Controversial but back to our next game

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... kened.html

HMMMMMM

So is chuckles right or wrong
And for those saying that team would be throwing in the towel or not trying to win show some respect to members of our 25man squad
Malky named a 25man squad at the start of the season
And could of selected this team to start our first game at west ham
If he had would that make picking the likes of caulker turner whitts meddle etc a team of non triers or a weakened team
I don't think so
Try thinking outside the box before spouting shit
It might make for good debate

You're the one spouting shit by trying to claim that the team you posted is the equal of our normal starting 11.

Daft - I didn't realise it had changed - I was wrong. Always happy to admit being wrong. nice to see that it entertained you so much though.

Show me wear I said it was equal

It's only oppinion that this side is a weaker team

You were insinuating it here... So is it a weaker side? Or were you just talking nonsense?

No I was suggesting others oppinions was it was a weaker team
Answer the question show me wear I said it was an equal
Or are you wrong again

Still waiting for a reply
As usual ignores the truth

No I was suggesting others oppinions was it was a weaker team
Answer the question show me wear I said it was an equal
Or are you wrong again

No I'm not.

Anyone who even suggests that those teams are equal, is clueless.

As usual, you ignored my question.

It's only oppinion that this side is a weaker team

You were insinuating it here... So is it a weaker side? Or were you just talking nonsense?

7% hu chuckle bummy you look a little foolish again tonight so I expect you to go quiet again as you did last night. You are sussed big time.

Malky should set us up to play open, attacking football that's pleasing on the eye. When we lose 8-0, Malky can then say to Tan "I changed our style of play to what you wanted, switching from being organised and hard to beat to being open, entertaining and attacking. This led to us getting pummelled with Luis Suarez having the time, freedom and space to put 8 goals past us. Will you start listening to me now?"

It's only oppinion that this side is a weaker team

You were insinuating it here... So is it a weaker side? Or were you just talking nonsense?

7% hu chuckle bummy you look a little foolish again tonight so I expect you to go quiet again as you did last night. You are sussed big time.

You were the one who looked foolish and sloped off after being proved wrong.

Chuckles ffs answer the question wear do I say this team is the equal
Oh and can you prove it is actually a weaker team as upto now it has never played together
Hudson was good enough last season as was connelly gunnerson cowie
We spent good money on maynard,brayford and corneloius so someone thinks there good enough
Every manager in the premier league use there 25 man squad to give players a mutch needed rest and target the games mostlikely to yield points in there favour its called management
What question of yours have I not answered or are you back to type and just squirming under the pressure of being sussed

Chuckles ffs answer the question wear do I say this team is the equal
Oh and can you prove it is actually a weaker team as upto now it has never played together
Hudson was good enough last season as was connelly gunnerson cowie
We spent good money on maynard,brayford and corneloius so someone thinks there good enough
Every manager in the premier league use there 25 man squad to give players a mutch needed rest and target the games mostlikely to yield points in there favour its called management
What question of yours have I not answered or are you back to type and just squirming under the pressure of being sussed

I've answered the question. i think you'll find it's you that hasn't answered my question!

They were good enough last year, but we are in a better league & need better players.. If you think that Connelly is the equal of Caulker, then you're deluded and clueless.

You've been Sussed Steve. mind you, we should have worked that out when you claimed Gestede was the best striker at both Cardiff and Swansea combined.

Your totally deluded chucks you have not answered the question wear DO I SAY that team or infact any one player is another players equal

Your totally deluded chucks you have not answered the question wear DO I SAY that team or infact any one player is another players equal

I've already answered it once. Keep up. I notice you still haven't answered mine though.

You're deluded. Gestede is shit and yet you say he's better than any other strikers from Cardiff and Swansea - then you post that a centre back partnership of Connelly and Hudson is just as good as Caulker & Turner & that Gunnarsson is as good as Medel.

Chuckles ffs answer the question wear do I say this team is the equal
Oh and can you prove it is actually a weaker team as upto now it has never played together
Hudson was good enough last season as was connelly gunnerson cowie
We spent good money on maynard,brayford and corneloius so someone thinks there good enough
Every manager in the premier league use there 25 man squad to give players a mutch needed rest and target the games mostlikely to yield points in there favour its called management
What question of yours have I not answered or are you back to type and just squirming under the pressure of being sussed

I've answered the question. i think you'll find it's you that hasn't answered my question!

They were good enough last year, but we are in a better league & need better players.. If you think that Connelly is the equal of Caulker, then you're deluded and clueless.

You've been Sussed Steve. mind you, we should have worked that out when you claimed Gestede was the best striker at both Cardiff and Swansea combined.

Chuckle bunny also thinks that only 7% want Tan out.

Which is why he will go quiet now as he does every time he is proved wrong.