Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:22 am

Golden cheetah wrote:
Anarch0 wrote:OGS does what Malky couldnt......get us relegated!



I am surprised how negativ some people are here, are they really fans of cardiff city?
Or are they swansea lads?
Strangeto see after a crusiol win


Negative? More like a realist mate. I like the way fans who have different views in this forum get branded a fan of another club by certain people (Pro-Tan/OGS fanboys). Maybe some people here just cant handle the truth.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:42 am

Anarch0 wrote:
Golden cheetah wrote:
Anarch0 wrote:OGS does what Malky couldnt......get us relegated!



I am surprised how negativ some people are here, are they really fans of cardiff city?
Or are they swansea lads?
Strangeto see after a crusiol win


Negative? More like a realist mate. I like the way fans who have different views in this forum get branded a fan of another club by certain people (Pro-Tan/OGS fanboys). Maybe some people here just cant handle the truth.

thats funny coming from a scouser

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:26 am

Re the mm / ole bickering in this thread . Time will tell lads . I thought mm deserved to be given the full season and honestly thought he would have kept us up before tan started to play up . Let's see how many points we get . Mm had 17 points from 18 games . By the last game ole will have had 18 games at the helm . We got 1 point from the 2 games kerslake took.

So on an even set of games who will get the most . You can't really use fixtures as a basis for argument as they work themselves out at the end of the season . What do I mean by that - on paper mm clearly had the tougher home games / easier away . But it's vice versa for ole .

Mm heads it at the mo as with ole on 7 from 9 . Although you could argue ole does have an advantage as he was given cash to strengthen .

Personally think whoever manages our club is on a hiding to nothing with that c**t in charge . Like to think we will stay up but can't see 4 more wins in us now tbh

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:30 am

northside of risca wrote:Re the mm / ole bickering in this thread . Time will tell lads . I thought mm deserved to be given the full season and honestly thought he would have kept us up before tan started to play up . Let's see how many points we get . Mm had 17 points from 18 games . By the last game ole will have had 18 games at the helm . We got 1 point from the 2 games kerslake took.

So on an even set of games who will get the most . You can't really use fixtures as a basis for argument as they work themselves out at the end of the season . What do I mean by that - on paper mm clearly had the tougher home games / easier away . But it's vice versa for ole .

Mm heads it at the mo as with ole on 7 from 9 . Although you could argue ole does have an advantage as he was given cash to strengthen .

Personally think whoever manages our club is on a hiding to nothing with that c**t in charge . Like to think we will stay up but can't see 4 more wins in us now tbh


errr Malky had £50m in the summer!

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:41 am

CraigCCFC wrote:
northside of risca wrote:Re the mm / ole bickering in this thread . Time will tell lads . I thought mm deserved to be given the full season and honestly thought he would have kept us up before tan started to play up . Let's see how many points we get . Mm had 17 points from 18 games . By the last game ole will have had 18 games at the helm . We got 1 point from the 2 games kerslake took.

So on an even set of games who will get the most . You can't really use fixtures as a basis for argument as they work themselves out at the end of the season . What do I mean by that - on paper mm clearly had the tougher home games / easier away . But it's vice versa for ole .

Mm heads it at the mo as with ole on 7 from 9 . Although you could argue ole does have an advantage as he was given cash to strengthen .

Personally think whoever manages our club is on a hiding to nothing with that c**t in charge . Like to think we will stay up but can't see 4 more wins in us now tbh


errr Malky had £50m in the summer!


And Ole had FURTHER funds in January to strengthen, so surely we should have a stronger squad from January onwards? Results and performances aren't showing that so far mind. Spurs and yesterday were an improvement although we were lucky they gifted us the 2nd and 3rd goals with bad keeping and an own goal.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:45 am

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
northside of risca wrote:Re the mm / ole bickering in this thread . Time will tell lads . I thought mm deserved to be given the full season and honestly thought he would have kept us up before tan started to play up . Let's see how many points we get . Mm had 17 points from 18 games . By the last game ole will have had 18 games at the helm . We got 1 point from the 2 games kerslake took.

So on an even set of games who will get the most . You can't really use fixtures as a basis for argument as they work themselves out at the end of the season . What do I mean by that - on paper mm clearly had the tougher home games / easier away . But it's vice versa for ole .

Mm heads it at the mo as with ole on 7 from 9 . Although you could argue ole does have an advantage as he was given cash to strengthen .

Personally think whoever manages our club is on a hiding to nothing with that c**t in charge . Like to think we will stay up but can't see 4 more wins in us now tbh


errr Malky had £50m in the summer!


And Ole had FURTHER funds in January to strengthen, so surely we should have a stronger squad from January onwards? Results and performances aren't showing that so far mind. Spurs and yesterday were an improvement although we were lucky they gifted us the 2nd and 3rd goals with bad keeping and an own goal.


Yes , that was my point , ole spending was further to the existing squad .

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:01 pm

northside of risca wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
northside of risca wrote:Re the mm / ole bickering in this thread . Time will tell lads . I thought mm deserved to be given the full season and honestly thought he would have kept us up before tan started to play up . Let's see how many points we get . Mm had 17 points from 18 games . By the last game ole will have had 18 games at the helm . We got 1 point from the 2 games kerslake took.

So on an even set of games who will get the most . You can't really use fixtures as a basis for argument as they work themselves out at the end of the season . What do I mean by that - on paper mm clearly had the tougher home games / easier away . But it's vice versa for ole .

Mm heads it at the mo as with ole on 7 from 9 . Although you could argue ole does have an advantage as he was given cash to strengthen .

Personally think whoever manages our club is on a hiding to nothing with that c**t in charge . Like to think we will stay up but can't see 4 more wins in us now tbh


errr Malky had £50m in the summer!


And Ole had FURTHER funds in January to strengthen, so surely we should have a stronger squad from January onwards? Results and performances aren't showing that so far mind. Spurs and yesterday were an improvement although we were lucky they gifted us the 2nd and 3rd goals with bad keeping and an own goal.


Yes , that was my point , ole spending was further to the existing squad .


But the strongest argument is that ole shouldn't have needed to spend but the fact Mackay was still playing 9 players from the championship campaign speaks volumes as to how badly he spent the money

Ole should have just needed one or two acquisitions to bolster the squad but in actual fact he needed players to add to a first team which should only happened if we were bringing in real quality players to replace what we had

I liked Mackay seemed a decent guy but IMO he wouldn't have kept us up either And please don't give me the old we were hard to beat under malky bollocks as we had second worst record in the league when he left

I still think we will go down as we got two tough games now which will be zero points and debt the confidence we just built through yesterday's win

However if we could nick a win in one of the next two games we would look in a much better position

I think the only thing we got going for us is we have more winnable home games than a few above us, norwich a run in is awful and although they are a few clear I fully expect them to be down with us come may if not relegated themselves then just above, west brom in free fall and I'd much rather be in our situation than sunderlands in fairness as having games in hand don't mean you've won those games they could lose all 3 and still be behind us there's plenty more twists to come

Palace is huge now cos we can go level if we beat them! Although they have a game in hand
It's gonna be interesting lets get behind the team every match day because at times we are awful and directing anger at tan isn't the answer that's just stupidity everyone would rather stay in this league than go back down, I can assure you staying up we have a far better chance of seeing the end of Vincent tan than going down

The club is far more attractibe to potential suitors in the premier league than it will be in the championship plus it's value will be more and that way tan can get most of his money back

As for a return to blue t would be awesome but I honestly think any potential new owner will not return us to blue anyway,

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:05 pm

But come on guys! You all saw how bad the games was before christmas. The team hit rock bottom in shape in the midle of the campain. When cornelius came back to copenhagen his coach was shocked how out of shape he was. Furter more,
Bying players in january to this joke of a club isnt exactly cake toppings. You have to be looking at players that have not played for their club, and need time to shape up. With a 6 mill budget we got players worth 9,5mill.. Surely this is not rocket science!

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:32 pm

Milky was clueless at this level end of, thank fuk he's gone :ole:

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:18 pm

Cardiff boss Solskjaer employed a 4-5-1 formation more akin to Malky Mackay's reign than his own for a match he described as "must win" for both sides.

An extract from BBCs report on the game - completely true the side looked like How we played under Malky

Don't think I'm taking this away from OGS - I'm really glad that he masterminded the win today and playing Campbell on the left wAs genius - but I get physically angry when I see some "fans" dubbing our old manager "milky" - it's pathetic and you should f*cking realise the amount he gave to this club

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:21 pm

What he gave to the club? You mean what he was paid very well to do!

Where has this insane idea come from that Malky loved us and "gave" us stuff. He was a highly paid manager....end of story.

If you think Milky (players gave him that nickname) would have allowed that many of our players in the opposition box, you sir are a mentalist.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:29 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:What he gave to the club? You mean what he was paid very well to do!

Where has this insane idea come from that Malky loved us and "gave" us stuff. He was a highly paid manager....end of story.

If you think Milky (players gave him that nickname) would have allowed that many of our players in the opposition box, you sir are a mentalist.


Bollocks the players gave him that nickname and if they did I bet it would be because he milked them for every ounce of effort they could muster - which showed on the pitch

The insane idea is that professional people take pride in their work and malky was a professional manager of the highest degree - no one would argue that he was a Cardiff supporter or wouldn't have taken a job from a big club if the opportunity had come along or that he would have worked at the club for free :lol: but he have 100% and we looked like a solid team under him - I'm not going to bother listing his many achievements for the 100th time

I didn't exactly see player cramming into the box.. 3 at most? Aside from corners and set pieces..

You don't have to call me sir either

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:34 pm

The players DID call him Milky and not for the reason you say. This is 100% fact.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:39 pm

For all this bitching not many of you must have seen goals on Sunday this morning. Malky only praised the fans, whereas you call him a c**t.

Some of our fans are completely classless.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:41 pm

Willy-Wonka wrote:For all this bitching not many of you must have seen goals on Sunday this morning. Malky only praised the fans, whereas you call him a c**t.

Some of our fans are completely classless.

Not bothered about him, he isnt our manager and I have no affinity to him. Unlike some.....

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:44 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:The players DID call him Milky and not for the reason you say. This is 100% fact.


How do you know this - show me an example

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:44 pm

As I said, some of our fans are like toddlers with toy, you forget in 5 minutes. Throw away society they say? hmmmmm.

Either way a lot of our fans will always remember him whereas you will remeber nothing based on that opinion. You like none of our former players or managers as they are gone. That is why that statement is flawed. and only used to discredit him

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:28 pm

Apparently no passion and fight from Ole, what a load of tosh. :lol:

The scenes from him and the team when we got the goals showed.

Caulker, Campbell chasing everything, charging down. Caulker was charging defenders down and the ball was going out for goal kicks, throwing.

Difference is with Ole and Malky, Ole doesn't hope to get something, he sends the team out to go out and get a result. Malky always hoped for a result.. getting the goal then shut up shop. Even at 2-1, we went for more, could of been 4-1 if Daelhi hit the ball on target.

I enjoyed the football today, the effort.. haven't done so for a while. Well done Ole and the team.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:33 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:The players DID call him Milky and not for the reason you say. This is 100% fact.

Not another Craig fact. It must be true then. :lol:

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:35 pm

Bluebird64 wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:The players DID call him Milky and not for the reason you say. This is 100% fact.

Not another Craig fact. It must be true then. :lol:

Yes, of course it is, when you are told by someone that calls him it.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:40 pm

No one is calling milky a kent willy wanka, all we are saying is the time was right for a change in personnel. His drab style was painfull to watch, atleast we are winning, losing and drawing playing good football now. All the people I go to.games with actually enjoy the.footy alot more under Ole, whereas under milky every game was painful to watch, defending all game every.game.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:53 pm

Kenfig Blue wrote:No one is calling milky a kent willy wanka, all we are saying is the time was right for a change in personnel. His drab style was painfull to watch, atleast we are winning, losing and drawing playing good football now. All the people I go to.games with actually enjoy the.footy alot more under Ole, whereas under milky every game was painful to watch, defending all game every.game.


I must have imagined us attacking West Brom the majority of the game and dominating the second half against Swansea then, which was something Ole COULDN'T get us to do! Ole also did something else Malky couldn't do this season - lose by 4 (FOUR) goals!!

Still, focus on whatever suits your agenda. :thumbup:

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:01 pm

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
Kenfig Blue wrote:No one is calling milky a kent willy wanka, all we are saying is the time was right for a change in personnel. His drab style was painfull to watch, atleast we are winning, losing and drawing playing good football now. All the people I go to.games with actually enjoy the.footy alot more under Ole, whereas under milky every game was painful to watch, defending all game every.game.


I must have imagined us attacking West Brom the majority of the game and dominating the second half against Swansea then, which was something Ole COULDN'T get us to do! Ole also did something else Malky couldn't do this season - lose by 4 (FOUR) goals!!

Still, focus on whatever suits your agenda. :thumbup:


West Brom? Majority? Delusional.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:07 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
Kenfig Blue wrote:No one is calling milky a kent willy wanka, all we are saying is the time was right for a change in personnel. His drab style was painfull to watch, atleast we are winning, losing and drawing playing good football now. All the people I go to.games with actually enjoy the.footy alot more under Ole, whereas under milky every game was painful to watch, defending all game every.game.


I must have imagined us attacking West Brom the majority of the game and dominating the second half against Swansea then, which was something Ole COULDN'T get us to do! Ole also did something else Malky couldn't do this season - lose by 4 (FOUR) goals!!

Still, focus on whatever suits your agenda. :thumbup:


This. I cannot remember us dominating any team under malky, oh wait actually blackburn away last season my bad.


West Brom? Majority? Delusional.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:23 pm

Surely 3 months down the line it's time to stop the we'd have done this under Malky or we wouldn't have done this under Malky arguments. It's impossible to know factually how the season or any matches would have panned out, Malky got us promoted and to Wembly but he's gone now, to some of us thankfully while others wish he was still here, let's leave it like that.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:27 am

Ole had around 30 days to plan and aquire his targets...


Malky had how long?
Fact of the matter is this; Malky isn't in Charge.... Turn the page lads. :wave:

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:43 am

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
Kenfig Blue wrote:No one is calling milky a kent willy wanka, all we are saying is the time was right for a change in personnel. His drab style was painfull to watch, atleast we are winning, losing and drawing playing good football now. All the people I go to.games with actually enjoy the.footy alot more under Ole, whereas under milky every game was painful to watch, defending all game every.game.


I must have imagined us attacking West Brom the majority of the game and dominating the second half against Swansea then, which was something Ole COULDN'T get us to do! Ole also did something else Malky couldn't do this season - lose by 4 (FOUR) goals!!

Still, focus on whatever suits your agenda. :thumbup:



Utter nonsense from you AGAIN.

We shared very similar stats against West Brom. It was a poor and scrappy game where it could have gone either way.

Dominated Swansea in the second half? How so? They had much better possession than us so how can you dominate without the ball?

We played better than Swansea in the second half defiantly but I wouldn't call it domination.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:43 am

AJ1927 wrote:Ole had around 30 days to plan and aquire his targets...


Malky had how long?
Fact of the matter is this; Malky isn't in Charge.... Turn the page lads. :wave:


OGS had 10% of what Malky had to spend.

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:27 am

DandoCCFC wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
Kenfig Blue wrote:No one is calling milky a kent willy wanka, all we are saying is the time was right for a change in personnel. His drab style was painfull to watch, atleast we are winning, losing and drawing playing good football now. All the people I go to.games with actually enjoy the.footy alot more under Ole, whereas under milky every game was painful to watch, defending all game every.game.


I must have imagined us attacking West Brom the majority of the game and dominating the second half against Swansea then, which was something Ole COULDN'T get us to do! Ole also did something else Malky couldn't do this season - lose by 4 (FOUR) goals!!

Still, focus on whatever suits your agenda. :thumbup:


West Brom? Majority? Delusional.


We had 3 times as many shots on target against Fulham than we did West Brom :laughing6:

Re: OGS does what Milky couldnt

Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:28 pm

Does anyone remember Malky bought us up to the premier league?? f**k sake what kind of fans do we have these these days!?