league.


Still not sure why you bothered posting that rubbish! :lol:


Ye and getting the club to the premier league :?

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:36 am

Mario wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:9 million to get promoted, 35 million this season. There, that was hard.



44m spent by malky then over two years, a net spend of what... 40 million?

to amass a squad not good enough for the premier league.


Still not sure why you bothered posting that rubbish! :lol:


Ye and getting the club to the premier league :?



so 9 millions to get to the premier league... job done. :)


then 35 million wasted when there, plus a wage bill of 40m + and all the "jackpot premier league money" is gone anyway :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:37 am

Mario wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:9 million to get promoted, 35 million this season. There, that was hard.



44m spent by malky then over two years, a net spend of what... 40 million?

to amass a squad not good enough for the premier league.


Still not sure why you bothered posting that rubbish! :lol:


Ye and getting the club to the premier league :?

No point just going to Mount Everest is it? You need to climb it to.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:38 am

its like Groundhog Day on here it really is.

The money gained from getting to the Prem has been spent in the last 2 years on transfers and wages FFS :lol:

How many times for crying out loud.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:41 am

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:its like Groundhog Day on here it really is.

The money gained from getting to the Prem has been spent in the last 2 years on transfers and wages FFS :lol:

How many times for crying out loud.



i just really dont know what hes trying to prove :lol:

showing we spend less than QPR over the last 5 seasons like, wtf does that matter! :laughing6:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:42 am

paulh_85 wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:its like Groundhog Day on here it really is.

The money gained from getting to the Prem has been spent in the last 2 years on transfers and wages FFS :lol:

How many times for crying out loud.



i just really dont know what hes trying to prove :lol:

showing we spend less than QPR over the last 5 seasons like, wtf does that matter! :laughing6:


I wish it was Groundhog Day and he was that guy who gets punched in the face.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:48 am

The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:48 am

Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:50 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:53 am

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, they have made money.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:56 am

Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, they have made money.



:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:


im going to have to leave it there. You must surely be a parody account, no-one could be that f*cking stupid!

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:57 am

Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, he and Moody have made money.


Corrected for you :thumbup:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:57 am

Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, they have made money.


Work in the recruitment and accounts department do you, as you seem to know a lot about who has signed who, and how much money was made/lost by tan and malky.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:57 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, they have made money.



:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:


im going to have to leave it there. You must surely be a parody account, no-one could be that f*cking stupid!


Im starting to think its Roathie or Barnett on a wind-up. No one could be this f*cking stupid surely. :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:59 am

Kenfig Blue wrote:
Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, they have made money.


Work in the recruitment and accounts department do you, as you seem to know a lot about who has signed who, and how much money was made/lost by tan and malky.


Do you?. Seeing as you make up total shit about mackays spending like saying he spent 50 million quid this season.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:02 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:The club have made more from mackay than they have lost. Alot more.



despite the fact we are in more f*cking debt!? :lol:


dear me :laughing5: :laughing5:

:lol: :lol:


Ye, ask tan about that.

From what mackay has had a hand in, they have made money.



:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:


im going to have to leave it there. You must surely be a parody account, no-one could be that f*cking stupid!


How so?. Mackay wasted 30 million, okay. What else did he waste?.

Compared to the fact the club will make over 100 million pound thanks to him getting us promoted.

So because I have a different opinion to yours I am stupid. Guess you must be right as you have those 2 retards backing your opinion. You put a smiley after every comment, a sure sign of being correct.

Retards hunt in packs I suppose.