Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:13 pm

Martyn1963 wrote:Apart from the 3 teams we have played then only Man U , Liverpool , Chelsea , Arsenal and Swansea remain a threat at home


Wrong. Every single team in this division is a threat. People seem to forget Palace done us in one leg in the cup and have done us in the league in years gone by even in the Championship and they are to some arguably the weakest team in this division. Yes we've added talent but the squad is a squad. We are no world beaters and cant expect to just pick up points against the lesser teams.

We'll see come the end of the season. Bookmark it if you like and if I am wrong I will hold my hands up and credit Malky for proving me wrong. However, I do believe hes out of his depth here.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:15 pm

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Oh dear god! If you honestly think we would have done better than take 4 points from Man City and Everton if we played a more attacking system, I give up!


We lost to West Ham and drew with Hull City, thats 1 from 6 points. You can take any 2 games and put your spin on it.

As for Craig, we lost to Spurs, that is all that matters and it was Malky's tactics that cost us because it kept inviting and inviting pressure and eventually they found the net. That is a fact. If you let a team take 29 shots against you its more than likely they will score. Also, as we have very little attacking threat of our own other than a few odd chances it puts us in a terrible position.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:18 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Oh dear god! If you honestly think we would have done better than take 4 points from Man City and Everton if we played a more attacking system, I give up!


We lost to West Ham and drew with Hull City, thats 1 from 6 points. You can take any 2 games and put your spin on it.

As for Craig, we lost to Spurs, that is all that matters and it was Malky's tactics that cost us because it kept inviting and inviting pressure and eventually they found the net. That is a fact. If you let a team take 29 shots against you its more than likely they will score. Also, as we have very little attacking threat of our own other than a few odd chances it puts us in a terrible position.



your posts are constantly full of shit. fair play to you for keeping up such a high level of bollocks.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:21 pm

paulh_85 wrote:
your posts are constantly full of shit. fair play to you for keeping up such a high level of bollocks.

as is your existence :wave:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:22 pm

:laughing6:

Angelis and Barnett. A match made in mong heaven

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:25 pm

paulh_85 wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Oh dear god! If you honestly think we would have done better than take 4 points from Man City and Everton if we played a more attacking system, I give up!


We lost to West Ham and drew with Hull City, thats 1 from 6 points. You can take any 2 games and put your spin on it.

As for Craig, we lost to Spurs, that is all that matters and it was Malky's tactics that cost us because it kept inviting and inviting pressure and eventually they found the net. That is a fact. If you let a team take 29 shots against you its more than likely they will score. Also, as we have very little attacking threat of our own other than a few odd chances it puts us in a terrible position.



your posts are constantly full of shit. fair play to you for keeping up such a high level of bollocks.

Incredibly back tracking too

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:29 pm

Hmmm,very queer that.Just how long after his original post did he edit it.You normally don't get that long to change it and then that needy little student type comes on and agrees with him.Could JB actualy be angelis......................discuss :lol: :lol:he's got lots of form in that area :laughing6: :laughing6:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:30 pm

Some people on this forum need to grow up. All they do is berate others that have a different opinion. We'll soon see who is right don't you worry because Tan is either going to sack Malky to bring in a known name or we are going to end up going back down.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:32 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:Some people on this forum need to grow up. All they do is berate others that have a different opinion. We'll soon see who is right don't you worry because Tan is either going to sack Malky to bring in a known name or we are going to end up going back down.

Problem is Barnett, you have several differing opinions per subject depending on what day of the week we're on.

"Some people on this forum need to grow up" may I suggest sir, you look in ones mirror

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:36 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Some people on this forum need to grow up. All they do is berate others that have a different opinion. We'll soon see who is right don't you worry because Tan is either going to sack Malky to bring in a known name or we are going to end up going back down.

Problem is Barnett, you have several differing opinions per subject depending on what day of the week we're on.

"Some people on this forum need to grow up" may I suggest sir, you look in ones mirror


Sorry for having a different opinion to you Craig but that's my view on the matter. Whilst his tactics, like Warnocks, were brilliant at getting out of the rugged and draining Championship they are not suited to this level.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:37 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:Some people on this forum need to grow up. All they do is berate others that have a different opinion. We'll soon see who is right don't you worry because Tan is either going to sack Malky to bring in a known name or we are going to end up going back down.


Thats about sums you up, you just want to argue and be seen to be right. I couldnt care less if im right or wrong, id rather just give my honest opinion on thing.

And like Craig said your bound to be right, you change your mind like the weather depending on who u can argue with most.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:38 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Some people on this forum need to grow up. All they do is berate others that have a different opinion. We'll soon see who is right don't you worry because Tan is either going to sack Malky to bring in a known name or we are going to end up going back down.

Problem is Barnett, you have several differing opinions per subject depending on what day of the week we're on.

"Some people on this forum need to grow up" may I suggest sir, you look in ones mirror


Sorry for having a different opinion to you Craig but that's my view on the matter. Whilst his tactics, like Warnocks, were brilliant at getting out of the rugged and draining Championship they are not suited to this level.

Why do you keep ducking the fact you alter your opinion almost daily. You boring rhetoric of having a different opinion is almost as bad as chuckles.

Why does your opinion on differing subjects change so drastically almost day to day?

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:43 pm

2blue2handle wrote:Thats about sums you up, you just want to argue and be seen to be right. I couldnt care less if im right or wrong, id rather just give my honest opinion on thing.


That is my honest opinion. Malky is out of his depth at this level. It just kills people to admit angelis is right for once.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:45 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Some people on this forum need to grow up. All they do is berate others that have a different opinion. We'll soon see who is right don't you worry because Tan is either going to sack Malky to bring in a known name or we are going to end up going back down.

Problem is Barnett, you have several differing opinions per subject depending on what day of the week we're on.

"Some people on this forum need to grow up" may I suggest sir, you look in ones mirror


Sorry for having a different opinion to you Craig but that's my view on the matter. Whilst his tactics, like Warnocks, were brilliant at getting out of the rugged and draining Championship they are not suited to this level.

Why do you keep ducking the fact you alter your opinion almost daily. You boring rhetoric of having a different opinion is almost as bad as chuckles.

Why does your opinion on differing subjects change so drastically almost day to day?


Thats easy,he needs to feel important and loved and it possibly gives him a stiffy too.But his angelis49 character is finally laid bare.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:48 pm

angelis49 wrote:If I'm honest with everyone, all I do is spout constant bollocks. I apologise



:laughing5:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:50 pm

Sneggyblubird wrote:Thats easy,he needs to feel important and loved and it possibly gives him a stiffy too.But his angelis49 character is finally laid bare.


If I was angelis I wouldn't be commenting on this thread posting the same stuff.

I said yesterday I agree with Polo on Malky's tactics and I was wrong. I will admit when I am wrong. Here though I believe I am right. We are not attacking enough to win enough games at this level.

8 wins
15 draws
15 losses

Already have 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses

39 points. Will that keep us up?

angelis says it because he/she/it hates Malky with a passion hence the constant history of posts. I am saying it not because I dislike Malky but because I am worried for the future based on what we've already seen.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:53 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
Sneggyblubird wrote:Thats easy,he needs to feel important and loved and it possibly gives him a stiffy too.But his angelis49 character is finally laid bare.


If I was angelis I wouldn't be commenting on this thread posting the same stuff.

I said yesterday I agree with Polo on Malky's tactics and I was wrong. I will admit when I am wrong. Here though I believe I am right. We are not attacking enough to win enough games at this level.

8 wins
15 draws
15 losses

Already have 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses

39 points. Will that keep us up?

angelis says it because he/she/it hates Malky with a passion hence the constant history of posts. I am saying it not because I dislike Malky but because I am worried for the future based on what we've already seen.


OK Angelis,anything you say butty :ayatollah:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:31 pm

I can not believe this thread has even been started, but everyone is entitled to their views.

My response

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=123907 :malky:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:43 pm

It's sad when a persons opinions are deleted because they don't fit with the majorities view. Like him or not he is entitled to his opinion and has stuck with his view in the face of constant criticism, I for one agree with Angelis that Malky's tactics are going to see us relegated.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:14 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
2blue2handle wrote:Thats about sums you up, you just want to argue and be seen to be right. I couldnt care less if im right or wrong, id rather just give my honest opinion on thing.


That is my honest opinion. Malky is out of his depth at this level. It just kills people to admit angelis is right for once.


My honest opinion is you're a grade A c**t :thumbup:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:25 pm

I appreciate theres no 'easy' games in this league. But they certainly come alot easier than westham away, man city and Everton. Your stats and averages mean nothing after just a few games. Sometimes I wonder how long people like you have been around because in my eyes weve been moving forward every year and we still are. Pessimism at its worst here!

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:28 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Oh dear god! If you honestly think we would have done better than take 4 points from Man City and Everton if we played a more attacking system, I give up!


We lost to West Ham and drew with Hull City, thats 1 from 6 points. You can take any 2 games and put your spin on it.

As for Craig, we lost to Spurs, that is all that matters and it was Malky's tactics that cost us because it kept inviting and inviting pressure and eventually they found the net. That is a fact. If you let a team take 29 shots against you its more than likely they will score. Also, as we have very little attacking threat of our own other than a few odd chances it puts us in a terrible position.


West Ham and Hull were both away games. I see every point away from home as a bonus, it's our home form I worry about and Malky is doing a great job so far, considering the teams we've played at home. Obviously we have differing expectations, I will grab 17th now if offered but you seem to think we can play more open and attacking and get the better of the majority of teams in our league!

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:49 pm

CF14-SE14 wrote:My honest opinion is you're a grade A c**t :thumbup:


Just as well your opinion counts for jack shit and you're a nobody in real terms then. :thumbup:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:50 pm

Firerawk88 wrote:It's sad when a persons opinions are deleted because they don't fit with the majorities view. Like him or not he is entitled to his opinion and has stuck with his view in the face of constant criticism, I for one agree with Angelis that Malky's tactics are going to see us relegated.


100% agreed but there are some on here who abuse others on here for saying something different. They cant quite comprehend its an opinion.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:59 pm

Whilst I disagree with his opinion, it is pretty poor that a moderator has edited another members posts to stop him allowing his opinion... :shock:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:22 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:Whilst I disagree with his opinion, it is pretty poor that a moderator has edited another members posts to stop him allowing his opinion... :shock:


I'd usually agree but with a post like this from this poster I don't mind.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:31 pm

Good grief. :lol: :lol: :lol:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:34 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:Whilst I disagree with his opinion, it is pretty poor that a moderator has edited another members posts to stop him allowing his opinion... :shock:


Mods shouldn't be allowed to edit posts in the way they have, if one of Annis's book selling posts got altered into something like this has been then there would be murder.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:48 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
CF14-SE14 wrote:My honest opinion is you're a grade A c**t :thumbup:


Just as well your opinion counts for jack shit and you're a nobody in real terms then. :thumbup:


And your opinion counts for something? You're the one with the schizophrenic internet personality you tart.
Obviously lacking something in the real world :laughing5:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:32 pm

Firerawk88 wrote:It's sad when a persons opinions are deleted because they don't fit with the majorities view. Like him or not he is entitled to his opinion and has stuck with his view in the face of constant criticism, I for one agree with Angelis that Malky's tactics are going to see us relegated.


The amount of times you've been wrong about Malky in the past you'd think that you would appreciate having posts edited for you. :laughing6: