Hypocrisy on here

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

You can't say that FFS as no-one can say that because simply no-one will ever know

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

Last edited by CF47 BLUEBIRD on Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Spot on, Brucy and Pulis are top managers, 2 levels above malky has to be said, very shrewd in the markets.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

So Ferguson never blew an even bigger percentage of his transfer budget on Veron then did he!!!!

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Malky had no room for mistake unlike Fergie and moruinho, he doesn't have to be better but alot more shrewd just like Brucy and Pulis who have made no mistakes on a tiny budget. Total balls up only 1 player from the 40+ mil has been worth it and that is caulker, every1 else was shit and Medel was way overpriced, 3 players could of been bought for Medels price.

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

True and it's amazing how time has helped many fans forget this.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Malky had no room for mistake unlike Fergie and moruinho, he doesn't have to be better but alot more shrewd just like Brucy and Pulis who have made no mistakes on a tiny budget. Total balls up only 1 player from the 40+ mil has been worth it and that is caulker, every1 else was shit and Medel was way overpriced, 3 players could of been bought for Medels price.

They've made no mistakes..? Are you sure about that

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

You can't say that FFS as no-one can say that because simply no-one will ever know

We had millions of debt to HMRC who had already given us multiple winding up orders. If Tan hadn't invested after the Blackpool final that would have been it for CCFC I'm sure.

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

You can't say that FFS as no-one can say that because simply no-one will ever know

We had millions of debt to HMRC who had already given us multiple winding up orders. If Tan hadn't invested after the Blackpool final that would have been it for CCFC I'm sure.

It impossible for you or anyone to know that would have happened. I wish people would stop trying to predict the impossible on here at times.

FACT is that NO-ONE will ever know that it would have happened

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

So Ferguson never blew an even bigger percentage of his transfer budget on Veron then did he!!!!

I dont know what Uniteds budget was that window but put it this way 28m was a fraction of what that United squad was worth.

It was hardly an unkown signing, Veron was regarded as one of the best in the world, it just didnt work at United and United had Scholes, Giggs, Keane.etc and were still winning games.

They also sold him for 17m. United losing 11m on a player is like Cardiff losing 120k on a player.

If Cornelius was signed for 2m and 15k a week no-one would batter an eyelid. To spend 8.5m and make him the highest earner when he had only played 30 odd games. Craziness and unforgivable.

As I said if you want to make comparisons lets compare clubs on a similair keel and how they spent their budget. Hull and Palace have squads just as good as ours for a fraction of the cost.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Malky had no room for mistake unlike Fergie and moruinho, he doesn't have to be better but alot more shrewd just like Brucy and Pulis who have made no mistakes on a tiny budget. Total balls up only 1 player from the 40+ mil has been worth it and that is caulker, every1 else was shit and Medel was way overpriced, 3 players could of been bought for Medels price.

Would you pay £8million for the same Kenwyne Jones which is playing for Cardiff..? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 905368.stm

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

You can't say that FFS as no-one can say that because simply no-one will ever know

We had millions of debt to HMRC who had already given us multiple winding up orders. If Tan hadn't invested after the Blackpool final that would have been it for CCFC I'm sure.

It impossible for you or anyone to know that would have happened. I wish people would stop trying to predict the impossible on here at times.

FACT is that NO-ONE will ever know that it would have happened

Ridsdale had already spent the following season ticket money, who was going to save us? the tooth fairy, santa claus, the easter bunny?

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

So Ferguson never blew an even bigger percentage of his transfer budget on Veron then did he!!!!

I dont know what Uniteds budget was that window but put it this way 28m was a fraction of what that United squad was worth.

It was hardly an unkown signing, Veron was regarded as one of the best in the world, it just didnt work at United and United had Scholes, Giggs, Keane.etc and were still winning games.

They also sold him for 17m. United losing 11m on a player is like Cardiff losing 120k on a player.

If Cornelius was signed for 2m and 15k a week no-one would batter an eyelid. To spend 8.5m and make him the highest earner when he had only played 30 odd games. Craziness and unforgivable.

As I said if you want to make comparisons lets compare clubs on a similair keel and how they spent their budget. Hull and Palace have squads just as good as ours for a fraction of the cost.

But that wasn't your point was it. You clearly meant transfer budget and Ferguson clearly blew the transfer budget when he signed him for £24.8 million in 2001!!! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -move.html

Proof that even the best managers can be wrong in the transfer market

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Malky had no room for mistake unlike Fergie and moruinho, he doesn't have to be better but alot more shrewd just like Brucy and Pulis who have made no mistakes on a tiny budget. Total balls up only 1 player from the 40+ mil has been worth it and that is caulker, every1 else was shit and Medel was way overpriced, 3 players could of been bought for Medels price.

Would you pay £8million for the same Kenwyne Jones which is playing for Cardiff..? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 905368.stm

Again comparing clubs, Stoke have been a solid prem club for years, buying a dud or 2 will not effect them as they have a solid team. We needed a good striker and malky fukt it end of

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

You can't say that FFS as no-one can say that because simply no-one will ever know

We had millions of debt to HMRC who had already given us multiple winding up orders. If Tan hadn't invested after the Blackpool final that would have been it for CCFC I'm sure.

It impossible for you or anyone to know that would have happened. I wish people would stop trying to predict the impossible on here at times.

FACT is that NO-ONE will ever know that it would have happened

Ridsdale had already spent the following season ticket money, who was going to save us? the tooth fairy, santa claus, the easter bunny?

and other parties were mentioned at the time. However the bottom line FACT is that no-one will ever know

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Malky had no room for mistake unlike Fergie and moruinho, he doesn't have to be better but alot more shrewd just like Brucy and Pulis who have made no mistakes on a tiny budget. Total balls up only 1 player from the 40+ mil has been worth it and that is caulker, every1 else was shit and Medel was way overpriced, 3 players could of been bought for Medels price.

Would you pay £8million for the same Kenwyne Jones which is playing for Cardiff..? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 905368.stm

Nope! But if i had a player im not going to use, and needed a beast to win headers i would swap him any day! Everyone knows he cant kick a ball, but no one will push him arround either..

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

How can you compare the richest clubs in the world to cardiff, they could buy 5 duds and still be fine. Plus it wasn't 1 dud malky signed it was a string of them total balls up, destroyed any chance of us staying up, also paid way over the odds for Medel.

So in your view point then Malky HAS to be better than Ferguson and Morhino in the transfer market because they can afford to buy 5 plus duds and still be fine!!!

Malky had no room for mistake unlike Fergie and moruinho, he doesn't have to be better but alot more shrewd just like Brucy and Pulis who have made no mistakes on a tiny budget. Total balls up only 1 player from the 40+ mil has been worth it and that is caulker, every1 else was shit and Medel was way overpriced, 3 players could of been bought for Medels price.

Would you pay £8million for the same Kenwyne Jones which is playing for Cardiff..? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 905368.stm

Nope! But if i had a player im not going to use, and needed a beast to win headers i would swap him any day! Everyone knows he cant kick a ball, but no one will push him arround either..

So you answered my question then. Shall we go through other flops which apprantly Steve Bruce or Tony Pulis never made according to the previous poster

I would say Tans money got us promoted personally, without Tans money we would be a mid table champ team under malky no doubt.

We wouldnt even be that.

Without Tans money we would have either gone to the wall, or would be where Pompey are right now, or worse.

You can't say that FFS as no-one can say that because simply no-one will ever know

We had millions of debt to HMRC who had already given us multiple winding up orders. If Tan hadn't invested after the Blackpool final that would have been it for CCFC I'm sure.

It impossible for you or anyone to know that would have happened. I wish people would stop trying to predict the impossible on here at times.

FACT is that NO-ONE will ever know that it would have happened

Ridsdale had already spent the following season ticket money, who was going to save us? the tooth fairy, santa claus, the easter bunny?

and other parties were mentioned at the time. However the bottom line FACT is that no-one will ever know

other partiesm what a 2nd hand car salesman from Guernsey

The bottom line is malky had one shot to sign atleast a decent striker who would score 6-8 goals, but he signed a total cart horse who couldn't trap a bag of cement.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

So Ferguson never blew an even bigger percentage of his transfer budget on Veron then did he!!!!

I dont know what Uniteds budget was that window but put it this way 28m was a fraction of what that United squad was worth.

It was hardly an unkown signing, Veron was regarded as one of the best in the world, it just didnt work at United and United had Scholes, Giggs, Keane.etc and were still winning games.

They also sold him for 17m. United losing 11m on a player is like Cardiff losing 120k on a player.

If Cornelius was signed for 2m and 15k a week no-one would batter an eyelid. To spend 8.5m and make him the highest earner when he had only played 30 odd games. Craziness and unforgivable.

As I said if you want to make comparisons lets compare clubs on a similair keel and how they spent their budget. Hull and Palace have squads just as good as ours for a fraction of the cost.

But that wasn't your point was it. You clearly meant transfer budget and Ferguson clearly blew the transfer budget when he signed him for £24.8 million in 2001!!! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -move.html

Proof that even the best managers can be wrong in the transfer market

So wrong he won United countless trophies whilst making them a 68m profit in the transfer market during his time there.

The same season he signed Veron he signed Ruud Van Nisterooy.

Please stop comparing Malky to Fergie and Mourinho in the transfer market you are embarrasing yourself.

The bottom line is malky had one shot to sign atleast a decent striker who would score 6-8 goals, but he signed a total cart horse who couldn't trap a bag of cement.

Didn't he already have a 6-8 goal striker in Campbell..?

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

So Ferguson never blew an even bigger percentage of his transfer budget on Veron then did he!!!!

I dont know what Uniteds budget was that window but put it this way 28m was a fraction of what that United squad was worth.

It was hardly an unkown signing, Veron was regarded as one of the best in the world, it just didnt work at United and United had Scholes, Giggs, Keane.etc and were still winning games.

They also sold him for 17m. United losing 11m on a player is like Cardiff losing 120k on a player.

If Cornelius was signed for 2m and 15k a week no-one would batter an eyelid. To spend 8.5m and make him the highest earner when he had only played 30 odd games. Craziness and unforgivable.

As I said if you want to make comparisons lets compare clubs on a similair keel and how they spent their budget. Hull and Palace have squads just as good as ours for a fraction of the cost.

But that wasn't your point was it. You clearly meant transfer budget and Ferguson clearly blew the transfer budget when he signed him for £24.8 million in 2001!!! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -move.html

Proof that even the best managers can be wrong in the transfer market

So wrong he won United countless trophies whilst making them a 68m profit in the transfer market during his time there.

The same season he signed Veron he signed Ruud Van Nisterooy.

Please stop comparing Malky to Fergie and Mourinho in the transfer market you are embarrasing yourself.

Stop trying to broaden my point. You clearly meant a season transfer budget FFS and Veron was clearly a huge percentage of United transfer budget that season so even the best managers can get it wrong in the transfer market at times.

The bottom line is malky had one shot to sign atleast a decent striker who would score 6-8 goals, but he signed a total cart horse who couldn't trap a bag of cement.

Didn't he already have a 6-8 goal striker in Campbell..?

Yes but 2 of them is better than 1, and 6-8 is the minimum that would be expected, wouldn't you say 8 goals from a 9 mil striker is better than 0? Campbell might of scored more with a decent striker next to him as well, someone who could play him in, the cart horse was terrible, any1 who seen him warm up would tell you that.

Did all of Alex Fergusons and Jose Mornhinos signings all work then..? Yet some fans think that all of Malkys signings had to work!!!!

What a stupid f*cking comparison

They have enough quality to cope with signings that dont quite work.

A club our size paying 10m for Cornelius not to work is like Real Madrid cutting their losses on Gareth Bale and selling him back to Spurs for 30m.

Or United selling Mata for 9m cos it didnt work.

Of course you can make a comparison as mypoint is no matter who the manager is not ever signing will work

If you want to make comparisons compare how Malky spent his budget compared to Steve Bruce and then come back and talk some sense.

Fergie and Mourinho never 30% of their transfer budget on on an unknown kid who turned out to be a flop.

Plus when you are winning games at the rate of Fergie and Mourinho your shite signings are forgiveable.

So Ferguson never blew an even bigger percentage of his transfer budget on Veron then did he!!!!

I dont know what Uniteds budget was that window but put it this way 28m was a fraction of what that United squad was worth.

It was hardly an unkown signing, Veron was regarded as one of the best in the world, it just didnt work at United and United had Scholes, Giggs, Keane.etc and were still winning games.

They also sold him for 17m. United losing 11m on a player is like Cardiff losing 120k on a player.

If Cornelius was signed for 2m and 15k a week no-one would batter an eyelid. To spend 8.5m and make him the highest earner when he had only played 30 odd games. Craziness and unforgivable.

As I said if you want to make comparisons lets compare clubs on a similair keel and how they spent their budget. Hull and Palace have squads just as good as ours for a fraction of the cost.

But that wasn't your point was it. You clearly meant transfer budget and Ferguson clearly blew the transfer budget when he signed him for £24.8 million in 2001!!! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... -move.html

Proof that even the best managers can be wrong in the transfer market

So wrong he won United countless trophies whilst making them a 68m profit in the transfer market during his time there.

The same season he signed Veron he signed Ruud Van Nisterooy.

Please stop comparing Malky to Fergie and Mourinho in the transfer market you are embarrasing yourself.

Stop trying to broaden my point. You clearly meant a season transfer budget FFS and Veron was clearly a huge percentage of United transfer budget that season so even the best managers can get it wrong in the transfer market at times.

I will broaden and expand on what I want thank you very much and trying to justify the way Malky spent 50m for a club our size in the summer, as "even Fergie and Mourinho make mistakes" is just laughable.

Fergie and Mourinho can offset any transfers that dont work out with medels on the table. Comparing a club our size and with our ambitions, to that of a club ten times the size, ad is just plain daft.

The way Malky spent his budget in the summer wasnt a "mistake" it was crazy. One senior pro, Medel, One player with prem experience, Odemwingie who he played out of position, 2 prospects Caulker and Cornelius, of which one was absolute dogshite and was at one point (until they signed Medel and Odemwingie) the highest paid player at the football club!!!!!

We already had 2 right backs, he signed another 2, none of them better than what we already had, and bombed one out straight away, and failed to sign a left back to cover one of the worst players in the promoted squad!!!

Didnt raise the bar one bit on a strikeforce that was averaging barely a goal a game in the Championship, 2nd half of the season, how the f**k did he think we was going to get the goals to win enough matches to stay in the Premier league???

Didnt add any pace or creativity to the squad, both lacking in our promotion season, where you can get away with it in the Championship but you cannot in the Premier League.

Try comparing it to what other teams have done in their first Premier League season on far less budgets and then come back and have a serious discussion.

QPR done what we did and two managers, Warnock and Hughes paid the price. QPR aside the last club I can think of that totally wasted a a budget beyond the size of their club was Liverpool and Dalglish paid the price.

f**k sake all this Malky love-in your doing you think we forget you were ranting about him the same way you are about OGS now, and wanted Poyet.

Adam, when you Mike and Pam adopted you did they f**k the surname up down the registry office cos you should have been called Adam Clown, not Adam Brown.