Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:58 am
Huggy Bear wrote:we need a striker asap
Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:05 pm
Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:07 pm
laws88 wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/cardiff-city-expect-sign-wilfried-3051432#.UuBRO_tFA_4
its not about being ITK its about reading the papers
Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:14 pm
dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:03 pm
steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:11 pm
Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:10 pm
steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:21 pm
dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
I can assure you that you are totally mistaken.
I do not intend wasting time explaining the process but believe me there are no such rules that say the parent club can not control the med. It would however probably be agreed by both clubs. As for the insurance they would ensure the med. Coincides with the criteria of the individual players cover that satisfies all parties . Location is not a deciding factor
qualification of the hospital may even include the Insurers Specialists etc.
Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:21 pm
dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
I can assure you that you are totally mistaken.
I do not intend wasting time explaining the process but believe me there are no such rules that say the parent club can not control the med. It would however probably be agreed by both clubs. As for the insurance they would ensure the med. Coincides with the criteria of the individual players cover that satisfies all parties . Location is not a deciding factor
qualification of the hospital may even include the Insurers Specialists etc.
Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:46 pm
steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
I can assure you that you are totally mistaken.
I do not intend wasting time explaining the process but believe me there are no such rules that say the parent club can not control the med. It would however probably be agreed by both clubs. As for the insurance they would ensure the med. Coincides with the criteria of the individual players cover that satisfies all parties . Location is not a deciding factor
qualification of the hospital may even include the Insurers Specialists etc.
I can assure you cardiff insist on doing their own medicals carried out by their own team at the vale. i take on board your points and south seas above but if that were the case why did the norwegians get flown to cardiff for their medicals then.
All transfer fees and wages would have been negotiated before they left norway so why not have the medicals done there.
Im just saying its club policy as far as i know
Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:19 pm
dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
I can assure you that you are totally mistaken.
I do not intend wasting time explaining the process but believe me there are no such rules that say the parent club can not control the med. It would however probably be agreed by both clubs. As for the insurance they would ensure the med. Coincides with the criteria of the individual players cover that satisfies all parties . Location is not a deciding factor
qualification of the hospital may even include the Insurers Specialists etc.
I can assure you cardiff insist on doing their own medicals carried out by their own team at the vale. i take on board your points and south seas above but if that were the case why did the norwegians get flown to cardiff for their medicals then.
All transfer fees and wages would have been negotiated before they left norway so why not have the medicals done there.
Im just saying its club policy as far as i know
What Cardiff want and what they get has nothing to do with the location of a medical.
He may well not have had one as you say.
However he may well have.
You clearly state that any medical has to be done by club loaning the player. You now say it's Cardiff insist on such. Now that's a different
Matter.
Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:05 pm
steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:steve davies wrote:dannyblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:steve davies wrote:wdb2721 wrote:BBC say otherwise regarding the medical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25852715
Cardiff City are hopeful of signing Manchester United winger Wilfried Zaha on loan until the end of the season.
Zaha, 21, underwent a medical on Wednesday and Cardiff want to complete the transfer before Saturday's FA Cup fourth-round tie at Bolton.
Any medical will take place in Cardiff if it happens. If there was any truth in this don't you think sky news would be all over it.
Spot on Steve
Not at all spot on.Depends on what the parent club decides. The recipient club can take it or leave it. Man u. Say he has his med with them then that's it. Unusual yes but I know a number of players that have been transacted on loans via meds at their parent club. Hope this helps.
The medical has to be done by the club loaning the player for insurance purposes and is not a take it or leave it situation as you put it.
Due to the loan fee and wages involved if Zaha broke down after a week and Cardiff had not done a medical to get the insurance cover they would be liable for all his wages despite him not being available.
Do you really believe that a football club would take the word of another club over the fact that a player they were loaning or buying was medically fine.
I can assure you that you are totally mistaken.
I do not intend wasting time explaining the process but believe me there are no such rules that say the parent club can not control the med. It would however probably be agreed by both clubs. As for the insurance they would ensure the med. Coincides with the criteria of the individual players cover that satisfies all parties . Location is not a deciding factor
qualification of the hospital may even include the Insurers Specialists etc.
I can assure you cardiff insist on doing their own medicals carried out by their own team at the vale. i take on board your points and south seas above but if that were the case why did the norwegians get flown to cardiff for their medicals then.
All transfer fees and wages would have been negotiated before they left norway so why not have the medicals done there.
Im just saying its club policy as far as i know
What Cardiff want and what they get has nothing to do with the location of a medical.
He may well not have had one as you say.
However he may well have.
You clearly state that any medical has to be done by club loaning the player. You now say it's Cardiff insist on such. Now that's a different
Matter.
the club loaning or buying the player undergoes its own medical. why are the press camped out at carrington waiting for mata at this moment in time. surely chelsea have equal facilities to utd.
even on deadline day deals are reliant on the medicals taking place in time look at fellani as an example he got to carrington to undergo his medical with a few hours to spare
Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:45 pm
Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:35 pm
Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:05 am
Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:11 pm
Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:19 pm
Fri Jan 24, 2014 5:23 pm