Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:50 am
paulh_85 wrote:Mario wrote:paulh_85 wrote:its a bit of a non story really
obviously in this poll people were given the option to choose Tan....doesn't really mean much except hes an obvious hate figure at the club.
Why wouldn't he be in a poll about blame for us going down.
Would you like a poll with the only option being Mackay?.
what I mean is that there is no one person to blame. Malky and Ole had roughly half a season each and a transfer window each too.
fact is when a poll like this is put up, people are going to automatically choose Tan, without thinking it through.
For me personally, the main factor in us going down is Malkys transfer dealings in the Summer. people talk about Tans meddling which is fair enough, but he trusted the manager with a massive budget, and he blew it.
Ole has been too naïve with his tactics, had a poor transfer window himself though obviously January is a lot more difficult.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:55 pm
Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:03 pm
swansealad69 wrote:Its all very well having 67% blaming tan but the same 67% dont do anything about it.
You have started protests and hopefully for the real fans they will gain momentum and finaly tan does one.
But I think its going to take a lot to get rid of him.
He realy has no care on how anyone views him and ses thick skinned.
It could be a case of u having to put up with him for a long time as he has so much power over your club and got his feet right under the table.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:19 pm
Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:51 pm
Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:23 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I would say in this order 1) Tan 2) Tan 3) Tan & Ole
Spot on Simon.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:29 pm
northside of risca wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I would say in this order 1) Tan 2) Tan 3) Tan & Ole
Spot on Simon.
Agree, not sure why many consider 17 points from as many games as a MM failure. Sure, some of the MM signings were shocking, but he was picking up points.
12 points since the new manager has been introduced confirms Tans decision making has been shocking / the primary reason we will be relegated on saturday.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:37 pm
LongBall wrote:northside of risca wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I would say in this order 1) Tan 2) Tan 3) Tan & Ole
Spot on Simon.
Agree, not sure why many consider 17 points from as many games as a MM failure. Sure, some of the MM signings were shocking, but he was picking up points.
12 points since the new manager has been introduced confirms Tans decision making has been shocking / the primary reason we will be relegated on saturday.
No, the primary reason is we have championship players, and that is shocking when you look at the money we spent.
If we win on Saturday Ole have the same shit stats as Malky.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:06 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I am shocked it's only 67% ? Thought it would be far far higher![]()
![]()
Me too. It's 100% Tan's fault we are getting relegated. Everyone should be able to see that but unfortunately, only 67% of those voting can see it!
Tonteg speaking nonsense again, what a surprise.
I obviously must have imagined us starting the season well before Tan stuck his nose in, interfered, disrupted things and then employ a manger to take us down into the relegation zone then.![]()
I will stick with facts, you stick to your false assumptions.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:19 pm
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I am shocked it's only 67% ? Thought it would be far far higher![]()
![]()
Me too. It's 100% Tan's fault we are getting relegated. Everyone should be able to see that but unfortunately, only 67% of those voting can see it!
Tonteg speaking nonsense again, what a surprise.
I obviously must have imagined us starting the season well before Tan stuck his nose in, interfered, disrupted things and then employ a manger to take us down into the relegation zone then.![]()
I will stick with facts, you stick to your false assumptions.
Tan doesn't buy players, choose tactics and take training. His disruptions have affected us but have been overblown to suit the agenda.
What you have said is not a fact, it is an opinion.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:37 pm
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I am shocked it's only 67% ? Thought it would be far far higher![]()
![]()
Me too. It's 100% Tan's fault we are getting relegated. Everyone should be able to see that but unfortunately, only 67% of those voting can see it!
Tonteg speaking nonsense again, what a surprise.
I obviously must have imagined us starting the season well before Tan stuck his nose in, interfered, disrupted things and then employ a manger to take us down into the relegation zone then.![]()
I will stick with facts, you stick to your false assumptions.
Tan doesn't buy players, choose tactics and take training. His disruptions have affected us but have been overblown to suit the agenda.
What you have said is not a fact, it is an opinion.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:48 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I am shocked it's only 67% ? Thought it would be far far higher![]()
![]()
Me too. It's 100% Tan's fault we are getting relegated. Everyone should be able to see that but unfortunately, only 67% of those voting can see it!
Tonteg speaking nonsense again, what a surprise.
I obviously must have imagined us starting the season well before Tan stuck his nose in, interfered, disrupted things and then employ a manger to take us down into the relegation zone then.![]()
I will stick with facts, you stick to your false assumptions.
Tan doesn't buy players, choose tactics and take training. His disruptions have affected us but have been overblown to suit the agenda.
What you have said is not a fact, it is an opinion.
The manager buys players, chooses tactics and takes training and the difference between Malky, the manager that Tan sacked and Ole, the manager Tan appointed is there for everyone to see. We were doing fine until Tan disrupted things. Whether Tan's destruction affected our performances and results is your opinion, but surely nobody can argue that Tan's off the pitch antics hasn't helped us one bit? Tan's breakdown in relationship with Malky followed by the appointment of Ole has seen us be humiliated, losing to Swansea and Palace 3-0 and losing to Hull and Sunderland 4-0. Those are facts I'm afraid and it's 100% Tan's fault.
Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:54 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:I am shocked it's only 67% ? Thought it would be far far higher![]()
![]()
Me too. It's 100% Tan's fault we are getting relegated. Everyone should be able to see that but unfortunately, only 67% of those voting can see it!
Tonteg speaking nonsense again, what a surprise.
I obviously must have imagined us starting the season well before Tan stuck his nose in, interfered, disrupted things and then employ a manger to take us down into the relegation zone then.![]()
I will stick with facts, you stick to your false assumptions.
Tan doesn't buy players, choose tactics and take training. His disruptions have affected us but have been overblown to suit the agenda.
What you have said is not a fact, it is an opinion.
The manager buys players, chooses tactics and takes training and the difference between Malky, the manager that Tan sacked and Ole, the manager Tan appointed is there for everyone to see. We were doing fine until Tan disrupted things. Whether Tan's destruction affected our performances and results is your opinion, but surely nobody can argue that Tan's off the pitch antics hasn't helped us one bit? Tan's breakdown in relationship with Malky followed by the appointment of Ole has seen us be humiliated, losing to Swansea and Palace 3-0 and losing to Hull and Sunderland 4-0. Those are facts I'm afraid and it's 100% Tan's fault.