Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:56 pm

Mel86 wrote:Think level might well be innocent. But bill roach guilty as hell. An actor friend of mine said he is well know for his wandering hands and known to those in the biz as "cock-roach"...


Wandering hands is one thing. Touching kids is totally different. Which begs the question, if your friend knew he was touching kids, why didnt he go to the police?

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:58 pm

i find it really suspicious that the girl states it was 3 times then when in court it was 5 times twice in one night and when asked why have been only been hearing about it now she said she had more flashbacks and she was questioned asking is she just saying it to make it more believable, i find it strange how she can say she did not tell anybody but was soon found out for telling three of her friends, her case just does not add up one bit but since saville every male celebritie must be shiting themselves for something like this to happen to them, if shes telling the truth then i apologise but it sounds like a badly put together lie

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:25 pm

Not Guilty

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:30 pm

citybluechris wrote:i find it really suspicious that the girl states it was 3 times then when in court it was 5 times twice in one night and when asked why have been only been hearing about it now she said she had more flashbacks and she was questioned asking is she just saying it to make it more believable, i find it strange how she can say she did not tell anybody but was soon found out for telling three of her friends, her case just does not add up one bit but since saville every male celebritie must be shiting themselves for something like this to happen to them, if shes telling the truth then i apologise but it sounds like a badly put together lie

looks that way

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:23 pm

paulh_85 wrote:Not Guilty


In my opinion she should be named and prosecuted for wasting police time . Clearly a pack of lies from reading court summary . Feel very sorry for the guy

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:44 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:I think he's guilty this isn't the first time he's been facing accustaiond of child molestation either


Yes it is.

As his defence just said, no other accusations, nothing on his computer, this isnt the work of a serial predator.

The prosecutions only evidence is that hes a drunk.

Cant see anything other than a not guilty.


I thought he was charged for similar stuff a few years back? MIT have been some
Other fucker lol

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:48 am

smakerzthebluebird wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
smakerzthebluebird wrote:I think he's guilty this isn't the first time he's been facing accustaiond of child molestation either


Yes it is.

As his defence just said, no other accusations, nothing on his computer, this isnt the work of a serial predator.

The prosecutions only evidence is that hes a drunk.

Cant see anything other than a not guilty.


I thought he was charged for similar stuff a few years back? MIT have been some
Other fucker lol

yeah he was charged a few years back.... For this case lol 2 yrs ago had to let him go then new evidence came to light

Re: Corrie la vell - Nonse or innocent?

Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:28 am

sloper_road_legend wrote:I know its off topic but the international break is boring me :lol: and I dont have alot to say about wales other than coleman out. roll on euro Quals

What do you think about this lavell case going on?
Is the guy innocent or did he do it... ''In your oppinion

IMO Im slightly suspicious that he's possibly done something bad and in return they are doing it out of spite, or perhaps there was more too it. (it is corrie after all so nothing is surprising.
a crazy allegation well he go down?

YES/NO

Innocent as found by a jury, no need for this sort of speculation when you probably haven't folloed the case detail by detail.