We thought you were blue

Lol mjw6150 what's your problem?

He doesn't like me because I don't agree with him on the rebrand & likes to try and make a mockery of me, despite it making him look rather foolish...

Are you condemning me trying to make a mockery of you there?

Because if you are then you are a hypocrite, because you constantly mock others on this forum.

We thought you were blue we thought you were blue
You play in red and that much is true

Look up Leeds United's history, then you'll see the irony kid.

That was YOUR definition for hypocrisy.

But now YOU have said he was mocking not condemning.

Totally different things.

And to quote one of your favourite lines, 'you failed to answer my initial question'

keep digging. You're looking silly, as other members are saying.

My problem is that Chuckles is a bully to people on this forum with his passive aggressive style, particularly to those who disagree with him. I don't like bullies and will stand against them, especially when they don't even know the meaning of the insults they are throwing at people.

I'm far from the only one who feels this way about his style on here.

What utter tripe. if I was bullying people, I'd be banned. I post my opinions and thoughts and will debate why I feel that way. Simple.

That was YOUR definition for hypocrisy.

But now YOU have said he was mocking not condemning.

Totally different things.

And to quote one of your favourite lines, 'you failed to answer my initial question'

keep digging. You're looking silly, as other members are saying.

Translation - 'I can't think of a response. Let's get out of this conversation quick'.

Other = one member. Know plenty more who say it about you!!

My problem is that Chuckles is a bully to people on this forum with his passive aggressive style, particularly to those who disagree with him. I don't like bullies and will stand against them, especially when they don't even know the meaning of the insults they are throwing at people.

I'm far from the only one who feels this way about his style on here.

What utter tripe. if I was bullying people, I'd be banned. I post my opinions and thoughts and will debate why I feel that way. Simple.

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

Translation - 'I can't think of a response. Let's get out of this conversation quick'.

Other = one member. Know plenty more who say it about you!!

Not at all. I'm backed up my labelling of "hypocrisy" with a definition, which confirms I was right to say that.

You're looking foolish here, give up.

Chuckles is involved in 90% of the arguments on here, that's not a slight against him but the truth. He sticks to his guns and his passive aggressive posting style often rubs people up the wrong way. He told me he put me on ignore yet responds to everything I say, which baffles me to be honest, the man literally cannot help himself.

Comment from a member on here about you yesterday. Nobody disagreed.

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

I'm well within my rights to post my thoughts, even if they don't go with your agenda.

Translation - 'I can't think of a response. Let's get out of this conversation quick'.

Other = one member. Know plenty more who say it about you!!

Not at all. I'm backed up my labelling of "hypocrisy" with a definition, which confirms I was right to say that.

You're looking foolish here, give up.

But then you said he was mocking not condemning which meant he wasn't being hypocritical by YOUR definition.

My problem is that Chuckles is a bully to people on this forum with his passive aggressive style, particularly to those who disagree with him. I don't like bullies and will stand against them, especially when they don't even know the meaning of the insults they are throwing at people.

I'm far from the only one who feels this way about his style on here.

What utter tripe. if I was bullying people, I'd be banned. I post my opinions and thoughts and will debate why I feel that way. Simple.

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

If you have a problem with Chuckles' posting style, thats fine. But having a pop over the definition of a word, thats pretty funny

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

I'm well within my rights to post my thoughts, even if they don't go with your agenda.

Try responding to what I have actually said. Didn't disagree with your right to post your thoughts, even if people disagree. I disagree with the WAY you post your thoughts - i.e. condescending, passive aggressive and patronising.

Translation - 'I can't think of a response. Let's get out of this conversation quick'.

Other = one member. Know plenty more who say it about you!!

Not at all. I'm backed up my labelling of "hypocrisy" with a definition, which confirms I was right to say that.

You're looking foolish here, give up.

But then you said he was mocking not condemning which meant he wasn't being hypocritical by YOUR definition.

Alright, he was CONDEMNING the club for changing colours, when his club did the same themselves.

if that really makes you happy, then you need to get a life.

My problem is that Chuckles is a bully to people on this forum with his passive aggressive style, particularly to those who disagree with him. I don't like bullies and will stand against them, especially when they don't even know the meaning of the insults they are throwing at people.

I'm far from the only one who feels this way about his style on here.

What utter tripe. if I was bullying people, I'd be banned. I post my opinions and thoughts and will debate why I feel that way. Simple.

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

If you have a problem with Chuckles' posting style, thats fine. But having a pop over the definition of a word, thats pretty funny

For a bit of context, he couldn't keep up in a debate the other day and called me a hypocrite which completely didn't fit what he was trying to say about me.

I now have a bee in my bonnet about ensuring he knows the true meaning of the word and stops using it incorrectly against members on this forum.

Translation - 'I can't think of a response. Let's get out of this conversation quick'.

Other = one member. Know plenty more who say it about you!!

Not at all. I'm backed up my labelling of "hypocrisy" with a definition, which confirms I was right to say that.

You're looking foolish here, give up.

But then you said he was mocking not condemning which meant he wasn't being hypocritical by YOUR definition.

Alright, he was CONDEMNING the club for changing colours, when his club did the same themselves.

if that really makes you happy, then you need to get a life.

But he wasn't was he? He was just mocking....do we need to teach you what 'condemnation' means as well?

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

I'm well within my rights to post my thoughts, even if they don't go with your agenda.

Try responding to what I have actually said. Didn't disagree with your right to post your thoughts, even if people disagree. I disagree with the WAY you post your thoughts - i.e. condescending, passive aggressive and patronising.

In YOUR opinion.

(See, I can use the bold function to make myself look myself look pompous too)

But he wasn't was he? He was just mocking....do we need to teach you what 'condemnation' means as well?

Seriously, get a life.

for the benefit of all forum members

http://bit.ly/1aYCmbL

If you have a problem with Chuckles' posting style, thats fine. But having a pop over the definition of a word, thats pretty funny

Even when he's totally wrong about it. He's obsessed & it's cringey.

Then cut the condescending, passive aggressive and patronising manner that you do it in then, please. If you cut the attitude, I will cut challenging you.

I'm well within my rights to post my thoughts, even if they don't go with your agenda.

Try responding to what I have actually said. Didn't disagree with your right to post your thoughts, even if people disagree. I disagree with the WAY you post your thoughts - i.e. condescending, passive aggressive and patronising.

In YOUR opinion.

(See, I can use the bold function to make myself look myself look pompous too)

I'm just making sure you understand the point we're discussing otherwise you usually veer off the point to suit your own agenda.

I'd love to go for a pint with Chuckles. I bet he'd argue with the barmaid so much she'd end up giving him a keg just to shut him up.

But he wasn't was he? He was just mocking....do we need to teach you what 'condemnation' means as well?

Seriously, get a life.

Got a great one thanks

though quite enjoying exposing you

If you have a problem with Chuckles' posting style, thats fine. But having a pop over the definition of a word, thats pretty funny

Even when he's totally wrong about it. He's obsessed & it's cringey.

In MY opinion it's perfectly valid

For Leeds to ever get back into the big time they will have to change their
name to Red Bull Leeds United

I'm just making sure you understand the point we're discussing otherwise you usually veer off the point to suit your own agenda.

Coming from the man who has derailed this topic to suit his own agenda.

More HYPOCRISY.

I'm just making sure you understand the point we're discussing otherwise you usually veer off the point to suit your own agenda.

Coming from the man who has derailed this topic to suit his own agenda.

More HYPOCRISY.

Really?

Leeds guy mocked us, you said it was hypocrisy, I disagreed and here we are...?

And the questions relating to your character on here were asked by someone else.

Next

Chuckles has won this one and hasn't even had to change gears.

Really?

Leeds guy mocked us, you said it was hypocrisy, I disagreed and here we are...?

And the questions relating to your character on here were asked by someone else.

Next

Yes, really. You've totally veered this topic away from the OP... To unleash attack after attack on me, complaining of bullying (even more hypocrisy?! )

Then moaned that I take this to my own "agenda", which is exactly what you've just done.

The irony-meter has just gone into overdrive.

Chuckles has won this one and hasn't even had to change gears.

He was wrong about the Leeds guy being hypocritical. That's the only point I really wanted to make to begin with

Chuckles has won this one and hasn't even had to change gears.

He was wrong about the Leeds guy being hypocritical. That's the only point I really wanted to make to begin with