Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:55 am
ChiChi wrote:Re the You tube link.
This is an embarrassment. Step back and get some perspective.
What are you looking to achieve with this march?
You need to ask yourself 2 important questions what's going to be gained by doing this?
Is this going to benefit the club?
Just let it go its a small price to pay for club stability and us being in the premiership. I do question the character and intelligence of anyone who is still wasting energy on this topic.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:55 am
Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:05 pm
2blue2handle wrote:So many holes in that video, I won't even bother to go through them.
At the end he says now is the time....... Well no that was last year.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:13 pm
lj1985 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:lj1985 wrote:taffy123 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mY5UVv6LedQ CCFC![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Howfor you lot, tan does not give a shite about what you lot think he see's you as customer's not fans.
As much as I hate what Tan has done the comforting factor about it all is that it has got to a bitter Jack like yourself.
Take away the politics of it all and what you have is an emergence of a football club that is going to be big. All that was required for this club to become big was a serious investor. That now is in place and that is what is eating into individuals like yourself.
Why would it eat into me after all Swansea are already a PL club and last week i saw my club play in Europe, the first welsh club to represent England. And it's only cardiff fans who think cardiff is or will be big, on my travels to malmo spoke to a danish guy who asked me if any other welsh clubs had played in the PL, when i told him cardiff will be there next season he told me he had never heard of them and that is true..
Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:16 pm
2blue2handle wrote:So many holes in that video, I won't even bother to go through them.
At the end he says now is the time....... Well no that was last year.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:54 pm
Magners wrote:2blue2handle wrote:So many holes in that video, I won't even bother to go through them.
At the end he says now is the time....... Well no that was last year.
Time for Action. Thought this was a Celebration march not a Protest march?
Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:28 pm
Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:31 pm
Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:51 pm
Andysince76 wrote:I may be wrong here, but in that vid a statement was made that it was more about the way the rebrand came about, rather than the actual colour change, least ways that's how I perceived it, so basically people are more annoyed about not being consulted than they are about the red.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:58 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Andysince76 wrote:I may be wrong here, but in that vid a statement was made that it was more about the way the rebrand came about, rather than the actual colour change, least ways that's how I perceived it, so basically people are more annoyed about not being consulted than they are about the red.
The video sent a lot of confusing messages.
It certainly wasnt thought through very well, maybe I should stop reading things on BU as everytime I do I cant help but think another own goal by them.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:45 pm
Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:57 pm
CardiffKid wrote:It's important that people are fair to the organisation of Bluebirds Unite, and seperate it out from individual people. Same goes when an MP says something controversial, it would be unfair to assume it's party policy, just because one member of that party said something in particular.
I've read on here, some vbery anti-blue stuff, including calling people dinosaurs, blue-tards, idiots etc. I can take it, it makes me think less of the individual, but it doesn't make me think less of everyone else.
Same goes here really. If you want a return to blue, then Bluebirds Unite should be for you, as they are trying to bring together all opinions. It's just unfortunate that people pay attention to those who shout loudest or most controversially.
CCFC
Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:07 pm
CardiffKid wrote:It's important that people are fair to the organisation of Bluebirds Unite, and seperate it out from individual people. Same goes when an MP says something controversial, it would be unfair to assume it's party policy, just because one member of that party said something in particular.
I've read on here, some vbery anti-blue stuff, including calling people dinosaurs, blue-tards, idiots etc. I can take it, it makes me think less of the individual, but it doesn't make me think less of everyone else.
Same goes here really. If you want a return to blue, then Bluebirds Unite should be for you, as they are trying to bring together all opinions. It's just unfortunate that people pay attention to those who shout loudest or most controversially.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:52 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I'm sorry to say this, but I feel that BU members are hurting the group's chances of succeeding by continuing to label other fans within their own groups page.
I support BU & the aims of BU, but its members need to realise that to succeed, it needs to get as many CCFC fans on board as possible & slagging them off isn't doing any favours.
Bluebirds UNITE - currently the fb page is dividing fans even more.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:03 pm
Magners wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I'm sorry to say this, but I feel that BU members are hurting the group's chances of succeeding by continuing to label other fans within their own groups page.
I support BU & the aims of BU, but its members need to realise that to succeed, it needs to get as many CCFC fans on board as possible & slagging them off isn't doing any favours.
Bluebirds UNITE - currently the fb page is dividing fans even more.
Chuckles I have to agree with you.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:27 pm
Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:36 pm
bluedragons wrote:Vincent tan is criticised for scaremongering when he decided to do the rebrand yet this video states "what next Cardiff dragons vs hull tigers?" I turned it off after that. BU scaremongering fans into supporting them.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:58 pm
Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:15 pm
Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:24 pm
CardiffKid wrote:FFS,
This isn't bloody North Korea, you don't have to analyse the wording od every last statement from the grand organisation committee.
If you want City in blue, then there is no reason not to support Bluebirds Unite.
It's a very broad spectrum of City support...that's the point! DIsagreeing on certain points is not only inevitable, it's a good thing! It shows how diverse the group is..
All different things, united by one thing; A pride in our colours and our bluebird and a desire to help Vincent Tan understand why it means so much to us.
It's not the koran, you don't have to scrutinize every word coming from B.U!
Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:38 pm
redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:FFS,
This isn't bloody North Korea, you don't have to analyse the wording od every last statement from the grand organisation committee.
If you want City in blue, then there is no reason not to support Bluebirds Unite.
It's a very broad spectrum of City support...that's the point! DIsagreeing on certain points is not only inevitable, it's a good thing! It shows how diverse the group is..
All different things, united by one thing; A pride in our colours and our bluebird and a desire to help Vincent Tan understand why it means so much to us.
It's not the koran, you don't have to scrutinize every word coming from B.U!
And what's wrong with the Koran,not sure if i like that statement .
I bet you wear chinos don't you.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:44 pm
CardiffKid wrote:redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:FFS,
This isn't bloody North Korea, you don't have to analyse the wording od every last statement from the grand organisation committee.
If you want City in blue, then there is no reason not to support Bluebirds Unite.
It's a very broad spectrum of City support...that's the point! DIsagreeing on certain points is not only inevitable, it's a good thing! It shows how diverse the group is..
All different things, united by one thing; A pride in our colours and our bluebird and a desire to help Vincent Tan understand why it means so much to us.
It's not the koran, you don't have to scrutinize every word coming from B.U!
And what's wrong with the Koran,not sure if i like that statement .
I bet you wear chinos don't you.
Nothing wrong with the Koran. Could have equally said the bible, or any religious text. I know what you are trying to insinuate, and on this occasion I'll forgive you and not take issue.
Point is that Bluebirds Unite, by definition, is a collection of people made up of a variety of different opinions.
The entire point of it, is that it is for anyone who wants a return to blue, and within that is a wide variety of opinions.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:51 pm
redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:FFS,
This isn't bloody North Korea, you don't have to analyse the wording od every last statement from the grand organisation committee.
If you want City in blue, then there is no reason not to support Bluebirds Unite.
It's a very broad spectrum of City support...that's the point! DIsagreeing on certain points is not only inevitable, it's a good thing! It shows how diverse the group is..
All different things, united by one thing; A pride in our colours and our bluebird and a desire to help Vincent Tan understand why it means so much to us.
It's not the koran, you don't have to scrutinize every word coming from B.U!
And what's wrong with the Koran,not sure if i like that statement .
I bet you wear chinos don't you.
Nothing wrong with the Koran. Could have equally said the bible, or any religious text. I know what you are trying to insinuate, and on this occasion I'll forgive you and not take issue.
Point is that Bluebirds Unite, by definition, is a collection of people made up of a variety of different opinions.
The entire point of it, is that it is for anyone who wants a return to blue, and within that is a wide variety of opinions.
What about the chinos?
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:03 pm
redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:FFS,
This isn't bloody North Korea, you don't have to analyse the wording od every last statement from the grand organisation committee.
If you want City in blue, then there is no reason not to support Bluebirds Unite.
It's a very broad spectrum of City support...that's the point! DIsagreeing on certain points is not only inevitable, it's a good thing! It shows how diverse the group is..
All different things, united by one thing; A pride in our colours and our bluebird and a desire to help Vincent Tan understand why it means so much to us.
It's not the koran, you don't have to scrutinize every word coming from B.U!
And what's wrong with the Koran,not sure if i like that statement .
I bet you wear chinos don't you.
Nothing wrong with the Koran. Could have equally said the bible, or any religious text. I know what you are trying to insinuate, and on this occasion I'll forgive you and not take issue.
Point is that Bluebirds Unite, by definition, is a collection of people made up of a variety of different opinions.
The entire point of it, is that it is for anyone who wants a return to blue, and within that is a wide variety of opinions.
What about the chinos?
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:12 pm
CardiffKid wrote:redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:redordead wrote:CardiffKid wrote:FFS,
This isn't bloody North Korea, you don't have to analyse the wording od every last statement from the grand organisation committee.
If you want City in blue, then there is no reason not to support Bluebirds Unite.
It's a very broad spectrum of City support...that's the point! DIsagreeing on certain points is not only inevitable, it's a good thing! It shows how diverse the group is..
All different things, united by one thing; A pride in our colours and our bluebird and a desire to help Vincent Tan understand why it means so much to us.
It's not the koran, you don't have to scrutinize every word coming from B.U!
And what's wrong with the Koran,not sure if i like that statement .
I bet you wear chinos don't you.
Nothing wrong with the Koran. Could have equally said the bible, or any religious text. I know what you are trying to insinuate, and on this occasion I'll forgive you and not take issue.
Point is that Bluebirds Unite, by definition, is a collection of people made up of a variety of different opinions.
The entire point of it, is that it is for anyone who wants a return to blue, and within that is a wide variety of opinions.
What about the chinos?
I tend to wear jeans, shorts or your missus.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:18 pm
Grange End Red wrote:That video is cringeworthy. And like someone posted saying about hull tigers v Cardiff dragons, what is that about...
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:32 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Grange End Red wrote:That video is cringeworthy. And like someone posted saying about hull tigers v Cardiff dragons, what is that about...
It's obviously about the fear of VT changing our name and rebranding our club even further. He's already changed our colour and badge and with Hull recently changing their name, it shows VT can do exactly the same if he wishes.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:35 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Grange End Red wrote:That video is cringeworthy. And like someone posted saying about hull tigers v Cardiff dragons, what is that about...
It's obviously about the fear of VT changing our name and rebranding our club even further. He's already changed our colour and badge and with Hull recently changing their name, it shows VT can do exactly the same if he wishes.
And he's also come out publicly and stated there will be no more more rebranding.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:35 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Grange End Red wrote:That video is cringeworthy. And like someone posted saying about hull tigers v Cardiff dragons, what is that about...
It's obviously about the fear of VT changing our name and rebranding our club even further. He's already changed our colour and badge and with Hull recently changing their name, it shows VT can do exactly the same if he wishes.
And he's also come out publicly and stated there will be no more more rebranding.
Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:36 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Grange End Red wrote:That video is cringeworthy. And like someone posted saying about hull tigers v Cardiff dragons, what is that about...
It's obviously about the fear of VT changing our name and rebranding our club even further. He's already changed our colour and badge and with Hull recently changing their name, it shows VT can do exactly the same if he wishes.
And he's also come out publicly and stated there will be no more more rebranding.