Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:10 pm
Natman Blue wrote:But when I posted the original post there was no link on the article. Also I said 'I guess you wrote that carl'. So you're well wide of tons on both accounts but I don't imagine that will stop your trolling
Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:13 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I'm guessing this is your sickening Carl. So will you retract that last two paragraphs if nothing happens and issue an apology?
And why would I need to issue an apology exactly ?
Damn predictive text, that should have read article, not sickening.
What I am saying is that you are suggesting Tan will do something within the next week as a petulant retaliation to the march. In effect bringing into question his character without any evidence or proof. You knoe as well as i do that fans will start using this as a fact and basing opinions on it as if it were true when it is just wild speculation at best. If Tan does nothing of the kind over the next week the will you state that you got it wrong whilst issuing a correction and an apology?
I am not suggesting anything Natman, I have put a link up from an article in a newspaper.
I await your apology.
The article is suggesting that, but I did ask if you wrote it
If you click the link then you see for yourself it is not my article.
If the article said that god wrote it he'd believe every word.
And they say I snipe! Pmsl, grow up.
Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:17 pm
Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:19 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I'm guessing this is your sickening Carl. So will you retract that last two paragraphs if nothing happens and issue an apology?
And why would I need to issue an apology exactly ?
Damn predictive text, that should have read article, not sickening.
What I am saying is that you are suggesting Tan will do something within the next week as a petulant retaliation to the march. In effect bringing into question his character without any evidence or proof. You knoe as well as i do that fans will start using this as a fact and basing opinions on it as if it were true when it is just wild speculation at best. If Tan does nothing of the kind over the next week the will you state that you got it wrong whilst issuing a correction and an apology?
I am not suggesting anything Natman, I have put a link up from an article in a newspaper.
I await your apology.
The article is suggesting that, but I did ask if you wrote it
If you click the link then you see for yourself it is not my article.
If the article said that god wrote it he'd believe every word.
And they say I snipe! Pmsl, grow up.
Go and bash your bible you weirdo.
Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:30 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I'm guessing this is your sickening Carl. So will you retract that last two paragraphs if nothing happens and issue an apology?
And why would I need to issue an apology exactly ?
Damn predictive text, that should have read article, not sickening.
What I am saying is that you are suggesting Tan will do something within the next week as a petulant retaliation to the march. In effect bringing into question his character without any evidence or proof. You knoe as well as i do that fans will start using this as a fact and basing opinions on it as if it were true when it is just wild speculation at best. If Tan does nothing of the kind over the next week the will you state that you got it wrong whilst issuing a correction and an apology?
I am not suggesting anything Natman, I have put a link up from an article in a newspaper.
I await your apology.
The article is suggesting that, but I did ask if you wrote it
If you click the link then you see for yourself it is not my article.
If the article said that god wrote it he'd believe every word.
And they say I snipe! Pmsl, grow up.
Go and bash your bible you weirdo.
![]()
Some Christian hes spent the lords day trolling the forum.
Its because if gimps like him I am an aetheist
Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:33 pm
carlccfc wrote:Oi Vincent Tan! Why Cardiff City will always be blue
The Metro
http://metro.co.uk/2014/03/22/oi-vincen ... e-4673474/?
Cardiff City fans show their sea of blue as the game progresses (Picture: Reuters)
Throughout the dissent at the re-brand, the attempted protests and the attempted fight back, the fans always seemed divided on the issue.
Today, for the first time in almost two years of re-brand hell, it felt like the fan base was united. It felt like we were all marching, excuse the pun, in the same direction.
Firstly, the pre-match march. It was amazing to see so many Cardiff City fans turn out for it. It could have been a damp squib, thanks to the showers above us, but the fans didn’t hide. There were, according to police estimates, around 4,000 fans on the march. It was overwhelmingly positive.
A sea of blue, marching towards the ground and it stretched as far as the eye could see. I was smack bang in the middle of the crowd and it was impossible to see either end of the train. Pro-blue songs were sung and it was all in very good spirits. There was no trouble and no problem.
Whilst Vincent tan dismissed the pro-blue crowd as just five per cent, this felt so much more.
Cardiff fans protest prior to the game (Picture: Getty Images)
And then, at 19 minutes and 27 seconds, a sea of blue. Vincent Tan was stood, in his directors box, when fans around the ground raised their blue scarves above their heads. Everywhere you looked, a blue scarf.
I was proud to see it. For so long, fans had been apathetic, fans had been silent. But today they sung loud and proud. Kudos to the supporters groups who organised it; it was heartening to see so many fighting for this football club.
It was vital that Tan saw the protests. There was no doubt that he did see it. He might have scuttled off very quickly after the display but he saw it.
Tan is kept in a little bubble, away from any dissent and any protest. But today it was shown to him in full force. The Cardiff City stadium was blue. It was overwhelmingly blue. Tan cannot ignore this.
Though, I assume he will. These moments of dissent are always followed by vindictive outbursts from Tan. Usually before a huge game.
West Brom away next Saturday is the biggest game of our season. And I expect the club to be destabilised in the days before.
Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:28 am
Natman Blue wrote:
Well?????
Is Friday evening and nothing had happened all week! But still, with pushing this article the damage has probably been done now in some people's eyes
Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:38 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:
Well?????
Is Friday evening and nothing had happened all week! But still, with pushing this article the damage has probably been done now in some people's eyes
![]()
why not chase the author and tell him how upset you are that he doesn't like a Tan about the rebrand?
You post your pro-red views on here & expect them to be respected & then disrespect anyone's views who isn't as much of a sell out as you?
Why shouldn't anti-Tan articles be posted on here? ALL OPINIONS WELCOME
Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:40 am
Natman Blue wrote:
Lol, nothing but anti tan articles are posted on here!
lies.
I brought it back up to make the point that it was scaremongering and nothing has in fact happened
scaremongering?!![]()
![]()
an article was posted. If you hate the article so much, take it up with the author.