NEW BUSINESS MAN INTERERESTED IN BUYING!

Your season ticket money was included in your accounts for last year. The only thing that we can count is the walk up, but that will probably just cover the costs of policing, staff etc.

Yes you do have whatever the Malaysian Government pay for ONE year. But I dont think its £6m is it?
Your figure is wild.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ff-6107698

"The Minister revealed the deal was worth £7.35m in total,"

From the link:-

International accountant Keith Morgan, a director of Mazars as well as of Cardiff City Supporters’ Trust, said: “To be honest, when I saw the figures for sponsorship quoted in the Malaysian Parliament, they didn’t appear to tally with figures that have already been announced in connection with Cardiff City. A sum of £500,000 has been mentioned, which actually seems a bit low. Maybe the sums mentioned in Malaysia are to be spread over more than one season.

That's just speculation from a fan.

http://www.insideworldfootball.com/prem ... parliament

Malaysian taxpayer will stump up £3 million for the 2013/2014 Premier League season sponsorship of the Welsh club

Thats not just "speculation from a fan"

Thats since62 on here, Keith Morgan. He is an international accountant and has even worked for the club.

I highly doubt it is £7.2m for one season. And even if it is, for arguments sake, that doesn't even cover 50% of the expansion at the reported £15m.

So then you spent £60m on players which is covered by the £63m TV money.

Now where is the wages? Its about £40m per season.

Anything you cannot cover by income - you owe Tan and it gets added to the debt.

Your season ticket money was included in your accounts for last year. The only thing that we can count is the walk up, but that will probably just cover the costs of policing, staff etc.

Yes you do have whatever the Malaysian Government pay for ONE year. But I dont think its £6m is it?
Your figure is wild.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ff-6107698

"The Minister revealed the deal was worth £7.35m in total,"

From the link:-

International accountant Keith Morgan, a director of Mazars as well as of Cardiff City Supporters’ Trust, said: “To be honest, when I saw the figures for sponsorship quoted in the Malaysian Parliament, they didn’t appear to tally with figures that have already been announced in connection with Cardiff City. A sum of £500,000 has been mentioned, which actually seems a bit low. Maybe the sums mentioned in Malaysia are to be spread over more than one season.

That's just speculation from a fan.

http://www.insideworldfootball.com/prem ... parliament

Malaysian taxpayer will stump up £3 million for the 2013/2014 Premier League season sponsorship of the Welsh club

Thats not just "speculation from a fan"

Thats since62 on here, Keith Morgan. He is an international accountant and has even worked for the club.

I highly doubt it is £7.2m for one season. And even if it is, for arguments sake, that doesn't even cover 50% of the expansion at the reported £15m.

So then you spent £60m on players which is covered by the £63m TV money.

Now where is the wages? Its about £40m per season.

Anything you cannot cover by income - you owe Tan and it gets added to the debt.

It is speculation from a fan, he's an international accountant yes but I doubt Tan's given him any special access to our private accounts.

I don't have anything to say on the rest, I just wanted to correct your factual errors

It is speculation from a fan, he's an international accountant yes but I doubt Tan's given him any special access to our private accounts.

I don't have anything to say on the rest, I just wanted to correct your factual errors

He doesnt need special access. The accounts are for public viewing.

Not sure what you mean?

Your season ticket money was included in your accounts for last year. The only thing that we can count is the walk up, but that will probably just cover the costs of policing, staff etc.

Yes you do have whatever the Malaysian Government pay for ONE year. But I dont think its £6m is it?
Your figure is wild.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ff-6107698

"The Minister revealed the deal was worth £7.35m in total,"

From the link:-

International accountant Keith Morgan, a director of Mazars as well as of Cardiff City Supporters’ Trust, said: “To be honest, when I saw the figures for sponsorship quoted in the Malaysian Parliament, they didn’t appear to tally with figures that have already been announced in connection with Cardiff City. A sum of £500,000 has been mentioned, which actually seems a bit low. Maybe the sums mentioned in Malaysia are to be spread over more than one season.

That's just speculation from a fan.

http://www.insideworldfootball.com/prem ... parliament

Malaysian taxpayer will stump up £3 million for the 2013/2014 Premier League season sponsorship of the Welsh club

Thats not just "speculation from a fan"

Thats since62 on here, Keith Morgan. He is an international accountant and has even worked for the club.

I highly doubt it is £7.2m for one season. And even if it is, for arguments sake, that doesn't even cover 50% of the expansion at the reported £15m.

So then you spent £60m on players which is covered by the £63m TV money.

Now where is the wages? Its about £40m per season.

Anything you cannot cover by income - you owe Tan and it gets added to the debt.

It is speculation from a fan, he's an international accountant yes but I doubt Tan's given him any special access to our private accounts.

I don't have anything to say on the rest, I just wanted to correct your factual errors

He doesnt need special access. The accounts are for public viewing.

Not sure what you mean?

The period where this sponsorship deal is involved hasn't been released yet

Then we will see when the next set of account are released.

Im skeptical, not that it will make much difference to whats being discussed here though. You are heading for another heavy annual loss, let alone a £30m profit

Then we will see when the next set of account are released.

Im skeptical, not that it will make much difference to whats being discussed here though. You are heading for another heavy annual loss, let alone a £30m profit

You have been proved wrong countless times on this thread ,your figures.don't add up ,its about time you gave up and try and concentrate what Swansea are going to do when you get relagated this season

Then we will see when the next set of account are released.

Im skeptical, not that it will make much difference to whats being discussed here though. You are heading for another heavy annual loss, let alone a £30m profit

You have been proved wrong countless times on this thread ,your figures.don't add up ,its about time you gave up and try and concentrate what Swansea are going to do when you get relagated this season

What? Have you read the thread?

Maybe you cam explain then..... How can you turn a profit when you spent £60m on players, £15m on an expansion, £40m on wages plus other financial commitments.....

Income is £63m from the premier league so you have another £60 million odd to make up.

Im all ears

After seeing RoathMagic's poor maths skills in the other thread, I'd ignore his nonsense in this topic.

Then we will see when the next set of account are released.

Im skeptical, not that it will make much difference to whats being discussed here though. You are heading for another heavy annual loss, let alone a £30m profit

You have been proved wrong countless times on this thread ,your figures.don't add up ,its about time you gave up and try and concentrate what Swansea are going to do when you get relagated this season

What? Have you read the thread?

Maybe you cam explain then..... How can you turn a profit when you spent £60m on players, £15m on an expansion, £40m on wages plus other financial commitments.....

Income is £63m from the premier league so you have another £60 million odd to make up.

Im all ears

60 million on players another made up quote by yourself ,it could reach 50 million with add ons over the next 5 years but European transfers you don't pay alltbe money up front so the next cash figure couldonly be a fraction of the 35 million quoted

After seeing RoathMagic's poor maths skills in the other thread, I'd ignore his nonsense in this topic.

Martyn, your failure to grasp concepts continues to amaze

Enlighten us all. Your spends are £120m.... How do you turn a profit?

Shoot

After seeing RoathMagic's poor maths skills in the other thread, I'd ignore his nonsense in this topic.

Agree ,the guy hasn't got.a.clue

I wouldn't be asking you to add it all up for me. Your lack of maths skills has been proven.

Then we will see when the next set of account are released.

Im skeptical, not that it will make much difference to whats being discussed here though. You are heading for another heavy annual loss, let alone a £30m profit

You have been proved wrong countless times on this thread ,your figures.don't add up ,its about time you gave up and try and concentrate what Swansea are going to do when you get relagated this season

What? Have you read the thread?

Maybe you cam explain then..... How can you turn a profit when you spent £60m on players, £15m on an expansion, £40m on wages plus other financial commitments.....

Income is £63m from the premier league so you have another £60 million odd to make up.

Im all ears

60 million on players another made up quote by yourself ,it could reach 50 million with add ons over the next 5 years but European transfers you don't pay alltbe money up front so the next cash figure couldonly be a fraction of the 35 million quoted

Made up?

Vincent Tan said you had a budget of £35m and spent £50m... You have since spent £5m in January not including signing on fees and agent fees etc.

Whether younpay the money up front or not is irrelevant - you HAVE to pay it. Which means you owe Tan.

So again, explain.

I wouldn't be asking you to add it all up for me. Your lack of maths skills has been proven.

apology accepted.

After seeing RoathMagic's poor maths skills in the other thread, I'd ignore his nonsense in this topic.

Martyn, your failure to grasp concepts continues to amaze

Enlighten us all. Your spends are £120m.... How do you turn a profit?

Shoot

Debt to equity and its all profit bet you.jacks are shitting it lol

Debt to equity and its all profit bet you.jacks are shitting it lol

so your answer is "if he wiped all the debt out"...

Thats exactly my point wez

Then we will see when the next set of account are released.

Im skeptical, not that it will make much difference to whats being discussed here though. You are heading for another heavy annual loss, let alone a £30m profit

You have been proved wrong countless times on this thread ,your figures.don't add up ,its about time you gave up and try and concentrate what Swansea are going to do when you get relagated this season

What? Have you read the thread?

Maybe you cam explain then..... How can you turn a profit when you spent £60m on players, £15m on an expansion, £40m on wages plus other financial commitments.....

Income is £63m from the premier league so you have another £60 million odd to make up.

Im all ears

60 million on players another made up quote by yourself ,it could reach 50 million with add ons over the next 5 years but European transfers you don't pay alltbe money up front so the next cash figure couldonly be a fraction of the 35 million quoted

Made up?

Vincent Tan said you had a budget of £35m and spent £50m... You have since spent £5m in January not including signing on fees and agent fees etc.

Whether younpay the money up front or not is irrelevant - you HAVE to pay it. Which means you owe Tan.

So again, explain.

There you got again making things up again 25 million was the transfer budget tan said in the press lol

When did we spend 5 million this month?

There you got again making things up again 25 million was the transfer budget tan said in the press lol

Nope. It was £35m, you went £15m over budget.

£35m + £15m... You do the math

Say im making it up if it helps.

You do the math

Good idea Trigger, because we all know you can't do it.

You do the math

Good idea Trigger, because we all know you can't do it.

84 out of 84 greeny

When did we spend 5 million this month?

on the two norweigens wasnt it?

When did we spend 5 million this month?

on the two norweigens wasnt it?

Certainly haven't seen any figures bandied around.. Roathie must just be guessing.

When did we spend 5 million this month?

on the two norweigens wasnt it?

Certainly haven't seen any figures bandied around.. Roathie must just be guessing.

figures i have seen banded about would suggest roughly 5 million, either way, it seems to be about that.

Where are these figures from? Have you got a link? Or has Roathie?

Where are these figures from? Have you got a link? Or has Roathie?

just stuff on here, nothing offical.... is it really important to you barry? maybe it was 4m, maybe it was 6... not really significant

What a surprise. RoathMagic is guessing again.

What a surprise. RoathMagic is guessing again.

Seems a theme on this thread made up figures from roathy lol

just stuff on here, nothing offical.... is it really important to you barry? maybe it was 4m, maybe it was 6... not really significant

So just guesses then, as I first stated.

Where are these figures from? Have you got a link? Or has Roathie?

just stuff on here, nothing offical.... is it really important to you barry? maybe it was 4m, maybe it was 6... not really significant

Is the correct answer.

Too many people on this forum intentionally ignore what is being said to focus on something irrelevant and then claim victory arms a loft.

£5m was the transfer fee bandied around. However my point doesnt rely on that now does it. Im asking how you arrive at a profit this term...

Still waiting for a sensible answer.