Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:39 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Anyone can edit Wikipedia.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:41 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Are people really saying he's signed because of a Wikipedia edit?![]()
![]()
![]()
NO!!!! But obviously you are assuming they are.Will you ever learn.![]()
Paul Ince's wiki page was also updated to "plays for Cardiff City FC" before he decided against moving to us.
ANYONE can edit a Wikipedia page... Quick, edit Messi's and get him to play for us.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:43 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:43 pm
aj1927 wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Watch this space, have a look at Gary Medel on Wikipedia![]()
Gwyn give me 10 mins and I will convince you Messi was released by Cardiff because he couldn't cut it....
Wiki is not a reliable source..
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:43 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Anyone can edit Wikipedia.
Chucks assuming things again, I said have a look at Wikipedia, gives a good background on our new player, didn't say that was the nailed on confirmation, perhaps you just made assumptions again,being in a Cardiff hotel, attending the game and agreeing terms prior to medical is a bit more than a pointer and also more believable than a Wikipedai entry, but two and two, most times makes four.
And at the end of the day, he has lied to us, 25 million my arse.![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:44 pm
Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:47 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:51 pm
Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:51 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:57 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:Not many transfers are paid up in full its like when we all buy a house we don't pay for it up front
Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:57 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:Not many transfers are paid up in full its like when we all buy a house we don't pay for it up front
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:03 pm
Unless he has paid up front I really wouldn't like to guess, he has the Wonga so maybe he hasMilitary Junta wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:Not many transfers are paid up in full its like when we all buy a house we don't pay for it up front
Whilst I fully understand Baz but legally the house isn't yours until you've paid the mortgage off!!! Only nit picking I know but to say that Tan has spent over £25 million seems incorrect on two fronts. Firstly all the transfer fees haven't fully been paid yet and also he would have loaned the club the money to purchase the players so he personally hasn't brought anyone.
Whilst my comment may annoy people it seems to be more truthful than the OPs comments on this thread.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:05 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:06 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:Unless he has paid up front I really wouldn't like to guess, he has the Wonga so maybe he hasMilitary Junta wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:Not many transfers are paid up in full its like when we all buy a house we don't pay for it up front
Whilst I fully understand Baz but legally the house isn't yours until you've paid the mortgage off!!! Only nit picking I know but to say that Tan has spent over £25 million seems incorrect on two fronts. Firstly all the transfer fees haven't fully been paid yet and also he would have loaned the club the money to purchase the players so he personally hasn't brought anyone.
Whilst my comment may annoy people it seems to be more truthful than the OPs comments on this thread.
al I know is he has a few bob more than me
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:09 pm
Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:13 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
And who gives a flying f**k
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:18 pm
Military Junta wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:Not many transfers are paid up in full its like when we all buy a house we don't pay for it up front
Whilst I fully understand Baz but legally the house isn't yours until you've paid the mortgage off!!! Only nit picking I know but to say that Tan has spent over £25 million seems incorrect on two fronts. Firstly all the transfer fees haven't fully been paid yet and also he would have loaned the club the money to purchase the players so he personally hasn't brought anyone.
Whilst my comment may annoy people it seems to be more truthful than the OPs comments on this thread.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:20 pm
Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
And who gives a flying f**k
Surely if you are accusing Chuckles of assuming then surely you are doing the same!!! Very hypocritical from what I can see
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:20 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Military Junta wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:Not many transfers are paid up in full its like when we all buy a house we don't pay for it up front
Whilst I fully understand Baz but legally the house isn't yours until you've paid the mortgage off!!! Only nit picking I know but to say that Tan has spent over £25 million seems incorrect on two fronts. Firstly all the transfer fees haven't fully been paid yet and also he would have loaned the club the money to purchase the players so he personally hasn't brought anyone.
Whilst my comment may annoy people it seems to be more truthful than the OPs comments on this thread.
OK to make you happy how about VT has 'committed' us to spending over £25m (eventually). Either way to knock VT now is absolutely crass, although I'm not saying you personally are
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:24 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:27 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
And who gives a flying f**k
Surely if you are accusing Chuckles of assuming then surely you are doing the same!!! Very hypocritical from what I can see
In fairness we ALL assume things from postings of others. If the assumption is wrong then all the original posters has to do is give an explanation to what he/she REALLY meant.
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:27 pm
Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
And who gives a flying f**k
Surely if you are accusing Chuckles of assuming then surely you are doing the same!!! Very hypocritical from what I can see
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:31 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Military Junta wrote:Do you know if all of the fees who 100% upfront in cash Gwyn as if that is the case then I would be very impressed fair play.
Don't know, don't care and it really doesn't mean anything to me either way, if all parties involved are happy and the deal is done, then tally ho.
Fair enough if all parties are happy but I thought you stated that Tan has spent over £25 million on players yet you are unsure whether any of the transfer fees are around a payment structure or not meaning that your opening statement is completely unproven and full of assumptions
And who gives a flying f**k
Surely if you are accusing Chuckles of assuming then surely you are doing the same!!! Very hypocritical from what I can see
Assuming what? are you saying if the press reports we have bought a player for ten million pound, that it's a lie, because what we have done is put six million down and two million a year for the next two years, perhaps the pres should announce when all the payments are made, keep your eyes open you may read that we have signed Peter Whittingham when they pay the final five hundred pound off next week.![]()
![]()
I can just see adam correcting every post on every message board, "Derby sign a five million pound player" Adam Brown replies " now they haven't, they have signed a player and paid three and a half million with the next one and a half million paid in installments over three years"
makes for much better reading.![]()
![]()
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:42 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:43 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:47 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Does this mean when someone tells you they have bought their house for two hundred thousand pounds, what they should say is I bought it for twenty thousand and I will confirm with you the amount it finally cost me plus the interest rate that as been acrued over the period,
Sounds quite straight forward and I can see this catching on.
How much was that brand new car mate, nothing, I had it for nothing, don't make my first payment for three months so it's a free car. Can't see this confusing anyone.![]()
![]()
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:49 pm
rontom wrote:Does it really matter whether he has paid in full for them yet, the accounts for the year will state X number of pounds spent on transfers, and will show the amount outstanding if any.
However way you look at it, he has purchased players to the value of £17m at present with a reported £9m awaiting on the medical of another player, and thankfully still not finished yet. So yes if it all comes off, he is either lying or had underestimated the value of the players needed when he made his £25m statement. Well done Mr Tan
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:50 pm
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:52 pm
Military Junta wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Does this mean when someone tells you they have bought their house for two hundred thousand pounds, what they should say is I bought it for twenty thousand and I will confirm with you the amount it finally cost me plus the interest rate that as been acrued over the period,
Sounds quite straight forward and I can see this catching on.
How much was that brand new car mate, nothing, I had it for nothing, don't make my first payment for three months so it's a free car. Can't see this confusing anyone.![]()
![]()
Man Utd stillowe Everton alarge percentage of the fee agreed for Wayne Rooney so does that mean that Man Utd have already paid them because a fee has been agreed..? NO!!!
Stop trying to twist things Gwyn you were factually incorrect so admit it FFS!!!
Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:53 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:What did the Romans do for us.......