Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:39 pm
steve davies wrote:soulofthesea wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Stop acting as if you / we had any say in the matter.
Tan interfered at the start of the season with the bonus situation, and the unity (in a band of mercenaries) drifted quickly. We were too naive to be in the premier league and it has shown all season.
Tan lost faith in the guy looking after the football side of the business, that is his right. The replacement hasn't performed any better but it appears he still has faith in the new regime.
interfered with?..think he OWNS the club............over used word this interfered, truth is he actually gave Malky far too much of a free hand.....
laughable isent it tan trusts him and moody with a small fortune and they f**k it up and its tans fault for signing the cheques.
he was constantly on malkys back although they never spoke and tan was here an average of one day a week.
oh and of course we were defensively sound under malky as well.
I love the guy for what he done for us and he was an absolute gentleman but he was out of his depth in the premiership.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:44 pm
steve davies wrote:soulofthesea wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Stop acting as if you / we had any say in the matter.
Tan interfered at the start of the season with the bonus situation, and the unity (in a band of mercenaries) drifted quickly. We were too naive to be in the premier league and it has shown all season.
Tan lost faith in the guy looking after the football side of the business, that is his right. The replacement hasn't performed any better but it appears he still has faith in the new regime.
interfered with?..think he OWNS the club............over used word this interfered, truth is he actually gave Malky far too much of a free hand.....
laughable isent it tan trusts him and moody with a small fortune and they f**k it up and its tans fault for signing the cheques.
he was constantly on malkys back although they never spoke and tan was here an average of one day a week.
oh and of course we were defensively sound under malky as well.
I love the guy for what he done for us and he was an absolute gentleman but he was out of his depth in the premiership.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:47 pm
Natman Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:soulofthesea wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Stop acting as if you / we had any say in the matter.
Tan interfered at the start of the season with the bonus situation, and the unity (in a band of mercenaries) drifted quickly. We were too naive to be in the premier league and it has shown all season.
Tan lost faith in the guy looking after the football side of the business, that is his right. The replacement hasn't performed any better but it appears he still has faith in the new regime.
interfered with?..think he OWNS the club............over used word this interfered, truth is he actually gave Malky far too much of a free hand.....
laughable isent it tan trusts him and moody with a small fortune and they f**k it up and its tans fault for signing the cheques.
he was constantly on malkys back although they never spoke and tan was here an average of one day a week.
oh and of course we were defensively sound under malky as well.
I love the guy for what he done for us and he was an absolute gentleman but he was out of his depth in the premiership.
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:01 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
I dont think you are best placed to judge hypocrisy.
You made snidey remarks about Adam Brown several times on the weekend for advertising and promoting his business whilst sponsoring Carls column, yet you are happy to promote your album on this forum, a forum you spend most of your free time knocking. Free of charge may I add.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:06 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
I dont think you are best placed to judge hypocrisy.
You made snidey remarks about Adam Brown several times on the weekend for advertising and promoting his business whilst sponsoring Carls column, yet you are happy to promote your album on this forum, a forum you spend most of your free time knocking. Free of charge may I add.
He also criticises members for making assumptions, yet when caulker said there were leaks and distractions last week, he immoderately assumed he was talking about this message board.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:07 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
I dont think you are best placed to judge hypocrisy.
You made snidey remarks about Adam Brown several times on the weekend for advertising and promoting his business whilst sponsoring Carls column, yet you are happy to promote your album on this forum, a forum you spend most of your free time knocking. Free of charge may I add.
He also criticises members for making assumptions, yet when caulker said there were leaks and distractions last week, he immoderately assumed he was talking about this message board.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:16 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:soulofthesea wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Stop acting as if you / we had any say in the matter.
Tan interfered at the start of the season with the bonus situation, and the unity (in a band of mercenaries) drifted quickly. We were too naive to be in the premier league and it has shown all season.
Tan lost faith in the guy looking after the football side of the business, that is his right. The replacement hasn't performed any better but it appears he still has faith in the new regime.
interfered with?..think he OWNS the club............over used word this interfered, truth is he actually gave Malky far too much of a free hand.....
laughable isent it tan trusts him and moody with a small fortune and they f**k it up and its tans fault for signing the cheques.
he was constantly on malkys back although they never spoke and tan was here an average of one day a week.
oh and of course we were defensively sound under malky as well.
I love the guy for what he done for us and he was an absolute gentleman but he was out of his depth in the premiership.
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
I dont think you are best placed to judge hypocrisy.
You made snidey remarks about Adam Brown several times on the weekend for advertising and promoting his business whilst sponsoring Carls column, yet you are happy to promote your album on this forum, a forum you spend most of your free time knocking. Free of charge may I add.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:22 pm
Natman Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:soulofthesea wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Stop acting as if you / we had any say in the matter.
Tan interfered at the start of the season with the bonus situation, and the unity (in a band of mercenaries) drifted quickly. We were too naive to be in the premier league and it has shown all season.
Tan lost faith in the guy looking after the football side of the business, that is his right. The replacement hasn't performed any better but it appears he still has faith in the new regime.
interfered with?..think he OWNS the club............over used word this interfered, truth is he actually gave Malky far too much of a free hand.....
laughable isent it tan trusts him and moody with a small fortune and they f**k it up and its tans fault for signing the cheques.
he was constantly on malkys back although they never spoke and tan was here an average of one day a week.
oh and of course we were defensively sound under malky as well.
I love the guy for what he done for us and he was an absolute gentleman but he was out of his depth in the premiership.
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
I dont think you are best placed to judge hypocrisy.
You made snidey remarks about Adam Brown several times on the weekend for advertising and promoting his business whilst sponsoring Carls column, yet you are happy to promote your album on this forum, a forum you spend most of your free time knocking. Free of charge may I add.
I don;t see where the hypocrisy comes in there. Adam posts multiple pointless threads and gets away with posting near scandalous stuff whilst always bashing and bashing the club. Others have been banned for saying much less ye he would seem to get away with it because he sponsors Carl's column. Also the rubbish he posts raises tempers and so adds to the hit count and the profits entering the owner's pockets.
Now, as regards to my album. We are all allowed to create our own signature line and there is nothing within the T&Cs to say that there is a bar from advertising. Hence that is what I post.
p.s. I don't spend my time knocking the forum, i spend my time knocking its agendas to undermine Tan at any and all expense (even the club's)
Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:46 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Natman Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:soulofthesea wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Stop acting as if you / we had any say in the matter.
Tan interfered at the start of the season with the bonus situation, and the unity (in a band of mercenaries) drifted quickly. We were too naive to be in the premier league and it has shown all season.
Tan lost faith in the guy looking after the football side of the business, that is his right. The replacement hasn't performed any better but it appears he still has faith in the new regime.
interfered with?..think he OWNS the club............over used word this interfered, truth is he actually gave Malky far too much of a free hand.....
laughable isent it tan trusts him and moody with a small fortune and they f**k it up and its tans fault for signing the cheques.
he was constantly on malkys back although they never spoke and tan was here an average of one day a week.
oh and of course we were defensively sound under malky as well.
I love the guy for what he done for us and he was an absolute gentleman but he was out of his depth in the premiership.
Steve, good job on pointing out the hypocrisy of this board and some of its posters!!!
I dont think you are best placed to judge hypocrisy.
You made snidey remarks about Adam Brown several times on the weekend for advertising and promoting his business whilst sponsoring Carls column, yet you are happy to promote your album on this forum, a forum you spend most of your free time knocking. Free of charge may I add.
I don;t see where the hypocrisy comes in there. Adam posts multiple pointless threads and gets away with posting near scandalous stuff whilst always bashing and bashing the club. Others have been banned for saying much less ye he would seem to get away with it because he sponsors Carl's column. Also the rubbish he posts raises tempers and so adds to the hit count and the profits entering the owner's pockets.
Now, as regards to my album. We are all allowed to create our own signature line and there is nothing within the T&Cs to say that there is a bar from advertising. Hence that is what I post.
p.s. I don't spend my time knocking the forum, i spend my time knocking its agendas to undermine Tan at any and all expense (even the club's)
Adam Brown has been bashing the club on this forum long before he sponsored Carls column. The money he spends advertising Carls column goes to Media Wales not Carl Curtis.
As for the raising the tempers and hits you are just as bad, so again hypocrisy.
Finally, whilst your advertising may not break any T&C's you clearly have an issue with this forum, or its agenda as you put it, yet still choose to advertise yourself on it. Says a lot about you and your principles.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:38 pm
CFS wrote:Were you saying our football was crap after beating Man city 3-2 and drawing with utd or beating West Brom, drawing at Hull the list goes on