Roathy

Who gives a shit about his opinion anyway for starters he's a jack, Plus a troll and lives in australia, Whens the last time he went to a live match?? He claims to know it all from his couch oh and his stats, He spends about 15 hours of his day on a rivals forum, Hes just a loser at the end of the day

Totally sums roathy up ,a sad little man

Who gives a shit about his opinion anyway for starters he's a jack, Plus a troll and lives in australia, Whens the last time he went to a live match?? He claims to know it all from his couch oh and his stats, He spends about 15 hours of his day on a rivals forum, Hes just a loser at the end of the day

Totally sums roathy up ,a sad little man

He probably looks like a cross between Roy Cropper and Norris Cole.

Who gives a shit about his opinion anyway for starters he's a jack, Plus a troll and lives in australia, Whens the last time he went to a live match?? He claims to know it all from his couch oh and his stats, He spends about 15 hours of his day on a rivals forum, Hes just a loser at the end of the day

Totally sums roathy up ,a sad little man

He probably looks like a cross between Roy Cropper and Norris Cole.

Add hayley cropper to that when he dresses up on weekends with his teddy bear BBQ s whilst on his laptop on here

Still foaming at the mouth I see

I'm still laughing at roathie's claim, there being 2.500 gypos on the jack march to oust Petty.


More like a 1000

Then you will laugh forever. Its a fact

But what are the media talking about today, is it the people who did not attend the march, or those who marched?

All I have read about is the people who marched, so therefore surely it was successful

So your goal wasnt to change from red to blue but get reported in the paper?

You could have just all striped naked and not bothered with a protest of that was your aim.

It isnt the media you need to convince.

Where did I state that the goal was to get reported in the media,I was pointing out that despite your comments and what seems to be you belittling the fact that only about 10% attended the march, they still got more publicity then those who did not attend, even though in all probability the vast majority of those who did not attend would still rather be blue, just like those who marched.

So what has publicity got to do with anything?

Murderers get publicity, would you class them as successful as a result over a doctor saving lives that doesn't get a mention.

I have asked what the goal of the march was, and it was said it was to show tan that not just 10% opposed.

Yet only 10-15% turned up and opposed it

But what are the media talking about today, is it the people who did not attend the march, or those who marched?

All I have read about is the people who marched, so therefore surely it was successful

So your goal wasnt to change from red to blue but get reported in the paper?

You could have just all striped naked and not bothered with a protest of that was your aim.

It isnt the media you need to convince.

Where did I state that the goal was to get reported in the media,I was pointing out that despite your comments and what seems to be you belittling the fact that only about 10% attended the march, they still got more publicity then those who did not attend, even though in all probability the vast majority of those who did not attend would still rather be blue, just like those who marched.

So what has publicity got to do with anything?

Murderers get publicity, would you class them as successful as a result over a doctor saving lives that doesn't get a mention.

I have asked what the goal of the march was, and it was said it was to show tan that not just 10% opposed.

Yet only 10-15% turned up and opposed it

You know very well what the point of the march was, but once again you are showing just how pigheaded you are. But just incase you have not got the brains to understand

WE WENT ON THE MARCH TO GET OUR IDENTITY BACK,WE WHO WERE ON THE MARCH FELT THAT WE HAD MADE A STATEMENT THAT WE ARE UNITED IN GETTING WHAT IS AFTER ALL OUR HISTORY,AND WE WERE IN A BETTER POSITION TO KNOW WHETHER IT WAS A SUCCESS OR NOT, THAN SOMEONE WHO STATES HE HAS GONE DOWN UNDER

But what are the media talking about today, is it the people who did not attend the march, or those who marched?

All I have read about is the people who marched, so therefore surely it was successful

So your goal wasnt to change from red to blue but get reported in the paper?

You could have just all striped naked and not bothered with a protest of that was your aim.

It isnt the media you need to convince.

Where did I state that the goal was to get reported in the media,I was pointing out that despite your comments and what seems to be you belittling the fact that only about 10% attended the march, they still got more publicity then those who did not attend, even though in all probability the vast majority of those who did not attend would still rather be blue, just like those who marched.

So what has publicity got to do with anything?

Murderers get publicity, would you class them as successful as a result over a doctor saving lives that doesn't get a mention.

I have asked what the goal of the march was, and it was said it was to show tan that not just 10% opposed.

Yet only 10-15% turned up and opposed it

You know very well what the point of the march was, but once again you are showing just how pigheaded you are. But just incase you have not got the brains to understand

WE WENT ON THE MARCH TO GET OUR IDENTITY BACK,WE WHO WERE ON THE MARCH FELT THAT WE HAD MADE A STATEMENT THAT WE ARE UNITED IN GETTING WHAT IS AFTER ALL OUR HISTORY,AND WE WERE IN A BETTER POSITION TO KNOW WHETHER IT WAS A SUCCESS OR NOT, THAN SOMEONE WHO STATES HE HAS GONE DOWN UNDER

I asked what the point of the march was, are you not listening?

I was told it was to show that more than 10% opposed Tan. 10-15% showed up.....

Im not sure how simpler i can put it.

But what are the media talking about today, is it the people who did not attend the march, or those who marched?

All I have read about is the people who marched, so therefore surely it was successful

So your goal wasnt to change from red to blue but get reported in the paper?

You could have just all striped naked and not bothered with a protest of that was your aim.

It isnt the media you need to convince.

Where did I state that the goal was to get reported in the media,I was pointing out that despite your comments and what seems to be you belittling the fact that only about 10% attended the march, they still got more publicity then those who did not attend, even though in all probability the vast majority of those who did not attend would still rather be blue, just like those who marched.

So what has publicity got to do with anything?

Murderers get publicity, would you class them as successful as a result over a doctor saving lives that doesn't get a mention.

I have asked what the goal of the march was, and it was said it was to show tan that not just 10% opposed.

Yet only 10-15% turned up and opposed it

You know very well what the point of the march was, but once again you are showing just how pigheaded you are. But just incase you have not got the brains to understand

WE WENT ON THE MARCH TO GET OUR IDENTITY BACK,WE WHO WERE ON THE MARCH FELT THAT WE HAD MADE A STATEMENT THAT WE ARE UNITED IN GETTING WHAT IS AFTER ALL OUR HISTORY,AND WE WERE IN A BETTER POSITION TO KNOW WHETHER IT WAS A SUCCESS OR NOT, THAN SOMEONE WHO STATES HE HAS GONE DOWN UNDER

I asked what the point of the march was, are you not listening?

I was told it was to show that more than 10% opposed Tan. 10-15% showed up.....

Im not sure how simpler i can put it.

who said that?......

Carl, but it was an open question and his response want mooted by anyone.

Carl, but it was an open question and his response want mooted by anyone.

Sad little man spending all day sprouting Shit on a rivals team football forum ! What a tool you are !

Carl, but it was an open question and his response want mooted by anyone.

Sad little man spending all day sprouting Shit on a rivals team football forum ! What a tool you are !

Yes wez, so you keep telling me

But what are the media talking about today, is it the people who did not attend the march, or those who marched?

All I have read about is the people who marched, so therefore surely it was successful

So your goal wasnt to change from red to blue but get reported in the paper?

You could have just all striped naked and not bothered with a protest of that was your aim.

It isnt the media you need to convince.

Where did I state that the goal was to get reported in the media,I was pointing out that despite your comments and what seems to be you belittling the fact that only about 10% attended the march, they still got more publicity then those who did not attend, even though in all probability the vast majority of those who did not attend would still rather be blue, just like those who marched.

So what has publicity got to do with anything?

Murderers get publicity, would you class them as successful as a result over a doctor saving lives that doesn't get a mention.

I have asked what the goal of the march was, and it was said it was to show tan that not just 10% opposed.

Yet only 10-15% turned up and opposed it

You know very well what the point of the march was, but once again you are showing just how pigheaded you are. But just incase you have not got the brains to understand

WE WENT ON THE MARCH TO GET OUR IDENTITY BACK,WE WHO WERE ON THE MARCH FELT THAT WE HAD MADE A STATEMENT THAT WE ARE UNITED IN GETTING WHAT IS AFTER ALL OUR HISTORY,AND WE WERE IN A BETTER POSITION TO KNOW WHETHER IT WAS A SUCCESS OR NOT, THAN SOMEONE WHO STATES HE HAS GONE DOWN UNDER

I asked what the point of the march was, are you not listening?

I was told it was to show that more than 10% opposed Tan. 10-15% showed up.....

Im not sure how simpler i can put it.

You have been told quite a lot on here what the point of the march was for, but it seems you are incapable of reading,

I only listen to music or speech on the computer but perhaps you can inform me how to listen to text

You have been told quite a lot on here what the point of the march was for, but it seems you are incapable of reading,

I only listen to music or speech on the computer but perhaps you can inform me how to listen to text

Ive been told AFTER the fact yes, but I dont give much credence to that. I could see this situation developing, hence why I made a thread explaining why I thought it was pointless and thus asked what the march was for.

It seemed it was agreed that it was to show tan that more than 10% opposed the rebrand - so as far as im concerned, you didnt really do that.

Since ive pointed that out the reasons behind the march seem to have changed. Wonder why.

You can keep hurling insults and resorting to child like comebacks all day long. It wont change anything i can assure you