Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:30 pm
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:36 pm
Kiffa wrote:PartyWithOle wrote:https://twitter.com/charles_watts/status/429357965918081025
Ah well if Charles Watts has spoken.
Move along now boys....
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:41 pm
Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Signed by Reading for 350k - He's been decent but £5 million?![]()
I'd rather Ole splash an extra £3-4million to get Mr Rhodes in from Blackburn!
You know they bought Rhodes for 8mill don't you?
Obviously... So because Blackburn paid £8million for Rhodes, that means we can't sign him for the same amount?
You really think a year and a half after they signed him, scoring 43 in 71 they are going to sell him for under half pricewtf.
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:42 pm
TripleD wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Signed by Reading for 350k - He's been decent but £5 million?![]()
I'd rather Ole splash an extra £3-4million to get Mr Rhodes in from Blackburn!
You know they bought Rhodes for 8mill don't you?
Obviously... So because Blackburn paid £8million for Rhodes, that means we can't sign him for the same amount?
You really think a year and a half after they signed him, scoring 43 in 71 they are going to sell him for under half pricewtf.
You miss a few maths classes![]()
He is saying to add on 3/4 million ON TOP of what we have offered for Le Fondre to get Rhodes...
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:51 pm
bakerbluebird wrote:TripleD wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Signed by Reading for 350k - He's been decent but £5 million?![]()
I'd rather Ole splash an extra £3-4million to get Mr Rhodes in from Blackburn!
You know they bought Rhodes for 8mill don't you?
Obviously... So because Blackburn paid £8million for Rhodes, that means we can't sign him for the same amount?
You really think a year and a half after they signed him, scoring 43 in 71 they are going to sell him for under half pricewtf.
You miss a few maths classes![]()
He is saying to add on 3/4 million ON TOP of what we have offered for Le Fondre to get Rhodes...
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:54 pm
bakerbluebird wrote:Signed by Reading for 350k - He's been decent but £5 million?![]()
I'd rather Ole splash an extra £3-4million to get Mr Rhodes in from Blackburn!
Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:00 pm
Metal Handkerchief wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Signed by Reading for 350k - He's been decent but £5 million?![]()
I'd rather Ole splash an extra £3-4million to get Mr Rhodes in from Blackburn!
*Yawn*
Rhodes is the most impossible transfer target in the entire championship.
1. Blackburn bought him for £8M.
2. Blackburn are now eyeing promotion and are on form to get to playoffs
3. Rhodes seems loyal to Rovers.
So. Not only will "an extra £3-4 million" be woefully short of what Rovers want for him, but he is unlikely to even look at the contract papers.
PS: Rhodes has very high goal bonuses.
Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:06 pm
Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:TripleD wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Walter White wrote:bakerbluebird wrote:Signed by Reading for 350k - He's been decent but £5 million?![]()
I'd rather Ole splash an extra £3-4million to get Mr Rhodes in from Blackburn!
You know they bought Rhodes for 8mill don't you?
Obviously... So because Blackburn paid £8million for Rhodes, that means we can't sign him for the same amount?
You really think a year and a half after they signed him, scoring 43 in 71 they are going to sell him for under half pricewtf.
You miss a few maths classes![]()
He is saying to add on 3/4 million ON TOP of what we have offered for Le Fondre to get Rhodes...
I think I missed a few English classes actually, didn't see the 'an extra.'
![]()
Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:27 pm