Mon Feb 17, 2014 6:10 pm
Southwalian wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Brezza wrote:I ask you because I do not know who else to ask. Has the debt been converted to equity? If not, will it? If it is going to be, when? What the hell happens if it doesn't ? And lastly, what does this mean with the Fair play thingy? Sorry so many questions but I am worried and with us in a precarious league position, Tan might bugger off. I know this will please you both and I understand this. But with him going so will his money, hence the need go get rid of the debt NOW.
NO it has not happened yet.
18 months ago Tan said he was going to do that then.
Then different dates were given, but still nothing happened.
The latest date we were given a few months ago was some time February 2014.
There are no reasons at all I can now think of why Tan has not, only Ran knows why.
My opinion is Tan is waiting to see if we stay up, I hope I am wrong and he does it this month.
I have been told by numerous people within the Club that Tan would go now if someone would give him back the £150 Million Debt he has created.
This has to be sorted under the New Premier League rules by 2015.
As to what will happen if he does not, my opinion and mine only, Tan will strip our club to its bare bones to try and get as much money back as possible.
How has Tan created £150million of debt?
Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:19 pm
Bluebird86 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Where on earth have we got assets of 100m??
Utter nonense
Players, stadium, sponsorship, training ground and parachute payments.
Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:31 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:40m on players?? Not a chance! We still have to field a viable playing squad. If we went down the vultures would circle.....we would get no where near that.
eh? You think Tan wont do it because you need players? Think you are missing the point here. The point isnt leaving you in a good position on the field, the point is him leaving you bare and getting his money back.
£40 million is minimum. It would be an open market.
shirt sponsor was 3m over 3 years started this season (around that figure)
again missing the point. He could sponsor the short himself for as long as he wants for free essentially.
Stadium naming??? Not guaranteed
again missed the point. He can name it the Bereja stadium or whatever his company is, forever if he pleases. That is worth millions.
8m on season tickets???????
£400 x 20,000 = £8 million
Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:40 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Where on earth have we got assets of 100m??
Utter nonense
Players, stadium, sponsorship, training ground and parachute payments.
stadium as no value as cannot be sold discussed number of times due to council covenant or something simlar
Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:10 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:40m on players?? Not a chance! We still have to field a viable playing squad. If we went down the vultures would circle.....we would get no where near that.
eh? You think Tan wont do it because you need players? Think you are missing the point here. The point isnt leaving you in a good position on the field, the point is him leaving you bare and getting his money back.
£40 million is minimum. It would be an open market.
shirt sponsor was 3m over 3 years started this season (around that figure)
again missing the point. He could sponsor the short himself for as long as he wants for free essentially.
Stadium naming??? Not guaranteed
again missed the point. He can name it the Bereja stadium or whatever his company is, forever if he pleases. That is worth millions.
8m on season tickets???????
£400 x 20,000 = £8 million
why do you always think you know how much things are worth as it is only conjecture, if there is a fire sale which it will be with us, values drop considerably past experiences with other clubs should surely tell you that? anyway i dont think our assets are worth £100m for this reason. also as matter of interest fair play rules prevent owners using there own companies to sponsor things like stadium name, man c were close to breaking rules with atiade as family connections with the shiek owner, they were investigated heared no more about it so doubtful if tan can do this anyway!
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:15 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:40m on players?? Not a chance! We still have to field a viable playing squad. If we went down the vultures would circle.....we would get no where near that.
eh? You think Tan wont do it because you need players? Think you are missing the point here. The point isnt leaving you in a good position on the field, the point is him leaving you bare and getting his money back.
£40 million is minimum. It would be an open market.
shirt sponsor was 3m over 3 years started this season (around that figure)
again missing the point. He could sponsor the short himself for as long as he wants for free essentially.
Stadium naming??? Not guaranteed
again missed the point. He can name it the Bereja stadium or whatever his company is, forever if he pleases. That is worth millions.
8m on season tickets???????
£400 x 20,000 = £8 million
why do you always think you know how much things are worth as it is only conjecture, if there is a fire sale which it will be with us, values drop considerably past experiences with other clubs should surely tell you that? anyway i dont think our assets are worth £100m for this reason. also as matter of interest fair play rules prevent owners using there own companies to sponsor things like stadium name, man c were close to breaking rules with atiade as family connections with the shiek owner, they were investigated heared no more about it so doubtful if tan can do this anyway!
yes Al, hence why ive dropped the prices considerably
![]()
Ive sold off Medel for £6.8m, caulker for the same and Mutch for £6m, Marshall for £2m etc etc etc
These are on the incredibly low side, firesale or not.
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:19 pm
wez1927 wrote:Southwalian wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Brezza wrote:I ask you because I do not know who else to ask. Has the debt been converted to equity? If not, will it? If it is going to be, when? What the hell happens if it doesn't ? And lastly, what does this mean with the Fair play thingy? Sorry so many questions but I am worried and with us in a precarious league position, Tan might bugger off. I know this will please you both and I understand this. But with him going so will his money, hence the need go get rid of the debt NOW.
NO it has not happened yet.
18 months ago Tan said he was going to do that then.
Then different dates were given, but still nothing happened.
The latest date we were given a few months ago was some time February 2014.
There are no reasons at all I can now think of why Tan has not, only Ran knows why.
My opinion is Tan is waiting to see if we stay up, I hope I am wrong and he does it this month.
I have been told by numerous people within the Club that Tan would go now if someone would give him back the £150 Million Debt he has created.
This has to be sorted under the New Premier League rules by 2015.
As to what will happen if he does not, my opinion and mine only, Tan will strip our club to its bare bones to try and get as much money back as possible.
How has Tan created £150million of debt?
He hasn't ,we are not in 150 m debt
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:19 pm
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:21 pm
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:24 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Southwalian wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Brezza wrote:I ask you because I do not know who else to ask. Has the debt been converted to equity? If not, will it? If it is going to be, when? What the hell happens if it doesn't ? And lastly, what does this mean with the Fair play thingy? Sorry so many questions but I am worried and with us in a precarious league position, Tan might bugger off. I know this will please you both and I understand this. But with him going so will his money, hence the need go get rid of the debt NOW.
NO it has not happened yet.
18 months ago Tan said he was going to do that then.
Then different dates were given, but still nothing happened.
The latest date we were given a few months ago was some time February 2014.
There are no reasons at all I can now think of why Tan has not, only Ran knows why.
My opinion is Tan is waiting to see if we stay up, I hope I am wrong and he does it this month.
I have been told by numerous people within the Club that Tan would go now if someone would give him back the £150 Million Debt he has created.
This has to be sorted under the New Premier League rules by 2015.
As to what will happen if he does not, my opinion and mine only, Tan will strip our club to its bare bones to try and get as much money back as possible.
How has Tan created £150million of debt?
He hasn't ,we are not in 150 m debt
Wez at this very moment we are approx £150mill in debt, rem to bring this back up when the next accounts come out![]()
Every year u say I am wrong and every year I am approx right.
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:26 pm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Southwalian wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Brezza wrote:I ask you because I do not know who else to ask. Has the debt been converted to equity? If not, will it? If it is going to be, when? What the hell happens if it doesn't ? And lastly, what does this mean with the Fair play thingy? Sorry so many questions but I am worried and with us in a precarious league position, Tan might bugger off. I know this will please you both and I understand this. But with him going so will his money, hence the need go get rid of the debt NOW.
NO it has not happened yet.
18 months ago Tan said he was going to do that then.
Then different dates were given, but still nothing happened.
The latest date we were given a few months ago was some time February 2014.
There are no reasons at all I can now think of why Tan has not, only Ran knows why.
My opinion is Tan is waiting to see if we stay up, I hope I am wrong and he does it this month.
I have been told by numerous people within the Club that Tan would go now if someone would give him back the £150 Million Debt he has created.
This has to be sorted under the New Premier League rules by 2015.
As to what will happen if he does not, my opinion and mine only, Tan will strip our club to its bare bones to try and get as much money back as possible.
How has Tan created £150million of debt?
He hasn't ,we are not in 150 m debt
Wez at this very moment we are approx £150mill in debt, rem to bring this back up when the next accounts come out![]()
Every year u say I am wrong and every year I am approx right.
It will be either around the zero mark or 90 million due to increased premier league revenue ,we will wait and see
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:28 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:29 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Minimum. Hes an excellent player.
I would be happy if Huw shelled out £6m for him to replace JDG when he goes back to Villareal.
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:32 pm
wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Projected profit this year ,Carl confirmed this in an update earlier in the season so it won't go up
Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:44 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Projected profit this year ,Carl confirmed this in an update earlier in the season so it won't go up
![]()
![]()
Think about it... How on earth are you going to make a profit.
Your wage bill is at least £40m a year, you have spent nearly £50m on players, paid for a training ground development and a ground extension.
If you lose less than £30m ill be amazed.
Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:04 am
wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Projected profit this year ,Carl confirmed this in an update earlier in the season so it won't go up
![]()
![]()
Think about it... How on earth are you going to make a profit.
Your wage bill is at least £40m a year, you have spent nearly £50m on players, paid for a training ground development and a ground extension.
If you lose less than £30m ill be amazed.
Where is the 50 mil on players coming from this year ???? How do you know if the transfer fees have been paid up front in full ? also the training ground hasn't been started yet the premier seating and hospitality is ours for the first time this season ,increased sponsership and tv money's will make our turnover over 100 million this season ,like I said we will wait and see
Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:30 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Projected profit this year ,Carl confirmed this in an update earlier in the season so it won't go up
![]()
![]()
Think about it... How on earth are you going to make a profit.
Your wage bill is at least £40m a year, you have spent nearly £50m on players, paid for a training ground development and a ground extension.
If you lose less than £30m ill be amazed.
Where is the 50 mil on players coming from this year ???? How do you know if the transfer fees have been paid up front in full ? also the training ground hasn't been started yet the premier seating and hospitality is ours for the first time this season ,increased sponsership and tv money's will make our turnover over 100 million this season ,like I said we will wait and see
You are looking at this from the completely wrong angle.
You are talking "paper profits and loss" - basically the sum that has to be presented at the end of financial year. As a fan this shouldn't matter as they dont tell the whole story.
You are in debt to those clubs you bought players from by THE WHOLE AMOUNT, just because you only paid half up front is irrelevant. If you spent £25m up front and £25m later or the whole £50m up front - you have still got a negative £50 million.
Depending on how it is broken down (when paid) it can be written to LOOK different come end of financial year. However in reality the debt will have risen by £50m regardless of when it was owed.
Your income wont be £100m either. It will be more like £85m.
The business transactions for the last 12 months will lose you A LOT of money, whether that loss is shown on the books this year or next year makes no difference. Anyone even trying to claim it will be a profitable year is either insanely stupid or insanely naive.
Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:29 pm
wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Projected profit this year ,Carl confirmed this in an update earlier in the season so it won't go up
![]()
![]()
Think about it... How on earth are you going to make a profit.
Your wage bill is at least £40m a year, you have spent nearly £50m on players, paid for a training ground development and a ground extension.
If you lose less than £30m ill be amazed.
Where is the 50 mil on players coming from this year ???? How do you know if the transfer fees have been paid up front in full ? also the training ground hasn't been started yet the premier seating and hospitality is ours for the first time this season ,increased sponsership and tv money's will make our turnover over 100 million this season ,like I said we will wait and see
You are looking at this from the completely wrong angle.
You are talking "paper profits and loss" - basically the sum that has to be presented at the end of financial year. As a fan this shouldn't matter as they dont tell the whole story.
You are in debt to those clubs you bought players from by THE WHOLE AMOUNT, just because you only paid half up front is irrelevant. If you spent £25m up front and £25m later or the whole £50m up front - you have still got a negative £50 million.
Depending on how it is broken down (when paid) it can be written to LOOK different come end of financial year. However in reality the debt will have risen by £50m regardless of when it was owed.
Your income wont be £100m either. It will be more like £85m.
The business transactions for the last 12 months will lose you A LOT of money, whether that loss is shown on the books this year or next year makes no difference. Anyone even trying to claim it will be a profitable year is either insanely stupid or insanely naive.
im am looking at it from a business view which is the correct way of doing it ,future liabilities only become in play when they are date due, as many so called debts never come in to play as normally a player/club liabilities don't come around due to being moved on from the club and also ie lang stone debts get written down when paid off earlylike i said we will wait and see but i would worry about Swansea debt this season as you have made massive signings, your wage bill has nearly gone up by 1/3 ,you have not sold any players to balance the books like in previous season ,decease in crowds ,large pay off to your manager ,are your directors going to put their hands in their pockets like tan does ????
Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:16 am
wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Annis will be about right. Look at the last set of figures and then work out what the deficit is this year.
Projected profit this year ,Carl confirmed this in an update earlier in the season so it won't go up
![]()
![]()
Think about it... How on earth are you going to make a profit.
Your wage bill is at least £40m a year, you have spent nearly £50m on players, paid for a training ground development and a ground extension.
If you lose less than £30m ill be amazed.
Where is the 50 mil on players coming from this year ???? How do you know if the transfer fees have been paid up front in full ? also the training ground hasn't been started yet the premier seating and hospitality is ours for the first time this season ,increased sponsership and tv money's will make our turnover over 100 million this season ,like I said we will wait and see
You are looking at this from the completely wrong angle.
You are talking "paper profits and loss" - basically the sum that has to be presented at the end of financial year. As a fan this shouldn't matter as they dont tell the whole story.
You are in debt to those clubs you bought players from by THE WHOLE AMOUNT, just because you only paid half up front is irrelevant. If you spent £25m up front and £25m later or the whole £50m up front - you have still got a negative £50 million.
Depending on how it is broken down (when paid) it can be written to LOOK different come end of financial year. However in reality the debt will have risen by £50m regardless of when it was owed.
Your income wont be £100m either. It will be more like £85m.
The business transactions for the last 12 months will lose you A LOT of money, whether that loss is shown on the books this year or next year makes no difference. Anyone even trying to claim it will be a profitable year is either insanely stupid or insanely naive.
im am looking at it from a business view which is the correct way of doing it ,future liabilities only become in play when they are date due, as many so called debts never come in to play as normally a player/club liabilities don't come around due to being moved on from the club and also ie lang stone debts get written down when paid off earlylike i said we will wait and see but i would worry about Swansea debt this season as you have made massive signings, your wage bill has nearly gone up by 1/3 ,you have not sold any players to balance the books like in previous season ,decease in crowds ,large pay off to your manager ,are your directors going to put their hands in their pockets like tan does ????
Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:41 am
Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:13 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Please dont give creedence to such stupidity, it makes you look similarly foolish.
YOU OWE £50m from these players. If you split it as £25m this year and £25m next then thats fine. You are still liabke for exactly the same as if it is paid up front, it is just written differently.
Its like be buying £100,000 car with my £20,000 income and because I only has to pay £10,000 up front, refuting any claim that my debt has worsened because im on course to make a £10,000 profit![]()
Utterly ridiculous. I would still be £90,000 in debt meaning the £10,000 "profit" is just for show and not the reality of the situation. You as fans surely would want the real story rather than the business spin?
Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:38 am
wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Please dont give creedence to such stupidity, it makes you look similarly foolish.
YOU OWE £50m from these players. If you split it as £25m this year and £25m next then thats fine. You are still liabke for exactly the same as if it is paid up front, it is just written differently.
Its like be buying £100,000 car with my £20,000 income and because I only has to pay £10,000 up front, refuting any claim that my debt has worsened because im on course to make a £10,000 profit![]()
Utterly ridiculous. I would still be £90,000 in debt meaning the £10,000 "profit" is just for show and not the reality of the situation. You as fans surely would want the real story rather than the business spin?
We will wait and see but I will more than be worried about your own accounts this season roathy who's going to fund your losses ? Is huw going dip his hand in his own pocket ? Has any of the Swansea so called welsh directors ogot the money to so it ?
Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:47 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Please dont give creedence to such stupidity, it makes you look similarly foolish.
YOU OWE £50m from these players. If you split it as £25m this year and £25m next then thats fine. You are still liabke for exactly the same as if it is paid up front, it is just written differently.
Its like be buying £100,000 car with my £20,000 income and because I only has to pay £10,000 up front, refuting any claim that my debt has worsened because im on course to make a £10,000 profit![]()
Utterly ridiculous. I would still be £90,000 in debt meaning the £10,000 "profit" is just for show and not the reality of the situation. You as fans surely would want the real story rather than the business spin?
We will wait and see but I will more than be worried about your own accounts this season roathy who's going to fund your losses ? Is huw going dip his hand in his own pocket ? Has any of the Swansea so called welsh directors ogot the money to so it ?
There is no "wait and sees", we know how much you have spent and we know the income of a prem team. You will make a heavy loss, whether that is bore by the club this season or next makes little difference.
As for Swansea we operate in the black. Im as worried for our accounts as I am about killer tomato soup men from outta space - (not worried at all, in case you are wondering). We should make record breaking profits this year (genuine profits too, not just paper profits) Do the math
Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:01 am
wez1927 wrote:You will make record losses this season you do the maths ,your crowd's are down ,and you've spent record amounts on transfers ,wages and runing cost s ,you sold players and had compo fees as income in previous season ,you blab on about us buy just worry about your club ,how are you going to fund your losses with no sugar daddy ?
Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:36 am
Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:50 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:How can any Cardiff fan suggest that Swansea's accounts should be more worrying than ours?!
Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:52 am
wez1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:How can any Cardiff fan suggest that Swansea's accounts should be more worrying than ours?!
Have I said that. ? Roathy should worry about Swansea rather than keep blabing on about ours
Wed Feb 19, 2014 10:02 am
wez1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:How can any Cardiff fan suggest that Swansea's accounts should be more worrying than ours?!
Have I said that. ? Roathy should worry about Swansea rather than keep blabing on about ours
Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:04 pm
Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:09 pm
Southwalian wrote:The debt will be nowhere near 150million.
Also, Forever Blue - you have said that Tan created a 150million debt. How can that be? Even if it was that figure are you suggesting that Tan spent all that money?
Surely the club was in massive debt before he arrived, a lot of it because of the absolute travesty that is Sam Hamman?