Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:13 am
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:15 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:
I dont have to deal with anything. I know what local means. Its ok with me if you wish to change the definition to suit your argument.
You do, you need to deal with the fact Cardiff are my local side![]()
Its not an argument, it was my initial point - you THEN turned it into an argument. My view of what a local side is hasn't changed once and Cardiff are most certainly mine.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:17 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Thats fine. If you feel the need to change the Oxford English dictionary to feel correct, then you crack on.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:18 am
Mario wrote:With this 5000 figure being thrown about, did they actually count the number of heads there? Or did they do the standard, "any ticket given out is a person in attendance".
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:21 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Thats fine. If you feel the need to change the Oxford English dictionary to feel correct, then you crack on.
Local:
relating or restricted to a particular area or one's neighbourhood.
Roath is very much my manor
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:24 am
CraigCCFC wrote:You live in Oz, apology accepted.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:33 am
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:36 am
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:42 am
Wayne S wrote:Why would you want an open training session at this time in the season. The team and club have more important things on their mind.
Suffice to say an open training session at the start of the season would see a lot more than 5k turn up as it did a few years back when we were still at Ninian Park.
You are letting the resident troll get under your skin.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:48 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Im amazed after 2 years of rebrand and tripled debt there still hasnt been any major opposition to Tan. In fact it astounds me.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:51 am
Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:30 am
Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:57 am
Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:06 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
How have we lost our history? Stupid statement to make.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:07 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
How have we lost our history? Stupid statement to make.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:14 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
How have we lost our history? Stupid statement to make.
I see what you mean. History is just that and can't be lost, but I see what you're on about. History and tradition are being swept aside.
I don't agree that the club is on its last legs though. We just had a year in top flight, beating the likes of Man C and Southampton. Hardly division 4 is it?
The shame is that the money man has his hands on policy. That is the biggest problem here. We were a very competitive Championship side with no need of huge money. Gradual drip feeding was what we required. The cash in was nice, but what about continuity (Malky), identity (Blue to red) and most of all, appeal? We need to sell seats for next season. Simple as that. Mine was in the bag ages ago. Plastics are walking away in a bigger march than we had for Blue! Mind you, you can argue, who needs that sort of fan, but the truth is, Tan has failed to keep these people interested.
Our club isn't dead. It is on the brink of greatness if we can get some sense through to Mr. High-Trousers. Maybe Tan Out is not what we realistically need. Maybe it is Tan In - Tan embracing our identity as it was, Tan being a fan, not a spoilt brat who can't take criticism or accept responsibility for a lack of success.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:35 pm
Tan Out wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
How have we lost our history? Stupid statement to make.
You know full well what Mario is trying to say but your picking on one single word to bury your head in the sand and to rubbish his whole post. Swap ''history'' for ''identity'' which I'm sure you knew anyway.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:39 pm
Tan Out wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
How have we lost our history? Stupid statement to make.
I see what you mean. History is just that and can't be lost, but I see what you're on about. History and tradition are being swept aside.
I don't agree that the club is on its last legs though. We just had a year in top flight, beating the likes of Man C and Southampton. Hardly division 4 is it?
The shame is that the money man has his hands on policy. That is the biggest problem here. We were a very competitive Championship side with no need of huge money. Gradual drip feeding was what we required. The cash in was nice, but what about continuity (Malky), identity (Blue to red) and most of all, appeal? We need to sell seats for next season. Simple as that. Mine was in the bag ages ago. Plastics are walking away in a bigger march than we had for Blue! Mind you, you can argue, who needs that sort of fan, but the truth is, Tan has failed to keep these people interested.
Our club isn't dead. It is on the brink of greatness if we can get some sense through to Mr. High-Trousers. Maybe Tan Out is not what we realistically need. Maybe it is Tan In - Tan embracing our identity as it was, Tan being a fan, not a spoilt brat who can't take criticism or accept responsibility for a lack of success.
Brink of greatness? Maybe Tan Out is not what we realistically need? We are almost relegated which will put us in a worse situation than when Tan arrived and he also said we will NEVER go back to Blue. stop burying your head in the sand.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:48 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:05 pm
Mario wrote:So basically he has transferred all the debt cardiff owe to himself, so he will have a gun to cardiffs head for an extremly long time.
I'd rather go bankrupt, go down the leagues and build our way back up.
He has gone for boom or bust tactics instead of building a financially stable club.
Even when we win games I struggle to feel happy as I know he owns us.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:05 pm
Mario wrote:So basically he has transferred all the debt cardiff owe to himself, so he will have a gun to cardiffs head for an extremly long time.
I'd rather go bankrupt, go down the leagues and build our way back up.
He has gone for boom or bust tactics instead of building a financially stable club.
Even when we win games I struggle to feel happy as I know he owns us.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:07 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:Tan Out wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Tan didn't save anything.
A buyer would have been found regardless. Just we were found by a total kent.
We are in a worse financial standing now than before him. We have lost our history and any credibility we ever had.
If you think what we have now is prospering you need to sectioned.
We are dying as a club.
How have we lost our history? Stupid statement to make.
I see what you mean. History is just that and can't be lost, but I see what you're on about. History and tradition are being swept aside.
I don't agree that the club is on its last legs though. We just had a year in top flight, beating the likes of Man C and Southampton. Hardly division 4 is it?
The shame is that the money man has his hands on policy. That is the biggest problem here. We were a very competitive Championship side with no need of huge money. Gradual drip feeding was what we required. The cash in was nice, but what about continuity (Malky), identity (Blue to red) and most of all, appeal? We need to sell seats for next season. Simple as that. Mine was in the bag ages ago. Plastics are walking away in a bigger march than we had for Blue! Mind you, you can argue, who needs that sort of fan, but the truth is, Tan has failed to keep these people interested.
Our club isn't dead. It is on the brink of greatness if we can get some sense through to Mr. High-Trousers. Maybe Tan Out is not what we realistically need. Maybe it is Tan In - Tan embracing our identity as it was, Tan being a fan, not a spoilt brat who can't take criticism or accept responsibility for a lack of success.
Brink of greatness? Maybe Tan Out is not what we realistically need? We are almost relegated which will put us in a worse situation than when Tan arrived and he also said we will NEVER go back to Blue. stop burying your head in the sand.
How else do we proceed? If Tan leaves, he will call in the debts and we will defo go to the wall. I know in an ideal world, his departure would be great, but realistically, it would be curtains for us. I don't think my head is in the sand. I'm trying to be pragmatic. I'm also BLUE and will never wear red. I also hate the badge, which belongs on a national shirt. I hate the fact that the only concession we have achieved is a small BLUEBIRD which looks like an afterthought (which is exactly what it is).
I still believe we can be a safe and respected PL club, but not yet. It will take a lot more graft and hardship, including maybe relegation. I just hope we have learned some lessons this year.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:16 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:29 pm
Mario wrote:Yes.
But we owe Tan more than what the club is worth.
He harps on about how he has invested 100 million into the club, when he should have used the 100 million to pay of the debts.
I will go to games because it is Cardiff, doesn't mean I have to bum Tan for doing something he hasn't done.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:59 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:07 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Yes.
But we owe Tan more than what the club is worth.
He harps on about how he has invested 100 million into the club, when he should have used the 100 million to pay of the debts.
I will go to games because it is Cardiff, doesn't mean I have to bum Tan for doing something he hasn't done.
He has paid off the debts. We owe it to him not third parties now.
Funny, you're concerned about money yet defend the man that wasted £50m on players that are never worth it.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:08 pm
Mario wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Mario wrote:Yes.
But we owe Tan more than what the club is worth.
He harps on about how he has invested 100 million into the club, when he should have used the 100 million to pay of the debts.
I will go to games because it is Cardiff, doesn't mean I have to bum Tan for doing something he hasn't done.
He has paid off the debts. We owe it to him not third parties now.
Funny, you're concerned about money yet defend the man that wasted £50m on players that are never worth it.
So Caulker was a waste?.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:08 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:09 pm
Mario wrote:He didn't spend 50 million pound. No one counts bonuses otherwise Spurs spent £150 million in the summer.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:13 pm