Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:18 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:Heavily backed in jan hmm make this a sticky in jan and I'll believe it when it comes...... If he's still here that is, I'm just sick to death of the MM boring style of football which musters up 12 shots on target over six games that's not much kop for the customer entertainment wise which is what I am now :ayatollah:


Survival this season is essential, no matter how we achieve. Give me negativity and survival every time. :malky:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:40 pm

bluebird58 wrote:
CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:


I'm sorry, I don't think you're allowed to post something this positve ;)


:laughing6:

You can't please some people. Today we actually looked like we had a shape. Turner was finding his man with every pass instead of looking for row Z, Whittingham is starting to look very comfortable in his centre mid role. There were a couple of reasons why we were toothless going forward. Gunnars who we played in the hole wasn't mobile enough and kept getting exposed by his marker. Theo had an off day so we had little width, but most telling of all was nothing was sticking to Odemwingie. If these three did their jobs today then we should have got something from the game

Blaming Malky after every defeat is very easy. We had the majority of possession today, but unfortunately it broke down at the points I've mentioned. It was an off day for some of the personnel, but that's something that can get addressed quickly

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:42 pm

CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:48 pm

As much as i'd like us to play passing fotball i'm finding Medels passing statistics pretty misleading. His 90% plus pass completion success looks impressive but it's a Swansea type stat - just sideways or backwards, and very rarely penetrating. And on the occasions Medel loses the ball he has no pace to retrieve it.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:50 pm

stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:56 pm

CityGent wrote:
bluebird58 wrote:
CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:


I'm sorry, I don't think you're allowed to post something this positve ;)


:laughing6:

You can't please some people. Today we actually looked like we had a shape. Turner was finding his man with every pass instead of looking for row Z, Whittingham is starting to look very comfortable in his centre mid role. There were a couple of reasons why we were toothless going forward. Gunnars who we played in the hole wasn't mobile enough and kept getting exposed by his marker. Theo had an off day so we had little width, but most telling of all was nothing was sticking to Odemwingie. If these three did their jobs today then we should have got something from the game

Blaming Malky after every defeat is very easy. We had the majority of possession today, but unfortunately it broke down at the points I've mentioned. It was an off day for some of the personnel, but that's something that can get addressed quickly

We had 57% of possession-if I was of Roathie's mentality i'd be claiming the 3 points!

Seriously though 12 points from 11 games in 1st season is a good return. Anyone who thinks we should be in top half of table having played the likes of Citeh, Spurs, Chelsea, Everton and Newcastle needs to be locked up with Roathie and his didgeridoo

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:57 pm

CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


You are fighting a loosing battle. our fans are so fickle it's unbelievable

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:03 pm

Arrow wrote:
CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


You are fighting a loosing battle. our fans are so fickle it's unbelievable

Your right,singing his praises last week saying his tactics are spot on.This week they want him out,fickle is spot on.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:06 pm

CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


and im sure there are examples of teams who have had a better start, if i looked. Just saying that your 'in living memory' statement doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:15 pm

stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


and im sure there are examples of teams who have had a better start, if i looked. Just saying that your 'in living memory' statement doesn't stand up to scrutiny.


If we both looked it would probably be an average start to life in the top flight for a newly promoted side. To the realists among us, average = adequate

No more than I expected. It's a pity some fans expected a top half side before Christmas, but that's their problem not mine

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:08 am

CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:





No reason to doubt you, CityGent, and what you say is music to my ears! :ayatollah: :malky: :ayatollah: :malky: :ayatollah:

Those "with an agenda" will soon be making mischief, though (and the two week 'international' break fills me with dread as to what they might come up with) :( :roll:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:08 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:
Shinobipony wrote:Don't know anyone who wants him gone other than Angelis.

But would like him to let em off the leesh now and then...

Villa were there for the taking ...

Wouldnt say I want him gone but wouldnt bother me if he did go. Cardiff Citys bigger than one man.

i am torn cos I think hes a top bloke, a real leader of men but I cant abide by his negative percentage football.

Weve done well to amass 12 points so far but can we keep getting the breaks over 38 games? I dont think so. Weve failed to score in 5 of the 11 games and lets be honest the 2 0-0s we had against Everton and Norwich where we picked up points we were battered.

People are saying we cant expect to beat Villa maybe not but we can at least expect to go there and have a go. They are not the Vilka of old they spent last season in the relegation zone for the most part, were off form, crippled with injuries yet we set up as if we were going to Old Trafford???

I also find it remarkable Malky spent 35m in the summer and weve got Don Cowie wide right.


Exactly polo great point about malky spending all that money and playing don cowie , f*cking shocking really, he wouldn't get in to half the championship teams

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:14 am

Syntax Design wrote:
JAWS wrote:
Syntax Design wrote:Fair enough and if he's backed, thats fine. However, I do recall Tan saying there won't be much money available for January and of course you can only go by what you know. If we get 21 points on the board by January 1st we have a strong chance of staying up especially if we spend and grow from there.

Without backing in January Malky has no chance and the signs are all there.


What happened to "malky will be sacked and rightly so".

Have you changed your mind again ?


Can you read and actually decipher a point FFS? It seems common on here that people just skim over things without reading them then come out with some inane tripe. If you're going to entertain a debate then at least read it.

I do think he'll be sacked and I do think he should be sacked still. He should be sacked for wasting money in the summer on the likes of Cornelius (yes a waste, almost 1/3rd through the season and useless) and on Brayford etc.) However, if he's backed then we might just survive. Without backing in January, as Tan said before there'd be very little funds, there's not a chance in hell we'd stay up as we have no creative outlet or threat.


Talk about contradicting yourself :lol: You think Malky should be sacked for wasting money etc, then you think he should be given more money in January :? Make your mind up :lol:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:17 am

CityGent wrote:We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory


I'd love to share your optimism, but We're 3 points off relegation and our tactics are to hoof the ball and 'park the bus' every game FFS!!

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:09 am

CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:

He's one of the few things good about our club at the moment, only a retard would want him to go

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:41 am

CityGent wrote:
bluebird58 wrote:
CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:


I'm sorry, I don't think you're allowed to post something this positve ;)


:laughing6:

You can't please some people. Today we actually looked like we had a shape. Turner was finding his man with every pass instead of looking for row Z, Whittingham is starting to look very comfortable in his centre mid role. There were a couple of reasons why we were toothless going forward. Gunnars who we played in the hole wasn't mobile enough and kept getting exposed by his marker. Theo had an off day so we had little width, but most telling of all was nothing was sticking to Odemwingie. If these three did their jobs today then we should have got something from the game

Blaming Malky after every defeat is very easy. We had the majority of possession today, but unfortunately it broke down at the points I've mentioned. It was an off day for some of the personnel, but that's something that can get addressed quickly

I think we desperately need a winger and a striker ,we are lacking terribly

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:43 am

CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:

Great post! :malky:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:44 am

I thought we we the better side yesterday but shot ourselves in the foot twice.You can't blame the manager for that.It makes me laugh when people want him gone because they think they have a technical understanding that is equal to or better than malky's.Fifa14 and football manager has alot to answer for. :lol:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:49 am

Syntax Design wrote:
JAWS wrote:Cornelius isn't yet a failure or a waste of money,he hasn't played yet.Lets wait and see when he plays.


One third of the season down and he's not played or added anything to our campaign. Waste of money if you ask me. That is a lot of money to just be out of the team and injury my arse. He's been in the development team and thereabouts and the next moment he's suddenly back down the Heath.
caulker,top signing.


Agreed. Stopped us getting smashed 4-0 or 5-0 today with his tackles and interceptions. He alone however is not Superman and is not going to keep us up.

medel,top singning.


Agreed but so far inconsistent. Sideways and backwards a lot today as pointed out by Malky who signalled at him to play it forward more often.

you say he's wasted money yet you say give him more and we may survive.The only inane tripe is coming from your chameleon gob.


If he stays. I'd rather he went as pointed out already. I refuse to take seriously some troll account online that has named himself after a shark from a movie.
he hasn't played because he's injured that's it!

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:54 am

Syntax Design wrote:
Shinobipony wrote:Don't know anyone who wants him gone other than Angelis.

But would like him to let em off the leesh now and then...

Villa were there for the taking ...


angelis, polo and myself want him gone. Craig is frustrated with his football although I'm not sure if he wants him gone.

A lot of our fan base love Malky more than the club. Its disturbing. I will be relieved in other ways when Malky is finally axed as then maybe some fans will see that he isn't the be all and end all of Cardiff City and we can and will, as we have done in the past, get by without him.



So three of you want him gone, fifty thousand plus don't :wave:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:45 am

Bluebina wrote:
CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:



Nice one Pal, as usual nice to see a fellow positive fan who understands we shouldn't consider away at Villa as three easy points, God some of our fans are thick as shit and unbelievably negative and fickle....

Greet news that Malky is the future and that we will get some reinforcements in, let's not forget our 2nd biggest transfer has been injured all season, and will hopefully be back soon :ayatollah: :malky:


Bluebina...

I do not think we as fans considered Villa as an easy 3 points, the fact of the matter is that we dominated possession up to the 1st goal and the 3 points were there for the taking. Villa were playing like the away team, I for one am delighted if the post by City gent is true (which I have full faith it is).

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:29 am

stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


and im sure there are examples of teams who have had a better start, if i looked. Just saying that your 'in living memory' statement doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Stop being pedantic! We are above 8 other teams that is what matters, the point CG is making is our start is ok if nothing else. Could be worse ask palace fans ect.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:34 am

Bakedalasker wrote:That first bit surprises me and the last bit


What about the "middle bit".

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:52 am

pembroke allan wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


and im sure there are examples of teams who have had a better start, if i looked. Just saying that your 'in living memory' statement doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Stop being pedantic! We are above 8 other teams that is what matters, the point CG is making is our start is ok if nothing else. Could be worse ask palace fans ect.

We are above 7 other teams actually

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:03 pm

CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:


:malky: :malky: :thumbup:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:21 pm

CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:
there is one big problem with your rose tinted view of things,and its this.....when you say that some kind of war chest will be made available to Mackay this coming January,the man who will fund this war chest does not rate Mackay and certainly does not rate his ability in the transfer market...........in other words its not going to happen

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:01 pm

angelis49 wrote:
CityGent wrote:I won't bother reading through the overreacting drivel again, but sorry to tell you the boardroom issues are fast becoming resolved and I had a very interesting conversation at Villa Park today that Malky will be heavily backed financially in January and several creative targets have already been pinpointed

We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory. There's much room for improvement but some of our so called"fans"are laughable

:thumbup:
there is one big problem with your rose tinted view of things,and its this.....when you say that some kind of war chest will be made available to Mackay this coming January,the man who will fund this war chest does not rate Mackay and certainly does not rate his ability in the transfer market...........in other words its not going to happen



Only time will tell.

If MM is still managing us come January then I will consider that a U turn by Tan. If he is given money then that will be a bonus.

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:18 pm

Like the vast majority i am very happy with our start to life in the top flight. However what is 'music to my ears' is that Malky and the board seem to have resolved their differences.
:ayatollah: :malky:

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:21 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
stevee1966 wrote:
CityGent wrote:
We've started the season as competitively as any of the newly promoted sides in living memory.
:thumbup:


Hull are above us, Blackpool had a fantastic start, and i would imagine Swaneea were more than comfortable when they were promoted, so your 'in living memory' statement really has no substance.



Swansea had the same amount of points as us after 11 games
Southampton had less points than us in their first season at the same stage

I'm sure there are many other examples if I looked.


and im sure there are examples of teams who have had a better start, if i looked. Just saying that your 'in living memory' statement doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Stop being pedantic! We are above 8 other teams that is what matters, the point CG is making is our start is ok if nothing else. Could be worse ask palace fans ect.

We are above 7 other teams actually

Was right then your just being pedantic !

Re: Those who want Malky gone

Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:27 pm

At time of my post it was 8 so was correct in saying being pedantic :thumbup: