Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:22 am

Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learm to not go crying for banning ebcause they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.


From what I understand, you were banned because you were pretending to be a Cardiff fan.. A pretty strange thing to do. :?

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:24 am

Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learn to not go crying for banning because they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.



why try to spin this around to be everyone elses problem. you are the one antagonising are you not? pretending to be a cardiff city fan.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:24 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learm to not go crying for banning ebcause they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.


From what I understand, you were banned because you were pretending to be a Cardiff fan.. A pretty strange thing to do. :?


Well then you understand incorrectly.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:24 am

Real_Blue_Really wrote:
Stringer Bell wrote:
If you don't want me to post then all you have to do is ask politely in a civilised fashion and I will stop posting and I genuinely mean that. There are other forums to use so there's no big issue. Your call.


That ultimatum hints at a level of dellusion regarding selfworth that i haven't whitnessed in a while. In your head what happens next? Annis begs you to stay? :lol:


No I genuinely mean it. There's other forums and I'll be back at uni soon enough starting my diss anyway so won't be on here much but if you don't want me to post at all and it really annoys you so much you have to take 2 weeks off the forum then I will leave. Annis won't beg me to stay. This forum gets enough hits as it is. The call is yours.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:25 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learn to not go crying for banning because they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.



why try to spin this around to be everyone elses problem. you are the one antagonising are you not? pretending to be a cardiff city fan.


Sometimes i do sometimes i dont. But the point is the same regardless, it shouldnt matter who i support.

If you are antagonised by my truthful opinions then a forum isnt the place for you as tye majority of my views are held by a vast majority of people.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:31 am

Masterplan wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learn to not go crying for banning because they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.



why try to spin this around to be everyone elses problem. you are the one antagonising are you not? pretending to be a cardiff city fan.


Sometimes i do sometimes i dont. But the point is the same regardless, it shouldnt matter who i support.

If you are antagonised by my truthful opinions then a forum isnt the place for you as tye majority of my views are held by a vast majority of people.

Roathie do you have Aspergers syndrome? And that's not an insult as Asperger's folk are always above average intelligence with a gift in one or two areas of life due to a persistent obsessive nature. The fact they can't form human bonds and usually have to settle for a sex life of wanking to porn is just a minor inconvienience. Vincent Van Gogh and Isaac Newton both had Asperger's syndrome.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:31 am

Stringer Bell wrote:
so won't be on here much



:lol:

its just not possible!

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:39 am

I can just about remember what I post using my one and only username, let alone having several!!!

Very, very sad that people actually go to such lengths to do this - should take up a sport/hobby/get a life :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :old:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:40 am

Real_Blue_Really wrote:
Masterplan wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learn to not go crying for banning because they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.



why try to spin this around to be everyone elses problem. you are the one antagonising are you not? pretending to be a cardiff city fan.


Sometimes i do sometimes i dont. But the point is the same regardless, it shouldnt matter who i support.

If you are antagonised by my truthful opinions then a forum isnt the place for you as tye majority of my views are held by a vast majority of people.

Roathie do you have Aspergers syndrome? And that's not an insult as Asperger's folk are always above average intelligence with a gift in one or two areas of life due to a persistent obsessive nature. The fact they can't form human bonds and usually have to settle for a sex life of wanking to porn is just a minor inconvienience. Vincent Van Gogh and Isaac Newton both had Asperger's syndrome.


Not to my knowledge. Although i will take it as a compliment that the only capacity you have first hand evidence of (intelligence) you regard as above average.

The rest is a guess as you dont know the details of my personal life as they are just that, personal.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:44 am

Fusilier23 wrote:I can just about remember what I post using my one and only username, let alone having several!!!

Very, very sad that people actually go to such lengths to do this - should take up a sport/hobby/get a life :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :old:


Its doing exactly the same as what you are doing but instead of giving in to being banned for no reason, they sign up and keep on doing what is their right to do. I made it clear from day one id never be silenced and will always ask questions and share my views, if people dont like it then tough. Worst they can do is ban me and as ive shown it hardly is a hindrance, every banning is a victory in my eyes,

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:45 am

Fusilier23 wrote:I can just about remember what I post using my one and only username, let alone having several!!!

Very, very sad that people actually go to such lengths to do this - should take up a sport/hobby/get a life :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :old:


I did suggest a reputation system. A system whereby if a users reputation falls below a certain level for posting rubbish and getting negative rep they receive an automatically imposed ban of 2 weeks. I don't have an issue with this and think it would be a good idea.

Although it seems a bit childish it also helps other posters on the forum help keep it a good community. Owain should definitely consider it.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:46 am

Masterplan wrote:
Real_Blue_Really wrote:
Masterplan wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Masterplan wrote:I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learn to not go crying for banning because they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.



why try to spin this around to be everyone elses problem. you are the one antagonising are you not? pretending to be a cardiff city fan.


Sometimes i do sometimes i dont. But the point is the same regardless, it shouldnt matter who i support.

If you are antagonised by my truthful opinions then a forum isnt the place for you as tye majority of my views are held by a vast majority of people.

Roathie do you have Aspergers syndrome? And that's not an insult as Asperger's folk are always above average intelligence with a gift in one or two areas of life due to a persistent obsessive nature. The fact they can't form human bonds and usually have to settle for a sex life of wanking to porn is just a minor inconvienience. Vincent Van Gogh and Isaac Newton both had Asperger's syndrome.


Not to my knowledge. Although i will take it as a compliment that the only capacity you have first hand evidence of (intelligence) you regard as above average.

The rest is a guess as you dont know the details of my oersonal life.

Aren't you aware of a persistent obsession drawing you here all hours of the day? :? They can also lack self-awareness :D And have a charming but often undiplomatic aversion to telling lies, which often blows your cover here.
It is being speculated that Aspergers is the next developement in human evolution. Jews are the ethnicity with greatest number of aspergers folk. And yes i do think you're above average intelligence but socially inept.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:47 am

Stringer Bell wrote:
Fusilier23 wrote:I can just about remember what I post using my one and only username, let alone having several!!!

Very, very sad that people actually go to such lengths to do this - should take up a sport/hobby/get a life :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :old:


I did suggest a reputation system. A system whereby if a users reputation falls below a certain level for posting rubbish and getting negative rep they receive an automatically imposed ban of 2 weeks. I don't have an issue with this and think it would be a good idea.

Although it seems a bit childish it also helps other posters on the forum help keep it a good community. Owain should definitely consider it.

There is an organic reputation-system built into everyone of our brains, which is why you circum navigate it by creating mulitple accounts :roll:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:48 am

make chuckles a mod

seriously, hes not everyones cup of tea but knows his football and is on here often enough to ban the constant roathie usernames which are more damaging to an excellent forum than anything else

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:50 am

englishbluebird wrote:make chuckles a mod

seriously, hes not everyones cup of tea but knows his football and is on here often enough to ban the constant roathie usernames which are more damaging to an excellent forum than anything else



i dont know about the "knows his football" statement. Doesnt really seem to get involved in the footballing threads as much, preferes to get into arguements about the rebrand and swansea :lol:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:51 am

englishbluebird wrote:make chuckles a mod

seriously, hes not everyones cup of tea but knows his football and is on here often enough to ban the constant roathie usernames which are more damaging to an excellent forum than anything else

I think Roathie is content on one account which i don't mind as you can ignore it. However barnett is a different animal.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:51 am

paulh_85 wrote:
englishbluebird wrote:make chuckles a mod

seriously, hes not everyones cup of tea but knows his football and is on here often enough to ban the constant roathie usernames which are more damaging to an excellent forum than anything else



i dont know about the "knows his football" statement. Doesnt really seem to get involved in the footballing threads as much, preferes to get into arguements about the rebrand and swansea :lol:


:lol: :lol: maybe but i honestly believe making him a mod will improve the forum strangely

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:52 am

Real_Blue_Really wrote: There is an organic reputation-rep built into everyone of our brains, which is why you circum navigate it by creating mulitple accounts :roll:


No I don't. This is my only account. Only when i'm banned do I create a new account because I am a believer in freedom of speech and think anyone is entitled to their say regardless of whether Jack and Jill agree with it or not.

As already stated if you do not wish for me to use the forum then I won't yet you would still rather argue and carry on having a pop than asking for me to stop using the forum? As I said, the call is yours. There's 2 other forums to use as well as the football forums. If you wish me to go to one of them out of your way then just ask. It's up to you.

This forum ain't the be all and end all of life and if I received warnings or time imposed bans instead of permanent bans I'd be on the same account I was in the beginning, RedBluebird.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:53 am

Real_Blue_Really wrote:Aren't you aware of a persistent obsession drawing you here all hours of the day? :? They can also lack self-awareness :D And have a charming but often undiplomatic aversion to telling lies, which often blows your cover here.
It is being speculated that Aspergers is the next developement in human evolution. Jews are the ethnicity with greatest number of aspergers folk. And yes i do think you're above average intelligence but socially inept.


Fantastic knowledge of the syndrome i must say. However diagnosing by guesswork is not the greatest thing to do. Im not here as often as you are led to believe. I am of the rare but privileged position, in which my posts were so thought provoking that they have left a permanent mark on this board. Everytime someone has a post that is well written or not the standard thinking then they are labelled roathie thus creating the illusion im here far far more than i actually am. I dread to think how many posters have been banned due to mistaken identity. You are perfectly entitled to your opinion of course but as we have never met, respectfully, your opinion is worthless to reality.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:59 am

paulh_85 wrote:
englishbluebird wrote:make chuckles a mod

seriously, hes not everyones cup of tea but knows his football and is on here often enough to ban the constant roathie usernames which are more damaging to an excellent forum than anything else



i dont know about the "knows his football" statement. Doesnt really seem to get involved in the footballing threads as much, preferes to get into arguements about the rebrand and swansea :lol:


I get involved with plenty, thanks. :wave:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:59 am

Well i must dash lads. Ive sent Annis a PM offering him the chance to restrict me to my Roath Magic account, if he acceots then i will continue the debate when i return. If he declines then im sure we will chat again soon but in what guise is anyones guess. One thing is for sure however that any opinion discussed will be mine completely and truly, as always.

Ttfn