Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:41 pm
Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:27 pm
Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:00 pm
llan bluebird wrote:This will go right to the wire and settle a day or two before court.
Could be interesting as Tan will want to prove that Malky was untrustworthy or acted against the interest of the club. Malky will argue his termination was legally unjust. If it goes to court, we may get to find out both sides of the story under oath.
Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:43 pm
Mon Dec 30, 2013 5:08 am
llan bluebird wrote:This will go right to the wire and settle a day or two before court.
Could be interesting as Tan will want to prove that Malky was untrustworthy or acted against the interest of the club. Malky will argue his termination was legally unjust. If it goes to court, we may get to find out both sides of the story under oath.
Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:15 am
Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:58 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:llan bluebird wrote:This will go right to the wire and settle a day or two before court.
Could be interesting as Tan will want to prove that Malky was untrustworthy or acted against the interest of the club. Malky will argue his termination was legally unjust. If it goes to court, we may get to find out both sides of the story under oath.
I don't even think this is the argument, it's probably more to do with tan not releasing the agreed sum of money... I.e. Balls to you I'm not paying you after what you've released to the press
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:29 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:So because of the Court case Malky can't seek further employmentBut why ? He was sacked. But did the dictaror sack him for so called miss conduct ?
Tan is one nasty dirty piece of work
Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:07 pm
novice wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:llan bluebird wrote:This will go right to the wire and settle a day or two before court.
Could be interesting as Tan will want to prove that Malky was untrustworthy or acted against the interest of the club. Malky will argue his termination was legally unjust. If it goes to court, we may get to find out both sides of the story under oath.
I don't even think this is the argument, it's probably more to do with tan not releasing the agreed sum of money... I.e. Balls to you I'm not paying you after what you've released to the press
f**k me you must have spent days coming up with that original post
Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:54 pm
Mon Dec 30, 2013 6:31 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:So another story today says Malky not taking Tan to court.
Mon Dec 30, 2013 7:58 pm
Sudds wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:So another story today says Malky not taking Tan to court.
Source?
Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:31 pm
Cardiffcitymad wrote:novice wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:llan bluebird wrote:This will go right to the wire and settle a day or two before court.
Could be interesting as Tan will want to prove that Malky was untrustworthy or acted against the interest of the club. Malky will argue his termination was legally unjust. If it goes to court, we may get to find out both sides of the story under oath.
I don't even think this is the argument, it's probably more to do with tan not releasing the agreed sum of money... I.e. Balls to you I'm not paying you after what you've released to the press
f**k me you must have spent days coming up with that original post
Have I touched a nerve?