Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:42 pm
Kenfig Blue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Forever Blue wrote:To all the Malky Mackay Bashers.
First season : Malky had hardly any funds, but Malky delivered a play off place and we were runners up to Liverpool in the League Cup drawing 2-2.![]()
![]()
2nd season : The Target was promotion and not only did Malky deliver promotion, Malky brought the title home as well with the funds that were given to him and brought up to £160 Mill in to our club So Malky succeeded end of![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
3rd season: Malky was given another target, to keep us up in the Premier League, Malky's point per game ratio was showing that we were heading towards enough points to stay up and dont forget everyone all the home games we had left after Malky was sacked, so once again Malky was on course to succeed his target.![]()
![]()
![]()
Now give the man some Respect![]()
Everyone has their different opinions/beliefs and thats mine backed by Facts, I as usual Respect everyones but mine wont change on this![]()
![]()
Ive got nothing more to say on the subject, lets all give our full support to Ole till the season finishes![]()
Good points, he made a couple of transfer mistakes, but overall did a fantastic job.
He did have us playing like a team and when we played the teams in the bottom half of the league, Swansea and Fulham we beat them.
We were also a much harder team to beat, less attacking but harder to break down more like a Allerdyce or Pullis team, but both of those know how to keep a team in the premier League....
But with the 2nd worst defensive record in the league, ye solid to beat
Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:52 pm
Bluebina wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Forever Blue wrote:To all the Malky Mackay Bashers.
First season : Malky had hardly any funds, but Malky delivered a play off place and we were runners up to Liverpool in the League Cup drawing 2-2.![]()
![]()
2nd season : The Target was promotion and not only did Malky deliver promotion, Malky brought the title home as well with the funds that were given to him and brought up to £160 Mill in to our club So Malky succeeded end of![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
3rd season: Malky was given another target, to keep us up in the Premier League, Malky's point per game ratio was showing that we were heading towards enough points to stay up and dont forget everyone all the home games we had left after Malky was sacked, so once again Malky was on course to succeed his target.![]()
![]()
![]()
Now give the man some Respect![]()
Everyone has their different opinions/beliefs and thats mine backed by Facts, I as usual Respect everyones but mine wont change on this![]()
![]()
Ive got nothing more to say on the subject, lets all give our full support to Ole till the season finishes![]()
Good points, he made a couple of transfer mistakes, but overall did a fantastic job.
He did have us playing like a team and when we played the teams in the bottom half of the league, Swansea and Fulham we beat them.
We were also a much harder team to beat, less attacking but harder to break down more like a Allerdyce or Pullis team, but both of those know how to keep a team in the premier League....
But with the 2nd worst defensive record in the league, ye solid to beat
We were playing harder games at the start of the season, our home games were against the likes of Man City, Everton, Spurs and we did ok against good teams and beat Swansea and Fulham away and Man City at home.
Ole has lost our shape and made us easy to score against, we have conceded four against Hull at home, three away to Swansea, three at West Brom, Three at home to Palace, all of these teams are pretty shit, and it's because we can no longer defend that we are going down.
It's fair to say we were more solid under Malky........
Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:14 pm
Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:08 pm
Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:11 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Your rite on all accounts....BUT..... he also delivered the most boring football ive ever seen, dave jones would have got us up with not even half of what malky was given and played good football, maybe he would of kept us up or maybe malky would have nobody will know now
Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:29 pm
Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:55 pm
JonCCFC wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Your rite on all accounts....BUT..... he also delivered the most boring football ive ever seen, dave jones would have got us up with not even half of what malky was given and played good football, maybe he would of kept us up or maybe malky would have nobody will know now
Who cares how good the football is? No one complained in League Two, League One or the Championship. If he kept us up we'd all be buzzing.
Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:17 pm
Forever Blue wrote:To all the Malky Mackay Bashers.
First season : Malky had hardly any funds, but Malky delivered a play off place and we were runners up to Liverpool in the League Cup drawing 2-2.![]()
![]()
2nd season : The Target was promotion and not only did Malky deliver promotion, Malky brought the title home as well with the funds that were given to him and brought up to £160 Mill in to our club So Malky succeeded end of![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
3rd season: Malky was given another target, to keep us up in the Premier League, Malky's point per game ratio was showing that we were heading towards enough points to stay up and dont forget everyone all the home games we had left after Malky was sacked, so once again Malky was on course to succeed his target.![]()
![]()
![]()
Now give the man some Respect![]()
Everyone has their different opinions/beliefs and thats mine backed by Facts, I as usual Respect everyones but mine wont change on this![]()
![]()
Ive got nothing more to say on the subject, lets all give our full support to Ole till the season finishes![]()
Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:48 pm
Bluebina wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Forever Blue wrote:To all the Malky Mackay Bashers.
First season : Malky had hardly any funds, but Malky delivered a play off place and we were runners up to Liverpool in the League Cup drawing 2-2.![]()
![]()
2nd season : The Target was promotion and not only did Malky deliver promotion, Malky brought the title home as well with the funds that were given to him and brought up to £160 Mill in to our club So Malky succeeded end of![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
3rd season: Malky was given another target, to keep us up in the Premier League, Malky's point per game ratio was showing that we were heading towards enough points to stay up and dont forget everyone all the home games we had left after Malky was sacked, so once again Malky was on course to succeed his target.![]()
![]()
![]()
Now give the man some Respect![]()
Everyone has their different opinions/beliefs and thats mine backed by Facts, I as usual Respect everyones but mine wont change on this![]()
![]()
Ive got nothing more to say on the subject, lets all give our full support to Ole till the season finishes![]()
Good points, he made a couple of transfer mistakes, but overall did a fantastic job.
He did have us playing like a team and when we played the teams in the bottom half of the league, Swansea and Fulham we beat them.
We were also a much harder team to beat, less attacking but harder to break down more like a Allerdyce or Pullis team, but both of those know how to keep a team in the premier League....
But with the 2nd worst defensive record in the league, ye solid to beat
We were playing harder games at the start of the season, our home games were against the likes of Man City, Everton, Spurs and we did ok against good teams and beat Swansea and Fulham away and Man City at home.
Ole has lost our shape and made us easy to score against, we have conceded four against Hull at home, three away to Swansea, three at West Brom, Three at home to Palace, all of these teams are pretty shit, and it's because we can no longer defend that we are going down.
It's fair to say we were more solid under Malky........
Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:30 am
Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:05 am
Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:59 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Some people are obsessed with slating Malky Mackay. It's ridiculous.
There's a thread on here about what questions you would like to ask OGS & it's turned into a MM slagging thread, with people posting what questions they would ask MM.
It's almost like trolling.
Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:29 pm
Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:32 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Annis you are like dictator Tan telling us we have to respect Malky.
Get over it, not everyone thought the sun shone out of his arse.
He spent over 40m on wages and transfer fees in 2012/13 season and we just about scraped over the line thanks to a mediocre championship. Given the money spent we should have toppled 100 points.
He then spent 40m on transfer fees alone (I dread to see next years accounts and the wage bill) on utter rubbish and played the worst brand of football the premiership has ever seen.
Yes he was 1 point outside the relegation zone however that was largely thanks to a decent August / September, but we were quickly found out and from October onwards our ratio of points per games was nothing to shout about, We couldnt score and wwe had the 2nd worse defensive record. Not a good combination.
With little chance of picking up many away points 2nd half of the season, we had to win nearly all our games, with a squad no better than we had in the Championship.
Good riddance to the football dinosaur
Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:35 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Annis you are like dictator Tan telling us we have to respect Malky.
Get over it, not everyone thought the sun shone out of his arse.
He spent over 40m on wages and transfer fees in 2012/13 season and we just about scraped over the line thanks to a mediocre championship. Given the money spent we should have toppled 100 points.
He then spent 40m on transfer fees alone (I dread to see next years accounts and the wage bill) on utter rubbish and played the worst brand of football the premiership has ever seen.
Yes he was 1 point outside the relegation zone however that was largely thanks to a decent August / September, but we were quickly found out and from October onwards our ratio of points per games was nothing to shout about, We couldnt score and wwe had the 2nd worse defensive record. Not a good combination.
With little chance of picking up many away points 2nd half of the season, we had to win nearly all our games, with a squad no better than we had in the Championship.
Good riddance to the football dinosaur
Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:36 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Annis you are like dictator Tan telling us we have to respect Malky.
Get over it, not everyone thought the sun shone out of his arse.
He spent over 40m on wages and transfer fees in 2012/13 season and we just about scraped over the line thanks to a mediocre championship. Given the money spent we should have toppled 100 points.
He then spent 40m on transfer fees alone (I dread to see next years accounts and the wage bill) on utter rubbish and played the worst brand of football the premiership has ever seen.
Yes he was 1 point outside the relegation zone however that was largely thanks to a decent August / September, but we were quickly found out and from October onwards our ratio of points per games was nothing to shout about, We couldnt score and wwe had the 2nd worse defensive record. Not a good combination.
With little chance of picking up many away points 2nd half of the season, we had to win nearly all our games, with a squad no better than we had in the Championship.
Good riddance to the football dinosaur
Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:40 pm
Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:43 pm
PartyWithOle wrote:Thank you for putting it as it is, we're not allowed to criticise Milky because he delivered promotion on a big budget
Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:20 pm
Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:31 pm
mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:37 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:38 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:52 pm
mjw6150 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
I would say Brayford but the fee involved was so small that it is hardly worth mentioning. Most of the decisions he made came off, maybe could have attacked more against Palace and Villa earlier this season but in the bigger picture I don't consider these terrible errors.
Maybe I should have worded it better, Cornelius was the only grave error.
Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:45 pm
Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:17 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
I would say Brayford but the fee involved was so small that it is hardly worth mentioning. Most of the decisions he made came off, maybe could have attacked more against Palace and Villa earlier this season but in the bigger picture I don't consider these terrible errors.
Maybe I should have worded it better, Cornelius was the only grave error.
I would say spending 40m and not improving our full backs, our wingers, our creativity, or addressing our goal scoring problems more than a grave error I would call it gross stupidity.
In fact he spent 40m and all we got to show for it is a 1 better centre half, and a defensive midfielder who run out of steam in October.
Crazy.
Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:29 pm
smakerzthebluebird wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
I would say Brayford but the fee involved was so small that it is hardly worth mentioning. Most of the decisions he made came off, maybe could have attacked more against Palace and Villa earlier this season but in the bigger picture I don't consider these terrible errors.
Maybe I should have worded it better, Cornelius was the only grave error.
I would say spending 40m and not improving our full backs, our wingers, our creativity, or addressing our goal scoring problems more than a grave error I would call it gross stupidity.
In fact he spent 40m and all we got to show for it is a 1 better centre half, and a defensive midfielder who run out of steam in October.
Crazy.
Spot on and the malky lovers can't see this simple fact that the squad he assembled is no better than it was after promotion by arguably one player!
We would have gone down under Mackay just as we will under solskjaer and in fairness to solskjaer he got lumbered with a top six championship side with zero chance of keeping us up
Give him chance to rid us of deadwood but players to suit his style then judge after next season
Comparing him to malky and DJ now is like comparing a arse and elbow
Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:35 pm
TRose69 wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
I would say Brayford but the fee involved was so small that it is hardly worth mentioning. Most of the decisions he made came off, maybe could have attacked more against Palace and Villa earlier this season but in the bigger picture I don't consider these terrible errors.
Maybe I should have worded it better, Cornelius was the only grave error.
I would say spending 40m and not improving our full backs, our wingers, our creativity, or addressing our goal scoring problems more than a grave error I would call it gross stupidity.
In fact he spent 40m and all we got to show for it is a 1 better centre half, and a defensive midfielder who run out of steam in October.
Crazy.
Spot on and the malky lovers can't see this simple fact that the squad he assembled is no better than it was after promotion by arguably one player!
We would have gone down under Mackay just as we will under solskjaer and in fairness to solskjaer he got lumbered with a top six championship side with zero chance of keeping us up
Give him chance to rid us of deadwood but players to suit his style then judge after next season
Comparing him to malky and DJ now is like comparing a arse and elbow
Most of the deadwood signings are OGS's...
Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:56 pm
smakerzthebluebird wrote:TRose69 wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
I would say Brayford but the fee involved was so small that it is hardly worth mentioning. Most of the decisions he made came off, maybe could have attacked more against Palace and Villa earlier this season but in the bigger picture I don't consider these terrible errors.
Maybe I should have worded it better, Cornelius was the only grave error.
I would say spending 40m and not improving our full backs, our wingers, our creativity, or addressing our goal scoring problems more than a grave error I would call it gross stupidity.
In fact he spent 40m and all we got to show for it is a 1 better centre half, and a defensive midfielder who run out of steam in October.
Crazy.
Spot on and the malky lovers can't see this simple fact that the squad he assembled is no better than it was after promotion by arguably one player!
We would have gone down under Mackay just as we will under solskjaer and in fairness to solskjaer he got lumbered with a top six championship side with zero chance of keeping us up
Give him chance to rid us of deadwood but players to suit his style then judge after next season
Comparing him to malky and DJ now is like comparing a arse and elbow
Most of the deadwood signings are OGS's...
Poppycock
He spent £3m what we got is good value for that price, not good enough at this level but will be great for next season
What value did Mackay get out of £50 f*cking million?
An overpriced English defender a massively over priced defensive midfielder and a giraffe for 8.5m along with a player bought for £2.5m who is a ghost around here
Spending £50m on four players of which only two actually play is complete buffoonery why dress it up as anything else?
It's bad management simple as that
Honesty some people have no clue Steve Bruce spent half that on 6/7 decent premiership players that's proper management
Malky = no clue lets not make a messiah out of someone who wasted £50m of the clubs money
Dave jones would have taken is up and kept us up with a quarter of that
Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:26 am
TRose69 wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:TRose69 wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:mjw6150 wrote: the only thing he really did wrong in his time at the club was sign Cornelius.
![]()
![]()
I would say Brayford but the fee involved was so small that it is hardly worth mentioning. Most of the decisions he made came off, maybe could have attacked more against Palace and Villa earlier this season but in the bigger picture I don't consider these terrible errors.
Maybe I should have worded it better, Cornelius was the only grave error.
I would say spending 40m and not improving our full backs, our wingers, our creativity, or addressing our goal scoring problems more than a grave error I would call it gross stupidity.
In fact he spent 40m and all we got to show for it is a 1 better centre half, and a defensive midfielder who run out of steam in October.
Crazy.
Spot on and the malky lovers can't see this simple fact that the squad he assembled is no better than it was after promotion by arguably one player!
We would have gone down under Mackay just as we will under solskjaer and in fairness to solskjaer he got lumbered with a top six championship side with zero chance of keeping us up
Give him chance to rid us of deadwood but players to suit his style then judge after next season
Comparing him to malky and DJ now is like comparing a arse and elbow
Most of the deadwood signings are OGS's...
Poppycock
He spent £3m what we got is good value for that price, not good enough at this level but will be great for next season
What value did Mackay get out of £50 f*cking million?
An overpriced English defender a massively over priced defensive midfielder and a giraffe for 8.5m along with a player bought for £2.5m who is a ghost around here
Spending £50m on four players of which only two actually play is complete buffoonery why dress it up as anything else?
It's bad management simple as that
Honesty some people have no clue Steve Bruce spent half that on 6/7 decent premiership players that's proper management
Malky = no clue lets not make a messiah out of someone who wasted £50m of the clubs money
Dave jones would have taken is up and kept us up with a quarter of that
Cardiff City 'Flops' (As decided by general consensus)
Cornelius (Malky)
Odemwingie (Malky)
Brayford
Zaha (OGS) agreed
Jones (OGS) agreed
Berget (OGS) hasn't played so can't judge yet
Eikrem (OGS) will be a good fit for next season
Key Players (As decided by general consensus)
Marshall (Dave Jones)
Caulker (Malky) (way overpriced and not as good as people make out at fault for at least 15 goals this season, however young and still learning)
Medal (Malky) way overpriced and no better than canas (free transfer) medel (£11m)
Mutch (Malky)
Noone (Malky)
Malky signed more good players than bad & the only half decent player OGS signed was Daehli who - lets face it - isn't quite good enough for the Prem yet
You're talking through you're arse if you are saying OGS spend well in January
Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:35 am