Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:18 am

thank f**k

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:17 am

Not good enough for premiership. Troobloo bleats on about being allowed to rate him, we'll I can also say that I'm allowed to think he's shite. :thumbup:

How some think he deserves to play after scoring against the 92nd team in the football league pyramid is beyond. :lol:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:37 am

So in that case those that didnt score should have less chance of playing stupid comment by chuckles again just picking on rudy and singling him out as you dont rate him :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:40 am

troobloo3339 wrote:So in that case those that didnt score should have less chance of playing stupid comment by chuckles again just picking on rudy and singling him out as you dont rate him :ayatollah:


What striker didn't score?! :? Maynard scored, as did Gestede. Are you really trying to use a goal against the side bottom of the football league pyramid as to why he should start in the premiership?!

No, I don't rate him.. Why are you going around abusing people who don't agree with you? :?

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:41 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:So in that case those that didnt score should have less chance of playing stupid comment by chuckles again just picking on rudy and singling him out as you dont rate him :ayatollah:


What striker didn't score?! :? Maynard scored, as did Gestede. Are you really trying to use a goal against the side bottom of the football league pyramid as to why he should start in the premiership?!

No, I don't rate him.. Why are you going around abusing people who don't agree with you? :?


Every game in Britain is a tough game whether its Man City or Accrington. Rudy done well. NQAT. :malky: :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:52 am

Ffs abusing you fu..ing cry baby
Cornelous started played 40 minutes did f**k all rudy played 50 minutes scored one linked play held the ball up well
If you went you would of seen it for yourself
But you wernt there were you
Think id rather go by what I saw and what others who were there were saying
My oppinion is not just based on the accrington game anyway
However the latest game played by a player is best for judging current form and improvement is it not
Or do use the fact that some one played well/bad scored /did not score in previous games/years to judge a player for the rest of there career :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:57 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Ffs abusing you fu..ing cry baby

more abuse. Weren't you the one complaining about name calling before? Hypocrite. :laughing6:

Cornelous started played 40 minutes did f**k all rudy played 50 minutes scored one linked play held the ball up well
If you went you would of seen it for yourself
But you wernt there were you

no, I wasn't there. Couldn't be there. Busy. :?

Think id rather go by what I saw and what others who were there were saying

think I'd rather judge players on whether they are good enough for the premiership on more than scoring and doing well against the bottom club in the pyramid. :thumbup:

My oppinion is not just based on the accrington game anyway

nor is mine. He's been poor for the last 2 seasons. Malky clearly agrees as he's generally a last resort...

However the latest game played by a player is best for judging current form and improvement is it not
Or do use the fact that some one played well/bad scored /did not score in previous games/years to judge a player for the rest of there career :ayatollah:

yes & he's not good enough for the premiership in my eyes. You get all upset when people disagree with you, then don't allow others an opinion... It's really rather strange. :lol:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:02 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Ffs abusing you fu..ing cry baby
Cornelous started played 40 minutes did f**k all rudy played 50 minutes scored one linked play held the ball up well
If you went you would of seen it for yourself
But you wernt there were you
Think id rather go by what I saw and what others who were there were saying
My oppinion is not just based on the accrington game anyway
However the latest game played by a player is best for judging current form and improvement is it not
Or do use the fact that some one played well/bad scored /did not score in previous games/years to judge a player for the rest of there career :ayatollah:


Spot on. Keeping it real and you got Barry running here mate. Keep it up. Team troobloo3339 :malky: :malky: :malky:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:13 am

Im not upset
Not busy enough that you have time to critisice aplayer you didnt even see play
How do you
know malky uses him as a last resort or do you mean a player used as a sub is a last resort or are you assuming again
Theres no debating with you is there any one having a differing oppinion to you are abusing you
Your last reply just backs up proves my point you are a cry baby
If calling you a cry baby is abusing you you really are a sensative little whimp
Try putting your dislike for me to one side and read others who have backed rudy in this thread and you will find im not on my own with the oppinion that rudy is improving and can become an asset :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:17 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Im not upset
Not busy enough that you have time to critisice aplayer you didnt even see play

ive seen Rudy play enough times to form an opinion about him. Sorry, but who are you to question my support? :roll:

How do you
know malky uses him as a last resort or do you mean a player used as a sub is a last resort or are you assuming again

its pretty obvious, going by his team selections. :lol:

Theres no debating with you is there any one having a differing oppinion to you are abusing you

calling people things for not agreeing with you is abusing. :lol: especially when you got so upset about it before.

Your last reply just backs up proves my point you are a cry baby
If calling you a cry baby is abusing you you really are a sensative little whimp

how about debating with no name calling at all? Not that hard, is it?

Try putting your dislike for me to one side and read others who have backed rudy in this thread and you will find im not on my own with the oppinion that rudy is improving and can become an asset :ayatollah:

try putting your dislike of me to one side too. Why can't you accept that I don't rate Rudy? I accept that you rate him, yet don't agree with you.

There are others who also have agreed with me, yet I don't see you having a to and abusing them.. Maybe you should learn to take your own advice? :laughing6:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:18 am

Chuckles has been destroyed by troobloo in this thread.

troobloo 1-0 Chuckles.

NQAT. :malky: :malky: :malky: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:27 am

You have not answered one of my comments just come back with same old drivell
Do you think replying in blue lettering makes what your writing more valid
You started personalising your replies to me not the other way around :ayatollah:
Ive used facts not fiction
You only turn poeples quote s around to suit yourself
Hope im wrong but are you dislexic becouse you seem to read things that arent wrote just to suit your oppinion/answers :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:31 am

troobloo3339 wrote:You have not answered one of my comments just come back with same old drivell

yes I have. :sleepy2:

Do you think replying in blue lettering makes what your writing more valid

no, I use a different colour to distinguish my replies from your sentences... :laughing5:

You started personalising your replies to me not the other way around :ayatollah:
Ive used facts not fiction

:? What?!!

You only turn poeples quote s around to suit yourself

thought this thread was about Rudy?

Hope im wrong but are you dislexic becouse you seem to read things that arent wrote just to suit your oppinion/answers :ayatollah:

You're calling me dyslexic? Have you seen your own spelling? :?

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:36 am

Come on now chuckles get your facts right just for once
I never called you dislexic
I asked you if you were
As this would of been a geniune reason for the crap you spout on here :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:37 am

So instead of accepting that I don't rate Rudy, you're going to accuse me of having a condition?

That's bloody pathetic.

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:43 am

There you go again accuse you I merely asked you
I never said you were
Facts facts and more facts
No more fiction from you please
They will come in white coats for you and put you on fantasy island where you can shout boss boss the plane
Think you would be more at home there
By the way replying yes I did is no answer :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:53 am

Judging by your bizarre posts, the men in white coats will more likely be looking for you. :thumbup:

All of this because I don't rate your favourite player! f*cking weird! :lol:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:55 am

All of this becouse I rate a player
Deary deary me :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:58 am

troobloo3339 wrote:All of this becouse I rate a player
Deary deary me :ayatollah:


I've already said that you can rate him all you like, but that I merely disagree.

You can't accept that and start suggesting people have a condition, purely because they disagree with you?!

That's f*cking pathetic, get your head out of your arse. :thumbup:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:03 am

chuckles on the backfoot again

2-0 to troobloo who is sweeping the floor with bazza here. :malky: :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:04 am

Never suggested im not qualified to make that sort of diagnosis
As previously stated I merely asked if you were
Now get your head out of your arse :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:05 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Never suggested im not qualified to make that sort of diagnosis
As previously stated I merely asked if you were
Now get your head out of your arse :ayatollah:


You did suggest. All because someone doesn't agree with you. f*cking pathetic.

I dont rate Rudy. Accept it. :thumbup:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:12 am

Asking is not suggesting
Now if I had said I think you might have dislexia that would of been suggesting
How ever I said are you dislexic facts dear boy facts
By the way you havnt answered that question to date have you facts
Its all about facts not fiction
The facts will allways find you out in the end :ayatollah:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:14 am

"As this would of been a geniune reason for the crap you spout on here "

I'd say this was a suggestion overall, you strange man. Trying to suggest that people have a condition because they don't agree with you?! :laughing6:

Thank God you aren't our manager. :malky: :malky:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:20 am

It was nevera suggestion get a grip your repeating yourself
A question was asked not a suggestion made
And still no answer to the question
Be carefull the facts dont bite you in the arse if of coarse they can get passed your head thats stuck up there :ayatollah:
Logging off now better things to do on a lovely week end than debate with a billy no mates :ayatollah: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :sleepy2:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:22 am

3-0 win for troobloo against Baz.

Worst verbal beat down you ever taken on this forum Baz. Time to hang up the gloves I think. :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:25 am

troobloo3339 wrote:It was nevera suggestion get a grip your repeating yourself
A question was asked not a suggestion made
And still no answer to the question
Be carefull the facts dont bite you in the arse if of coarse they can get passed your head thats stuck up there :ayatollah:
Logging off now better things to do on a lovely week end than debate with a billy no mates :ayatollah: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :sleepy2:


More abuse for not liking your favourite player. :lol: really is pathetic!

What question?! You keep going on about this, but what bloody question? :laughing5:

Rudy is shite, in my opinion. Simple as that. :thumbup:

Re: No Rudy?

Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:29 am

I watched the forward players warm up with shots against the keeper before kick off.

Whitts scored every time. Top corners, bending them around the keeper, just badically did what he wanted.

I was then wondering what Caulker was doing shooting with the forwards as this big lump couldnt shoot and
even managed to clear the net that protects the fans twice!!! It was only on closer inspection I realised it was Rudy.

Say no more.