Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:52 am

Leytonstoneblue wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
8ballpottingmachine wrote:
Valleybluebird wrote:Most of our fans have just let all this go. At least hull fans are making themselves heard with signs banners etc. I don't mean effect the team by singing it, but let's get some banners made so tv and newspapers will picture it. That will get our point across. Whoever says we ain't a laughing stock must be blind. Let's do something before it's too late and malkys gone.
Whether your intention is the colour change, the badge, the treatment of malky and moody or your just worried about Cardiff city as a traditional football club. Or maybe all of the above but we should all stick together and let people know how we feel and stand up to it.

My reason is this year the club has been ripped apart, I don't feel the love I used to and it hurts me. Anyone who knows me, knows I'm cardiff through and through and love the club and supporters, this year has been differant. The more this fiasco goes on, the less I'm enjoying it. Even though I'd still go, it hurts


This. Get at Tan out of our club. :malky:


'Lets get some banners' ....... 'Lets do something' ...... 'Get Tan out of our club'
Fine words but words on a forum are easy.
When the match starts nothing really happens.
Not having a go at all but saying 'lets do this', 'let's do that' gets nothing done does it? Why don't you actually do something like you talk?


This is a forum with a few hundred posters, a large number who are just knee jerk hot heads :lol: Our attendance is 27,000 the large majority of which are rational, logical people who understand what the ramifications would be of driving the owner out of the club, that's why there will be no demonstrations of any meaningful scale. Thank God :thumbup:

Lets all bend over and take it from behind again then. What a pathetic stance.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:55 am

Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Tan Out/Could this increase?

It was even brought up in the meeting at the stadium tonight




Tan out


Let's hope not. Make no mistake, if VT decides to leave as he is not wanted, then the club will go into freefall. As he will be leaving on bad terms he will want to extract every penny he can from a sale of the club or by cutting all costs, either way, the club will suffer, and as with all these scenarios we will hit the bottom before we bounce back. I would urge anyone who feels emotional about this whole situation to think hard about their thoughts and actions :thumbup:



Agree, be very very careful what you wish for. :thumbup:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:08 pm

Time for Tan to leave.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:33 pm

GENERAL CHAT wrote:
Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Tan Out/Could this increase?

It was even brought up in the meeting at the stadium tonight




Tan out


Let's hope not. Make no mistake, if VT decides to leave as he is not wanted, then the club will go into freefall. As he will be leaving on bad terms he will want to extract every penny he can from a sale of the club or by cutting all costs, either way, the club will suffer, and as with all these scenarios we will hit the bottom before we bounce back. I would urge anyone who feels emotional about this whole situation to think hard about their thoughts and actions :thumbup:


If Tan leaves, only somebody with that money can take over. I believe this club is attractive enough for many owners, especially with a big potential fan base.


Agree, be very very careful what you wish for. :thumbup:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:49 pm

I agree that Lim always seems to be the route of problems. The Statement wasn’t even on the official site was it? All seems a bit random to me.

As for the main point on Tan..

Tan out? Who in?
Or do people expect him to leave and we just keep using his money? I dont undertand what “Tan out” means. If people think just being in the prem now means we are financially secure then just look at Pompey who had several years in the prem and are now struggling in league 2, I fear we would be even worse off.

I dont think the pressure will add onto Tan by much, the way he or Lim has gone about it hasnt been professional but I think most people can see he has a point. We have spent a huge amount of money in the summer and last season and it should have bee used better without a doubt, I think any reasonable person would agree with Tan on that one.

It is only my opinion but from what I read this is how I see it.

Tan – He wants Malky gone but doesnt want to pay the reported 3m compensation

Malky – Knows he is going and now wants his compensation.

If true I cant blame Tan for not wanting to pay the compensation and I dont blame Malky for wanting it either, sadly its our fans stuck in the middle of a game. Dalman said last week that it was unlikely funds would be made available in january, then a few days later Malky states he wants 3 players, something he didnt need to say. Tan has mentioned an over spend and then Malky comes out and says he spend 8m for a player with potential both coninsidance maybe but my opinion is its more games.

I may be way off the mark but that exactly what I think is going on (no inside knoweldge) and if that is the case then I hope the club get the best deal – not Malky and not Tan.

As a fan I certainly dont feel any loyalty to Malky as a person, he would never rule himself out of the Everton job and would have jumped at the chance and who would blame him but? I wouldnt have but I dont feel I need to show him loyalty. The loyalty is to the club.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:02 pm

Cardiff has always been a circus with various madmen in charge. Its just the microscope is a lot bigger these days with a warped zoom. Doesn't help that the lense looking in on the club has its own agenda and misses the bigger picture. The natives are never ever happy and never will be.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:03 pm

Leytonstoneblue wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
8ballpottingmachine wrote:
Valleybluebird wrote:Most of our fans have just let all this go. At least hull fans are making themselves heard with signs banners etc. I don't mean effect the team by singing it, but let's get some banners made so tv and newspapers will picture it. That will get our point across. Whoever says we ain't a laughing stock must be blind. Let's do something before it's too late and malkys gone.
Whether your intention is the colour change, the badge, the treatment of malky and moody or your just worried about Cardiff city as a traditional football club. Or maybe all of the above but we should all stick together and let people know how we feel and stand up to it.

My reason is this year the club has been ripped apart, I don't feel the love I used to and it hurts me. Anyone who knows me, knows I'm cardiff through and through and love the club and supporters, this year has been differant. The more this fiasco goes on, the less I'm enjoying it. Even though I'd still go, it hurts


This. Get at Tan out of our club. :malky:


'Lets get some banners' ....... 'Lets do something' ...... 'Get Tan out of our club'
Fine words but words on a forum are easy.
When the match starts nothing really happens.
Not having a go at all but saying 'lets do this', 'let's do that' gets nothing done does it? Why don't you actually do something like you talk?


This is a forum with a few hundred posters, a large number who are just knee jerk hot heads :lol: Our attendance is 27,000 the large majority of which are rational, logical people who understand what the ramifications would be of driving the owner out of the club, that's why there will be no demonstrations of any meaningful scale. Thank God :thumbup:

...............................................................................................................................................
50 can easily turn into 100 then 200 then 2000 etc and every time Tan pulls another trick out of the hat the numbers will increase...look at Hull City.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:14 pm

MillenniumNova wrote:
GENERAL CHAT wrote:
Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Tan Out/Could this increase?

It was even brought up in the meeting at the stadium tonight




Tan out


Let's hope not. Make no mistake, if VT decides to leave as he is not wanted, then the club will go into freefall. As he will be leaving on bad terms he will want to extract every penny he can from a sale of the club or by cutting all costs, either way, the club will suffer, and as with all these scenarios we will hit the bottom before we bounce back. I would urge anyone who feels emotional about this whole situation to think hard about their thoughts and actions :thumbup:



Agree, be very very careful what you wish for. :thumbup:


If Tan leaves, only somebody with that money can take over. I believe this club is attractive enough for many owners, especially with a big potential fan base.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:16 pm

My earlier post was a mess up, the one before Is what I was meant to post

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:38 pm

I hope so, he is a spoilt brat.
But, too many people got on the premier dream band-wagon, as I did in the beginning, until I realised that he is a dictator.

He is going to destroy this club with his red and dragon bullshit and then when it all hits the fan and we tumble down the league/divisions... only the hardcore will remain, if there is a club to follow.

The more you shoot the more you score, the man has not got a clue

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:07 pm

All the Free Red scarfs now should be either thrown on the pitch in disgust or handed in to the homeless :thumbup:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:12 pm

But mate, they won't will they?

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:22 pm

OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:But mate, they won't will they?


The BLUE is increasing match by match :thumbup: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:26 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Let's hope not. Make no mistake, if VT decides to leave as he is not wanted, then the club will go into freefall. As he will be leaving on bad terms he will want to extract every penny he can from a sale of the club or by cutting all costs, either way, the club will suffer, and as with all these scenarios we will hit the bottom before we bounce back. I would urge anyone who feels emotional about this whole situation to think hard about their thoughts and actions :thumbup:


"If I go, I will leave this club in good hands."

What's up - don't trust him?

:laughing6:

:lol: :thumbup:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:04 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:But mate, they won't will they?


The BLUE is increasing match by match :thumbup: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:


Definitely, one day this club will be back to normal whilst enjoying the top flight, if Tan doesn't leave, the minimum the fans could do is show Tan exactly what we believe in.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:13 pm

MillenniumNova wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:But mate, they won't will they?


The BLUE is increasing match by match :thumbup: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:


Definitely, one day this club will be back to normal whilst enjoying the top flight, if Tan doesn't leave, the minimum the fans could do is show Tan exactly what we believe in.


Spot on again, Wearing BLUE is the best form of protest, but even more it shows our Pride/passion for our Club :thumbup: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:14 pm

All these brave souls calling for VT to leave the club, calling him all sorts, you all make me laugh :lol:
If he made an announcement with immediate effect that he is leaving, has no more interest in owning the club and will leave it to run itself and therefore all financial backing halts immediately, you would all shite yourselves and be sending begging letters to the Echo in their thousands :lol: :lol:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:18 pm

Leytonstoneblue wrote:All these brave souls calling for VT to leave the club, calling him all sorts, you all make me laugh :lol:
If he made an announcement with immediate effect that he is leaving, has no more interest in owning the club and will leave it to run itself and therefore all financial backing halts immediately, you would all shite yourselves and be sending begging letters to the Echo in their thousands :lol: :lol:


I know I Certainly wouldn't. I tell you what makes me laugh, all these going along with his erosion of this club's identity... especially when they identify themselves as being a "blue". :lol:

I'll ask you again... Vincent Tan was quoted on TV as saying "If I leave, I will leave this club in good hands."

Don't you trust him? :laughing6:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:26 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Leytonstoneblue wrote:All these brave souls calling for VT to leave the club, calling him all sorts, you all make me laugh :lol:
If he made an announcement with immediate effect that he is leaving, has no more interest in owning the club and will leave it to run itself and therefore all financial backing halts immediately, you would all shite yourselves and be sending begging letters to the Echo in their thousands :lol: :lol:


I know I Certainly wouldn't. I tell you what makes me laugh, all these going along with his erosion of this club's identity... especially when they identify themselves as being a "blue". :lol:

I'll ask you again... Vincent Tan was quoted on TV as saying "If I leave, I will leave this club in good hands."

Don't you trust him? :laughing6:


I have never trusted what has been sad by any owners or chairmen at our club over the last 40 years, so why start now?? We have been let down consistently. So why would I trust anything that this owner says?
What cannot be denied, is that he has invested over £100 million in the club, has most certainly put his money where his mouth is. Is investing £10 million in new training facilities, is increasing the size of the stadium, backed the manager with £35-£50 million in the transfer window.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:44 pm

Malkys spent enough,had a very good budget in the summer so now he has to earn his money and manage his team to premier league survival.
I can't see what the problem is,we all wanted a statement of why moody was let go,well now we know.As for no more cash in January ,i salute tan for his honesty.A good owner who tells it as it is.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:55 pm

Not sure the purpose of this topic other than to incite trouble. Not sure If that's a great idea.
But it seems to have the desired effect. Shame
After all the managers not entirely blameless.wasn.t the bonus issue and banning of Tan leaked from the dressing room on purpose to the local rag the start of this nonsense. Perhaps Malky will ensure our survival after Tan is hounded out. I can't see him leaving us in good hands after the continual insults and who could blame him.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:46 pm

In reality all brave key board talk. There won't be demonstrations, there won't be Tan out protests, in fact he only has to make one big signing or some positive spin and it's a Tan love in again :)

The truth is the " new fans " attracted have taken over the asylum , they don't care about colours or history, they just want to watch Man Utd and Arsenal, even some " old fans " have towed that line too. The only place this could happen would have been Wales as it's a divided Country anyway, English speakers / welsh speakers / pro welsh assembly / anti welsh assembly / rugby nation/ football nation the list goes on.

That's the problem for you " loyals " there was no unification as Tan approached and you all dived in different channels fighting amongst yourselves, too late now , he's in bed with big red quilt tucked in and you don't have the thought or the numbers to counteract now , the loyals will be shouted down by the new masses.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:50 pm

redordead wrote:Malkys spent enough,had a very good budget in the summer so now he has to earn his money and manage his team to premier league survival.
I can't see what the problem is,we all wanted a statement of why moody was let go,well now we know.As for no more cash in January ,i salute tan for his honesty.A good owner who tells it as it is.


What a foolish comment, you entered the premiership with one maybe two premiership quality players. Okay you spent , but it takes a lot more than what was spent to build a full premiership squad. Your manager has actually worked miracles in attracting players to Wales in the first place and to a newly promoted premiership small town club.

By god you talk some rubbish.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:01 pm

Daya wrote:In reality all brave key board talk. There won't be demonstrations, there won't be Tan out protests, in fact he only has to make one big signing or some positive spin and it's a Tan love in again :)

The truth is the " new fans " attracted have taken over the asylum , they don't care about colours or history, they just want to watch Man Utd and Arsenal, even some " old fans " have towed that line too. The only place this could happen would have been Wales as it's a divided Country anyway, English speakers / welsh speakers / pro welsh assembly / anti welsh assembly / rugby nation/ football nation the list goes on.

That's the problem for you " loyals " there was no unification as Tan approached and you all dived in different channels fighting amongst yourselves, too late now , he's in bed with big red quilt tucked in and you don't have the thought or the numbers to counteract now , the loyals will be shouted down by the new masses.


Just like your great club are sucking up to the Porn king and Uncle Shylock :lol: :lol: and will move all their great heritage into a part of London that's another teams patch, stamping on their tradition,as well as your own, just to chase the dollar :lol: into a stadium that's not even fit for purpose :lol: People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones :thumbup: but who are you to talk, gave up watching his beloved Hammers, to become a plastic hooligan with the Soul Crew. Your right about one thing, we welcome in any old Tom, Dick and Arry down the City, your testament to that :lol:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:19 pm

Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Daya wrote:In reality all brave key board talk. There won't be demonstrations, there won't be Tan out protests, in fact he only has to make one big signing or some positive spin and it's a Tan love in again :)

The truth is the " new fans " attracted have taken over the asylum , they don't care about colours or history, they just want to watch Man Utd and Arsenal, even some " old fans " have towed that line too. The only place this could happen would have been Wales as it's a divided Country anyway, English speakers / welsh speakers / pro welsh assembly / anti welsh assembly / rugby nation/ football nation the list goes on.

That's the problem for you " loyals " there was no unification as Tan approached and you all dived in different channels fighting amongst yourselves, too late now , he's in bed with big red quilt tucked in and you don't have the thought or the numbers to counteract now , the loyals will be shouted down by the new masses.


Just like your great club are sucking up to the Porn king and Uncle Shylock :lol: :lol: and will move all their great heritage into a part of London that's another teams patch, stamping on their tradition,as well as your own, just to chase the dollar :lol: into a stadium that's not even fit for purpose :lol: People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones :thumbup: but who are you to talk, gave up watching his beloved Hammers, to become a plastic hooligan with the Soul Crew. Your right about one thing, we welcome in any old Tom, Dick and Arry down the City, your testament to that :lol:


You let yourself down straight away by being insulting and making matters up too. I've never given up supporting West Ham , so you start off talking nonsense and your post becomes farcical straight away.

As for Sullivan and a Gold they themselves are doing a fantastic club , they saved us from Administration and likely to do a Portsmouth. Whilst they did that there's been no need for nonsense like rebrands, yes of course we need a new stadium just like Arsenal and what both Spuds and Chelski seek too, Manchester City oop North have only gone forward in theirs ( no rebrand again ) Moving a couple miles up the road doesn't mean anything to us, in fact nobody who goes to the games lives these days in little India anymore anyway, times change and progress is progress it's all about doing it the right way and that's exactly what S&G are doing. Finally just because I attended matches locally here with Annis & co doesn't make me plastic soul crew, in fact I was a sponsor donating a lot of hard earned money to your club to assist its survival .

It must be awful to be as bitter as you , god help me when MM returns to West Ham you will be even more sour but before then try growing up and don't enter my threads or posts until you can return with some intelligent debate Mr Davies.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:39 pm

Daya wrote:
Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Daya wrote:In reality all brave key board talk. There won't be demonstrations, there won't be Tan out protests, in fact he only has to make one big signing or some positive spin and it's a Tan love in again :)

The truth is the " new fans " attracted have taken over the asylum , they don't care about colours or history, they just want to watch Man Utd and Arsenal, even some " old fans " have towed that line too. The only place this could happen would have been Wales as it's a divided Country anyway, English speakers / welsh speakers / pro welsh assembly / anti welsh assembly / rugby nation/ football nation the list goes on.

That's the problem for you " loyals " there was no unification as Tan approached and you all dived in different channels fighting amongst yourselves, too late now , he's in bed with big red quilt tucked in and you don't have the thought or the numbers to counteract now , the loyals will be shouted down by the new masses.


Just like your great club are sucking up to the Porn king and Uncle Shylock :lol: :lol: and will move all their great heritage into a part of London that's another teams patch, stamping on their tradition,as well as your own, just to chase the dollar :lol: into a stadium that's not even fit for purpose :lol: People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones :thumbup: but who are you to talk, gave up watching his beloved Hammers, to become a plastic hooligan with the Soul Crew. Your right about one thing, we welcome in any old Tom, Dick and Arry down the City, your testament to that :lol:


You let yourself down straight away by being insulting and making matters up too. I've never given up supporting West Ham , so you start off talking nonsense and your post becomes farcical straight away.

As for Sullivan and a Gold they themselves are doing a fantastic club , they saved us from Administration and likely to do a Portsmouth. Whilst they did that there's been no need for nonsense like rebrands, yes of course we need a new stadium just like Arsenal and what both Spuds and Chelski seek too, Manchester City oop North have only gone forward in theirs ( no rebrand again ) Moving a couple miles up the road doesn't mean anything to us, in fact nobody who goes to the games lives these days in little India anymore anyway, times change and progress is progress it's all about doing it the right way and that's exactly what S&G are doing. Finally just because I attended matches locally here with Annis & co doesn't make me plastic soul crew, in fact I was a sponsor donating a lot of hard earned money to your club to assist its survival .

It must be awful to be as bitter as you , god help me when MM returns to West Ham you will be even more sour but before then try growing up and don't enter my threads or posts until you can return with some intelligent debate Mr Davies.


Intelligent debate, with you? You are joking, right. Never gave up supporting West Ham? You never went for years, when travelling the country with the soul crew :lol: What a mug. What has VT done then? we were in far deeper shit than West Ham was ever in. There were 4 or 5 consortiums knocking about waiting to buy into West Ham, whilst no body, wanted anything to do with City, so unlike you making out it was The Porn King or admin, for City it really was the rebrand or admin. All the teams you mention, have grounds which are way to small for them, West Ham have trouble filling what they have got. All the other teams will build purpose built football grounds out of their own money, where their supporters will be able to actually SEE their teams play :lol: unlike your lot who will have to put up with watching behind an athletics track :lol: But, hey ho, at least Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, will make a few Million out of Upton Park :lol: Just like us, youre all pawns in the modern football era, so don't kid yourself otherwise :thumbup:

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:06 pm

Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Daya wrote:
Leytonstoneblue wrote:
Daya wrote:In reality all brave key board talk. There won't be demonstrations, there won't be Tan out protests, in fact he only has to make one big signing or some positive spin and it's a Tan love in again :)

The truth is the " new fans " attracted have taken over the asylum , they don't care about colours or history, they just want to watch Man Utd and Arsenal, even some " old fans " have towed that line too. The only place this could happen would have been Wales as it's a divided Country anyway, English speakers / welsh speakers / pro welsh assembly / anti welsh assembly / rugby nation/ football nation the list goes on.

That's the problem for you " loyals " there was no unification as Tan approached and you all dived in different channels fighting amongst yourselves, too late now , he's in bed with big red quilt tucked in and you don't have the thought or the numbers to counteract now , the loyals will be shouted down by the new masses.


Just like your great club are sucking up to the Porn king and Uncle Shylock :lol: :lol: and will move all their great heritage into a part of London that's another teams patch, stamping on their tradition,as well as your own, just to chase the dollar :lol: into a stadium that's not even fit for purpose :lol: People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones :thumbup: but who are you to talk, gave up watching his beloved Hammers, to become a plastic hooligan with the Soul Crew. Your right about one thing, we welcome in any old Tom, Dick and Arry down the City, your testament to that :lol:


You let yourself down straight away by being insulting and making matters up too. I've never given up supporting West Ham , so you start off talking nonsense and your post becomes farcical straight away.

As for Sullivan and a Gold they themselves are doing a fantastic club , they saved us from Administration and likely to do a Portsmouth. Whilst they did that there's been no need for nonsense like rebrands, yes of course we need a new stadium just like Arsenal and what both Spuds and Chelski seek too, Manchester City oop North have only gone forward in theirs ( no rebrand again ) Moving a couple miles up the road doesn't mean anything to us, in fact nobody who goes to the games lives these days in little India anymore anyway, times change and progress is progress it's all about doing it the right way and that's exactly what S&G are doing. Finally just because I attended matches locally here with Annis & co doesn't make me plastic soul crew, in fact I was a sponsor donating a lot of hard earned money to your club to assist its survival .

It must be awful to be as bitter as you , god help me when MM returns to West Ham you will be even more sour but before then try growing up and don't enter my threads or posts until you can return with some intelligent debate Mr Davies.


Intelligent debate, with you? You are joking, right. Never gave up supporting West Ham? You never went for years, when travelling the country with the soul crew :lol: What a mug. What has VT done then? we were in far deeper shit than West Ham was ever in. There were 4 or 5 consortiums knocking about waiting to buy into West Ham, whilst no body, wanted anything to do with City, so unlike you making out it was The Porn King or admin, for City it really was the rebrand or admin. All the teams you mention, have grounds which are way to small for them, West Ham have trouble filling what they have got. All the other teams will build purpose built football grounds out of their own money, where their supporters will be able to actually SEE their teams play :lol: unlike your lot who will have to put up with watching behind an athletics track :lol: But, hey ho, at least Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, will make a few Million out of Upton Park :lol: Just like us, youre all pawns in the modern football era, so don't kid yourself otherwise :thumbup:


That's it, well done start off with insults albeit manufactured on bullshit , although your pedigree could only produce that anyway. Now you claim to know about my movements and personal life which of course you are clueless totally about evidently.

Anyway let's look at your latest post of drivel as you have bothered to respond. It's probably easier to break it down in simple terms for you, A B C , Peter & Jayne style.

A. You know nothing about my movements so pointless pathetic snide comment. Yes locally did enjoy watching Cardiff City in previous years. well spotted . Soul Crew ? In correct. In your dreams of bullshit fantasy.

B. Mug ? - no enjoyed the football locally on a Saturday Afternoon, was quite pleasant albeit Mug probably in sponsorship terms as never got a return.... So be it that's life sponsoring low league football clubs I guess. Can't ever recall you posting " don't do it ! "

C. Your inside knowledge of consortiums ranks 1/10 clearly so no point in discussion on West Ham United. No point debating something you have limited knowledge about.

D. Grounds . You don't own a crystal ball and you haven't seen the business plan --- no point in discussion again.

E. Athletics track , no such thing , I advise you to stop talking shite and watch the stadium plans and conversion on you tube. Until then your misguided small mind has no vision so hence no point in discussion as your facts of the situation are totally farcical.

F. Pawns , not at all, we are progressing the right way and in the correct manner in these modern times.

G. Kidding myself ? Not at all, the only point I'm probably kidding myself with is having a discussion with you in the first instance because clearly you have no substance to your ramblings and clearly hell bent on personal attack issues as clearly shown in your wild claims and postings, so yes I'm probably kidding myself there on that point.

This is easily shown when you address our Chairman as a " porn king "

Don't you like Porn , don't you like sex ? I know the majority of the world do, even the boobs and bums thread on here is the most ever visited !

It would take a very strange odd ball like you not to like porn or sex !!! I think porns class, sex too , it can only be sad bastards like you who don't like it.

So what's the matter with making money out of porn ? Give it a go you weirdo you may relieve yourself of some bitterness.

Here's a tip try www.xhamster.com Find some tissues and take your hand off your key board and give it a go.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:29 pm

Craig Bellamy will be manager with a director of football above him,now who said that on bu's Facebook page yesterday.
There's only one person chatting shit and that's you daya

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:40 pm

redordead wrote:Craig Bellamy will be manager with a director of football above him,now who said that on bu's Facebook page yesterday.
There's only one person chatting shit and that's you daya


That's my opinion and My thought. That's not talking shit is it . That's expressing my opinion .

Are you a bit thick ? Is so I will excuse you. There's a remedial class in every school just for that reason so don't be ashamed to confess you can't understand the difference from talking shit or having and expressing an opinion.

Re: Tan Out/Could this increase?

Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:43 pm

redordead wrote:Craig Bellamy will be manager with a director of football above him,now who said that on bu's Facebook page yesterday.
There's only one person chatting shit and that's you daya


Hasn't your slime ball chairman already expressed that it's highly likely a directors football is required and the Club are looking for that " grey haired old chap " ?????

Hasn't Bellamy expressed his desire to go into management ?


Have I dreamed that up ?

There's only one person talking shit here fella and that's you as you attempt to become a vindictive poster on a public forum .