Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:30 pm

PremierJacks wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
PremierJacks wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:If you offered me our new signings or NGog & King (who?) I know which ones I'd go for. :laughing6:


Don't think that was the question, though Baz! Interesting that all the comments about him being "one for the future" or "he'll come good when he gets some game time" have disappeared now you seem to have got rid of the donkey. Also, I remember people on here laughing at Laudrup because he missed out on his fellow countryman Cornelius. He who laughs last as they say......


Where do I say that was the question? :laughing6:

You remember it all during pre season? But you're account is only from November Nigel, so you must be a multi. :laughing6: :wave:


Unfortunately, Baz, as usual, your logic once again fails you. You need to have an account to post, not to read. :wave:


And just to rub it in even more, the date I joined was November, 2012, not 2013. So apart from, as usual, getting your facts wrong, it now appears you may even be a little dyslexic!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:32 pm

PremierJacks wrote:
PremierJacks wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
PremierJacks wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:If you offered me our new signings or NGog & King (who?) I know which ones I'd go for. :laughing6:


Don't think that was the question, though Baz! Interesting that all the comments about him being "one for the future" or "he'll come good when he gets some game time" have disappeared now you seem to have got rid of the donkey. Also, I remember people on here laughing at Laudrup because he missed out on his fellow countryman Cornelius. He who laughs last as they say......


Where do I say that was the question? :laughing6:

You remember it all during pre season? But you're account is only from November Nigel, so you must be a multi. :laughing6: :wave:


Unfortunately, Baz, as usual, your logic once again fails you. You need to have an account to post, not to read. :wave:


And just to rub it in even more, the date I joined was November, 2012, not 2013. So apart from, as usual, getting your facts wrong, it now appears you may even be a little dyslexic!! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Owned yet again, Baz. This really is too easy

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:34 pm

64JACK wrote:
"Dahlia is also 18 years old and cost 600k & from his showings so far, is a great investment for the future."

Good for you. However, you don't need more players for the future, you need them now. You are bottom of the legue and hoping that results from the first half of the season will be turned on their head!

Which we have also done. We are bottom after a hard run of fixtures, now we have some easier games and I'm confident to come away from there soonish, just like you did yesterday after your run of bad games. :thumbup:

"You can list his previous clubs all you like, but you've got him now - not then. Now, he struggled to get in a Bolton side near the bottom of the championship & who's fans are delighted to get rid."

We've got him now yes, until the end of the season. Thats how long he has to show that he can reinvent himself. As I said, if not, bye bye no loss.

you obvious need him, or you wouldn't have signed him, therefore I'd say it was a poor signing.

"You're woeful form since the secondary cup win suggests you do need to make some major investment.. The squad is nowhere near a top 8 in the league, which is why you aren't there. :laughing6:
"


We've made major (sensible) investment and will continue to do so. Even you cannot deny that Europe and injuries have taken it's toll on us this year. They have both come hand in hand and if it weren't for them then yes, we would be in the top 8.

where have I ever denied that? I've often said that was the case. :laughing6: top 8 though, is dream land & an assumption, which you cannot state as fact, pure and simple. You ain't as good as you lot think you are. Most arrogant set of supporters in the prem. :thumbup:
[/quote]

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:36 pm

Quite right, I got it wrong. Hardly owning someone though, Nigel.

Your longer membership just shows how obsessed you are though. :wave:

Owning somebody would be like when the mods owned you for lying about threatening to close this website down and going to the police about it. :laughing6:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:43 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
"Dahlia is also 18 years old and cost 600k & from his showings so far, is a great investment for the future."

Good for you. However, you don't need more players for the future, you need them now. You are bottom of the legue and hoping that results from the first half of the season will be turned on their head!

Which we have also done. We are bottom after a hard run of fixtures, now we have some easier games and I'm confident to come away from there soonish, just like you did yesterday after your run of bad games. :thumbup:

"You can list his previous clubs all you like, but you've got him now - not then. Now, he struggled to get in a Bolton side near the bottom of the championship & who's fans are delighted to get rid."

We've got him now yes, until the end of the season. Thats how long he has to show that he can reinvent himself. As I said, if not, bye bye no loss.

you obvious need him, or you wouldn't have signed him, therefore I'd say it was a poor signing.

"You're woeful form since the secondary cup win suggests you do need to make some major investment.. The squad is nowhere near a top 8 in the league, which is why you aren't there. :laughing6:
"


We've made major (sensible) investment and will continue to do so. Even you cannot deny that Europe and injuries have taken it's toll on us this year. They have both come hand in hand and if it weren't for them then yes, we would be in the top 8.

where have I ever denied that? I've often said that was the case. :laughing6: top 8 though, is dream land & an assumption, which you cannot state as fact, pure and simple. You ain't as good as you lot think you are. Most arrogant set of supporters in the prem. :thumbup:
[/quote]

Where have I said you have denied it? But if you accept it to be the case, then you also have to accept it to be the case that we are a top 8 side! Example: Tottenham are 5th scoring 29 and conceding 26. we are 10th scoring 29 and conceding 33. It can be a very fine line between success and failure in this league Bazza. :thumbright:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:45 pm

"The fact that we are a top 8 side".

Since when was this in any way a fact? :laughing6:

Delusional.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:49 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:"The fact that we are a top 8 side".

Since when was this in any way a fact? :laughing6:

Delusional.


I'll tell you whats delusional, and thats the use of the word 'fact'. I haven't used the word. It is my opinion. Nice try though! :laughing6:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:51 pm

On paper barry our first team is.
We allso have replacements to come in to the side.
However Europe has fucked us up and u can add 9 players injured at 1 time to that.
This season has not been a true reflection of our team and even u must admit to that.
If we can have our players back and a good run without choping and changing we will climbe the table.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:52 pm

swansealad69 wrote:He best player to come out of Scandinavia?
All the talk at the beginning of the season, on how good this lad is and how he was choosing u over us.
You realy should not hype up untill u know what u are talking about.
Same goes for the players u are bringing in now, stop expecting to much and maybee if rhey are a let down then it wont be so bad.
Just a thought. :thumbup:


First time I've ever agreed with you. I've got nothing else to say on the matter. Cornelius is completely rubbish.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:54 pm

64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:"The fact that we are a top 8 side".

Since when was this in any way a fact? :laughing6:

Delusional.


I'll tell you whats delusional, and thats the use of the word 'fact'. I haven't used the word. It is my opinion. Nice try though! :laughing6:


Quite right, apologies.

Fact is, you aren't a top 8 side. Now that IS a fact. :thumbup: :laughing6:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:55 pm

swansealad69 wrote:On paper barry our first team is.
We allso have replacements to come in to the side.
However Europe has fucked us up and u can add 9 players injured at 1 time to that.
This season has not been a true reflection of our team and even u must admit to that.
If we can have our players back and a good run without choping and changing we will climbe the table.


You can't add 9 injured at once, we proved that wrong the other day. You can't have it all, you laud it on here about being in Europe, then cry about it when it suits you. :laughing6:

I'd say this season has been a true reflection of your form since your secondary cup win.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:57 pm

Barry u are having a mare mate.
Sory to me and 64 jack in one thread :o

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:57 pm

64JACK wrote:Good for you. However, you don't need more players for the future, you need them now. You are bottom of the legue and hoping that results from the first half of the season will be turned on their head!


I agree with pretty much all of this as well. Another thing many of our fans don't understand. No point signing players for the future if our future is back in the Championship. They'll just be poached from the lower leagues, turned into the great players they are and then sold on for more money. I thought some would have learnt from the sale of Ramsey but clearly not. We can keep this type of player or demand much more if we are in the Premier League.

However, i disagree with you in referring to Daehli in this. He's good enough to play in the Premier League now and is showing truly what he's capable of in his cameos. I cant wait to see him against lesser sides. However, if this post was referring to Cornelius I'd be inclined to agree 100% because we spent so much on him and he's contributed naff all this season and in fact has been nothing more than a hindrance to our campaigns aims.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:57 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:"The fact that we are a top 8 side".

Since when was this in any way a fact? :laughing6:

Delusional.


I'll tell you whats delusional, and thats the use of the word 'fact'. I haven't used the word. It is my opinion. Nice try though! :laughing6:


Quite right, apologies.

Fact is, you aren't a top 8 side. Now that IS a fact. :thumbup: :laughing6:


Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:59 pm

64JACK wrote:
Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)


Glad you can agree that you aren't a top 8 side, fact. :thumbup:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:00 pm

swansealad69 wrote:Barry u are having a mare mate.
Sory to me and 64 jack in one thread :o


Haven't apologised to you at all in this thread? Where have I done that?

Always apologise if I get something wrong, good manners that... I mis quoted someone & will happily apologise for it. :thumbup:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:13 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)


Glad you can agree that you aren't a top 8 side, fact. :thumbup:


Bazza. Your starting to become silly again, and are turning into the 'chuckles' that no one likes. So I wont say anything further if you don't. This is no longer good debate that people want to read. They've read both our points, and am sure they dont wish to read drivel. :thumbright:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:26 pm

64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)


Glad you can agree that you aren't a top 8 side, fact. :thumbup:


Bazza. Your starting to become silly again, and are turning into the 'chuckles' that no one likes. So I wont say anything further if you don't. This is no longer good debate that people want to read. They've read both our points, and am sure they dont wish to read drivel. :thumbright:


I'm just stating facts, couldn't care less whether you like that or not. :thumbup: FACT: you are not a top 8 side & to claim that is incorrect. :thumbup:

Although I do find it bizarre that you say posting facts is "silly". I'd say silly was making claims that are factually wrong, like you have.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:36 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)


Glad you can agree that you aren't a top 8 side, fact. :thumbup:


Bazza. Your starting to become silly again, and are turning into the 'chuckles' that no one likes. So I wont say anything further if you don't. This is no longer good debate that people want to read. They've read both our points, and am sure they dont wish to read drivel. :thumbright:


I'm just stating facts, couldn't care less whether you like that or not. :thumbup: FACT: you are not a top 8 side & to claim that is incorrect. :thumbup:

Although I do find it bizarre that you say posting facts is "silly". I'd say silly was making claims that are factually wrong, like you have.


Bazza, I stated that we are top 8 squad when we have all our players back. That is my opinion. You turned that into the 'fact' that we are not a top 8 side because we are not 8th. You're obviously too blinkered too see there is a difference between the two. You are pedantic to the extreme and you fail to realise how fuckin boring it is for people too read. Why continue to ruin threads with inane shit. Now as I said, If you say nothing else on the matter, neither will I. Let someone else have a go theres a good lad. :thumbright:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:39 pm

64JACK wrote:Bazza, I stated that we are top 8 squad when we have all our players back. That is my opinion. You turned that into the 'fact' that we are not a top 8 side because we are not 8th. You're obviously too blinkered too see there is a difference between the two. You are pedantic to the extreme and you fail to realise how fuckin boring it is for people too read. Why continue to ruin threads with inane shit. Now as I said, If you say nothing else on the matter, neither will I. Let someone else have a go theres a good lad. :thumbright:


Which you have nothing to back up with & I've proved is factually incorrect. How is that blinkered? :laughing6: you could make any sort of claim, doesn't mean it's right.

:thumbup:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:41 pm

64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)


Glad you can agree that you aren't a top 8 side, fact. :thumbup:


Bazza. Your starting to become silly again, and are turning into the 'chuckles' that no one likes. So I wont say anything further if you don't. This is no longer good debate that people want to read. They've read both our points, and am sure they dont wish to read drivel. :thumbright:


I'm just stating facts, couldn't care less whether you like that or not. :thumbup: FACT: you are not a top 8 side & to claim that is incorrect. :thumbup:

Although I do find it bizarre that you say posting facts is "silly". I'd say silly was making claims that are factually wrong, like you have.


Bazza, I stated that we are top 8 squad when we have all our players back. That is my opinion. You turned that into the 'fact' that we are not a top 8 side because we are not 8th. You're obviously too blinkered too see there is a difference between the two. You are pedantic to the extreme and you fail to realise how fuckin boring it is for people too read. Why continue to ruin threads with inane shit. Now as I said, If you say nothing else on the matter, neither will I. Let someone else have a go theres a good lad. :thumbright:


He get's awfully excited at anything Swansea.Bless.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:42 pm

6 bysedd wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:
Yes I know Barry. And for the reasons I have stated and too which you have agreed with. ;)


Glad you can agree that you aren't a top 8 side, fact. :thumbup:


Bazza. Your starting to become silly again, and are turning into the 'chuckles' that no one likes. So I wont say anything further if you don't. This is no longer good debate that people want to read. They've read both our points, and am sure they dont wish to read drivel. :thumbright:


I'm just stating facts, couldn't care less whether you like that or not. :thumbup: FACT: you are not a top 8 side & to claim that is incorrect. :thumbup:

Although I do find it bizarre that you say posting facts is "silly". I'd say silly was making claims that are factually wrong, like you have.


Bazza, I stated that we are top 8 squad when we have all our players back. That is my opinion. You turned that into the 'fact' that we are not a top 8 side because we are not 8th. You're obviously too blinkered too see there is a difference between the two. You are pedantic to the extreme and you fail to realise how fuckin boring it is for people too read. Why continue to ruin threads with inane shit. Now as I said, If you say nothing else on the matter, neither will I. Let someone else have a go theres a good lad. :thumbright:


He get's awfully excited at anything Swansea.Bless.


His reply will be. 'Says the Jack on a CCFC forum'

I'm hoping to have timed this right :thumbup:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:44 pm

6 bysedd wrote:His reply will be. 'Says the Jack on a CCFC forum'

I'm hoping to have timed this right :thumbup:


Glad you can see the hypocrisy in your own post. :thumbup:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:49 pm

Drat !!

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:51 pm

6 bysedd wrote:Drat !!


:lol: unlucky. I've no doubt that you have a good side & you've been unlucky with injuries, but to claim top 8 is a bit too much for me. As was Paul's claims about our January signings - especially when those criticisms fit your very own January signings.

Honestly, think we will both be safe. Us about 16th and you lot in about 11th/12th.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:51 pm

swansealad69 wrote:He best player to come out of Scandinavia?
All the talk at the beginning of the season, on how good this lad is and how he was choosing u over us.
You realy should not hype up untill u know what u are talking about.
Same goes for the players u are bringing in now, stop expecting to much and maybee if rhey are a let down then it wont be so bad.
Just a thought. :thumbup:



What a fackin tool you are :thumbup:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:56 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Drat !!


:lol: unlucky. I've no doubt that you have a good side & you've been unlucky with injuries, but to claim top 8 is a bit too much for me. As was Paul's claims about our January signings - especially when those criticisms fit your very own January signings.

Honestly, think we will both be safe. Us about 16th and you lot in about 11th/12th.


I agree on this seasons form anyway.The Europa League put paid to us pushing from a top 10 to a top 8 side.I said on here to goats at the start of the season that we'd both be ok.I didn't think you'd struggle as much though nor us.All said there's plenty to play for yet.

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:57 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
64JACK wrote:Bazza, I stated that we are top 8 squad when we have all our players back. That is my opinion. You turned that into the 'fact' that we are not a top 8 side because we are not 8th. You're obviously too blinkered too see there is a difference between the two. You are pedantic to the extreme and you fail to realise how fuckin boring it is for people too read. Why continue to ruin threads with inane shit. Now as I said, If you say nothing else on the matter, neither will I. Let someone else have a go theres a good lad. :thumbright:


Which you have nothing to back up with & I've proved is factually incorrect. How is that blinkered? :laughing6: you could make any sort of claim, doesn't mean it's right.

:thumbup:


Ok! Let's have a look at this thread. I originally stated that we were a top 8 squad when all of our players are back. You agreed with the fact that Europe and injuries have taken it's toll. (with me so far?). I then pointed out to you that there is a fine line between success and failure and showed you an example of a team (Spurs) who have 19 points more than us simply because they have conceded 7 goals less than us but scored the same amount. That is a FACT! Now the only Fact that you have come up with is the fact that we are not in 8th place. Do you see now see how silly and pedantic that is? What have you proved? Especially as you agreed with me that we have under performed due too circumstances such as Europe/injuries. Now you have apologised to me once on this thread because you got things wrong. So i suggest you leave it there as people don't wish to read drivel! ;)

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:00 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
6 bysedd wrote:Drat !!


:lol: unlucky. I've no doubt that you have a good side & you've been unlucky with injuries, but to claim top 8 is a bit too much for me. As was Paul's claims about our January signings - especially when those criticisms fit your very own January signings.

Honestly, think we will both be safe. Us about 16th and you lot in about 11th/12th.


Agh! So now we have your 'opinion' that we are not a top 8 side! What a relief! Thats much better Bazza! Try to keep it up! :thumbright:

Re: So much for

Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:01 pm

64JACK wrote:
Ok! Let's have a look at this thread. I originally stated that we were a top 8 squad when all of our players are back. You agreed with the fact that Europe and injuries have taken it's toll. (with me so far?). I then pointed out to you that there is a fine line between success and failure and showed you an example of a team (Spurs) who have 19 points more than us simply because they have conceded 7 goals less than us but scored the same amount. That is a FACT! Now the only Fact that you have come up with is the fact that we are not in 8th place. Do you see now see how silly and pedantic that is? What have you proved? Especially as you agreed with me that we have under performed due too circumstances such as Europe/injuries. Now you have apologised to me once on this thread because you got things wrong. So i suggest you leave it there as people don't wish to read drivel! ;)


No, I see that as debating. You've linked no facts linked directly to Swansea to back up your incorrect claim that you're a top 8 side. Where as I have.

Unless you're being a hypocrite and saying I can't post facts, but you can? (Even if they are spurs facts :laughing6: )

About as ridiculous as your "Caulker won't be called up when at a welsh club" post, when he already had been. :laughing6: