Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:11 pm
Aramore wrote:waddle wrote:waddle wrote:Aramore wrote:Every team that goes up pays silly amounts in wages because bonuses are included. Swansea made a loss they year they went up
Our losses were a incurred as a result of promotion in BONUSES to players , if we hadn't have gone up we wouldn't have lost money , God you lot have got the club you deserve
I'll repeat your WAGES ARE 185% OF YOUR INCOME , thats not down to bonuses mate thats mismanagement
You're just jealous your club can't afford to spend 185% of turnover on wages
Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:15 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:waddle wrote:Unfortunately for you boys no mate , f**k it hound tan out no matter what go all the way down and come back up a proper club again
I'd love for that to happen. Take the hit and move on. In a minority though.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:15 pm
waddle wrote:Aramore wrote:waddle wrote:waddle wrote:Aramore wrote:Every team that goes up pays silly amounts in wages because bonuses are included. Swansea made a loss they year they went up
Our losses were a incurred as a result of promotion in BONUSES to players , if we hadn't have gone up we wouldn't have lost money , God you lot have got the club you deserve
I'll repeat your WAGES ARE 185% OF YOUR INCOME , thats not down to bonuses mate thats mismanagement
You're just jealous your club can't afford to spend 185% of turnover on wages
Haha , God I hope that's a joke !
Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:19 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:33 pm
mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:Aramore wrote:Every team that goes up pays silly amounts in wages because bonuses are included. Swansea made a loss they year they went up
Our losses were a incurred as a result of promotion in BONUSES to players , if we hadn't have gone up we wouldn't have lost money , God you lot have got the club you deserve
You paid £8.2m+ in bonuses?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sout ... s-16689224
That's obscene if true but it's not. Truth is, you gambled for promotion as much as we did.
We have no control over the clubs spending, I wish we would run at a break even but we don't. Don't pretend the situation would be any different if reversed, you have as much control as we do over what the board do.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:20 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:mjw6150 wrote:waddle wrote:Aramore wrote:Every team that goes up pays silly amounts in wages because bonuses are included. Swansea made a loss they year they went up
Our losses were a incurred as a result of promotion in BONUSES to players , if we hadn't have gone up we wouldn't have lost money , God you lot have got the club you deserve
You paid £8.2m+ in bonuses?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-sout ... s-16689224
That's obscene if true but it's not. Truth is, you gambled for promotion as much as we did.
We have no control over the clubs spending, I wish we would run at a break even but we don't. Don't pretend the situation would be any different if reversed, you have as much control as we do over what the board do.
It isnt all bonuses.
It can be contractual agreements with clubs that are triggered by promotion. For example we initially bought Scott Sinclair for 500k, but on promotion we had to pay Chelsea another £1m - which contributes to the loss.
If we didnt go up then we wouldnt have had to pay that money, or indeed the promotion bonuses. But on promotion it is payed out of the sky money, so it is not wreckless at all. I think bonus payments were £5.8m if memory serves and spread out equally amongst the players that played a part. 25 players all had around £230k each.
You however paid 189% of turnover to wages regardless of if you went up or not.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:32 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:50 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Dont know, im torn.
On one hand, I want you to stay up because it will be good to have a welsh presence in the Prem, players like John can develop for Wales, the derby is great fun....
But then it makes financial sense for me to want us to be the only club in the Prem in a 100 mile radius or whatever it is.
So that side of it (relegation/survival) I will just allow to play out and then be happy with whatever outcome fate delivers.
On your club. As a football fan, and one that has experienced a tyrant at the helm. I want you guys to take your club back, get rid of the nonsense ethos you have had for over a decade and start becoming self sufficient. To spend nearly double the clubs income on wages is a model for disaster as without loans to the tune of 90% on top of total income you CANNOT operate. Thats terrifying for you guys - truly.
As for us, i just want us to continue growing as a club on and off the field. We dont need to be the best in the league or become a major global brand - just happy to continue growing bit by bit.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:56 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:03 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:For that, then Tan simply has to go.
However everyone seems to hate the thought of not having a chairman that will write cheques at will while sticking the club in major debt. The "ride" of the Premier League and the kudos that comes with it is far more important than the club to many of your fans which is why even the protest before the liverpool had a stern "no comments about Tan" directive.
It was a show for the cameras and to tap each other on the back to say "at least we tried". Firmly believe that.
Until you guys get some collective bollocks and take your club back by the scruff of the neck then this will be like groundhog day, if not with Tan then the next fella, and the next, and the next. The sad thing is, it doesn't seem like many want to.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:21 am