Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:07 am
adr wrote:All the stirring up about tan is not doing the club any favours. The article below has a quote from malky saying that he nearly signed velikonja for watford and had been tracking him for 2 years!! Why would he lie?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400
If veilikonja had been tracked for 2 years that means that moody had been putting together a thorough portfolio on velikonja and in the end wasted £2m. Sacking any coincidence?
Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:17 am
CardiffKid wrote:Jinks wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/oct/31/cardiff-city-etien-velikonja-malky-mackay?CMP=twt_gu
Another reason to force Tan out.
It says in a newspaper so we all better believe itWill you believe newspapers when we are linked to everyone in the next transfer window
![]()
If it was official fair enough but to many on here are to quick to believe the bullshit because it suits..
Don't you feel a bit stupid defending Vincent Tan all the time?
Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:21 am
JBCCFC1927 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/oct/31/cardiff-city-etien-velikonja-malky-mackay?CMP=twt_gu
Another reason to force Tan out.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:43 am
Sven Ghali wrote:adr wrote:All the stirring up about tan is not doing the club any favours. The article below has a quote from malky saying that he nearly signed velikonja for watford and had been tracking him for 2 years!! Why would he lie?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400
If veilikonja had been tracked for 2 years that means that moody had been putting together a thorough portfolio on velikonja and in the end wasted £2m. Sacking any coincidence?
You have a point, fella![]()
Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:11 am
steve davies wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:adr wrote:All the stirring up about tan is not doing the club any favours. The article below has a quote from malky saying that he nearly signed velikonja for watford and had been tracking him for 2 years!! Why would he lie?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400
If veilikonja had been tracked for 2 years that means that moody had been putting together a thorough portfolio on velikonja and in the end wasted £2m. Sacking any coincidence?
You have a point, fella![]()
perhaps malky was covering his bosses arse to avoid him embarrasment. probably before he saw him in those trousers though
Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:45 am
Fri Nov 01, 2013 8:58 am
wez1927 wrote:This thread is bollocks malky and moody were tracking him before at Watford ,funny how the same posters twisting things to suit there anti tan / club agenda ,this board is going down hill rapidly
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:05 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:wez1927 wrote:This thread is bollocks malky and moody were tracking him before at Watford ,funny how the same posters twisting things to suit there anti tan / club agenda ,this board is going down hill rapidly
Yet you were quite happy to assume a post the other day about another head of recruitment, because it suited your own agenda....
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:09 am
wez1927 wrote:Chuckles when he signed malky said in the press conference that he had been ,you really are a arsehole ,stop your trolling
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:10 am
JBCCFC1927 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/oct/31/cardiff-city-etien-velikonja-malky-mackay?CMP=twt_gu
Another reason to force Tan out.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:20 am
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:26 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:Sorry JB, there are no quotes no facts just lazy journalism but another trash paper.
Ive seen a few interviews by Malky suggesting that himself and his recruitment team had Etien watched for a while.
Lets get one things sorted, YES we all want BLUE, YES we all would like a change in OWNERSHIP, but everyday is like groundhog day on here sometimes and I really feel instead of banging the same drum, pointing the same fingers and saying the same things, lets just get behind the team until things change, its utter and totally boring.
Oh, and unless you got £140-£200m stashed away, change the record on Tan.
We got Swansea on Sunday, lets just support the bloody team.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:30 am
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:34 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Sorry JB, there are no quotes no facts just lazy journalism but another trash paper.
Ive seen a few interviews by Malky suggesting that himself and his recruitment team had Etien watched for a while.
Lets get one things sorted, YES we all want BLUE, YES we all would like a change in OWNERSHIP, but everyday is like groundhog day on here sometimes and I really feel instead of banging the same drum, pointing the same fingers and saying the same things, lets just get behind the team until things change, its utter and totally boring.
Oh, and unless you got £140-£200m stashed away, change the record on Tan.
We got Swansea on Sunday, lets just support the bloody team.
What a load of tripe.
You don't have to have the money to criticise Tan. How ridiculous!
Thought you loved Tan anyway?
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:46 am
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:49 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:
Read it again you numpty, if Tan walked that's the kind of Money if not more than what he will demand, did I once say you need money to criticise Tan? No
Loved Tan?? utter shite, he prevented the club from being liquidated, anyone with a single brain cell knew he was the only option avaiable to the club at the time, also I didnt see thousands of city fans screaming at the gate about the re-brand so don't you dare jump at anyone who agreed with what he did to save this club.
Regardless of what he has done, this club is still here and can be changed in the future because of his money.
So its not LOVE its BUSINESS,
Stupid tw*t.
caerdydd_78 wrote:
Oh, and unless you got £140-£200m stashed away, change the record on Tan.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:53 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:
Read it again you numpty, if Tan walked that's the kind of Money if not more than what he will demand, did I once say you need money to criticise Tan? No
Loved Tan?? utter shite, he prevented the club from being liquidated, anyone with a single brain cell knew he was the only option avaiable to the club at the time, also I didnt see thousands of city fans screaming at the gate about the re-brand so don't you dare jump at anyone who agreed with what he did to save this club.
Regardless of what he has done, this club is still here and can be changed in the future because of his money.
So its not LOVE its BUSINESS,
Stupid tw*t.
Read it again.... Where in that quote does it state you cannot jump on Tan?? its boring with you Chucks because you go around in circles spouting crap? where??
What else did we have other than Tan?? come on straight up, what other options were available at the 11th hour when the club was on the brink? lets hear a full and accurate reply other than crap?
The whole forum is watching?? lets have it? no ifs or buts, no possibles, just a straight answer?
Yes you did... You saidcaerdydd_78 wrote:
Oh, and unless you got £140-£200m stashed away, change the record on Tan.
I'll do what I want thanks.by the way, any need for the abuse?
stick to annoying Hudson by flirting with his missus.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:57 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:
Oh, and unless you got £140-£200m stashed away, change the record on Tan.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:59 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:
Read it again you numpty, if Tan walked that's the kind of Money if not more than what he will demand, did I once say you need money to criticise Tan? No
Loved Tan?? utter shite, he prevented the club from being liquidated, anyone with a single brain cell knew he was the only option avaiable to the club at the time, also I didnt see thousands of city fans screaming at the gate about the re-brand so don't you dare jump at anyone who agreed with what he did to save this club.
Regardless of what he has done, this club is still here and can be changed in the future because of his money.
So its not LOVE its BUSINESS,
Stupid tw*t.
Yes you did... You saidcaerdydd_78 wrote:
Oh, and unless you got £140-£200m stashed away, change the record on Tan.
I'll do what I want thanks.by the way, any need for the abuse?
stick to annoying Hudson by flirting with his missus.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:02 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:
Again ill say, where in that lines does it say that?? as always 1000% assumption and Chuckles, its making you look like a right tool..... a right tool.
Lets have it out, here and now. At the 11th Hour when the club was on the brink of going into liquidation and disappearing, who else was there to pick? who else had the clout to prevent the obvious? who came running???
Come on, no crap, no ifs no possibles, just a honest answer? remember this is not about the rebrand, this is about good hard British pounds changing hands to save this club at the time it was on its knees?
Come on Chuckles the forum is waiting! lets see how intelligent you really are?
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:07 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:
Loved Tan?? utter shite.
Stupid tw*t.
caerdydd_78 wrote:
In a non gay way... I actually think I love him.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:10 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:
Again ill say, where in that lines does it say that?? as always 1000% assumption and Chuckles, its making you look like a right tool..... a right tool.
Lets have it out, here and now. At the 11th Hour when the club was on the brink of going into liquidation and disappearing, who else was there to pick? who else had the clout to prevent the obvious? who came running???
Come on, no crap, no ifs no possibles, just a honest answer? remember this is not about the rebrand, this is about good hard British pounds changing hands to save this club at the time it was on its knees?
Come on Chuckles the forum is waiting! lets see how intelligent you really are?
Again I'll say... I've already quoted you where it shows and answered you... You're either blind or too dull to understand.![]()
This is about you telling people to "change the record" on Tan, when people can say whatever they want about that head case dictator. Yes he saved the club, that doesn't mean the supporters have to accept every crackpot decision he makes with complete apathy. ALL OPINIONS WELCOME.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:13 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:Sums you up really, same crap. All i asked was for a simple answer but as always you spout utter crap.
the very answer which I've given you three times now, you clearly cannot understand it.![]()
im sorry Chuckles you are one of the reasons this forum is simply full of keyboard warriors.
says the man who dived in calling me a tw*t for disagreeing with him.
I'm also always free if you wish to insult me to my face.
sorry, weren't you the one that started getting abusive by calling me a numpties and a tw*t? Don't be such a hypocrite.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:15 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:
Again ill say, where in that lines does it say that?? as always 1000% assumption and Chuckles, its making you look like a right tool..... a right tool.
Lets have it out, here and now. At the 11th Hour when the club was on the brink of going into liquidation and disappearing, who else was there to pick? who else had the clout to prevent the obvious? who came running???
Come on, no crap, no ifs no possibles, just a honest answer? remember this is not about the rebrand, this is about good hard British pounds changing hands to save this club at the time it was on its knees?
Come on Chuckles the forum is waiting! lets see how intelligent you really are?
Again I'll say... I've already quoted you where it shows and answered you... You're either blind or too dull to understand.![]()
This is about you telling people to "change the record" on Tan, when people can say whatever they want about that head case dictator. Yes he saved the club, that doesn't mean the supporters have to accept every crackpot decision he makes with complete apathy. ALL OPINIONS WELCOME.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:16 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Sums you up really, same crap. All i asked was for a simple answer but as always you spout utter crap.
the very answer which I've given you three times now, you clearly cannot understand it.![]()
im sorry Chuckles you are one of the reasons this forum is simply full of keyboard warriors.
says the man who dived in calling me a tw*t for disagreeing with him.
I'm also always free if you wish to insult me to my face.
sorry, weren't you the one that started getting abusive by calling me a numpties and a tw*t? Don't be such a hypocrite.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:17 am
Sneggyblubird wrote:
Aye,right enough Chuckles,and its jolly nice of you to acknowledge that fact because lets face it if he hadn't saved the club what the hell would you be doing right now.Crying into your beer like the rest of us I imagine.Its a pity you don't concentrate less on childish pointscoring and semantics because your clearly not stupid.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:21 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:
You say you've told me several times about the investment in this club? where you tool?
in a post above.. Aimed at you.![]()
Ill ask for a FORTH time, give me an intelligent reply regarding this club at the time Tan invested, ill ask again no crap please or keep going in bloody circles. A straight answer please.
I'll answer for a fourth time.. I've already done it.![]()
And if you think calling you a tw*t is remotely insulting or abuse, you need to man up and just answer my questions above.
youre the one going on about wanting to meet me, you strange man.
But i don't think you can, i honestly think you neither have the intelligence or know how to answer the question.
I've already done it in this thread. I don't think you have the intelligence or know how to actually read it though.![]()
Ill let you prove me wrong.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:26 am
Barry Chuckle wrote: I do believe that He said he will seek other means of investment just not from him, so dont think we would have gone bust...
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:27 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:
Aye,right enough Chuckles,and its jolly nice of you to acknowledge that fact because lets face it if he hadn't saved the club what the hell would you be doing right now.Crying into your beer like the rest of us I imagine.Its a pity you don't concentrate less on childish pointscoring and semantics because your clearly not stupid.
Where have I said that he didn't rescue the club? I've said it many times... What I don't agree with, is that we should just allow him to do whatever he wants with this club, just because he saved it.
The apathy about some of this loon's decisions, it's amazing, quite frankly.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:30 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:
Barry, you acknowledge he saved the club, you are right you don't have to throw rose petals at his feet, chant his name of wear his merchandise, all im trying to point out is that without him regardless of what he has done since, we wouldn't have a club, there would not have been any other outcome than liquidation. We simply would not have agreed a CVA to maintain even Football League status, we would have simply vanished.
that's simply a prediction, just as much as mine is. Nobody actually knows, so cut out the facts crap.
Please understand that simple line.
If you think owners in this modern era in football are simply going to do a Jack Walker and throw countless millions at the club without a return, you are deluded. Football regardless of what anyone says, is a Business. Any investor be it a group of or a simple investor, will want a return on his money.
where am I against that? All I'm saying is that this loon has made some stupid decisions - mainly the rebrand.
Look at Chelsea, if Abramovic walks, Chelsea will disappear as they rely heavily on his money. the club will simply not survive. Thankfully along as we can maintain Premier League football and stick to strict financial restraints, we can stay afloat without the need for millions on a monthly basis from an investor.