Thu Dec 26, 2013 3:56 pm
Military Junta wrote:wdb2721 wrote:Military Junta wrote:wdb2721 wrote:Its not the formation, try the likes of whitts, taylor, turner, gunnarson not good enough!
Did he has a limitless pot then..? You clearly stated change to 4-4-2 when they are already playing 4-4-2 and others also picked you up on it. #posterisbraindead
Its not about what pot he had it is about the players mentioned above raising their game. So who do you blame for this debacle today then?
Stop trying to divert the point of you asking to play 4-4-2 when they are already playing 4-4-2!!!![]()
Thu Dec 26, 2013 3:57 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 3:59 pm
wdb2721 wrote:Military Junta wrote:wdb2721 wrote:Military Junta wrote:wdb2721 wrote:Its not the formation, try the likes of whitts, taylor, turner, gunnarson not good enough!
Did he has a limitless pot then..? You clearly stated change to 4-4-2 when they are already playing 4-4-2 and others also picked you up on it. #posterisbraindead
Its not about what pot he had it is about the players mentioned above raising their game. So who do you blame for this debacle today then?
Stop trying to divert the point of you asking to play 4-4-2 when they are already playing 4-4-2!!!![]()
Whatever I said is not the point of how we are playing. you being a so called politician knows how to divert as you are well doing from my latest question. WHO TAKES THE BLAME FOR THIS MUCK?
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:01 pm
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:05 pm
Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:12 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
They have 2 forwards on pitch but is it 442? Or 4411 hard to tell really
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:18 pm
Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
Commentator on Sky called it 4-5-1
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
They have 2 forwards on pitch but is it 442? Or 4411 hard to tell really
I would go on what the professional commentators are saying personally.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:30 pm
CardiffOz wrote:Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
Commentator on Sky called it 4-5-1
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
They have 2 forwards on pitch but is it 442? Or 4411 hard to tell really
I would go on what the professional commentators are saying personally.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:35 pm
pembroke allan wrote:CardiffOz wrote:Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
Commentator on Sky called it 4-5-1
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
They have 2 forwards on pitch but is it 442? Or 4411 hard to tell really
I would go on what the professional commentators are saying personally.
Yes looking at it its 2up front but since cornelious on we have not used his hight , bit of a waste of time really!
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:36 pm
Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:CardiffOz wrote:Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
Commentator on Sky called it 4-5-1
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
They have 2 forwards on pitch but is it 442? Or 4411 hard to tell really
I would go on what the professional commentators are saying personally.
Yes looking at it its 2up front but since cornelious on we have not used his hight , bit of a waste of time really!
They have been saying it from the start
Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:43 pm
wdb2721 wrote:Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:CardiffOz wrote:Military Junta wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Military Junta wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Blaming the fans for the tactics
No I'm blaming the players for not putting a shift in but what I am saying is that these change of tactics is clearly an attempt to please the individuals including Tan who have been calling for him to change his tactics and playing a 4-4-2 clearly isn't the answer
Its not about pleasing anybody. We played 4 4 1 1 against wba same as we are playing today you moron.
Commentator on Sky called it 4-5-1
No they are playing 4-4-2 as the two are playing as two out and out strikers and they are being found out by a 5 man midfield. Even the commentors are saying it too
They have 2 forwards on pitch but is it 442? Or 4411 hard to tell really
I would go on what the professional commentators are saying personally.
Yes looking at it its 2up front but since cornelious on we have not used his hight , bit of a waste of time really!
They have been saying it from the start
Give it a rest you plank![]()