Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:18 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:17 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:37 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:40 am
troobloo3339 wrote:So in that case those that didnt score should have less chance of playing stupid comment by chuckles again just picking on rudy and singling him out as you dont rate him
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:41 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:So in that case those that didnt score should have less chance of playing stupid comment by chuckles again just picking on rudy and singling him out as you dont rate him
What striker didn't score?!Maynard scored, as did Gestede. Are you really trying to use a goal against the side bottom of the football league pyramid as to why he should start in the premiership?!
No, I don't rate him.. Why are you going around abusing people who don't agree with you?
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:52 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:57 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Ffs abusing you fu..ing cry baby
more abuse. Weren't you the one complaining about name calling before? Hypocrite.![]()
Cornelous started played 40 minutes did f**k all rudy played 50 minutes scored one linked play held the ball up well
If you went you would of seen it for yourself
But you wernt there were you
no, I wasn't there. Couldn't be there. Busy.![]()
Think id rather go by what I saw and what others who were there were saying
think I'd rather judge players on whether they are good enough for the premiership on more than scoring and doing well against the bottom club in the pyramid.![]()
My oppinion is not just based on the accrington game anyway
nor is mine. He's been poor for the last 2 seasons. Malky clearly agrees as he's generally a last resort...
However the latest game played by a player is best for judging current form and improvement is it not
Or do use the fact that some one played well/bad scored /did not score in previous games/years to judge a player for the rest of there career
yes & he's not good enough for the premiership in my eyes. You get all upset when people disagree with you, then don't allow others an opinion... It's really rather strange.![]()
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:02 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Ffs abusing you fu..ing cry baby
Cornelous started played 40 minutes did f**k all rudy played 50 minutes scored one linked play held the ball up well
If you went you would of seen it for yourself
But you wernt there were you
Think id rather go by what I saw and what others who were there were saying
My oppinion is not just based on the accrington game anyway
However the latest game played by a player is best for judging current form and improvement is it not
Or do use the fact that some one played well/bad scored /did not score in previous games/years to judge a player for the rest of there career
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:13 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:17 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Im not upset
Not busy enough that you have time to critisice aplayer you didnt even see play
ive seen Rudy play enough times to form an opinion about him. Sorry, but who are you to question my support?![]()
How do you
know malky uses him as a last resort or do you mean a player used as a sub is a last resort or are you assuming again
its pretty obvious, going by his team selections.![]()
Theres no debating with you is there any one having a differing oppinion to you are abusing you
calling people things for not agreeing with you is abusing.especially when you got so upset about it before.
Your last reply just backs up proves my point you are a cry baby
If calling you a cry baby is abusing you you really are a sensative little whimp
how about debating with no name calling at all? Not that hard, is it?
Try putting your dislike for me to one side and read others who have backed rudy in this thread and you will find im not on my own with the oppinion that rudy is improving and can become an asset
try putting your dislike of me to one side too. Why can't you accept that I don't rate Rudy? I accept that you rate him, yet don't agree with you.
There are others who also have agreed with me, yet I don't see you having a to and abusing them.. Maybe you should learn to take your own advice?![]()
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:18 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:27 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:31 am
troobloo3339 wrote:You have not answered one of my comments just come back with same old drivell
yes I have.![]()
Do you think replying in blue lettering makes what your writing more valid
no, I use a different colour to distinguish my replies from your sentences...![]()
You started personalising your replies to me not the other way around![]()
Ive used facts not fiction
What?!!
You only turn poeples quote s around to suit yourself
thought this thread was about Rudy?
Hope im wrong but are you dislexic becouse you seem to read things that arent wrote just to suit your oppinion/answers
You're calling me dyslexic? Have you seen your own spelling?![]()
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:36 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:37 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:43 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:53 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:55 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:58 am
troobloo3339 wrote:All of this becouse I rate a player
Deary deary me
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:03 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:04 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:05 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Never suggested im not qualified to make that sort of diagnosis
As previously stated I merely asked if you were
Now get your head out of your arse
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:12 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:14 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:20 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:22 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:25 am
troobloo3339 wrote:It was nevera suggestion get a grip your repeating yourself
A question was asked not a suggestion made
And still no answer to the question
Be carefull the facts dont bite you in the arse if of coarse they can get passed your head thats stuck up there![]()
Logging off now better things to do on a lovely week end than debate with a billy no mates![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:29 am