Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:41 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Hitler done something HE believed in
Are you seriously comparing fans who write petitions and organise meeting about the rebranding of their football club, to Hitler's actions?!
Wow.![]()
Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:45 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:46 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:55 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:00 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Thought my post was factual and correct, how is it seen by you as pathetic and a cheap shot, oh, let me guess, that's just your opinion.![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:03 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Thought my post was factual and correct, how is it seen by you as pathetic and a cheap shot, oh, let me guess, that's just your opinion.![]()
![]()
![]()
Nothing factual in your post at all about rival groups & marches approaching the clubs from all sides...![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:03 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Thought my post was factual and correct, how is it seen by you as pathetic and a cheap shot, oh, let me guess, that's just your opinion.![]()
![]()
![]()
Nothing factual in your post at all about rival groups & marches approaching the clubs from all sides...![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:05 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:05 pm
Damned Yank wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Thought my post was factual and correct, how is it seen by you as pathetic and a cheap shot, oh, let me guess, that's just your opinion.![]()
![]()
![]()
Nothing factual in your post at all about rival groups & marches approaching the clubs from all sides...![]()
![]()
![]()
What about Browny? Can you reroute things to pick up such a vocal and supportive ringleader of the "bring back blue" movement?
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:06 pm
BigGwynram wrote:
The factual part related to your rival protest group and the petition and proposed march, the approaching the club from all sides was pre-empted by the word perhaps, so hardly claiming that to be factual, come on Chucks, putting words in people's mouths yet again.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:07 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:11 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Damned Yank wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Perhaps Chuckles has got his group planning their own rival march and they can approach the club from all sides for maximum affect.
Maybe one day you'll keep your pathetic little posts to yourself. Making cheap shots about someone doing something for what they believe in...![]()
![]()
Thought my post was factual and correct, how is it seen by you as pathetic and a cheap shot, oh, let me guess, that's just your opinion.![]()
![]()
![]()
Nothing factual in your post at all about rival groups & marches approaching the clubs from all sides...![]()
![]()
![]()
Utu
What about Browny? Can you reroute things to pick up such a vocal and supportive ringleader of the "bring back blue" movement?
He will be following behind driving his taxi and hoping for some business from any walkers that fall by the way side.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:19 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:26 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:30 pm
ross04bluebird wrote:The only dictator in this piece is Tan.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:35 pm
ross04bluebird wrote:The only dictator in this piece is Tan.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:36 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:ross04bluebird wrote:The only dictator in this piece is Tan.
He OWNS the club. The fans DO NOT. You have a choice whether you support the club or not, watch the team or not, spend money on games and in the stadium or not. That choice, the free will to choose your own actions, means that Tan CANNOT be a DICTATOR. To label him as such, yet being able to choose, it isn't actually possible.
Somebody doesn't know what a dictator is.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:38 pm
ross04bluebird wrote:
He OWNS the club. The fans DO NOT. You have a choice whether you support the club or not, watch the team or not, spend money on games and in the stadium or not. That choice, the free will to choose your own actions, means that Tan CANNOT be a DICTATOR. To label him as such, yet being able to choose, it isn't actually possible.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:38 pm
arri potta wrote:ross04bluebird wrote:The only dictator in this piece is Tan.
He OWNS the club. The fans DO NOT. You have a choice whether you support the club or not, watch the team or not, spend money on games and in the stadium or not. That choice, the free will to choose your own actions, means that Tan CANNOT be a DICTATOR. To label him as such, yet being able to choose, it isn't actually possible.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:38 pm
TheHangedMan wrote:
Brilliant clip from a brilliant film and just about sums it up.
Nice one.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:41 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:ross04bluebird wrote:The only dictator in this piece is Tan.
He OWNS the club. The fans DO NOT. You have a choice whether you support the club or not, watch the team or not, spend money on games and in the stadium or not. That choice, the free will to choose your own actions, means that Tan CANNOT be a DICTATOR. To label him as such, yet being able to choose, it isn't actually possible.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:43 pm
factgasm wrote: how many City supporters will be welcome to the march should they have the sheer audacity to turn up wearing the club's home shirt?
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:48 pm
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:54 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:What an absolutely ridiculous notion.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:56 pm
factgasm wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:What an absolutely ridiculous notion.
What I find ridiculous is that one group of Cardiff City would turn away another simply because of the colour of their shirt.
To paraphrase Martin Luther King "I have a dream that my fellow fans will one day attend events where they will not be judged by the color of their shirt, but by the content of their character."
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:00 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:factgasm wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:What an absolutely ridiculous notion.
What I find ridiculous is that one group of Cardiff City would turn away another simply because of the colour of their shirt.
To paraphrase Martin Luther King "I have a dream that my fellow fans will one day attend events where they will not be judged by the color of their shirt, but by the content of their character."
Your quotes are all very good, but some BU haven't "turned away".
Your complaint that people in red would be turned away in nonsensical because nobody would turn up in red, if they wanted blue back.
I still maintain to this day, anyone who has bought the red shirt cannot call themselves a "reluctant red" as they quite happily have purchased a red shirt.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:02 pm
TheHangedMan wrote:Has it ever crossed your mind that they've bought a red shirt to show their support for the team they love, namely Cardiff City Footbal Club.
After all we do actually play our home games in red.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:10 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:TheHangedMan wrote:Has it ever crossed your mind that they've bought a red shirt to show their support for the team they love, namely Cardiff City Footbal Club.
After all we do actually play our home games in red.
Of course & I have no problem with that. But if you have bought the red shirt, you aren't a "reluctant" red.. because you've quite happily endorsed the rebrand with the red shirt.
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:11 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:nobody would turn up in red
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:18 pm
factgasm wrote:
You have made my point for me so eloquently, Barry, I couldn't have put it better myself. BU have made red shirt wearing fans feel unwelcome, excluded and apprehensive about attending a Cardiff City fan event. How can that be right? This is precisely the kind division that BU is causing within the club.
Fans don't wear the red shirt as a symbol of having beaten the blues. If you think that, then I'm afraid you've got it very badly wrong. Fans wear the red shirt because that is what the club wears, no other reason than that.