Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:27 pm

BluebirdsTilIDie wrote:Wouldn't even count on it then.. he will do it when he wants

He wont do it at all.Tan is a bare faced liar.Who would want shares in a Championship club.If ' when we get relegated'it will be seen as Tans failure.Hopefully he will then piss off.

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:50 pm

barriboy wrote:Don't you know that there is a very long queue of people wanting to take over the club, pay off Tan and turn us back to blue.

There's ....um, what's his name. Then there's that other bloke. And the fella from Jersey who once almost bought us. And Sam Hammam - he's got lot's of money now that he.. I mean Langston, have been paid back.

Now that we're a Premier League team there must be literally hundreds of rich owners with a preference for blue just waiting for the right time to buy us?



Which is why he'd be a mug to do it at present with all the protests and anger against him, and one thing he isn't is a mug. If I was him I wouldn't do it either, I'd leave it as it is and make someone who wanted it give me all my money back. The problem is people on here believe that there's a long line of people willing to buy us out just cos we've had 1 year in the prem, where as in truth there isn't and there's also no guarantee that if there was they'd change us back to blue.[/quote]


When you look at the way the fan base has evolved with endless bickering and personal insults being traded on every other thread about the rebrand I look back and think this could have all been avoided if Sam had turned his debt to equity.
After all it has been posted on here several times that Sam left the club with 30 million pounds worth of assets so he could have sold them off and started again.
Ok we might not be in the premier league but there's the possibility we could have been in a new stadium but working off the same financial model that the jacks have the last ten years and playing in blue.

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Thu Mar 20, 2014 11:01 pm

Pant_yr_awel bluebird wrote:
BluebirdsTilIDie wrote:Wouldn't even count on it then.. he will do it when he wants

He wont do it at all.Tan is a bare faced liar.Who would want shares in a Championship club.If ' when we get relegated'it will be seen as Tans failure.Hopefully he will then piss off.


Yes piss off then what? Gift us £80m we owe him or piss off and take every last penny club has? But that will be ok club has good academy players for 1st team 11! :thumbup:

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:47 am

Would you buy a house or a car from someone who constantly calls you names like wanker and worse. Seems to me like Tans having an understandable reaction to all those fans who still haven't realised that we need him more than he needs us.

There are no other buyers. Anyone with any money usually has a decent level of intellegence and will be looking at the often negative way we treat our current owner and be thinking I'd be mad to invest in that.

We've gone well and truly down the knobhead route of trying to get Tan to work with us on returning to blue. It's us that need to retract and start again if we are to have any chance of turning this around and if it's not Tan then I can't see it being anyone else either.

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:35 pm

Skewett wrote:Would you buy a house or a car from someone who constantly calls you names like wanker and worse. Seems to me like Tans having an understandable reaction to all those fans who still haven't realised that we need him more than he needs us.

There are no other buyers. Anyone with any money usually has a decent level of intellegence and will be looking at the often negative way we treat our current owner and be thinking I'd be mad to invest in that.

We've gone well and truly down the knobhead route of trying to get Tan to work with us on returning to blue. It's us that need to retract and start again if we are to have any chance of turning this around and if it's not Tan then I can't see it being anyone else either.



i wonder what would happen if the march makes tan decide to sell the club and the only buyer as an example is peter lim.
he is willing to take the club over pay off tan but he also wants the club to remain red.
do the same people start marching against lim to then drive him away ? im only wondering because how many buyers are out there willing to let 10% of the fan base( based on 2500 marching) dictate to them the colour of a jersey.
I would love to see us playing in blue but what are the options if the only available buyer does not want to reverse tans rebrand.

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:56 pm

Nobody knows if it was lim who turned us red on the option of buying in if we stayed in the prem, who's to say this didn't go on to start with

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:10 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:Nobody knows if it was lim who turned us red on the option of buying in if we stayed in the prem, who's to say this didn't go on to start with



who knows ian but the point is still relevant you cant keep on protesting and marching till you get the owner you want.
Plan A seems to be to drive tan out with no one having a clue what would happen if he went.

Re: ' Tan will not make City debt Free until Malky case solv

Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:37 pm

steve davies wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:Nobody knows if it was lim who turned us red on the option of buying in if we stayed in the prem, who's to say this didn't go on to start with



who knows ian but the point is still relevant you cant keep on protesting and marching till you get the owner you want.

Plan A seems to be to drive tan out with no one having a clue what would happen if he went.


Why not :?: I'm not being flippant that's a genuine question. Do the little people not have any right to choose?