Gestede

Never given a chance by malky just like many others.

Yet it was Ole that sold him.

Umm no it wasn't.

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

2 managers have decided that Mason isn't good enough to get in this team.

You slate Malky for that decision, then not Ole for deciding exactly the same thing?



If a player isn't good enough to get in the team, that doesn't mean he is being mistreated.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25567406

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25581950

Whats that got to do with malky not giving him a chance donkey

He wasn't given a chance because he wasn't good enough.

Malky gave him premiership time, Ole didn't even give him that & sold him straight away....

Sounds like Ole was the one not to give him a chance, not Malky.

Ole will want to get his own players in, and get rid of the majority of the malky type players.

Malky never gave rudy a sniff, he obviously got talent as hes been slotting them home for blackburn.

7 goals in 54 appearance's for Cardiff. Malky defiantly never gave him a chance...

Mainly ten minute run outs, malky rarely gave him full games, what do you expect chucking someone on for ten mins here and there, his confidence must of been shot.

Would you have started him over Kenny Millar, Helguson, Mason, Maynard (When fit) and Campbell? Because I for sure would not.

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

I for one am glad we will never see milky again, for the sake of Cardiffs finances. Any longer with milky and cardiff would of been in admin IMO, atleast Ole will steady the ship regarding finances and won't be taken for a mug like Messiah Milky.

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

Whats that got to do with malky not giving him a chance donkey

He wasn't given a chance because he wasn't good enough.

Malky gave him premiership time, Ole didn't even give him that & sold him straight away....

Sounds like Ole was the one not to give him a chance, not Malky.

Ole will want to get his own players in, and get rid of the majority of the malky type players.

Malky never gave rudy a sniff, he obviously got talent as hes been slotting them home for blackburn.

7 goals in 54 appearance's for Cardiff. Malky defiantly never gave him a chance...

Mainly ten minute run outs, malky rarely gave him full games, what do you expect chucking someone on for ten mins here and there, his confidence must of been shot.

Would you have started him over Kenny Millar, Helguson, Mason, Maynard (When fit) and Campbell? Because I for sure would not.

Gestede has scored 4 in 10 for Blackburn, Helguson scored 8 in 38, so yes I would of started Gestede instead of Helguson

Last edited by Kenfig Blue on Thu Mar 13, 2014 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

Exactly, so all settled in and had a decent scoring record. I remember Annis(not a dig but not exactly heavily reliable but right never the less in this case) saying that when we loaned him it was done anyway, even before Malky was sacked, the deal was done, he was a Blackburn player! Paperwork was the hold up on first day of the window I think, so the deal was confirmed on second. Shame people don't read

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

So I'm not allowed to criticise Tommy Smith who played a minimal part in getting us promoted and rarely featured for us due to injury and age? The wages Smith are on are disgusting and you can't deny that. I remember in our first season everyone was contempt with the playing squad saying the players were playing for the shirt and not the pay cheque yet the wages were still the same as the 2010/2011 team!! We threw wages around and haven't learnt from our mistakes, hence Moody's sacking and Malky's

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

Exactly, so all settled in and had a decent scoring record. I remember Annis(not a dig but not exactly heavily reliable but right never the less in this case) saying that when we loaned him it was done anyway, even before Malky was sacked, the deal was done, he was a Blackburn player! Paperwork was the hold up on first day of the window I think, so the deal was confirmed on second. Shame people don't read

Barry Bullshit has been proved wrong yet again

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

So I'm not allowed to criticise Tommy Smith who played a minimal part in getting us promoted and rarely featured for us due to injury and age? The wages Smith are on are disgusting and you can't deny that. I remember in our first season everyone was contempt with the playing squad saying the players were playing for the shirt and not the pay cheque yet the wages were still the same as the 2010/2011 team!! We threw wages around and haven't learnt from our mistakes, hence Moody's sacking and Malky's

Tommy Smith was a fantastic player for us until he got injured. He was never the same after his injury, but that's just bad luck. The performances Tommy Smith put in before his injury helped us to win the title. Smith was a key player in our team when we won our first 10 home games of the season and that gave us the momentum and confidence to win the title.

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

So I'm not allowed to criticise Tommy Smith who played a minimal part in getting us promoted and rarely featured for us due to injury and age? The wages Smith are on are disgusting and you can't deny that. I remember in our first season everyone was contempt with the playing squad saying the players were playing for the shirt and not the pay cheque yet the wages were still the same as the 2010/2011 team!! We threw wages around and haven't learnt from our mistakes, hence Moody's sacking and Malky's

Tommy Smith was a fantastic player for us until he got injured. He was never the same after his injury, but that's just bad luck. The performances Tommy Smith put in before his injury helped us to win the title. Smith was a key player in our team when we won our first 10 home games of the season and that gave us the momentum and confidence to win the title.

30k a weeks worth? go to bed you whopper.

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

So I'm not allowed to criticise Tommy Smith who played a minimal part in getting us promoted and rarely featured for us due to injury and age? The wages Smith are on are disgusting and you can't deny that. I remember in our first season everyone was contempt with the playing squad saying the players were playing for the shirt and not the pay cheque yet the wages were still the same as the 2010/2011 team!! We threw wages around and haven't learnt from our mistakes, hence Moody's sacking and Malky's

Tommy Smith was a fantastic player for us until he got injured. He was never the same after his injury, but that's just bad luck. The performances Tommy Smith put in before his injury helped us to win the title. Smith was a key player in our team when we won our first 10 home games of the season and that gave us the momentum and confidence to win the title.

30k a weeks worth? go to bed you whopper.

How do you know he was on 30k a week? Prove it please.

When you come in as a new manager you need a proven PL goalscorer, hence why he went to Kenwyne Jones to get goals, not hit the ground running at all but throwing Rudy in would have been a mistake, it wasn't a reference to his time in the Prem, just the two seasons he was here in the Champ, no one can deny Mason hasn't been mistreated

Why are people saying that certain players have been mistreated, just because eh haven't had games?!

If they aren't getting games, it's because the manager doesn't think they are good enough. Has Tommy Smith been "mistreated" too?! How about Matt Connelly?

Absolutely laughable.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

So I'm not allowed to criticise Tommy Smith who played a minimal part in getting us promoted and rarely featured for us due to injury and age? The wages Smith are on are disgusting and you can't deny that. I remember in our first season everyone was contempt with the playing squad saying the players were playing for the shirt and not the pay cheque yet the wages were still the same as the 2010/2011 team!! We threw wages around and haven't learnt from our mistakes, hence Moody's sacking and Malky's

Tommy Smith was a fantastic player for us until he got injured. He was never the same after his injury, but that's just bad luck. The performances Tommy Smith put in before his injury helped us to win the title. Smith was a key player in our team when we won our first 10 home games of the season and that gave us the momentum and confidence to win the title.

30k a weeks worth? go to bed you whopper.

How do you know he was on 30k a week? Prove it please.

No one ever proved cornflop was on 45k a week but we all new it

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

It wasn't already agreed. It was a loan with a view to permanently buy, but Malky wanted to bring a replacement in. Unfortunately, when Malky revealed he would like another striker, Tan sent that email and sacked him. Nobody knows if Malky would still have been willing to offload Rudy if he couldn't replace him. Ole as our new manager had that option mind and he chose to allow Rudy to go and bring Kenwyne Jones in, which was fair enough to me at the time. Allowing Maynard, Mason and Cornelius to go and only bring Berget in along with Jones has unfortunately left us very short up front however, and we are struggling to score as a result.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

30k a weeeek!! No wonder they called him Milky

It's embarrassing He didn't want to come here and wanted to stay in London so Malky offered him a big wage he couldn't turn down. Helguson was on a fair bit etc. Absolute joke how we just threw wages about

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

So I'm not allowed to criticise Tommy Smith who played a minimal part in getting us promoted and rarely featured for us due to injury and age? The wages Smith are on are disgusting and you can't deny that. I remember in our first season everyone was contempt with the playing squad saying the players were playing for the shirt and not the pay cheque yet the wages were still the same as the 2010/2011 team!! We threw wages around and haven't learnt from our mistakes, hence Moody's sacking and Malky's

Tommy Smith was a fantastic player for us until he got injured. He was never the same after his injury, but that's just bad luck. The performances Tommy Smith put in before his injury helped us to win the title. Smith was a key player in our team when we won our first 10 home games of the season and that gave us the momentum and confidence to win the title.

30k a weeks worth? go to bed you whopper.

How do you know he was on 30k a week? Prove it please.

No one ever proved cornflop was on 45k a week but we all new it

You keep dealing with assumptions, I will keep dealing with facts.

Mason was our top goalscorer and more or less got us to the play-offs and put a good showing of himself in the League Cup final. It is being mistreated, look at the way he loaned Kerim Frei yet barely played him due to him not being mathc fit, WELL WHY LOAN HIM MALKY?

Smith is on a healthy wage and was brought here to do a Championship job, he didn't even want to be here, hopefully we release him as he's on 30k a week apparently

The wages Malky "threw about" as you put it got us into the Premiership. Have a pop at Malky for the Cornelius deal by all means, but having a pop at Malky for bringing in players who proved well worth their wages by getting us into the Premiership makes you look a bit silly.

Tommy Smith was a fantastic player for us until he got injured. He was never the same after his injury, but that's just bad luck. The performances Tommy Smith put in before his injury helped us to win the title. Smith was a key player in our team when we won our first 10 home games of the season and that gave us the momentum and confidence to win the title.

30k a weeks worth? go to bed you whopper.

How do you know he was on 30k a week? Prove it please.

No one ever proved cornflop was on 45k a week but we all new it

You keep dealing with assumptions, I will keep dealing with facts. [/quote][/quote][/quote]

I got a good fact for you. Malky won 6 out of 28 leagues games going back to last season. He also had the 2nd worst defensive record in the prem league, before he was rightfully given the boot

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

It wasn't already agreed. It was a loan with a view to permanently buy, but Malky wanted to bring a replacement in. Unfortunately, when Malky revealed he would like another striker, Tan sent that email and sacked him. Nobody knows if Malky would still have been willing to offload Rudy if he couldn't replace him. Ole as our new manager had that option mind and he chose to allow Rudy to go and bring Kenwyne Jones in, which was fair enough to me at the time. Allowing Maynard, Mason and Cornelius to go and only bring Berget in along with Jones has unfortunately left us very short up front however, and we are struggling to score as a result.

You do know what that means dont you "view to a permanant deal" means its outside the transfer window so he will be on loan until the new transfer window opens.

OGS had zero influence on the Gestede deal as it was done on Nov 26th

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

It wasn't already agreed. It was a loan with a view to permanently buy, but Malky wanted to bring a replacement in. Unfortunately, when Malky revealed he would like another striker, Tan sent that email and sacked him. Nobody knows if Malky would still have been willing to offload Rudy if he couldn't replace him. Ole as our new manager had that option mind and he chose to allow Rudy to go and bring Kenwyne Jones in, which was fair enough to me at the time. Allowing Maynard, Mason and Cornelius to go and only bring Berget in along with Jones has unfortunately left us very short up front however, and we are struggling to score as a result.

You do know what that means dont you "view to a permanant deal" means its outside the transfer window so he will be on loan until the new transfer window opens.

OGS had zero influence on the Gestede deal as it was done on Nov 26th

Oh dear.

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

It wasn't already agreed. It was a loan with a view to permanently buy, but Malky wanted to bring a replacement in. Unfortunately, when Malky revealed he would like another striker, Tan sent that email and sacked him. Nobody knows if Malky would still have been willing to offload Rudy if he couldn't replace him. Ole as our new manager had that option mind and he chose to allow Rudy to go and bring Kenwyne Jones in, which was fair enough to me at the time. Allowing Maynard, Mason and Cornelius to go and only bring Berget in along with Jones has unfortunately left us very short up front however, and we are struggling to score as a result.

You do know what that means dont you "view to a permanant deal" means its outside the transfer window so he will be on loan until the new transfer window opens.

OGS had zero influence on the Gestede deal as it was done on Nov 26th

Oh dear.

I take it by your lack of a decent counter argument you agree

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

It wasn't already agreed. It was a loan with a view to permanently buy, but Malky wanted to bring a replacement in. Unfortunately, when Malky revealed he would like another striker, Tan sent that email and sacked him. Nobody knows if Malky would still have been willing to offload Rudy if he couldn't replace him. Ole as our new manager had that option mind and he chose to allow Rudy to go and bring Kenwyne Jones in, which was fair enough to me at the time. Allowing Maynard, Mason and Cornelius to go and only bring Berget in along with Jones has unfortunately left us very short up front however, and we are struggling to score as a result.

You do know what that means dont you "view to a permanant deal" means its outside the transfer window so he will be on loan until the new transfer window opens.

OGS had zero influence on the Gestede deal as it was done on Nov 26th

Oh dear.

I take it by your lack of a decent counter argument you agree

Unlike you, I have already explained. "View to a permanent deal" does not mean the transfer is concluded at all. The Blackburn manager may not have liked him or Malky/Ole may have been impressed with Rudy during his loan spell and decide to recall him. If the transfer was already concluded, it would have been announced as concluded, not "with a view".

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

And he was already at Blackburn from Nov 26th

So Ole comes in the same day Rudy got sold after we are without a manager for over a week, yet you're honestly saying Ole was happy to allow the transfer to be completed instead of having a look at Rudy himself before making a decision?

What part of the deal was already agreed for him to leave in DECEMBER before Malky was sacked don't you get

It wasn't already agreed. It was a loan with a view to permanently buy, but Malky wanted to bring a replacement in. Unfortunately, when Malky revealed he would like another striker, Tan sent that email and sacked him. Nobody knows if Malky would still have been willing to offload Rudy if he couldn't replace him. Ole as our new manager had that option mind and he chose to allow Rudy to go and bring Kenwyne Jones in, which was fair enough to me at the time. Allowing Maynard, Mason and Cornelius to go and only bring Berget in along with Jones has unfortunately left us very short up front however, and we are struggling to score as a result.

You do know what that means dont you "view to a permanant deal" means its outside the transfer window so he will be on loan until the new transfer window opens.

OGS had zero influence on the Gestede deal as it was done on Nov 26th

Oh dear.

I take it by your lack of a decent counter argument you agree

Unlike you, I have already explained. "View to a permanent deal" does not mean the transfer is concluded at all. The Blackburn manager may not have liked him or Malky/Ole may have been impressed with Rudy during his loan spell and decide to recall him. If the transfer was already concluded, it would have been announced as concluded, not "with a view".

How can it be concluded outside of a transfer window?
I'm sorry but your fistpump blindness is totally absurd

Got to love the usual culprits blaming Malky, despite Ole selling him.

OLE WAS APPOINTED ON JAN 2ND
GESTEDE JOINED BLACKBURN ON JAN 2ND

OLE NEVER MET THE PLAYERS UNTIL THE DAY HE WAS APPOINTED

CRAIG POSTED IT
HELLO
READ

got no chance of either responding because its in black white and cant refute it?

How can it be concluded outside of a transfer window?
I'm sorry but your fistpump blindness is totally absurd

They would simply announce that the transfer will become permanent on January 1st when the window opens, not say it's only with a view. Lewandowski has already been announced as a Bayern player next season, but that's not possible in your opinion.

How can it be concluded outside of a transfer window?
I'm sorry but your fistpump blindness is totally absurd

They would simply announce that the transfer will become permanent on January 1st when the window opens, not say it's only with a view. Lewandowski has already been announced as a Bayern player next season, but that's not possible in your opinion.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... rn-2853461

How can it be concluded outside of a transfer window?
I'm sorry but your fistpump blindness is totally absurd

They would simply announce that the transfer will become permanent on January 1st when the window opens, not say it's only with a view. Lewandowski has already been announced as a Bayern player next season, but that's not possible in your opinion.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... rn-2853461

This. Someone looks abit silly

This thread is hilarious in a tragic way. I seem to remember for at least a year their were threads made regularly slamming malky for playing gestede too much and how only malky couldn't see he wasn't up to scratch.

Funny how much shite is scewed to suit certain peoples agendas.