Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:56 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:[
Agree with you. However Williams rarely does that so its ok..
Williams enjoys an error. We all know that!
Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:58 am
MilkyJoe wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:[
Agree with you. However Williams rarely does that so its ok..
Williams enjoys an error. We all know that!
Yes Barry, of course.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:58 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:[
Agree with you. However Williams rarely does that so its ok..
Williams enjoys an error. We all know that!
Yes Barry, of course.
He's made several changers over the years.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:02 am
Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:06 am
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:31 am
MilkyJoe wrote:Owain wrote:Gavin wrote:Very reassuring, and an obvious but good point, home form is key, I see his WH team pushing for top 8 if Carroll has a decent season, theyve shaped a team around him.
They've got some top quality players, and I agree I think they'll be very strong this year.
The irony is, since their promotion from the Championship, if you take out Andy Carroll who didn't play yesterday - you have spent nearly TWICE as much as they spent in their two seasons at this level combined!
lets not forget that's on top of a championship winning squad where as West Ham went up via play-offs.
IF you think they have a better squad then surely Malky has spent incredibly poorly considering he spent twice as much?
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:34 am
toshacks_1_tales wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:Owain wrote:Gavin wrote:Very reassuring, and an obvious but good point, home form is key, I see his WH team pushing for top 8 if Carroll has a decent season, theyve shaped a team around him.
They've got some top quality players, and I agree I think they'll be very strong this year.
The irony is, since their promotion from the Championship, if you take out Andy Carroll who didn't play yesterday - you have spent nearly TWICE as much as they spent in their two seasons at this level combined!
lets not forget that's on top of a championship winning squad where as West Ham went up via play-offs.
IF you think they have a better squad then surely Malky has spent incredibly poorly considering he spent twice as much?
Did you take Cornelius Brayford and Moore out of your calculations. As they didn't play yesterday.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:37 am
MilkyJoe wrote:toshacks_1_tales wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:Owain wrote:Gavin wrote:Very reassuring, and an obvious but good point, home form is key, I see his WH team pushing for top 8 if Carroll has a decent season, theyve shaped a team around him.
They've got some top quality players, and I agree I think they'll be very strong this year.
The irony is, since their promotion from the Championship, if you take out Andy Carroll who didn't play yesterday - you have spent nearly TWICE as much as they spent in their two seasons at this level combined!
lets not forget that's on top of a championship winning squad where as West Ham went up via play-offs.
IF you think they have a better squad then surely Malky has spent incredibly poorly considering he spent twice as much?
Did you take Cornelius Brayford and Moore out of your calculations. As they didn't play yesterday.
No because none of them are guaranteed to start if fit.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:41 am
toshacks_1_tales wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:toshacks_1_tales wrote:MilkyJoe wrote:Owain wrote:Gavin wrote:Very reassuring, and an obvious but good point, home form is key, I see his WH team pushing for top 8 if Carroll has a decent season, theyve shaped a team around him.
They've got some top quality players, and I agree I think they'll be very strong this year.
The irony is, since their promotion from the Championship, if you take out Andy Carroll who didn't play yesterday - you have spent nearly TWICE as much as they spent in their two seasons at this level combined!
lets not forget that's on top of a championship winning squad where as West Ham went up via play-offs.
IF you think they have a better squad then surely Malky has spent incredibly poorly considering he spent twice as much?
Did you take Cornelius Brayford and Moore out of your calculations. As they didn't play yesterday.
No because none of them are guaranteed to start if fit.
Pointless post then.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:42 am
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:43 am
Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: Roathie takes a player out of the equation because he didn't play, yet doesn't do the same for Cardiff..
Just showed that your biased crap on here is just that, total nonsense.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:46 am
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:47 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:He also said that he didn't play Cornelius because he had only just returned to training. No doubt he would have played otherwise.
![]()
Your bias is showing through now Roath.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 11:49 am
MilkyJoe wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: Roathie takes a player out of the equation because he didn't play, yet doesn't do the same for Cardiff..
Just showed that your biased crap on here is just that, total nonsense.
![]()
![]()
![]()
No, took a player out because he is a starter that is unavailable. Malky reported a fully fit squad yet didn't play those players I left out.
However if you want them in, you still spent more so the point stands
Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:27 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:00 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:21 pm